ライフサイエンスコーパス: activation energy

1 ty in an organic device is determined by the activation energy.

2 the same temperature range, with a very low activation energy.

3 ce group also affected the reaction rate and activation energy.

4 ionic conductivity and reasonable Arrhenius activation energy.

5 s energies, viz. the activation enthalpy and activation energy.

6 eV, in good agreement with the experimental activation energy.

7 pathway to *OH, did not impact the observed activation energy.

8 et CH through C2h-like trajectories, with no activation energy.

9 , lower soot ignition temperature, and lower activation energy.

10 s to a spread of approximately 30 meV in the activation energy.

11 ucture, reduce soot ignition temperature and activation energy.

12 echanism of degradation in terms of rate and activation energy.

13 s-type equation was applied to determine the activation energies.

14 ger changes in conformation result in higher activation energies.

15 oom temperature conductivity values and high activation energies.

16 ential factors and small but distinguishable activation energies.

17 tie-chain model consistent with anisotropic activation energies.

18 dated dimers were calculated to have similar activation energies.

19 thane, water, and oxygen as well as apparent activation energies.

20 s chemisorption process, releases CO2 at low activation energies.

21 and estimate the amplitudes, time scales and activation energies.

22 nteractions that account for their different activation energies.

23 ng events since this requires a much smaller activation energy ~0.53 eV, and which tends to be much q

24 conformation change (consistent with a high activation energy, 106 kJ/mol) that increases Mn(II) aff

25 ds (-921.2 kV cm(-1)mol(-1)), and electrical activation energy (12.9 kJ mol(-1)) was also carried out

26 n of phenol degradation had a relatively low activation energy (18.4 +/- 2.7 kJ mol(-1)).

27 As supported by its lower activation energy, 2-FM-GABA (55.9 kJ/mol) and 2-FM-Lys+

28 somerization pathways, the lowest Gibbs free activation energy 25.8 kcal/mol was in close agreement w

29 The activation energy (35 kJ/mol) for dimerization is almost

30 utein increased with increasing temperature (activation energy=38 kJ/mol).

31 rst-order kinetics (k25 degrees C=34.4d(-1), activation energy=51.0kJ/mol).

32 s examples of properties that correlate with activation energy across many classes of ionic conductor

33 Experimental Gibbs free activation energy, activation enthalpy, and activation e

34 The present evaluation of isoconversional activation energies affords accurate kinetic modeling of

35 ure range, allowing the measurement of local activation energies along the chain, and the assignment

36 te kinetic and thermodynamic data (including activation energies and activation volumes) were measure

37 hey exhibit similar turnover rates, apparent activation energies and apparent reaction orders at the

38 e found to be concerted involving small free activation energies and are all exoenergonic.

39 Activation energies and enthalpies for DMC additions to

40 were unimodal and linear, affording negative activation energies and entropies.

41 Arrhenius analysis of the data gives similar activation energies and pre-exponential factors for diff

42 diffusivities display a dramatic increase in activation energies and prefactors at temperatures below

43 Similar activation energies and reaction rates are found for CO

44 attached to the reacting centers reduce the activation energies and the reaction energies with incre

45 The activation energy and enthalpy for addition of 1 to meth

46 itive vs multiplicative relationship between activation energy and fusion rate provides a novel expla

47 BN exhibits p-type semiconductivity with low activation energy and high thermal stability, making it

48 eveloped and refined to estimate the overall activation energy and its component parts, and they span

49 concentrations is characterized by a larger activation energy and leads to more polymorphic structur

50 t occurs through a Grotthuss mechanism, with activation energy and mobility of 0.19 eV and 1.2 x 10(-

51 ic properties by simultaneously reducing the activation energy and selectively producing a desired bu

52 The reduced activation energy and super-linear dependence on light i

53 The electron-transport activation energy and the Coulomb blockade threshold for

54 ty, we will show that the calculation of the activation energy and the determination of the Thiele mo

55 d force is a combination of a low force-free activation energy and the fact that the change in rate w

56 e past, however, AOS devices required higher activation energies, and hence higher processing tempera

