ライフサイエンスコーパス: academy

1 psychology, as well as in other areas of the academy.

2 sts are truly included in all aspects of the academy.

3 forward toward a more positive and inclusive academy.

4 countries contemplate the creation of a new academy.

5 of Medicine (IOM) committee of The National Academies.

6 This resulting report is endorsed by both academies.

7 National science and medical academies across the world serve a range of roles and fu

8 ional actions supported by the Joint Allergy Academies and the ICD World Health Organization (WHO) re

9 he National Research Council of the National Academies and the legal and forensic sciences communitie

10 eceived his B.S. at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and his Ph.D. at Columbia University.

11 more extensive view of basic research in the academy and promote the linkage of life-science research

12 The Academy at Harvard Medical School is developing best pra

13 After 70 years at the Academy, he continues to work in his home lab and office

14 In 2009, a committee of the National Academy highlighted the "understanding of plant growth"

15 3, an international collaboration of Allergy Academies, including first the World Allergy Organizatio

16 ovative regions and to estimate the value of academy-industry links for scientific and human benefit.

17 ovative regions and to estimate the value of academy-industry links for scientific and human benefit.

18 The most recent National Academies Keck Futures Initiative Conference, entitled '

19 sion in a focus group at the recent National Academies Keck Futures Initiative.

20 Academy leaders helped pave the way for the development

21 diseases built by crowdsourcing the Allergy Academy leaderships.

22 This, our Inaugural Article as Academy Members, is ironically our swan song from the fi

23 Concern has been raised by the National Academies of Science about how well America is sustainin

24 A Committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has mad

25 ring also CRD according to GA(2)LEN-European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology guideline

26 lergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology) met seve

27 The European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Task Force on A

28 tion was proposed to the members of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) (indi

29 , this Task Force initiative of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) aimed

30 The vision of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and t

31 The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Food

32 and whether treatment followed the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guide

33 The current European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guide

34 The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) has p

35 borated by a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Immun

36 practice, the European Network and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Inter

37 The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is de

38 The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in

39 uidelines have been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Taskf

40 hma and Immunology (AAAAI), and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), and

41 r this task force initiative of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), expe

42 Immunology (iCAALL), formed by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the

43 e of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the

44 The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the

45 rd on Allergology together with the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology advocates the

46 rt of the PRACTALL initiatives, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Ameri

47 PRACTALL is a joint effort of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Ameri

48 PRACTALL is an initiative of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Ameri

49 eness campaign was organized by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Europ

50 reviews undertaken on behalf of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology as part of th

51 roup on Occupational Allergy of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology by means of a

52 For this reason, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology gave its patr

53 profile was evaluated based on the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology grading syste

54 Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology has organized

55 Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology have formed a

56 was given Task Force status by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in 2014.

57 nd publications, including the 1993 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology position pape

58 ared by a panel of experts from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force on

59 his position paper, prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Taskforce on

60 llergy, Asthma & Immunology and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology to provide sh

61 Primary Care Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology undertook an

62 guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Gui

63 uidelines have been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Gui

64 guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Tas

65 guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Tas

66 as conducted by a task force of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, aimed to ass

67 This position paper, from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, highlights t

68 of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Israel Assoc

69 nterest Group on Biologicals of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, we review bi

70 ses-sponsored Working Group and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

71 ersensitivity Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

72 rug Allergy (ENDA) on behalf of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

73 e of the Dermatology section of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

74 my of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; World Allerg

75 rld Allergy Organization (WAO), the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), and th

76 The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the

77 arameters (JTFPP), representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the Ame

78 actice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the Ame

79 actice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the Ame

80 actice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the Ame

81 arameters (JTFPP), representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the Ame

82 rgy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology aiming to harmon

83 ACTALL is a joint initiative of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and the European

84 Reactions to Foods Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and the Internat

85 rgy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology nominated an exp

86 n attempt of a working group of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to provide furth

87 among the following organizations: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, American Academ

88 view facilitated integration of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College

89 etence Network on Mastocytosis; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the Europea

90 ng burden of allergic diseases, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; European Academ

91 ractice Parameters representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American Co

92 ch comprises representatives of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) and th

93 nd Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), the A

94 rgy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, which aims to

95 Academy of Architecture for Health, Facilities Guideline

96 practice guideline developed by the American Academy of Audiology.

