ライフサイエンスコーパス: acoustical

1 We find that the frequency dependence of acoustical and physiological interaural delays are match

2 loped a combined approach including optical, acoustical, and electrophysiological techniques to enabl

3 This review examines the acoustical basis of auditory motion perception and a wid

4 th higher frequencies, better control of the acoustical beam, and tests in media with higher rates of

5 CD-based optico-acoustical biosensor (OAB) was used for detection of var

6 communicate identity, engage other birds in acoustical combat, and attract mates.

7 Acoustical comparison between free and phagocytosed micr

8 d representation of the speech envelope, the acoustical cue that provides syllable pattern informatio

9 These observations rule out simple acoustical cues as a basis for voice selectivity in the

10 level differences (ILDs), one of the primary acoustical cues for sound location.

11 What are the acoustical cues that carry these different types of voca

12 itory pathway that is involved in processing acoustical cues to sound location.

13 nt over earphones stimuli containing all the acoustical cues to the location of broadband stimuli and

14 is to encode a correlate of ILDs, one of the acoustical cues to the spatial location of sound.

15 That ability relies on sensitivity to acoustical cues-particularly interaural time and level d

16 voice even when accounting for a variety of acoustical cues.

17 known to attract cetacean strandings produce acoustical "Dead Zones" where echolocation signals are s

18 ding a near-ubiquitous transformation of the acoustical environment due to the propagation of anthrop

19 Because the acoustical environment is a critical ecological dimensio

20 ource of periodic sound stimuli in the human acoustical environment, shows that the probability distr

21 ion remains flexible in the face of changing acoustical environments, pointing to rapid interactions

22 or encoding sound information across varying acoustical environments.

23 d living sheep was exposed to the sinusoidal acoustical excitation of 40-90dB SPL, in the frequency r

24 Many mechanical and acoustical factors have been proposed to account for thi

25 We briefly discuss acoustical feature selectivity and invariance in the cen

26 functional groups that divided the space of acoustical features into regions that represent cues for

27 nditions that yielded the precedence effect, acoustical features known to evoke neuronal discharges w

28 suggests that binaural neurons are tuned to acoustical features of ecological environments, rather t

29 We first show that the acoustical features of the LFH call do not differ betwee

30 ditory chimeras", which preserved subsets of acoustical features of the vocal sounds.

31 illates at small amplitude in the absence of acoustical input.

32 ransmitting properties of song, avoidance of acoustical interference with other species, and random p

33 cal observation with a high-speed camera and acoustical interrogation of individual bubbles and cells

34 we construct a global mechanical-electrical-acoustical mathematical model of the cochlea based on a

35 ogist may not understand the finer points of acoustical measurement.

36 ty of vibrating systems, whether mechanical, acoustical, optical, or quantum.

37 ion results in progressive changes to speech acoustical outputs that serve to correct for the perturb

38 elays in cochlear processing, as well as the acoustical properties of sound sources in the natural en

39 hat behave as effective materials with novel acoustical properties.

40 In acoustical recordings, we found that interaural delay va

41 s prefrontal processes that are sensitive to acoustical regularities rather than the bottom-up encodi

42 ed for in-vitro and in-vivo investigation of acoustical response of sheep's middle-ear ossicles.

43 bles and cells, we assessed the physical and acoustical responses of both phagocytosed and free micro

44 hrough the environment, sum to form a single acoustical signal.

45 larvae and pupae employ complex chemical and acoustical signals to manipulate ants.

46 of neural responses in increasingly complex acoustical situations, including spectrum variations, no

47 mposium held at the June 2006 meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, and illustrate some of th

48 s, opposite to the correlation observed with acoustical stimulation.

49 ined by the statistical relationship between acoustical stimuli and their naturally occurring sources

50 essentially silent when presented with other acoustical stimuli.

51 , indicating that either an electrical or an acoustical stimulus evoked a forward travelling wave.

52 e-frequency scales that best represented the acoustical structure in zebra finch song, we concluded t

53 sound into frequency bands and preserved the acoustical structure present in the original song with v

54 We developed a simple computer-based acoustical test that has allowed us to subdivide AP poss

55 at sounds is believed to benefit mainly from acoustical training [2].

56 ps and provides a bridge between optical and acoustical trapping.

57 use light whose frequency is modulated by an acoustical wave.

58 ings provide us an enhanced understanding of acoustical-wave scattering and lead potentially to wides

59 If the acoustical waveforms from a real sound source are reprod

60 , e.g., polarized waves in electromagnetism, acoustical waves and matter waves in quantum mechanics.

61 the intensity of infrared light rather than acoustical waves.