ライフサイエンスコーパス: accreditation

1 ellence and many bariatric centers obtaining accreditation.

2 l infrastructure, and little use of external accreditation.

3 e Liaison Committee on Medical Education for accreditation.

4 he billing of services according to level of accreditation.

5 ssary part of World Marrow Donor Association accreditation.

6 of their service even in the absence of full accreditation.

7 formance on these measures differs by cancer accreditation.

8 of maintaining different qualifications and accreditations.

9 masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom.

10 emands for data from employer-purchasers and accreditation agencies and the adoption of strategies fo

11 The flexible scope of accreditation allowed for minor modifications and extens

12 critically assess proposed reforms, such as accreditation and central IRBs, according to how well th

13 sented at the meeting, including health care accreditation and certification entities, foundations, g

14 el will need to overcome major challenges of accreditation and certification, alternative education p

15 lity standards in medicine, with emphasis on accreditation and certification.

16 ons within the existing framework of medical accreditation and certification.

17 ctitioners need to comply with the pertinent accreditation and licensing requirements.

18 laboratory or in a laboratory that meets the accreditation and proficiency testing requirements set o

19 Cancer center accreditation and public reporting are 2 approaches avai

20 Official fellowship accreditation and subspecialty certification, however, s

21 ly in duration, class size, target audience, accreditation, and projected training settings.

22 hospital characteristics related to volume, accreditations, and offering of advanced care services.

23 ave accredited fellowships, and a fellowship accreditation application is under review for obstetric

24 gh to use for public reporting, payment, and accreditation are not well-defined.

25 nd referral as a condition for cancer center accreditation beginning in 2015.

26 can College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accreditation benchmarks.

27 tal, and an independent Pharmacy Compounding Accreditation Board-accredited pharmacy).

28 We therefore propose that all accreditation bodies work cooperatively to create a rout

29 rgeon procedure volume, but unrelated to COE accreditation by professional organizations.

30 lowships must meet specific requirements for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate

31 ult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology fellowship accreditation by the American College of Graduate Medica

32 Cancer center recognition, offered as accreditation by the American College of Surgeons Commis

33 ng, qualifications, and appropriate facility accreditation can improve patient outcomes compared to s

34 CQI process that incorporated Intersocietal Accreditation Commission standards.

35 tion Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education,

36 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

37 Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

38 educators feel increasing pressure from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

39 in the United States were established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

40 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

41 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

42 ssed whether outcomes changed after the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

43 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

44 New Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

45 ns across the United States who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

46 g the most comprehensive data available, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

47 Participating in the study are Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

48 Programs were randomly assigned to current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

49 significantly increased in number following Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

50 iple training pathways are recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

51 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

52 Patient outcomes associated with the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

53 In 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

54 In 2010, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

55 t present, the 6 general competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

56 f Colon and Rectal Surgery, working with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and

57 Material published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and

58 survey of all GME programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as

59 Evaluations are mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education but

60 ns among general surgery residents using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

61 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

62 ve review of categorical postgraduate year 1 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

63 d in the ICU--areas that encompass different Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

64 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

65 rtable with several areas of the nonclinical Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

66 spects of surgical training, including the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

67 Diversity of cases was assessed based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education def

68 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dut

69 Compliance with the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dut

70 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ena

71 variability and address the requirements of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for

72 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

73 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

74 Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

75 idency Review Committee Ophthalmology of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

76 patient care had improved as a result of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education man

77 and lifelong learning competencies, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Mil

78 uate medical education was introduced by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education of

79 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Out

80 cal care interventions was constructed using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education rec

81 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education rec

82 e changed little since the initiation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

83 f teaching and evaluation, and the impact of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

84 Instead, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

85 ernight shifts, a position reinforced by new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education req

86 Since 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education req

87 receiving data about practice habits on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education res

88 axis for every patient, and results from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education res

89 These findings support the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education sta

90 To test our hypotheses, we analyzed the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Sur

91 hour limits were implemented in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to

92 l duties for research fellows as a result of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

93 In support of the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

94 Despite implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

95 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's n

96 American College of Critical Care Medicine, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Ac

97 hifts, which are currently sanctioned by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, po

98 eview Committee for Internal Medicine of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, pr

99 ecific requirements for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, tr

100 t had surgery, anesthesiology, and pulmonary Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

101 y is an expectation for program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

102 Within the adult critical care Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

103 Physician graduates of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

104 One third (320 of 863; 37%) of fellows in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

105 There is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-app

106 the work-hour limitations introduced by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

107 petitive accreditation standards through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

108 te medical education (GME) accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

109 ment of the Next Accreditation System of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

110 based on 6 broad competencies defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

111 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

112 overlapping sets of instruments testing the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACG

113 h residents demonstrate their skill in a new Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education comp

114 In 2002, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education enac

115 Residents and fellows employed by Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accr

116 United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-appr

117 ariatric surgery led to the establishment of accreditation criteria for bariatric centers of excellen

