コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 roke Scale, Rankin Disability Scale, Barthel Activities of Daily Living).
2 rments driving is a particularly problematic activity of daily living.
3 not severe enough to require help with usual activities of daily living.
4 capacity and an enhanced ability to perform activities of daily living.
5 an amputee would greatly facilitate her/his activities of daily living.
6 ry objects, functions that are essential for activities of daily living.
7 oke are dependent on informal caregivers for activities of daily living.
8 ase, quality of life, physical function, and activities of daily living.
9 tion, and reaching, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.
10 tion, and reaching, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.
11 hypertension, arthritis, and limitations on activities of daily living.
12 ad a geriatric syndrome, and 13% had loss of activities of daily living.
13 e and severity of spatial neglect during the activities of daily living.
14 involving IR motor sequencing, switching and activities of daily living.
15 asking, reduced voice volume, and slowing of activities of daily living.
16 gurement or interference with work and other activities of daily living.
17 ' ratings regarding their ability to perform activities of daily living.
18 g a mild impairment without interfering with activities of daily living.
19 n of pain assessments with information about activities of daily living.
20 ments, which are more frequently used in the activities of daily living.
21 function, behavior/mood, and quality of life/activities of daily living.
22 improve the co-primary parameter of overall activities of daily living.
23 rofessional nursing services, and support of activities of daily living.
24 aily living or in three or more instrumental activities of daily living.
25 promote wellness, and boost participation in activities of daily living.
26 or functional motor assessment that reflects activities of daily living.
27 mpared with the benchmark ROM, essential for activities of daily living.
28 muscle plays an important role in performing activities of daily living.
29 ncontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities of daily living.
30 nce-based measures of the ability to perform activities of daily living.
31 conditions, and 16% had difficulty with >/=1 activities of daily living.
32 aily living, and difficulty with one or more activities of daily living.
33 1.25-2.54) with >/=3 versus 0 limitations in activities of daily living, 1.36 (1.0-1.86) with moderat
35 95% CI, 1.16-4.33, P = .02) and (2) loss of activities of daily living (2.71; 95% CI, 1.07-6.84, P =
36 terms or broad goals focusing on achievable activities of daily living; 2) applying time-limited tri
37 .4%; P=0.015), with at least 1 limitation in activities of daily living (59.6% versus 74.7%; P=0.001)
38 3.0 [62.4-63.7] to 64.1 [62.7-65.2], p=0.16; activities of daily living, 62.3 [61.6-63.0] to 64.6 [63
39 3.5 [63.0-64.0] to 64.3 [63.0-65.3], p=0.24; activities of daily living, 62.7 [62.1-63.3] to 65.0 [63
40 to 63.2 [61.5-64.5], p=0.0416; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.0 [62.4-63.7] to 64.1 [62
41 6] to 64.8 [63.6-65.7], p=0.01; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.5 [63.0-64.0] to 64.3 [63
42 racteristics, smoking status, limitations in activities of daily living, a wide range of chronic illn
43 cline than did those in the placebo group in activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL difference in slope
45 th the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale, on which sc
47 = 0.21) and less dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted mean difference, 0.
48 ined functional impairment and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) (defined as severe or m
49 ency (PVF), and the quality of life measures activities of daily living (ADL) and EQ-5D-3L index.
50 and self-reported functional status based on activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (I
51 Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and trajectories of dep
52 oms, and standing from an armless chair) and activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (transferri
53 test, and two quality-of-life measures: the activities of daily living (ADL) part of the Friedreich'
54 fined as a decrease of >/= 0.5 points on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale between the begin
55 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the HD Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and a number of
57 as defined based on ability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and instrumental
62 rlying determinant of the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), in older patients with
63 ental State Exam, Timed Get Up and Go (GUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activitie
64 on's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), scales of activities of daily living (ADL), neuropsychological tes
65 tcomes were investigated: annual death rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance i
72 y walking one-quarter mile) or difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL; e.g., transferring).
