コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 roke Scale, Rankin Disability Scale, Barthel Activities of Daily Living).
2 not severe enough to require help with usual activities of daily living.
3 capacity and an enhanced ability to perform activities of daily living.
4 an amputee would greatly facilitate her/his activities of daily living.
5 ry objects, functions that are essential for activities of daily living.
6 oke are dependent on informal caregivers for activities of daily living.
7 ase, quality of life, physical function, and activities of daily living.
8 tion, and reaching, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.
9 tion, and reaching, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.
10 hypertension, arthritis, and limitations on activities of daily living.
11 ad a geriatric syndrome, and 13% had loss of activities of daily living.
12 e and severity of spatial neglect during the activities of daily living.
13 involving IR motor sequencing, switching and activities of daily living.
14 asking, reduced voice volume, and slowing of activities of daily living.
15 gurement or interference with work and other activities of daily living.
16 ' ratings regarding their ability to perform activities of daily living.
17 g a mild impairment without interfering with activities of daily living.
18 n of pain assessments with information about activities of daily living.
19 ments, which are more frequently used in the activities of daily living.
20 function, behavior/mood, and quality of life/activities of daily living.
21 improve the co-primary parameter of overall activities of daily living.
22 promote wellness, and boost participation in activities of daily living.
23 rofessional nursing services, and support of activities of daily living.
24 aily living or in three or more instrumental activities of daily living.
25 or functional motor assessment that reflects activities of daily living.
26 participants were assessed for disability in activities of daily living.
27 mpromise, and a decreased ability to perform activities of daily living.
28 mpared with the benchmark ROM, essential for activities of daily living.
29 muscle plays an important role in performing activities of daily living.
30 ncontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities of daily living.
31 conditions, and 16% had difficulty with >/=1 activities of daily living.
32 nce-based measures of the ability to perform activities of daily living.
33 aily living, and difficulty with one or more activities of daily living.
34 1.25-2.54) with >/=3 versus 0 limitations in activities of daily living, 1.36 (1.0-1.86) with moderat
36 95% CI, 1.16-4.33, P = .02) and (2) loss of activities of daily living (2.71; 95% CI, 1.07-6.84, P =
37 terms or broad goals focusing on achievable activities of daily living; 2) applying time-limited tri
38 .4%; P=0.015), with at least 1 limitation in activities of daily living (59.6% versus 74.7%; P=0.001)
39 3.0 [62.4-63.7] to 64.1 [62.7-65.2], p=0.16; activities of daily living, 62.3 [61.6-63.0] to 64.6 [63
40 3.5 [63.0-64.0] to 64.3 [63.0-65.3], p=0.24; activities of daily living, 62.7 [62.1-63.3] to 65.0 [63
41 to 63.2 [61.5-64.5], p=0.0416; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.0 [62.4-63.7] to 64.1 [62
42 6] to 64.8 [63.6-65.7], p=0.01; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.5 [63.0-64.0] to 64.3 [63
43 lity data consisted of a six-item measure of activities of daily living, a three-item measure of gros
44 racteristics, smoking status, limitations in activities of daily living, a wide range of chronic illn
45 cline than did those in the placebo group in activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL difference in slope
47 th the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale, on which sc
49 = 0.21) and less dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted mean difference, 0.
50 ined functional impairment and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) (defined as severe or m
51 ency (PVF), and the quality of life measures activities of daily living (ADL) and EQ-5D-3L index.
52 nctional outcomes were measured with several activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activi
53 and self-reported functional status based on activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (I
54 Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and trajectories of dep
55 oms, and standing from an armless chair) and activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (transferri
56 test, and two quality-of-life measures: the activities of daily living (ADL) part of the Friedreich'
57 fined as a decrease of >/= 0.5 points on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale between the begin
58 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the HD Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and a number of
60 as defined based on ability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and instrumental
65 rlying determinant of the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), in older patients with
66 ental State Exam, Timed Get Up and Go (GUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activitie
67 on's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), scales of activities of daily living (ADL), neuropsychological tes
68 tcomes were investigated: annual death rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance i
75 y walking one-quarter mile) or difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL; e.g., transferring).