97 for AD management published by the American Academy of Dermatology 2014 work group were compared wit

98 haracteristics of each product (eg, American Academy of Dermatology [AAD] criteria, sun protection fa

99 ollowers, led by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respective

100 and examine the extent to which the American Academy of Dermatology enforced their Administrative Reg

101 Three American Academy of Dermatology guidelines published from 2013 to

102 AD Practice Parameter and the 2014 American Academy of Dermatology guidelines to highlight the basic

103 The American Academy of Dermatology policies may benefit from stricte

104 tronic survey of all members of the American Academy of Dermatology with available e-mail addresses.

105 for Investigative Dermatology, and American Academy of Dermatology,point to the lasting impact of st

106 merican College of Physicians (ACP)/American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) criteria from 31 to

107 College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) jointly developed th

108 American College of Physicians and American Academy of Family Physicians developed this guideline to

109 .S. Preventive Services Task Force, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Cancer Society, A

110 merican Society of Breast Surgeons, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American College of Ob

111 The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College o

112 This guideline is endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

113 ganization, Danish Medical Research Council, Academy of Finland, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deu

114 Research Centre for the Working Environment, Academy of Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Emplo

115 Research Centre for the Working Environment, Academy of Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Emplo

116 Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Academy of Finland.

117 Hamilton Academy of Health Science Research Organization, Canadia

118 Academy of Medical Sciences and Health Foundation Clinic

119 In a lecture delivered to the Academy of Medical Sciences on Nov 13, 2017, I describe

120 Academy of Medical Sciences Starter Grant, Cancer Resear

121 Cancer Research UK, Academy of Medical Sciences, Health Foundation, EU, ERC,

122 per level of intake (defined by the National Academy of Medicine as 2000 to 2500 mg/d) should be cons

123 ociety Unpublished Literature Bank, New York Academy of Medicine Library Grey Literature Collection,

124 The National Academy of Medicine's (formerly Institute of Medicine) d

125 ONALISM: Served as President of the New York Academy of Medicine, the American Medical Association, a

126 d relevant grey literature from The New York Academy of Medicine, The World Bank, The Center for Glob

127 Qualitative synthesis of 19 National Academy of Medicine-commissioned white papers, with supp

128 In 2016, the American Academy of Microbiology convened a colloquium to examine

129 of Science in 1996, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology in 1997, and a member of the Nat

130 neurology are the presidents of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Neurological

131 The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) issued new guidelines in 2010

132 els of evidence guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology and the highest-quality data for ea

133 two organizations, even though the American Academy of Neurology began as a small and politically vu

134 , and evidence of efficacy based on American Academy of Neurology criteria were determined.

135 On its formation, the American Academy of Neurology did not enter a vacuum.

136 the primary source materials in the American Academy of Neurology Historical Collection and the paper

137 The American Academy of Neurology is now the larger of the two organi

138 chamber' of American neurology, the American Academy of Neurology leadership was ultimately savvier a

139 With the 1995 American Academy of Neurology practice parameters, the difference

140 and the practice guidelines of the American Academy of Neurology regarding artificial nutrition and

141 guidelines endorsed by the WHO and American Academy of Neurology regarding the optimal management of

142 The American Academy of Neurology was formed around a group of young

143 The struggle of the American Academy of Neurology with the American Neurological Asso

144 iated ventriculitis and meningitis (American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurologic

145 erican Neurological Association and American Academy of Neurology.

146 e development process to be conducted by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' EAL.

147 ematic review process to be conducted by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Evidence Analysis Li

148 ideline development will be conducted by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Evidence Analysis Li

149 ty for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the Food and Drug Ad

150 t position of The Joint Commission, American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) and American Society of C

151 American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) and American Society of C

152 rug monotherapy for 1 year from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Intelligent Research in S

153 Systematic reviews should inform American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Patter

154 treatment recommendations from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Patter

155 t the turn of the 20th century, the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology joined the A

156 an Ophthalmological Society and the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, the AMA's c

157 erican Medical Association, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology-are credited

158 merican Medical Association and the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

159 n Ophthalmological Society, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

160 Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, 2016, Chicago,

161 osing guidelines established by the American Academy of Ophthalmology in 2011 and 2016.