73 evaluating social situation, functionality (activities of daily living [ADL] + instrumental activiti
74 self-reported health status, limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (ADLs and instrumental
76 ve impairment and to determine the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs
77 eristics and status with regard to mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs) and Modified Rankin Sc
78 ith arthritis who reported no limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) at baseline, 697 remai
81 bility, categorized as (1) any disability in activities of daily living (ADLs), (2) any disability in
82 questionnaire and lower-extremity function, activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental ADLs
83 hiatric Inventory (NPI), ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), caregiver distress, c
87 and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency departm
88 ve GA, which includes basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognition (Min
89 redict the 5-year risk of severe, persistent activities-of-daily-living (ADLs) disability, defined as
90 sessments with a disability scale (measuring activities of daily living [ADLs] and instrumental ADLs)
91 long (34 questions, including 20 concerning activities of daily living and 14 relating to the use of
92 ation for mood, drug and/or alcohol use, and activities of daily living and a newly designed 20-minut
93 meant patients require more help with their activities of daily living and additional hours of close
96 erformance trajectories for both measures of activities of daily living and fewer emergency departmen
97 h generalized estimating equations (for Katz activities of daily living and Functional Activities Que
99 greater functional disability (P < 0.001 for activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
100 , and functional disability as determined by activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
102 Patients' self-care ability was measured by activities of daily living and instrumental activities o
105 ed Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (activities of daily living and motor subsections), timed
107 bidity burden, self-reported difficulty with activities of daily living and prior hospitalizations.
108 stroke improve ability to undertake personal activities of daily living and reduce risk of deteriorat
109 ge-was defined as the ability to perform six activities of daily living and the ability to walk indep
110 ociated with increased odds of disability in activities of daily living and worse motor-sensory funct
111 nctional limitations (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) and cognitive impairment aft
112 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), and (2) informal caregiving
113 t Letter Acuity), general functional status (Activities of Daily Living), and cardiac assessments.
114 vities of daily living, 1.7 for instrumental activities of daily living, and 2.2 for depressive sympt
115 ) reported 1 or more difficulties with the 5 activities of daily living, and 270 of 707 patients (38.
116 he subjects reported knee instability during activities of daily living, and 44% reported that instab
117 x, had limitations in instrumental and basic activities of daily living, and a mean length of stay of
118 CU discharge health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, and anxiety and depression w
120 on use, limitations in basic or instrumental activities of daily living, and cognitive impairment.
121 ss, difficulty with one or more instrumental activities of daily living, and difficulty with one or m
122 rength and function, motor nerve conduction, activities of daily living, and erectile function did no
123 ), they were able to perform the majority of activities of daily living, and had a normal social life
124 impairment, medication variables, decreased activities of daily living, and impaired cognition did n
125 ealth, mental health, and ability to conduct activities of daily living, and increases in chronic pai
126 A report episodes of knee instability during activities of daily living, and instability affects phys
127 in activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities was
128 e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities) and
129 o assess changes in mortality, disability in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive f
130 me Score subscales, covering pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and quality of life (KOOS4);
132 ological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression.
134 impairments in the level of independence for activities of daily living appear to have more predictiv
136 come for patients was self-reported extended activities of daily living at 6 months, measured with th
137 Male gender, being limited in instrumental activities of daily living at baseline, distance to the
138 of the subjects had disability in essential activities of daily living at the beginning of the study
139 arge, we assessed vital status, instrumental activities of daily living, basic activities of daily li
140 were nondisabled at baseline in 4 essential activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking,
141 r who were initially independent in four key activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking,
143 who report moderate to severe limitations in activities of daily living (clinical functional score >/
144 d, but that women's functional capacities in activities of daily living, cognition, and physical perf
146 help with or being unable to perform various activities of daily living, conferred increased risks.
148 State Examination score); and disability in activities of daily living (defined as none, mild, or mo
149 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), despite adjustment for cova
151 lifestyle, and socioeconomics might compress activities of daily living disability, that is, benefits
152 8.9 (95% CI -13.8 to -4.0; p=0.0004), in the activities of daily living domain was -12.4 (-17.3 to -7
153 reporting reduced ability to perform routine activities of daily living due to vision loss is warrant
154 emodynamic monitor data were obtained during activities of daily living during a 24-hour time period.
155 her this improvement is also relevant to the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.