76 evaluating social situation, functionality (activities of daily living [ADL] + instrumental activiti
77 self-reported health status, limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (ADLs and instrumental
79 ve impairment and to determine the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs
80 eristics and status with regard to mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs) and Modified Rankin Sc
81 ith arthritis who reported no limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) at baseline, 697 remai
84 bility, categorized as (1) any disability in activities of daily living (ADLs), (2) any disability in
85 questionnaire and lower-extremity function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental ADLs
86 hiatric Inventory (NPI), ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), caregiver distress, c
90 and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency departm
91 ve GA, which includes basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognition (Min
92 redict the 5-year risk of severe, persistent activities-of-daily-living (ADLs) disability, defined as
93 sessments with a disability scale (measuring activities of daily living [ADLs] and instrumental ADLs)
94 long (34 questions, including 20 concerning activities of daily living and 14 relating to the use of
95 ation for mood, drug and/or alcohol use, and activities of daily living and a newly designed 20-minut
96 meant patients require more help with their activities of daily living and additional hours of close
99 erformance trajectories for both measures of activities of daily living and fewer emergency departmen
100 h generalized estimating equations (for Katz activities of daily living and Functional Activities Que
101 be associated with both impaired recovery in activities of daily living and increased mortality.
102 greater functional disability (P < 0.001 for activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
103 , and functional disability as determined by activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
105 Patients' self-care ability was measured by activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
108 ed Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (activities of daily living and motor subsections), timed
110 bidity burden, self-reported difficulty with activities of daily living and prior hospitalizations.
111 stroke improve ability to undertake personal activities of daily living and reduce risk of deteriorat
112 ge-was defined as the ability to perform six activities of daily living and the ability to walk indep
113 ociated with increased odds of disability in activities of daily living and worse motor-sensory funct
114 nctional limitations (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) and cognitive impairment aft
115 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), and (2) informal caregiving
116 t Letter Acuity), general functional status (Activities of Daily Living), and cardiac assessments.
117 vities of daily living, 1.7 for instrumental activities of daily living, and 2.2 for depressive sympt
118 ) reported 1 or more difficulties with the 5 activities of daily living, and 270 of 707 patients (38.
119 he subjects reported knee instability during activities of daily living, and 44% reported that instab
120 x, had limitations in instrumental and basic activities of daily living, and a mean length of stay of
121 CU discharge health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, and anxiety and depression w
123 on use, limitations in basic or instrumental activities of daily living, and cognitive impairment.
124 ss, difficulty with one or more instrumental activities of daily living, and difficulty with one or m
125 rength and function, motor nerve conduction, activities of daily living, and erectile function did no
126 ), they were able to perform the majority of activities of daily living, and had a normal social life
127 impairment, medication variables, decreased activities of daily living, and impaired cognition did n
128 ealth, mental health, and ability to conduct activities of daily living, and increases in chronic pai
129 A report episodes of knee instability during activities of daily living, and instability affects phys
130 in activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities was
131 e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities) and
132 o assess changes in mortality, disability in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive f
133 me Score subscales, covering pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and quality of life (KOOS4);
135 ological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression.
137 impairments in the level of independence for activities of daily living appear to have more predictiv
139 come for patients was self-reported extended activities of daily living at 6 months, measured with th
140 Male gender, being limited in instrumental activities of daily living at baseline, distance to the
141 of the subjects had disability in essential activities of daily living at the beginning of the study
142 arge, we assessed vital status, instrumental activities of daily living, basic activities of daily li
143 were nondisabled at baseline in 4 essential activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking,
144 r who were initially independent in four key activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking,
146 who report moderate to severe limitations in activities of daily living (clinical functional score >/
147 d, but that women's functional capacities in activities of daily living, cognition, and physical perf
149 help with or being unable to perform various activities of daily living, conferred increased risks.
151 State Examination score); and disability in activities of daily living (defined as none, mild, or mo
152 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), despite adjustment for cova
154 hip fracture patients had substantially more activities of daily living disability than that explaine
155 lifestyle, and socioeconomics might compress activities of daily living disability, that is, benefits
156 8.9 (95% CI -13.8 to -4.0; p=0.0004), in the activities of daily living domain was -12.4 (-17.3 to -7
157 reporting reduced ability to perform routine activities of daily living due to vision loss is warrant
158 emodynamic monitor data were obtained during activities of daily living during a 24-hour time period.