118 It shifts residency program accreditation from external audit of educational process

119 h respect to structural characteristics (ie, accreditations, geography, and oncologic services provid

120 Funding agencies, physician accreditation groups, and quality improvement initiative

121 stics suggestive of higher quality (eg, more accreditations) have greater VTE prophylaxis adherence r

122 of "Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence" accreditation; however, future research into the quality

123 Regulatory authorities for accreditation in North America have included nontechnica

124 ce the beginnings of its standardization and accreditation in the early 20th century, its growth duri

125 s presumed that echocardiographic laboratory accreditation leads to improved quality, but there are f

126 cialty certifying boards, resident education accreditation, licensure boards, and hospital medical st

127 l involved parties, testing methods used for accreditation, limited audits, publication of policy, an

128 To increase the utility of the monthly accreditation mammographic phantom image, the authors ad

129 y, units from non-Netcord Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (Netcord-FACT)-accredi

130 ation program (e.g., the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's [JCAHO] new O

131 d Services (CMS) and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) measur

132 cal Specialties, and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (organizations

133 In July 2002, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations implemented st

134 nd Medicaid Services/Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations performance me

135 The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations recommends ven

136 itals (later renamed the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) was formed to

137 te federal agencies, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and the pharm

138 of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Veteran's Hea

139 nit core measures of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

140 requirements of the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

141 In 1951, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (later renamed the Joint Comm

142 erring physicians, patients, and the public; accreditation of imaging facilities; management of self-

143 ded; and 9) certification of individuals and accreditation of programs are rejected.

144 espiratory Care (NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditation of Respiratory Care education (CoARC) rela

145 lla were performed according to the scope of accreditation of the respective laboratories conforming

146 Early on, there was no supervision or accreditation of these fellowships, and they varied wide

147 e penalized more frequently had more quality accreditations, offered advanced services, were major te

148 tudies have evaluated the impact of hospital accreditation on all bariatric surgery outcomes.

149 d be the role of federal and state agencies, accreditation organizations, and philanthropic foundatio

150 scans of an American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom (module 2, low contrast) were perf

151 to resolve the four 6-mm rods in the ACR CT accreditation phantom can be lost.

152 e the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom LCR section at volume CT dose inde

153 Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using a dual-source

154 directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom.

155 tandards, we set out to design and assess an accreditation procedure for allergen-specific serum IgE.

156 Method validation according to the accreditation procedure under the EN ISO 15189 standard

157 le analyte assay in view of the EN ISO 15189 accreditation procedure.

158 Council, is in the process of introducing an accreditation process to further ensure the highest qual

159 or are accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation program (e.g., the Joint Commission on Acc

160 he American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program reviewed clinical images for 2,341

161 of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network accreditation program, and its prospective, longitudinal

162 erican College of Radiology (ACR) breast MRI accreditation program.

163 and August 1993 through the ACR Mammography Accreditation Program.

164 res at a high standard and provides data for accreditation purposes.

165 eflecting quality (hospital size, numbers of accreditations/quality initiatives) and performance on V

166 In addition, strict accreditation requirements and student/faculty concerns

167 Accreditation requirements mandate teaching quality impr

168 Regulatory and accreditation requirements, professional guidelines, and

169 blished scholarly guidelines consistent with accreditation requirements.

170 This is possible within current accreditation requirements.

171 specialization when designing curriculum and accreditation requirements.

172 erating procedures and diagnostic laboratory accreditation serve to build trust and confidence among

173 boratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist and the Strengthening L

174 Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation (SLMTA) curriculum were used in 6 MOH labo

175 et bacterial testing and the promulgation of accreditation standards by the College of American Patho

176 s have collectively fostered anticompetitive accreditation standards through the Accreditation Counci

177 Contrary to accreditation standards, most US and Canadian dental sch

178 nitored with the use of stringent laboratory accreditation standards, proficiency testing, and compet

179 r inform quality improvement initiatives and accreditation standards.

180 stigators blinded to the external laboratory accreditation status and echocardiographic results.

181 Hospital accreditation status is associated with safer outcomes,

182 cal Education, proposes a new outcomes-based accreditation strategy for residency training programs i

183 tencies, achieved through voluntary hospital accreditation, supported through an expanded process of

184 The method was accredited by the Hellenic Accreditation System and it was applied for an 8 years s

185 lestones is an important element of the Next Accreditation System of the Accreditation Council for Gr

186 acquisitions, and professional training and accreditation), the need for qualitative and quantitativ

187 there is emerging literature linking office accreditation to improved patient outcomes, more work is

188 ne with the current trend of laboratory test accreditation to international standards, we set out to

189 uire managed care organizations seeking NCQA accreditation to measure and report the percentage of pa

190 ying for American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation were collected between August 1987 and Aug