ライフサイエンスコーパス: accommodative

1 y lens retains a significant fraction of its accommodative ability after transection of the anterior

2 o alter ocular SA to -0.10 microm to improve accommodative accuracy and reduce any lag of accommodati

3 These results suggest that poor accommodative accuracy in individuals with DS may be pre

4 Accommodative accuracy was not related to age (4-90 mont

5 For example, the initial magnitude of accommodative adaptation in the dark after nearwork is g

6 the critical test is to assess this initial accommodative aftereffect and its subsequent decay in th

7 ommodative-stimulus response (ASR) function, accommodative amplitude (AA), AC/A, and CA/C ratios in a

8 ckward during accommodation in proportion to accommodative amplitude and lens thickening.

9 riorly during accommodation in proportion to accommodative amplitude and the sclera bows inward with

10 Guidelines for predicting accommodative amplitude by age are often based on subjec

11 Maximum accommodative amplitude correlated significantly with th

12 ontraction is age independent, even as total accommodative amplitude declines.

13 These data indicate that accommodative amplitude decreases in a curvilinear manne

14 tudy, objective methods were used to measure accommodative amplitude in a wide age range of individua

15 The maximum accommodative amplitude of each subject was plotted by a

16 onkey eyes but does not affect EW-stimulated accommodative amplitude or dynamics in anesthetized, iri

17 responses showed linear peak velocity versus accommodative amplitude relationships that were not stat

18 ngent analysis of the fit indicated that the accommodative amplitude remained relatively stable until

19 d add powers) was indicated, measurements of accommodative amplitude show a weak tendency toward the

20 ge and CLS together are better predictors of accommodative amplitude than is age alone.

21 Centrally stimulated accommodative amplitude was 10.08 +/- 1.15 D before pilo

22 Accommodative amplitude was 11.25 +/- 0.18 D before atro

23 Accommodative amplitude was measured by coincidence refr

24 Accommodative amplitude was measured with a Hartinger co

25 Over all ages studied, age could explain accommodative amplitude, but not as well as accommodativ

26 When limited to studies only measuring accommodative amplitude, female sex was not associated w

27 nd of itself, has a causal relationship with accommodative amplitude, or that changes in the CLS play

28 topically to manipulate resting refraction, accommodative amplitude, starting point, and end point i

29 plitude: the greater the CLS the greater the accommodative amplitude.

30 l lens movement nor the 76% (10.2 D) loss in accommodative amplitude.

31 cle is believed to be inhibitory, decreasing accommodative amplitude.

32 parity stimuli and to age-related changes in accommodative amplitude.

33 The CLS correlated significantly with the accommodative amplitude: the greater the CLS the greater

34 In iridectomized monkeys, postphenylephrine accommodative amplitudes were similar to prephenylephrin

35 he total number of latency measurements (17% accommodative and 16% disaccommodative) were longer than

36 actions among hyperopic refractive error and accommodative and binocular functions as a way of identi

37 action, amplitude, and starting point affect accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics in anestheti

38 Pharmacologic manipulations showed that accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics in anestheti

39 Accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics were analyze

40 Mean accommodative and disaccommodative latencies decreased l

41 Age-related changes in dynamics occur in accommodative and disaccommodative latencies, accommodat

42 Familiarity with accommodative and multifocal lenses, in conjunction with

43 rrecting certain types of strabismus such as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

44 ctive surgery can be useful in patients with accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

45 nships were studied in rhesus monkeys, whose accommodative apparatus and age-related loss of accommod

46 aracterization of age-related changes in the accommodative apparatus may help to model the system for

47 This accommodative change in CSA, which decreases with age, m

48 Accommodative change in distances between the vitreous z

49 Previous studies suggest that lens biometric accommodative changes are different with pharmacological

50 That both age and accommodative changes in CSA appear to be limited to the

51 In vivo, nicotine induced similar accommodative changes in iridectomized and control eyes.

52 on, and goniovideography was used to measure accommodative changes in lens diameter in the iridectomi

53 image on the retina due to microsaccades or accommodative changes in the lens of the eye but instead

54 ration of one tissue within an organ compels accommodative changes in the surrounding tissues.

55 neal power, crystalline lens power, ratio of accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A ratio),

56 The links among hyperopia, accommodative convergence, and strabismus are well estab

57 Centripetal accommodative CP and capsule movement increased in veloc

58 Post-ICLE compared with pre-ICLE centripetal accommodative CP movement was dampened in all eyes in wh

59 Accommodative deficits in myopia may be the functional c

60 errations did not change systematically with accommodative demand in Crystalens eyes.