57 peratures below the bulk solvent Tg, has low activation energy, and is likely due to fast vibrations

58 n-Arrhenius equation, published estimates of activation energy, and time series of temperature from 2

59 The activation energies are only consistent with the experim

60 For bimolecular reactions, the activation energies are the sum of the energies to disto

61 We rationalize the reduction in activation energy as a result of a mechanistic change fr

62 theory, the traditional Arrhenius picture of activation energy as a single point on a free energy sur

63 ce transform to retrieve the distribution of activation energies associated with metastable oxygen de

64 The activation energies associated with the temperature resp

65 Because of the generally lower activation energy associated with proton conduction in o

66 onor level were introduced by As doping with activation energies at 88 meV, 293 meV and 377 meV.

67 reaction is calculated to proceed with a low activation energy barrier (2 kcal/mol).

68 We determined the Gibbs activation energy barrier DeltaG (double dagger)r that o

69 se-change materials as a way to introduce an activation energy barrier for phase-change materials sol

70 tallic glass powders revealing a low thermal activation energy barrier of 22.6 kJ/mol.

71 ur kinetic measurements demonstrate that the activation energy barrier to autocatalytic surface reduc

72 tabilizes the virion, resulting in a smaller activation energy barrier to trigger DNA release.

73 free energy of formation is used to lower an activation energy barrier, likely related to a rate-limi

74 rapid refilling owing to an inherently high activation energy barrier.

75 or carbon dioxide, adsorption enthalpies and activation energy barriers are both decreased on fluorin

76 The MPC ET activation energy barriers are little changed by the pre

77 ormation mechanism, thus revealing the close activation energy barriers associated with each pathway.

78 We show that the heights of the activation energy barriers can be selectively changed by

79 of the pi* orbital of CO by the nitride with activation energy barriers of 24.7 and 11.3 kcal mol(-1)

80 These slow diffusion constants yield activation energy barriers to sliding approximately 2.8-

81 e with PC revealed a large difference in the activation energy barriers when Li(+) was the countercat

82 ing and migration are quantified in terms of activation energies (barriers) for thermally activated p

83 is much greater in fragile liquids, with the activation energy becoming very large near Tg.

84 modeled as a diffusion of methyl axis, have activation energy by a factor of 2.7 larger in the twofo

85 The increase of the activation energy can be attributed to the TiBw architec

86 on and amide hydrogen exchange have a higher activation energy compared to that required for displace

87 ighter than substrates, thereby lowering the activation energy compared with that of the correspondin

88 The activation energy concept was applied to understand the

89 ose displacement otherwise requires a higher activation energy, consequently yielding compressed inte

90 18.8 +/- 2.4 kcal/mol), while the Gibbs free activation energy DeltaG() for the hydrogenation of cycl

91 The Gibbs free activation energy DeltaG() was obtained experimentally w

92 ielding DeltaG(assn) = -24 kJ mol(-1) and an activation energy DeltaG(double dagger) = 54 kJ mol(-1).

93 strained cycloalkenes, and that most of the activation energy differences are accounted for by this

94 were carried out to obtain the difference in activation energies (E(D) - E(H)) and the pre-exponentia

95 ased with temperature, exhibiting comparable activation energies (E, electronvolts [eV]) for all subs

96 factors AH/AD was 0.28 and the difference in activation energies Ea(D) - Ea(H) was 9.1 kJ.mol(-1).

97 0(-17) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) at 294 K and activation energy Ea = 64 +/- 37 kJ/mol.

98 the boiling point, the effect of MWs on the activation energy Ea and k0 is found nonexistent.

99 ermined to be 3.33 x 10(-5) min(-1), with an activation energy Ea of 16.4 +/- 0.7 kcal mol(-1).

100 nover frequency (TOF) of 4896.8 h(-1) and an activation energy (Ea ) of 18.8 kJ mol(-1) .

101 Furthermore, the activation energy (Ea ) of soil N mineralization was sig

102 rized by thermal optima (Topt ) and apparent activation energy (Ea ), were determined by measuring po

103 temperature sensitivity, as measured by the activation energy (Ea , in eV).

