ライフサイエンスコーパス: absorbed fraction

1 also corresponding changes in values of the absorbed fraction.

2 body was determined by calculating a photon-absorbed fraction.

3 ce versa), differences >50% were seen in the absorbed fraction.

4 odels of mouse anatomy are used to determine absorbed fractions.

5 r bone allows improved estimates of skeletal absorbed fractions.

6 energy dependence was seen in the calculated absorbed fraction, a factor not considered in values rec

7 studies, radiation transport calculations of absorbed fractions (AFs) were performed using MCNP, vers

8 leton, thus permitting improved estimates of absorbed fractions and radionuclide S values for interme

9 Values of the specific absorbed fractions and radionuclide S values were calcul

10 Absorbed fractions and specific absorbed fractions for i

11 ties such as the absorbed fraction, specific absorbed fraction, and various dose coefficients.

12 masses, (b) transport models used to assign absorbed fractions, and (c) implicit assumptions made in

13 Absorbed fractions assessed with the new model were show

14 ble between many pairs of organs in specific absorbed fractions because of the improved realism of th

15 loss is to uniformly scale the resulting TMS absorbed fractions by reference values of site-specific

16 hese recommended absorbed fractions with the absorbed fractions calculated in this study show large d

17 le variation with bone site was noted in the absorbed fraction data.

18 For example, values of absorbed fraction for the self-dose to active bone marro

19 The assumption that the specific absorbed fraction for total body irradiating red marrow

20 Absorbed fractions for 5 monoenergetic electrons, rangin

21 n on Radiation Protection (ICRP)-recommended absorbed fractions for cortical bone are given only for

22 those found by other investigators show that absorbed fractions for electrons for organ self-irradiat

23 Absorbed fractions and specific absorbed fractions for internal emitters were derived us

24 Absorbed fractions for self-irradiation of the TAM were

25 In doing so, however, the resulting absorbed fractions for self-irradiation of the trabecula

26 ical half lives and by precalculating photon-absorbed fractions for these radionuclides for several t

27 -tissue absorbed doses were calculated using absorbed fractions generated by the Monte Carlo particle

28 -specific tissue masses, along with electron absorbed fractions given by our 3-dimensional transport

29 he regional and the energy dependency of the absorbed fraction not previously considered in the ICRP

30 of the annihilation photons component to the absorbed fraction of energy in the calculation of S valu

31 Absorbed fractions of energy for photon and electron sou

32 Absorbed fractions of energy for photon and electron sou

33 ith the Monte Carlo transport code EGS4, and absorbed fractions of energy were calculated for 14 sour

34 Absorbed fractions of energy were calculated for both ph

35 Electron absorbed fractions of energy were tabulated for seven ad

36 Electron-absorbed fractions of energy were tabulated for three ad

37 Cross-organ electron-absorbed fractions of up to 0.33 were obtained (e.g., (9

38 Published values of alpha-particle absorbed fraction phi in the skeletal tissues, as needed

39 For example, ratios of the specific absorbed fraction Phi(lungs <-- liver)(UF Dog) to Phi(lu

40 instead the influence of obesity on specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) and dose factors in adults.

41 ion has been performed to study how specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) vary with changes in adult bod

42 iation transport codes to calculate specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) with internal photon and elect

43 mbols for fundamental quantities such as the absorbed fraction, specific absorbed fraction, and vario

44 Substantial variations in the absorbed fraction to active marrow are seen with changes

45 man and Stabin model underestimates the self-absorbed fraction to active marrow by 75%.

46 Voxel model simulations demonstrated that absorbed fractions to active marrow given by the ICRP 30

47 ies greater than 50-200 keV, a divergence in absorbed fractions to active marrow is noted between PIR

48 onal electron transport models for assessing absorbed fractions to both marrow and endosteum in trabe

49 For example, ratios of self-absorbed fractions to the CBE in this model and in the I

50 For all source-target combinations, the absorbed fraction was seen to vary widely within the ske

51 These absorbed fractions were then used along with radionuclid

52 These absorbed fractions were then used along with radionuclid

53 The absorbed fractions were then used to assemble S values f

54 Furthermore, variations in alpha-particle absorbed fraction with marrow cellularity have yet to be

55 Comparisons of these recommended absorbed fractions with the absorbed fractions calculate

56 by the relatively fast decrease of the self-absorbed fraction within many of the brain subregions, w