156 ial neglect on a quantitative measure of the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.
157 urvive, and have a steady improvement in the activity of daily living during the first 6 months after
159 by gait speed, difficulty with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, exhaustion, and low physical
160 factors for an impaired ability to carry out activities of daily living, falls, prolonged recovery ti
161 health, fewer chronic diseases and impaired activities of daily living, faster walking speed, and fa
162 d not demonstrate significant differences in activities of daily living function changes for resident
166 onfusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Katz activities of daily living, Functional Activities Questi
167 comes than placebo on measures of cognition, activities of daily living, global outcome, and behavior
168 functional status (Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living >/=4) and nutritional status
169 previously, and that disability according to activities of daily living had significantly reduced ann
170 , as were the following functional outcomes: activities of daily living, health status, and return to
172 dified Rankin Score (mRS>2) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL<8) and cognitive perfor
173 , 18.55) and >/=1 impairment in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 0
174 e the hierarchical structure of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities o
175 ait and balance performance and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-living ol
177 the Nagi Disability Scale, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activit
178 score was </= 27/30 in 31%, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 3
179 tus was assessed by gait speed, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), modified Rankin Scale
180 ivities of daily living [ADL] + instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), cognition, depressio
181 ned as the inability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) 1 yr following prolon
183 and two or more dependencies in instrumental activities of daily living ("impaired physical function"
184 us (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living), improvement and severity (C
186 id not slow cognitive decline or the loss of activities of daily living in patients with mild AD.
187 d dependence level on basic and instrumental activities of daily living in pre- and post-liver transp
188 lation on a set of hand functions that mimic activities of daily living in the paretic hand of patien
189 nal status (i.e., their ability to carry out activities of daily living) in addition to conventional
190 e is defined as a loss in ability to perform activities of daily living including a loss of independe
191 ills, is a feature of older age that impacts activities of daily living, independence, and integratio
193 sical dependency was measured using the Katz Activity of Daily Living index, and neuropsychiatric sym
194 ental State Examination), functional status (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of d
196 studies reporting disability outcomes (i.e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of d
197 d the Alzheimer's Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) scales f
198 e (the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory; ADCS-ADL), and mod
199 Preventing the development of disability in activities of daily living is an important goal in older
200 omes included parkinsonian motor disability, activities of daily living, levodopa-induced motor compl
201 likely to be depressed (odds ratio 1.35 per activities of daily living limitation of sepsis survivor
202 nce interval (CI): 1.09, 1.83), instrumental activities of daily living (linear coefficient = 0.98, 9
203 ate preadmission functional status using the Activities of Daily Living-Long Form (ADL-L) and cogniti
204 Limited mobility, the need for assistance in activities of daily living, makes paraplegia an importan
205 ry (SIB) and the seven-item minimum data set-activities of daily living (MDS-ADL), respectively.
206 ies of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Activities of Daily Living [MDS-ADL] scale of 0 to 28 po
207 vities Questionnaire (measuring instrumental activities of daily living), Medical Outcomes Study 36-i
208 at least 18 years, with a Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 6 or more,
209 0-10) was calculated based on limitation in activities of daily living, mobility limitation, comorbi
210 n's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; Mentation + Activities of Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plu
211 EEL scores with regard to ability to perform activities of daily living (n = 391, r = -0.54, P < .001
212 primary outcome was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) Scale score at 3 mont
214 educed the odds of deteriorating in personal activities of daily living (odds ratio 0.72 [95% CI 0.57
215 duct is associated with more difficulties in activities of daily living (odds ratio = 1.41, 95% confi
216 le analysis, the number of difficulties with activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI
217 assessing the degree of dependence in seven activities of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Acti
218 ncy was defined as dependency in one or more activities of daily living or in three or more instrumen
220 oststroke disability (OR, 1.4), and impaired activities of daily living (OR, 1.8) were independently
221 with 3 physical function domains, including activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38)
222 (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38), instrumental activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38)
223 tia, disability (difficulty with one or more activities of daily living) or death up to 2025, by use