104 The binding of Na(+) requires a very high activation energy (Ea 106.8 kJ mol(-1)) and consequently

105 Finally, the transformation kinetics and the activation energy (Ea = 246.1 kJ.mol(-1)) of the reactio

106 Calculation of the rate constant (k) and activation energy (Ea) for this hydrolysis reaction are

107 The activation energy (Ea) of enzyme electrode is 35.93KJmol

108 between WPM and polyphenolic compounds, the activation energy (Ea) required for their diffusion in t

109 Thermal-oxidation activation energy (Ea) requirements ranged from 51 to 12

110 The frequency factor (A) and activation energy (Ea) were correlated well with the val

111 emperature on photosynthetic capacity (i.e., activation energy, Ea ; deactivation energy, Hd ; entrop

112 O2 production step is subject to an apparent activation energy (Eapp) of 56.5 (+/-5) kJ mol-1 and is

113 ely rapid and subject to an average apparent activation energy (Eapp), across the techniques applied,

114 Overall activation energies (Eoverall) for particle formation ca

115 detailed electrochemical properties such as activation energy, exchange current density, rate capabi

116 Activation energies for all colour parameters were 64-73

117 Importantly, the activation energies for amide hydrogen exchange were fou

118 plant effluents significantly increased the activation energies for community respiration and gross

119 Activation energies for community respiration were highe

120 on density functional theory calculations of activation energies for electrochemical carbon monoxide

121 Here, the activation energies for ionic migration in methylammoniu

122 ace of CsF5 , surrounded by reasonably large activation energies for its exothermic decomposition to

123 Activation energies for k1 and k-1 were 3.04 and 45.2 kJ

124 The activation energies for Li-ion conduction traversing the

125 ies suggest are less tortuous and have lower activation energies for migration than in stoichiometric

126 The activation energies for proton migration are calculated

127 Instead, the activation energies for rotations in the crystals of 2 a

128 entropies (S(conf)), probability fluxes, and activation energies for side chain inter-rotameric trans

129 In addition, the activation energies for the conductivity and Hall effect

130 bled calculation of the limits for the Gibbs activation energies for the conversions of compound 0 --

131 Our DFT calculations provide the activation energies for the translation of the CoPc mole

132 Activation energies for total carotenoids, polyphenolic,

133 with an increase in optimum temperature and activation energy for cellobiose hydrolysis.

134 so as effective catalysts where the apparent activation energy for char gasification got remarkably r

135 nsfer states and the ground state, and lower activation energy for charge generation.Molecular orient

136 etals such as Pd, Pt, Ru, or Rh to lower the activation energy for chemical reactions.

137 Using established models we determine the activation energy for crystallization and find that it c

138 -Mehl-Avrami model was used to determine the activation energy for decomposition of FAPbI3 into PbI2.

139 ce-trapped to detrapped state and provide an activation energy for electron hopping of 63(8) cm(-1).

140 and-gap semiconductor at 39.7 GPa and has an activation energy for electronic conduction of 0.232(1)

141 For a strong liquid, the activation energy for eta changes little with cooling to

142 icle priming, unpriming, and fusion, and the activation energy for fusion by fitting a vesicle state

143 ing from defects, the chain mobility and the activation energy for inter-domain diffusion.

144 ose (less than 17.0 A apart), the calculated activation energy for intramolecular proton transfer wit

145 eal an approximately three-fold reduction in activation energy for ion transport at a sodium bromide

146 n approximately 8 kJ mol(-1) decrease in the activation energy for ion transport through the protein

147 We estimate that the activation energy for methane C-H bond cleavage is 9.5 k

148 substituent play a key role in lowering the activation energy for nucleophilic addition via formatio

149 this study, we have found that the apparent activation energy for propene oxidation to acrolein over

150 sition and, hence, why one should expect the activation energy for propene oxidation to correlate wit

151 ms ([Formula: see text]20 nm), the effective activation energy for rearrangement (temperature depende

152 nded to show higher TOF and smaller reaction activation energy for Rh NPs encapsulated in either dend

153 emarkably, to the best of our knowledge, the activation energy for spontaneous bilayer fusion has nev

154 f relaxation times) becomes smaller than the activation energy for surface diffusion.