162 everity was determined based on the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns gui

163 American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations for screening f

164 The 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations on screening fo

165 The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations on screening fo

166 The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends that ophthalmic scre

167 afety, and in 2015, teamed with the American Academy of Ophthalmology to convene all ophthalmology su

168 e provided recommendations from the American Academy of Ophthalmology's 2012 Preferred Practice Patte

169 een in clinics participating in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's IRIS (Intelligent Research in

170 ity was classified according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Pattern gu

171 erence of ophthalmologists with the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Patterns (

172 uated adherence by residents to the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Patterns,

173 aluate and improve adherence to the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Primary Open-angle Glaucoma (

174 creening guidelines promoted by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics

175 standardized grading adopted by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

176 DA labeling and guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

177 dized grading scheme adopted by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

178 American Optometric Association and American Academy of Optometry quickly responded in support of AAO

179 Rehabilitation Products through the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists.

180 modified Oswestry Disability Index (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons MODEMS version) at 6 wee

181 The change in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons pain scores after 1, 3,

182 r at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the disclosure statemen

183 ograms have been implemented by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Commission on Accr

184 ding the American Pain Society, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the Federation of State Me

185 The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) also recently revised their

186 as updated recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Advisory Committee on Im

187 recent clinical reviews and updated American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical guidelines for the

188 merican Heart Association (AHA) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) describing how to evaluate a

189 The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended that nutriti

190 ools and guidelines provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) provide a framework for cons

191 phthalmology and Strabismus and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) was convened.

192 yretics have been emphasized by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

193 New recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics about the evaluation and preventio

194 well as updated guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Advisory Committee on Immuniza

195 The American Academy of Pediatrics and American Medical Association h

196 Preventive Services Task Force, and American Academy of Pediatrics are available to aid providers in

197 sional organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics as a means of increasing the suppl

198 h patients who refuse vaccines, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics advises aga

199 Although the American Academy of Pediatrics does not recommend any CAM therapi

200 ittee on Immunization Practices and American Academy of Pediatrics emphasize the value of extending t

201 coincide with those endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics for the general pediatric patient

202 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines emphasize regionalized

203 The American Academy of Pediatrics has just released new clinical pra

204 The American Academy of Pediatrics has released new guidelines emphas

205 Updated guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics have significantly changed the app

206 f the Back to Sleep campaign by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1992, the incidence of Sudden i

207 publication of guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2000, which recommended a delay

208 ntina) in a modified version of the American Academy of Pediatrics Neonatal Resuscitation Program (wh

209 current literature and discuss the American Academy of Pediatrics new recommendations on sudden infa

210 al MC rates are decreasing, but the American Academy of Pediatrics now recognizes the medical benefit

211 ease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics now recommend annual influenza vac

212 Centers for Disease Control and the American Academy of Pediatrics now recommend the routine vaccinat

213 In 2004, the American Academy of Pediatrics officially recommended universal p

214 TSB level that was at or above the American Academy of Pediatrics phototherapy threshold.

215 at least 1 TSB level exceeding the American Academy of Pediatrics phototherapy threshold; (3) photot

216 c infants suggests that the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation about bed sharing i

217 of current regimens, including the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation, and to design a mo

218 isability, and Health model and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations are appropriate fr

219 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for prevention of

220 e on Immunization Practices and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that states ensure tha

221 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a permissive hypoxaemic

222 risk for severe RSV infections, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends immunoprophylaxis with

223 the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics reviewed the available literature

224 Physician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Critical Care.

225 ntation and 160 physicians from the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Nephrology or Bioethics

226 o serve as a supplement to the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics statement on developmental surveil

227 To review the American Academy of Pediatrics statement on the effects of early

228 The American Academy of Pediatrics treatment recommendations for neon

229 Recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics updated guidance on lipid screenin

230 As a result, the American Academy of Pediatrics updated their guidelines in 2008 t

231 Children meeting the 2003 American Academy of Pediatrics vision screening referral criteria

232 The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physic

233 my of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Allergy, Asth

234 American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Diabetes Association

235 nce, a consortium consisting of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the ASN, the American Society for

236 Representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Canadian Thoracic Society, th

237 The American Academy of Pediatrics-recommended 5-injection regimen is

238 e of Cardiology, March of Dimes and American Academy of Pediatrics.