224 fferences were found on the CSDD, cognition, activities of daily living, or on rates of hospitalizati
226 scores for physical components (P = 0.030), activities of daily living (P = 0.001), mini nutritional
227 h greater odds of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (P = 0.04 at 3 mo and P = 0.0
229 with respect to motor disability (P<0.001), activities of daily living (P<0.001), levodopa-induced m
230 reased need for assistance with instrumental activities of daily living [P = .015] and lower physical
231 ncluded pain, joint swelling and tenderness, activities of daily living, patient global assessment, r
233 ssment Instrument for measuring instrumental activities of daily living, Physical Component Summary o
234 inistered self-assessment questionnaires for activities of daily living, quality of life and erectile
235 Patient-relevant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impr
236 ce interval [CI], -175 to -43), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire = 18 (95% CI, 7-3
237 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire, and quality of l
238 th a reading-related measure of instrumental activities of daily living (r = -0.60) (P < .001 for bot
239 m (32.5% returned to </=5 points of baseline Activities of Daily Living [range 0-100], 63.3% returned
242 Patients were assessed on 5 preoperative activities of daily living recommended by the American C
244 s significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the activity of daily living requirements in controls, provi
245 or Depression in Dementia (CSDD), cognition, activities of daily living, resource use, and caregiver'
246 Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance
247 Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance
248 ), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living scale (ADCS-ADL), and the cli
249 nd the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL; range, 0 to
251 were scores on the SMMSE and on the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS, on which scores
253 icant improvements in scores on the extended activities of daily living scale and in the odds of livi
254 e the Barthel Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale as well as recovery fro
255 ability (I(KOS) score) was assessed with the Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Sur
256 ssessment Questionnaire, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale), potential prediagnost
258 st, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacit
260 Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales and the Physical Compo
261 pecific Version), and functional disability (activities of daily living scales, Pfeffer Functional Ac
263 (OR, 1.67/integer increase in Instruments of Activities of Daily Living score), and low serum neutral
264 nificant deterioration in the UPDRS part II (activities of daily living) score (mean baseline, 0.00;
265 delirium duration was associated with worse activities of daily living scores (p = 0.002) over the c
266 t was not associated with worse instrumental activities of daily living scores (p = 0.15) or worse Me
268 Rating Scale (PSPRS) and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) scale at up to 52 wee
269 ng age, comorbidity scores, dementia scores, activities of daily living, severity of illness, and adm
270 ith active range of motion and progressed to activities of daily living, sitting, standing, and walki
271 increased ability of patients to do personal activities of daily living (standardised mean difference
272 's Disease Questionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of th
274 the reduction in off time (p=0.105), and the activities of daily living subscore (part II) of the UPD
277 -reported or parent-reported improvements in activities of daily living supported these findings.
278 re 3.1-fold more likely to have a decline in activities of daily living than those without insomnia (
279 and Independence Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capaci
280 or low (n = 166) intensity based on how many activities of daily living they performed for the care r
281 l score of symptoms and ability to undertake activities of daily living), UMSARS II (neurological mot
282 Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plus Activities of Daily Living UPDRS change, measured in unt
283 d postoperative assessments further included activities of daily living (UPDRS-II), motor complicatio
284 activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living using the Chinese Barthel Ind
285 omfort and muscle spasms,), physical impact (activities of daily living, walking and body movements)
287 lioration of spatial neglect symptoms in the activities of daily living was also generally accompanie
288 A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment
290 tween geriatric conditions and dependency in activities of daily living was strong and significant, e
292 , a composite measure of pain, function, and activities of daily living, was the primary outcome meas
293 -related or treatment-related limitations in activities of daily living were greater with surgery tha
294 stolic, diastolic, and ePAD pressures during activities of daily living were higher than the ranges o
295 t common reasons cited for desiring PAD were activities of daily living were not enjoyable (89.7%) an
296 rall joint pain, swelling and stiffness, and activities of daily living were obtained from 16,222 ind
297 the visual field, visual search, reading and activities of daily living were performed before and aft
298 ognitive domains, psychosocial function, and activities of daily living were pooled separately for mi
299 s of hemiparetic gait improves endurance for activities of daily living while promoting cognition and
300 EF, and compare the hemodynamic responses to activities of daily living with symptom-limited upright
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。