155 The activation energy for surface nucleation is found to be

156 It was found computationally that the activation energy for the C-H bond cleavage step is negl

157 Between 70 and 90 degrees C, activation energy for the degradation of betalains was 4

158 The Gibbs activation energy for the first stage was 18.7 kcal.mol(

159 d, revealing important kinetics steps and an activation energy for the gas-phase cycloaddition of two

160 Interestingly, the alcohol oxidation activation energy for the microbubble systems is much lo

161 h atomic packing topology, and also with the activation energy for thermally activated relaxation and

162 erial, has been a challenge due to very high activation energy for transforming graphite to diamond,

163 chain is more than compensated by a reduced activation energy for transport.

164 ular dynamics trajectories and determine the activation energy for viscosity.

165 n kinetics, effectively raising the apparent activation energy from 70 +/- 5 kJ/mol (in product-free

166 IRE-RNA/IRP1 binding changed activation energies: FRT IRE-RNA 47.0 +/- 2.5 kJ/mol, AC

167 The activation energy had a maximum in the rate minimum at p

168 rs to overcome the fundamental issue of high activation energy has been proposed and investigated the

169 eoretical models require a typically unknown activation energy, hindering implementation in materials

170 Both processes are associated with similar activation energies; however, the translation is more fr

171 e GaAsBi band gap diagram to correlate their activation energies in samples with different Bi content

172 tes the origin of the difference between the activation energies in the gas phase (~62 kcal/mol) and

173 nitroso species are super-reactive and that activation energies in the NDA processes are lower than

174 We report the apparent activation energy in both atmospheres using three Kissin

175 The dramatic suppression of activation energy in condensed phase decomposition of ni

176 o Arrhenius ("strong") behavior with a large activation energy in no man's land.

177 Despite the comparable activation energy, interface nucleation dominates at hig

178 inspired complex, the recombination reaction activation energy is <2 kcal mol(-1).

179 The activation energy is 94, 106, and 112 kJ/mol for MNPZ, N

180 ation is an energy activated process and the activation energy is increased by the axial strain energ

181 In both atmospheres, a bimodal apparent activation energy is observed, suggesting a two stage pr

182 A new physical model of the activation energy is proposed by virtue of the energy an

183 ed by 3 orders of magnitude, and the thermal activation energy is reduced to zero, heralding the form

184 ical relationships between fragility and the activation energy is shown.

185 synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane ('activation energy') is considered a major determinant in

186 l sulfonates to complex with VB12 and not an activation energy issue that can be overcome by stronger

187 lysts enhance reaction rates by lowering the activation energy it is often obscure how catalysts achi

188 sidering transition structure geometries and activation energies, it was concluded that rearrangement

189 cture of the thermal quenching processes and activation energy levels.

190 The activation energy needed for the key reaction is quite l

191 Apparent activation energies obtained for DOM isolates purchased

192 ocesses have an order of magnitude different activation energies of 0.13 and 1.3 eV.

193 res display ultrafast Brownian rotation with activation energies of 2.4-4.9 kcal/mol and pre-exponent

194 and 85 s(-1), respectively, corresponding to activation energies of 347 and 390 meV for the forward a

195 The kinetic rates increase with acidity at activation energies of 54.9 (TA) and 66.1 kJ.mol(-1) (TU

196 e majority lithium characterized by very low activation energies of 58(2)-98(1) meV.

197 n Arrhenius dependence with two well-defined activation energies of 73 +/- 5 meV and 420 +/- 10 meV,

198 bited different temperature dependencies and activation energies of 8.9 and 19.6 kcal/mol.

199 to slowly and spontaneously fully fuse with activation energies of approximately 30 kBT Our data dem

200 anions, are promising materials for lowering activation energies of chemical reactions.

201 n/interaction model shows that the increased activation energies of cyclic 1-azadienes originate from

202 em level, focusing on apparent vs. intrinsic activation energies of ecosystem processes, how to repre

203 in has a considerable effect in lowering the activation energies of oxygen migration.