159 her this improvement is also relevant to the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.
160 ial neglect on a quantitative measure of the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.
162 by gait speed, difficulty with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, exhaustion, and low physical
163 factors for an impaired ability to carry out activities of daily living, falls, prolonged recovery ti
164 health, fewer chronic diseases and impaired activities of daily living, faster walking speed, and fa
165 n cognitive functions over time and improved activities of daily living for patients with multiple sc
166 d not demonstrate significant differences in activities of daily living function changes for resident
170 onfusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Katz activities of daily living, Functional Activities Questi
171 comes than placebo on measures of cognition, activities of daily living, global outcome, and behavior
172 functional status (Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living >/=4) and nutritional status
173 previously, and that disability according to activities of daily living had significantly reduced ann
174 , as were the following functional outcomes: activities of daily living, health status, and return to
176 dified Rankin Score (mRS>2) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL<8) and cognitive perfor
177 , 18.55) and >/=1 impairment in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 0
178 e the hierarchical structure of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities o
179 ait and balance performance and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-living ol
181 the Nagi Disability Scale, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activit
182 ities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales and analyzed wi
183 score was </= 27/30 in 31%, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 3
184 l care, 14 cognitively oriented instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and 4 physically orie
185 tus was assessed by gait speed, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), modified Rankin Scale
186 ivities of daily living [ADL] + instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), cognition, depressio
187 ned as the inability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) 1 yr following prolon
189 and two or more dependencies in instrumental activities of daily living ("impaired physical function"
190 oke, impairment in cognitive functioning and activities of daily living impairment, and other medicat
191 us (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living), improvement and severity (C
193 id not slow cognitive decline or the loss of activities of daily living in patients with mild AD.
194 d dependence level on basic and instrumental activities of daily living in pre- and post-liver transp
195 lation on a set of hand functions that mimic activities of daily living in the paretic hand of patien
196 nal status (i.e., their ability to carry out activities of daily living) in addition to conventional
197 e is defined as a loss in ability to perform activities of daily living including a loss of independe
198 ills, is a feature of older age that impacts activities of daily living, independence, and integratio
200 ental State Examination), functional status (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of d
202 studies reporting disability outcomes (i.e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of d
203 d the Alzheimer's Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) scales f
204 e (the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory; ADCS-ADL), and mod
205 Preventing the development of disability in activities of daily living is an important goal in older
206 highest energy requirements for instrumental activities of daily living, leaving little or no reserve
207 omes included parkinsonian motor disability, activities of daily living, levodopa-induced motor compl
208 likely to be depressed (odds ratio 1.35 per activities of daily living limitation of sepsis survivor
209 nce interval (CI): 1.09, 1.83), instrumental activities of daily living (linear coefficient = 0.98, 9
210 ate preadmission functional status using the Activities of Daily Living-Long Form (ADL-L) and cogniti
211 Limited mobility, the need for assistance in activities of daily living, makes paraplegia an importan
212 ry (SIB) and the seven-item minimum data set-activities of daily living (MDS-ADL), respectively.
