ライフサイエンスコーパス: acetabular

1 tatistically significantly, in demonstrating acetabular and femoral cartilage pathology.

2 After imaging, acetabular and femoral data were separated and acetabula

3 The same values for acetabular cartilage assessment were 89/56, 40/60, 71/71

4 was substantial to excellent with regard to acetabular cartilage assessment with MRa and CTa (kappa=

5 ssment with use of a modified Beck scale for acetabular cartilage damage was performed by an orthoped

6 Pressures on normal human acetabular cartilage have been collected from two implan

7 eement was also recorded in only one case of acetabular cartilage loss with both methods.

8 Signal void around the acetabular component was smaller for STIR-warp than STIR

9 Acetabular components are not required, but attention to

10 ncidence of loosening was shown for cemented acetabular components with time.

11 etal-backed versus non-metal backed cemented acetabular components, and an increasing incidence of lo

12 about the diffusion process of lipids in the acetabular cup and provides, for the first time, a promi

13 s among the most commonly used materials for acetabular cup replacement in artificial joint systems.

14 efined by the results of measurements of the acetabular depth (<9 mm) or the center-edge angle (<30 d

15 In addition, center-edge angle and acetabular depth were assessed as geometric measurements

16 regions including the oral sensory papillae, acetabular ducts, tegument, acetabular glands, and nervo

17 = 0.001]) as well as a higher prevalence of acetabular dysplasia (mean lateral center edge angle 29.

18 rformed to determine the association between acetabular dysplasia and incident hip OA, and all analys

19 There is no consensus on the degree of acetabular dysplasia that does or does not require treat

20 Acetabular dysplasia was defined by the results of measu

21 By age 2 years, subluxation, dislocation, or acetabular dysplasia were identified by radiography on o

22 ssociation of abnormal center-edge angle and acetabular dysplasia with incident hip OA were 3.3 (95%

23 Acetabular dysplasia, defined by a decrease in the cente

24 features of hip joint architecture, such as acetabular dysplasia, pistol grip deformity, wide femora

25 antial interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multiplanar refo

26 age, 43 years; age range, 15-86 years) with acetabular fractures.

27 te by holocytosis of vesicles from ten large acetabular gland cells.

28 ties concurrent with the temporal release of acetabular gland components.

29 ensory papillae, acetabular ducts, tegument, acetabular glands, and nervous system.

30 sive approaches to the management of femoral acetabular impingement, labral tears, loose bodies and c

31 g imaging modality for accurate diagnosis of acetabular labral tears.

32 a with contrast material that tracked at the acetabular-labral junction, one of which had associated

33 trast material, and contrast material at the acetabular-labral junction.

34 was to prospectively compare imaging of the acetabular labrum with 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) ima

35 acture of the acetabulum following RFA of an acetabular lesion.

36 how to interpret the continuous spectrum of acetabular morphology.

37 f fluid pockets (in millimeters) seen in the acetabular notch; recesses anterior, posterior, and late

38 pace (MJS) < or =1.5 mm, definite femoral or acetabular osteophytes, definite superolateral joint spa

39 The patient-specific acetabular projection enabled co-localization between th

40 The patient-specific acetabular projection with a T2* mapping overlay enabled

41 A patient-specific acetabular projection with a T2* overlay was developed t

42 ity, dural ectasia, joint hypermobility, and acetabular protrusion.

43 etabular and femoral data were separated and acetabular regions of interest were identified.

44 e inserts proximally and continuously to the acetabular rim periosteum.

45 rly with regard to innovative design such as acetabular screw rings, whereas porous-coated hemispheri

46 Three-dimensional US can display the full acetabular shape, which might improve DDH developmental

47 h were assessed as geometric measurements of acetabular shape.

48 ateral center-edge angle, impingement angle, acetabular slope, femoral head-to-femoral neck ratio, an