204 DFT calculations, were used to determine the activation energies of the conformational exchange arisi

205 The activation energies of the process span 135 kJ/mol to 22

206 Moreover, the activation energies of these composites are significantl

207 ies, strain energies, transition states, and activation energies of these rearrangements with the goa

208 and forth within the oligomers with a small activation energy of </=kBT, likely controlled by the mo

209 ivity of 0.2 S cm(-1) at 300 K, with the low activation energy of 0.11 eV.

210 onductivity as high as 10(-1) S/cm and a low activation energy of 0.176 eV.

211 An activation energy of 0.21 +/- 0.06 eV was observed for r

212 ted 3D RT conductivity of 10(-2) S/cm, a low activation energy of 0.210 eV, a giant band gap of 8.5 e

213 transport for wires >4 nm in length with an activation energy of 0.245 +/- 0.008 eV for OPI-7; (iii)

214 rved at a molecular length of 4-5 nm with an activation energy of 0.35 eV extracted from Arrhenius pl

215 y of 10(-3) S cm(-1) at 25 degrees C with an activation energy of 0.35 eV, which is an order of magni

216 rotation about the P-O1 axis, with a higher activation energy of 0.50 +/- 0.07 eV being obtained for

217 cy-assisted migration of iodide ions with an activation energy of 0.6 eV, in good agreement with the

218 gh thermal stability red pigment production (activation energy of 10.5kcal.mol(-1)), turning an inter

219 carbamate linkages and exhibits an Arrhenius activation energy of 111 +/- 10 kJ/mol, which is lower t

220 ht line with, however, an unexpectedly large activation energy of 114 +/- 8 kcal/mol, which is much l

221 uantum yield on a time scale < 100 ps and an activation energy of 12.6 +/- 1.4 kJ/mol.

222 e dependent admittance spectroscopy, with an activation energy of 131 meV determined via that techniq

223 ge air temperatures, we estimated a reaction activation energy of 14.25 kJ/mol and a temperature coef

224 ons, circling the surface OH with a measured activation energy of 187 +/- 10 meV.

225 c Monte Carlo simulations yield a self climb activation energy of 2 (2.5) times the vacancy migration

226 e dependence between 60-90 degrees C with an activation energy of 22-27 kcal/mol.

227 crystals of the trans-2 isomer, with a mean activation energy of 4.6 +/- 0.6 kcal/mol and a pre-expo

228 quenching was temperature-dependent with an activation energy of 4.654+/-0.1091kJmol(-1) to withstan

229 enol into its phenolate moiety with a modest activation energy of 48 kJ/mol.

230 The activation energy of 4b (Ea = 0.71 kcal mol(-1)) is the

231 ng the cis-2 isomer, which has a higher mean activation energy of 5.1 +/- 0.6 kcal/mol and a lower pr

232 activity at pH 5.0 and 68 degrees C with an activation energy of 6.66 kcal/mol and Q10 1.42.

233 roton flow of about 10 Omega cm(2) and a low activation energy of about 0.3 electronvolts.

234 ite, showing Arrhenius-type behavior with an activation energy of approximately 300 meV.

235 at various temperatures, we report that the activation energy of complete membrane fusion is at the

236 sed on probability distributions of apparent activation energy of counterparts (epsilona).

237 reference temperature of 132.5 degrees C and activation energy of cyanidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3

238 The activation energy of Diels-Alder reactions correlates ve

239 The activation energy of double bond breakage was relatively

240 s in n-type GaAs1-x N x and assumes that the activation energy of electron traps decreases with the B

241 pling between neighbouring bases, and in the activation energy of hole hopping.

242 The activation energy of ionic conductivity was shown to be

243 ine the orders of reaction and the Arrhenius activation energy of polymerization.

244 In contrast, the activation energy of proton transfer on a clean SiO2 (11

245 ed out to determine the guanidinium promoted activation energy of pseudorotation.

246 Mn(2+) (50 microM) decreased the activation energy of RNA-IRP1 binding for both IRE-RNAs.

247 t is capable of significantly decreasing the activation energy of the CO and CH bond scission during

248 The activation energy of the gas-phase reaction decreases wi

249 at high temperatures without decreasing the activation energy of the material.