213 ies of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Activities of Daily Living [MDS-ADL] scale of 0 to 28 po
214 vities Questionnaire (measuring instrumental activities of daily living), Medical Outcomes Study 36-i
215 at least 18 years, with a Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 6 or more,
216 0-10) was calculated based on limitation in activities of daily living, mobility limitation, comorbi
217 n's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; Mentation + Activities of Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plu
218 EEL scores with regard to ability to perform activities of daily living (n = 391, r = -0.54, P < .001
219 primary outcome was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) Scale score at 3 mont
221 educed the odds of deteriorating in personal activities of daily living (odds ratio 0.72 [95% CI 0.57
222 duct is associated with more difficulties in activities of daily living (odds ratio = 1.41, 95% confi
223 le analysis, the number of difficulties with activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI
224 assessing the degree of dependence in seven activities of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Acti
225 ncy was defined as dependency in one or more activities of daily living or in three or more instrumen
227 oststroke disability (OR, 1.4), and impaired activities of daily living (OR, 1.8) were independently
228 with 3 physical function domains, including activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38)
229 (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38), instrumental activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38)
230 tia, disability (difficulty with one or more activities of daily living) or death up to 2025, by use
231 fferences were found on the CSDD, cognition, activities of daily living, or on rates of hospitalizati
232 scores for physical components (P = 0.030), activities of daily living (P = 0.001), mini nutritional
233 h greater odds of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (P = 0.04 at 3 mo and P = 0.0
235 with respect to motor disability (P<0.001), activities of daily living (P<0.001), levodopa-induced m
236 reased need for assistance with instrumental activities of daily living [P = .015] and lower physical
237 ncluded pain, joint swelling and tenderness, activities of daily living, patient global assessment, r
238 ssment Instrument for measuring instrumental activities of daily living, Physical Component Summary o
239 inistered self-assessment questionnaires for activities of daily living, quality of life and erectile
240 Patient-relevant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impr
241 th a reading-related measure of instrumental activities of daily living (r = -0.60) (P < .001 for bot
242 m (32.5% returned to </=5 points of baseline Activities of Daily Living [range 0-100], 63.3% returned
244 Patients were assessed on 5 preoperative activities of daily living recommended by the American C
246 or Depression in Dementia (CSDD), cognition, activities of daily living, resource use, and caregiver'
247 Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance
248 Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance
249 ), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living scale (ADCS-ADL), and the cli
250 nd the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL; range, 0 to
252 were scores on the SMMSE and on the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS, on which scores
254 icant improvements in scores on the extended activities of daily living scale and in the odds of livi
255 e the Barthel Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale as well as recovery fro
256 ability (I(KOS) score) was assessed with the Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Sur
257 ssessment Questionnaire, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale), potential prediagnost
259 st, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacit
261 Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales and the Physical Compo
262 pecific Version), and functional disability (activities of daily living scales, Pfeffer Functional Ac
264 (OR, 1.67/integer increase in Instruments of Activities of Daily Living score), and low serum neutral
265 nificant deterioration in the UPDRS part II (activities of daily living) score (mean baseline, 0.00;
266 delirium duration was associated with worse activities of daily living scores (p = 0.002) over the c
267 t was not associated with worse instrumental activities of daily living scores (p = 0.15) or worse Me
268 Rating Scale (PSPRS) and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) scale at up to 52 wee
269 ng age, comorbidity scores, dementia scores, activities of daily living, severity of illness, and adm
270 ith active range of motion and progressed to activities of daily living, sitting, standing, and walki
271 increased ability of patients to do personal activities of daily living (standardised mean difference
272 's Disease Questionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of th
274 the reduction in off time (p=0.105), and the activities of daily living subscore (part II) of the UPD
277 -reported or parent-reported improvements in activities of daily living supported these findings.
278 re 3.1-fold more likely to have a decline in activities of daily living than those without insomnia (
279 and Independence Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capaci
280 or low (n = 166) intensity based on how many activities of daily living they performed for the care r
281 l score of symptoms and ability to undertake activities of daily living), UMSARS II (neurological mot
282 Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plus Activities of Daily Living UPDRS change, measured in unt
283 d postoperative assessments further included activities of daily living (UPDRS-II), motor complicatio
284 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living using the Chinese Barthel Ind
285 omfort and muscle spasms,), physical impact (activities of daily living, walking and body movements)
287 lioration of spatial neglect symptoms in the activities of daily living was also generally accompanie
288 A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment
290 tween geriatric conditions and dependency in activities of daily living was strong and significant, e
292 , a composite measure of pain, function, and activities of daily living, was the primary outcome meas
293 -related or treatment-related limitations in activities of daily living were greater with surgery tha
294 stolic, diastolic, and ePAD pressures during activities of daily living were higher than the ranges o
295 t common reasons cited for desiring PAD were activities of daily living were not enjoyable (89.7%) an
296 rall joint pain, swelling and stiffness, and activities of daily living were obtained from 16,222 ind
297 the visual field, visual search, reading and activities of daily living were performed before and aft
298 ognitive domains, psychosocial function, and activities of daily living were pooled separately for mi
299 s of hemiparetic gait improves endurance for activities of daily living while promoting cognition and
300 EF, and compare the hemodynamic responses to activities of daily living with symptom-limited upright
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。