61 r target positions were changed to create an accommodative demand of 1.5 D from starting positions of

62 evaluate the effect of refractive error and accommodative demand on transient axial elongation of th

63 e for static targets between 0.17 and 4.00 D accommodative demand was measured with the SRW-5000 (Shi

64 lens for 5 minutes at either 5.00- or 2.50-D accommodative demand, followed by 3 minutes of viewing t

65 3 minutes of viewing the target at a 5.00-D accommodative demand.

66 al aberrations, and pupil diameter) with the accommodative demand.

67 rical and alignment changes in the lens with accommodative demand.

68 Intermediate accommodative demands (1.25 D) elicited the greater shif

69 (2) Fixed near: accommodative demands from 1 to 5 D were created by plac

70 ects, under three conditions: (1) Fixed far: accommodative demands from 1 to 6 D were created by plac

71 The magnitude of NITM correlated with the accommodative drift after viewing a distant target for m

72 Accommodative dynamics as a function of amplitude were n

73 Changes were found in accommodative dynamics as a function of starting point a

74 d accommodation (0.1 diopter [D]) and strong accommodative effort (8.0 D).

75 es with age, the thickness of the lens under accommodative effort is only modestly age-dependent.

76 Repetitive changes in accommodative effort were induced in 15 subjects (18-34

77 modative structures and changes with age and accommodative effort will further the development of new

78 The A-IOL did not shift systematically with accommodative effort, with 9 lenses moving forward and 1

79 ilt changes with respect to natural lens and accommodative effort.

80 stalline lens, with increasing tendency with accommodative effort.

81 dilated and natural viewing conditions (for accommodative efforts ranging from 0 to 2.5 diopters [D]

82 al viewing conditions and phenylephrine (for accommodative efforts ranging from 0 to 2.5 diopters [D]

83 fined as affected; two had esotropia with an accommodative element; and three underwent strabismus su

84 ening Program examined whether screening for accommodative errors by using videorefraction without cy

85 e family history study, 23% of children with accommodative esotropia had an affected first-degree rel

86 Identification of risk factors for accommodative esotropia may help to determine which chil

87 sometropia had a 7.8-fold increased risk for accommodative esotropia over nonanisometropic patients.

88 t bifocals improve outcomes in children with accommodative esotropia with high AC/A.

89 a, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5)

90 52 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-1

91 ia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed inte

92 sation of pre-existing strabismus, new-onset accommodative esotropia, concurrent onset of systemic di

93 dence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotrop

94 roups of children, with right and left fully accommodative esotropia, respectively, pointed at target

95 In children with accommodative esotropia, the critical period for suscept

96 se a significant risk for the development of accommodative esotropia.

97 used successfully in adult patients to treat accommodative esotropia.

98 ecutive patients, aged 18 to 60 months, with accommodative esotropia.

99 butes to poor outcomes in both infantile and accommodative esotropia.

100 ising option for the treatment of refractive accommodative esotropia.

101 rabismus such as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

102 in patients with accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

103 Similar findings are true for accommodative esotropia; children treated within the fir

104 Patients with high AC/A accommodative esotropia; evidence of stereopsis, binocul

105 Patients with late-onset accommodative ET and intermittent infantile strabismus r

106 Patients with infantile ET and infantile accommodative ET had high concordance between mVEP respo

107 fantile accommodative ET, 22 with late-onset accommodative ET, 10 with intermittent infantile strabis

108 ren: 20 with infantile ET, 16 with infantile accommodative ET, 22 with late-onset accommodative ET, 1

109 Monocular accommodative facility measurements were taken for a 40-

110 accommodation, which led to a lower distance accommodative facility rate.

111 the dynamic changes in refraction during the accommodative facility test in myopes and emmetropes.

112 During distance accommodative facility testing, myopes exhibited a lower

113 Field of view and accommodative focus are two fundamental attributes of ma

114 is present particularly in intermittent and accommodative forms; however, further research is requir

115 Accommodative function was also assessed in an age-match

116 at present in CP has a significant impact on accommodative function.

117 For both fully accommodative groups, the pointing responses to the cent

118 Accommodative intraocular lens design and development ar

119 lens designs are attempting to commercialize accommodative intraocular lens devices.

120 To inform the reader of forthcoming accommodative intraocular lens technologies that are bei

121 Accommodative intraocular lenses could revolutionize not

122 re currently available or pending release on accommodative intraocular lenses.