250 nsible for the enhanced activity and reduced activation energy of the photochemical reverse water gas

251 The overall activation energy of the process must be large enough to

252 any Pro analogue tested, EF-P decreases the activation energy of the reaction by an almost uniform v

253 RML reduced by a factor of 3.12 and 1.16 the activation energy of the reaction with Lipozyme(R) RM IM

254 The higher activation energy of the second process is most likely a

255 We observe a universal scaling between the activation energy of the transistors and the interfacial

256 The electronic activation energy of the transmetalation is rather reaso

257 he results indicate a remarkable drop in the activation energy of this process for dialkylphosphate e

258 The activation energy of this process is slightly lower than

259 The high activation energy of this step suggests that it occurs b

260 C to possess high Li capacity due to the low activation energy of water formation at high temperature

261 gs play an important role in controlling the activation energy of Z-E isomerization as well as the sh

262 S cm(-1) at 65 degrees C, a proton transport activation energy of ~0.2 eV and a proton mobility of ~7

263 The dependencies of the activation energy on the gate voltage and the drain volt

264 nucleation, with this process having a lower activation energy on the obtuse step.

265 ers, and observe an increasing dependency of activation energy on the reaction progress.

266 ogen phosphonate groups and gives a very low activation energy pathway for proton transfer.

267 response to temperature (as described by its activation energy) provides a simple heuristic for predi

268 on energies and interaction energies over an activation energy range of 45 kcal/mol.

269 Activation energies ranged from 22 to 136 kJ mol(-1), HM

270 of the solid solutions are enhanced and the activation energies reduced for values of x = 0-0.25.

271 membrane structure and thereby increase the activation energy required for fusion, likely through an

272 of gHgL with an integrin contributes to the activation energy required to cause the refolding of gB

273 tural explanation of the growth of effective activation energy scale and the concomitant huge increas

274 75%St+25%Su presented the highest values of activation energy showing the greatest stability in the

275 Low activation energy, small-amplitude local motions dominat

276 nd a strong Lewis acid in the presence of an activation energy source had been studied extensively, t

277 onductivity values of 0.02-0.04 S.cm(-1) and activation energies strongly influenced by hydrostatic p

278 formation of tau(T) experimental data to the activation energy temperature index form, the clear prev

279 reactions of carbon nucleophiles have lower activation energies than those of amines.

280 Because of the lower activation energy, the aerobic process would be more fav

281 We find the ground-state dissociation activation energy to be 4.74 eV/N2, with Fe as the activ

282 ntramolecular rotation, increasing the known activation energy to rotation from 8.5 to 10.6 kcal mol(

283 The calculated activation energy to separate the attractively bound sol

284 to propargyl and allenyl systems occurs with activation energies typical for vinylation of ketones.

285 Process II is observed above 170 K, with activation energy typical of beta relaxations in a glass

286 lux motion is thermally activated, where the activation energy U0 is going to zero at the extrapolate

287 The activation energy values at atmospheric pressure were 54

288 l-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model to estimate activation energy values for recovery and recrystallizat

289 Activation energy values were derived from the slopes of

290 111.174 kJ mol(-1) and 93.311 kJ mol(-1) of activation energy values were found for L( *), Hue angle

291 res and levofloxacin concentrations, and the activation energy was determined.

292 Activation energy was found to be 28.24 kJ mol(-1).

293 However, an increase in activation energy was observed in lower molecular weight

294 By determining rate constants and activation energies, we fully quantify the reaction ener

295 nd insulating grain boundaries, and that the activation energies were calculated to be 0.052 eV and 0

296 Activation energies were of the order of magnitude assoc

297 Following the Arrhenius model, activation energies were ranged from 51 to 135 kJ mol(-1

298 The ionic conductivity and Arrhenius activation energy were explored for the LiOH-LiCl system

299 for [1,5]H-shift reaction despite its higher activation energy, which results in a competition betwee

300 ysis of the energy components comprising the activation energy why the band-gap energy is the primary