1  CT-1 deficiency caused a phase shift of the acrophase.

2  whereas sunrise had greatest power for T(b) acrophase.

3 traclass correlation coefficients of the CLS acrophase (0.6 [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.9]; P = .03), CLS bathy

4      The average circadian amplitude between acrophase and nadir was 75.6% in lean, 51.7%, in obese a

5                        The 24-hour IOP curve acrophases and amplitudes for OHTNs were closer to those

6 ding signal, maximum signal, minimum signal, acrophase, and bathyphase (P > .15).

7     Insulin sensitivity reached its maximum (acrophase) around noon, being 54% higher than during mid

8                               Comparisons of acrophase, bathyphase, amplitude, and the midline estima

9                                Comparison of acrophase, bathyphase, amplitude, midline estimating sta

10 over time with mean T(b) increasing and T(b) acrophase becoming earlier as the season progressed.

11 ther chronobiological parameters (amplitude, acrophase, circadian quotient, and goodness-of-fit coeff

12                       We also found that the acrophase of molecular circadian clock component REV-ERB

13 rity of sundowning was associated with later acrophase of temperature, less correlation of circadian

14  of body temperature and activity and in the acrophase of the circadian rhythm for temperature.

15             That is, the timing of the peak (acrophase) of multiple circadian rhythms (leaf movement,

16 re significant changes in mean T(b) and T(b) acrophase over time with mean T(b) increasing and T(b) a

17  (4) /PER3 (4) subjects advanced their aMT6s acrophase (p < 0.05), and showed a trend of advanced sle

18 ine temperature curve, and later temperature acrophase than did the healthy subjects.

19 lity of motor activity, and a later activity acrophase (time of peak) than did the healthy individual

20  deviated from 24 hours (P = .007) and daily acrophase (time of the peak of the fit circadian rhythm)