123 The Lumina accommodative IOL effectively restores the visual functi

124 Twenty eyes with a 1CU accommodative IOL implanted were refracted and distance

125 ) who underwent implantation of a Crystalens accommodative IOL, and control groups of 9 normal subjec

126 VIEW FIL611PV multifocal and OPTOFLEX FIL618 accommodative IOLs (Soleko, Ltd., Rome, Italy) in patien

127 Accommodative IOLs tend to be slightly more vertically t

128 sponse of eyes implanted with the Crystalens accommodative IOLs, measured objectively using laser ray

129 Children had high accommodative lag and also had near esophoria if their m

130 however, not finding an association between accommodative lag and myopia progression is inconsistent

131 A +2.00-D bifocal add did not eliminate accommodative lag and reduced lag by less than 25% of th

132 r target, there was only a greater amount of accommodative lag in children who became myopic compared

133 Accommodative lag in children who became myopic was comp

134 Elevated accommodative lag is unlikely to be a useful predictive

135 Increased hyperopic defocus from accommodative lag may be a consequence rather than a cau

136 Increased accommodative lag occurred in children after the onset o

137 the subjects with CP, 57.6% demonstrated an accommodative lag outside normal limits at one or more d

138 Substantive and consistent elevations in accommodative lag relative to model estimates of lag in

139 Monocular accommodative lag to a 4-D Badal stimulus was measured o

140 Overall, the accommodative lag was 0.44 D greater in the participants

141 Accommodative lag was greater in individuals susceptible

142 At baseline, accommodative lag was higher (1.72 +/- 0.37 D; mean +/-

143 Accommodative lag was measured annually with either a Ca

144 Accommodative lag was measured with the following correc

145 Accommodative lag was not associated with myopia progres

146 In the sample as a whole, accommodative lag was not significantly different in chi

147 Accommodative lag was not significantly elevated during

148 background had the chosen chromaticity, the accommodative lag was reduced by an average of 0.16 D (P

149 eccentric photorefractor was used to record accommodative lag while participants viewed a cross on a

150 t, and Hispanic children having intermediate accommodative lag.

151 viously thought in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

152 he colored background slightly increased the accommodative lag.

153 rts hyperopic defocus-based theories such as accommodative lag; however, not finding an association b

154 Children with larger accommodative lags (>0.43 D for a 33 cm target) wearing

155 New multifocal and accommodative lens technology should enhance patient sat

156 accommodative amplitude, but not as well as accommodative lens thickening and resting muscle apex th

157 or muscle apex were important for predicting accommodative lens thickening.

158 st US Food and Drugs Administration approved accommodative lens.

159 With the advent of interest in accommodative lenses as a solution for presbyopia and th

160 commodation in accordance with the Helmholtz accommodative mechanism and in contrast to the accommoda

161 Some debate surrounds the accommodative mechanism in primates, particularly whethe

162 commodative mechanism and in contrast to the accommodative mechanism originally proposed by Tschernin

163 Future descriptions of the accommodative mechanism, and approaches to presbyopia th

164 The magnitude of accommodative microfluctuations during sustained near ac

165 ncies, peak velocities, and the magnitude of accommodative microfluctuations were calculated from the

166 atencies, accommodative peak velocities, and accommodative microfluctuations, all of which decrease w

167 there is a significant posttask blur-driven accommodative NITM, which is sustained for longer than h

168 is crowded, whereas that of lysozyme is more accommodative of either isomer.

169 avitreal LAT-A of 10 microM had no effect on accommodative or miotic responses to intramuscular PILO.

170 Accommodative peak velocities were fastest in subjects i

171 ccommodative and disaccommodative latencies, accommodative peak velocities, and accommodative microfl

172 ion between tonic accommodation, the resting accommodative position of the eye in the absence of a vi

173 ctive correction and, hopefully, the type of accommodative range that we take for granted when we are

174 on accommodation, age, and age dependence of accommodative rate.

175 Other measurements included accommodative response (by an open field of view autoref

176 Accommodative response amplitude is reduced with pilocar

177 Accommodative response and cycloplegic refractive error

178 Static aspects of accommodation (maximum accommodative response and lag) were measured with an au

179 n children with lower versus higher baseline accommodative response at near (P = 0.03) and with lower

180 Fourier analysis was used to determine the accommodative response at the frequency of the stimulus.

181 The disparity in accommodative response between EMMs and LOMs, however, a

182 Mean accommodative response for emmetropic children was lower

183 the dark-focus values and the slopes of the accommodative response function are not significantly di

184 nsory part not only affects the slope of the accommodative response function but also increases the s

185 differences in dark focus, the slope of the accommodative response function, and the ET were compare

186 demand led to a significant reduction in the accommodative response in all subjects (0.0 D: by -0.35

187 cond, continuous-objective recordings of the accommodative response measured with an open-view infrar

188 The accommodative response of eyes implanted with the Crysta

189 ts of amplitude and the starting point of an accommodative response on the dynamics of far-to-near (a

190 o the data to determine peak velocity versus accommodative response relationships.