239 (ADHD) have been established by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

240 iseases Society of America, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

241 aborative Research Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

242 lected sample of 291 members of the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and 64 periodontal resid

243 isease Control and Prevention (CDC)/American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) criteria using measures

244 The American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) recently embarked on a B

245 ification currently accepted by the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) was devised by the 1999

246 We followed the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP)/Centers for Disease Cont

247 for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP).

248 e collected from 171 members of the American Academy of Periodontology (response rate = 34.41%).

249 requested by the Task Force of the American Academy of Periodontology as a follow-up study of the 20

250 As a result, in 1993 the American Academy of Periodontology began encouraging postgraduate

251 for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology case definitions at the census

252 for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology case definitions, 49.5% of par

253 ggested Centers for Disease Control/American Academy of Periodontology case definitions.

254 for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology classification as well as cont

255 ease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology definition for severe periodon

256 for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology definition).

257 Prevention in partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology developed and reported standar

258 ern states were drawn from the 2002 American Academy of Periodontology Directory and the 2001 America

259 sedation (74.0%) was reported from American Academy of Periodontology District 5 (south central Unit

260 the American Dental Association and American Academy of Periodontology member directories) were obtai

261 The American Academy of Periodontology Parameters of Care include tob

262 ease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology surveillance case definition f

263 e Project in collaboration with the American Academy of Periodontology to address population-based su

264 d for efforts by the ADA and/or the American Academy of Periodontology to draw attention to the limit

265 on (CDC), in collaboration with the American Academy of Periodontology, to examine the feasibility of

266 or Disease Control and Prevention / American Academy of Periodontology.

267 iled to 1,000 active members of the American Academy of Periodontology.

268 On the basis of the American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control an

269 We followed the American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control an

270 stitute of Cytology and Genetics of the USSR Academy of Science Siberian branch, her plight at the fa

271 In response, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) developed its first conflict o

272 than individual exposure; thus, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommends them for cumulative

273 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize for Che

274 iology in 1997, and a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1997.

275 d biomass (AGB) (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108

276 In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts

277 The National Academy of Sciences recently issued voluntary guidelines

278 ional Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences recently published the report Exposu

279 ted States, highlighted in a recent National Academy of Sciences report, a national assessment of the

280 Following the National Academy of Sciences' 2001 recommendations on combining a

281 olleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).

282 Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences, "Frontiers in Bioinformatics: Unsol

283 Board, Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, and thus substantial segments of th

284 ential member of the Council of the National Academy of Sciences, and, after retirement from the Univ

285 titute, who had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences, or who had won a major career award

286 of Clinical Practice, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Social Science Quarterly, and on th

287 f many important committees for the National Academy of Sciences, the National Institutes of Health,

288 This paper uses a National Academy of Sciences-sponsored ND dataset comprising 905

289 oyed as curator of insects at the California Academy of Sciences.

290 Lorenz von Liburnau of the Austrian Imperial Academy of Sciences.

291 the minimum 25 h recommended by the National Academy of Sciences.

292 ineering resilience advanced by the National Academy of Sciences.

293 cordant for PD ascertained from the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council World War

294 cordant for PD ascertained from the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council World War

295 se (FEX) by cadets in the Norwegian Military Academy provided a venue in which to study the effects o

296 A recent National Academies report articulates a path forward for research

297 -of-function research set up by the European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC) has emphasise

298 n particular, the benefits of an independent academy tasked with the provision of formal advice are c

299 ection models developed by the U.S. National Academies that incorporate these data and reflect severa

300 he IOM can serve as a useful model for other academies to consider for strengthening their work or wh