191 asing cognitive demand caused a reduction in accommodative response that was attributable principally

192 , the 2- to 4-month-old infants generated an accommodative response to at least the 0.75 D amplitude

193 Long-term treatment with ECHO decreased the accommodative response to pilocarpine and increased intr

194 The static accommodative response to targets at proximal distances

195 The accommodative response was obtained by analyzing changes

196 VA, accommodative response, and stereoacuity were significan

197 Accommodative response, binocular near VA, and near ster

198 tive push-up test data that overestimate the accommodative response.

199 DS subjects had lower maximum accommodative responses (mean = 2.52 +/- 1.66 D) and hig

200 Eccentric photorefraction was used to record accommodative responses at 25 Hz.

201 en with CP demonstrate significantly reduced accommodative responses compared with their neurological

202 The greatly attenuated accommodative responses in vitro for iridectomized eyes

203 Dynamic analysis of the accommodative responses showed linear peak velocity vers

204 ith Down syndrome showed considerably poorer accommodative responses than normally developing childre

205 Five accommodative responses to 20/100 letters located at 4 m

206 Accommodative responses to a step stimulus cartoon movie

207 meral LAT-A of 5 microM inhibited miotic and accommodative responses to intramuscular PILO.

208 The subject's accommodative responses to one-, two-, three-, and four-

209 of this study was to record infants' dynamic accommodative responses to stimuli moving at a range of

210 Accommodative responses were also measured for a counter

211 Accommodative responses were measured continuously with

212 Accommodative responses were measured in 140 subjects ag

213 Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared phot

214 Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared phot

215 Binocular accommodative responses were recorded at 25 Hz.

216 Reduced accommodative responses were significantly associated wi

217 Static and dynamic EW-stimulated accommodative responses were studied in five iridectomiz

218 d model of static accommodation, in which an accommodative sensory gain as a linear operator is added

219 Within refractive groups, however, accommodative shifts with increasing cognition correlate

220 line of sight for the stimulus while holding accommodative state fixed.

221 ed statistically independent of both age and accommodative state.

222 meter does not correlate with age for either accommodative state.

223 anterior portion increased with age in both accommodative states.

224 Short-term adaptive changes in accommodative step response dynamics could be induced, a

225 cted to demonstrate short-term adaptation of accommodative step response dynamics to optically induce

226 At higher levels of accommodative stimulation, a significantly greater trans

227 During relatively short periods of accommodative stimulation, axial length increases in bot

228 and myopic subjects during short periods of accommodative stimulation.

229 Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), while accommodative stimuli of 0, 2, 4 and 6 D were presented

230 ve corrections while viewing a letter target accommodative stimulus of 4 D (either in a Badal system

231 The objective accommodative stimulus-response curve for static targets

232 rst near-spectacle reading correction on the accommodative-stimulus response (ASR) function, accommod

233 th a history of onset of either infantile or accommodative strabismus before 5 years of age.

234 antifying normal biometric dimensions of the accommodative structures and changes with age and accomm

235 The physiological amenability of the accommodative structures in the presbyopic eye to accomm

236 ntly, the crystal structures reveal open and accommodative substrate-binding sites, which correlates

237 The dynamics of the infant accommodative system are almost unknown and yet have a l

238 immaturity in the motor capabilities of the accommodative system compared with the sensory visual sy

239 to age-related biomechanical changes in the accommodative system.

240 Pencil push-ups and use of accommodative targets have a role in the treatment of co

241 m was designed to appear to be real vergence/accommodative therapy, without stimulating vergence, acc

242 use in future clinical trials using vergence/accommodative therapy.

243 Although general anesthesia reduced the accommodative tone in most children, it was still signif

244 cular (disparity-driven) convergence and use accommodative vergence and saccades to refixate near tar

245 duction in accommodation, increased ratio of accommodative vergence to accommodation, and relative di

246 Monocular viewing (i.e., accommodative vergence) caused substantial reductions in

247 These results provide evidence of accommodative vigor in youth and a slowing of accommodat