ライフサイエンスコーパス: acute appendicitis

1 of surgical versus conservative treatment of acute appendicitis.

2 o were operated on had pathologically proven acute appendicitis.

3 pendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute appendicitis.

4 etected in three (75%) of four patients with acute appendicitis.

5 epicted in 17 (89.5%) of 19 patients without acute appendicitis.

6 eal neoplasms had presented with symptoms of acute appendicitis.

7 tine evaluation of women suspected of having acute appendicitis.

8 stolytica is not a common causative agent of acute appendicitis.

9 Fifty-one (22.4%) of 228 patients had acute appendicitis.

10 n CT significantly improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

11 e study comprised 2756 children operated for acute appendicitis.

12 curate technique for diagnosing or excluding acute appendicitis.

13 s of surgical and conservative treatment for acute appendicitis.

14 = 1975) who underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.

15 omography (CT) criteria for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

16 that were interpreted as being equivocal for acute appendicitis.

17 e study comprised 2756 children operated for acute appendicitis.

18 ppendicoliths should prompt the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

19 ger than 18 years old who were evaluated for acute appendicitis.

20 t and 1 patient after 9 months for recurrent acute appendicitis.

21 nd effective procedures for the treatment of acute appendicitis.

22 ery for treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

23 ring system for more accurate diagnostics of acute appendicitis.

24 rty (37%) patients had pathologically proved acute appendicitis.

25 argely adopted in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis.

26 ignated positive, negative, or equivocal for acute appendicitis.

27 laparoscopic surgery performed for suspected acute appendicitis.

28 tudies supporting a semielective approach to acute appendicitis.

29 the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

30 the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

31 ervation had histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis.

32 to the hospital, or number of patients with acute appendicitis.

33 treatment with antibiotic therapy for early, acute appendicitis.

34 675 of 2871 patients (23.5%) had confirmed acute appendicitis.

35 een shown to be accurate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

36 dectomies were performed in 57 patients with acute appendicitis.

37 ars) who were clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis.

38 ch data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis.

39 Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendic

40 c pregnancy (2010, 94.12%; 2011, 93.48%) and acute appendicitis (2010, 86.87%; 2011, 84.31%).

41 or acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon,

42 Establish a protocol of management of acute appendicitis (AA) in ambulatory surgery (AmbSurg)

43 has typically been regarded as the cause of acute appendicitis (AA).

44 dult patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis, abdominopelvic CT frequently identif

45 Among the 48 cases of acute appendicitis, abnormal appendices were identified

46 Adult intussusception is a rare phenomenon, acute appendicitis accompanying multiple transient intus

47 ssment of diagnostic performance of MDCT for acute appendicitis, according to the reference standard

48 004-2011) for all patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and diverticuli

49 Eighty patients (20.0%) had acute appendicitis and 79 (19.8%) had another cause for

50 a total of 184 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis and indicated for surgery were includ

51 6.3%) of these underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis and laparoscopy was used in 74.4% of

52 IV-1-infected individuals who presented with acute appendicitis and later underwent appendectomy at o

53 the diagnostic accuracy of PSP in predicting acute appendicitis and therefore the evidence of appendi

54 erwent appendectomy for clinically suspected acute appendicitis and underwent preoperative evaluation

55 d MR imaging findings that were positive for acute appendicitis, and 336 had negative findings.

56 0.0%; 95% CI, 4.1% to 19.5%) had complicated acute appendicitis, and 5 (7.1%; 95% CI, 2.4% to 15.9%)

57 y, both patients showed clinical evidence of acute appendicitis, and an appendectomy was performed.

58 pecificity of MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis, and corresponding 95% confidence int

59 gery group had histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis, and there were no significant compli

60 Seven patients underwent surgery; four had acute appendicitis, and three had ovarian torsion.

61 Antibiotics for suspected acute appendicitis are safe and effective and may avoid

62 Using acute appendicitis as a model, we tested the hypothesis

63 h to imaging in children suspected of having acute appendicitis at a large urban pediatric teaching h

64 nt care settings for evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis at a single academic medical center f

65 undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolinska University Hospital, St

66 undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolinska University Hospital, St

67 ctomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to

68 1 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted.

69 ts 16 years or older operated on for assumed acute appendicitis between January 1, 2008, and December

70 ergency medicine were examined for suspected acute appendicitis by using thin-section nonenhanced hel

71 in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner

72 Atypically located acute appendicitis can show atypical presentation and re

73 Two of the acute appendicitis cases had normal, the other two had e

74 s, precious clinical and imaging findings of acute appendicitis coexisting with multiple spontaneousl

75 The ACS model appears to improve outcomes of acute appendicitis compared with a TRAD home-call model.

76 ients aged 18 to 60 years with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by a CT scan.

77 A test that rules out acute appendicitis could be cost effective if it allowed

78 se 22, only 1 patient (5%) had recurrence of acute appendicitis during follow-up.

79 The sensitivity of CT and US for diagnosing acute appendicitis exceeded 93% and 77%, respectively, i

80 subanalysis, seasonal variation was found in acute appendicitis (F = 119.62, P < 0.0001), acute chole

81 ective cohort study of 122,990 patients with acute appendicitis from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

82 ge of clinical presentation in children with acute appendicitis, from mild inflammation of the append

83 eoperative computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis has dramatically increased since the

84 astatic spread to the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis has rarely been reported.

85 The treatment of acute appendicitis has seen changes in diagnosis and the

86 in the evaluation of abdominal MR images for acute appendicitis improved after training with direct f

87 Diagnostic accuracy of helical CT for acute appendicitis improved significantly with use of in

88 nosis of normal appendix in 632 (13%) cases, acute appendicitis in 3286 (66%) cases, and perforated a

89 rial suggests that nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children is feasible and safe and

90 reatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute appendicitis in children.

91 monoclonal antibody (LeuTech) for diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients with an equivocal clinica

92 readmission rates following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pediatric patients.

93 Estimates of the incidence of acute appendicitis in pregnancy remain imprecise and inc

94 s an excellent modality for use in excluding acute appendicitis in pregnant women who present with ac

95 diagnostic advancements for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population, the role

96 role in the prompt and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population.

97 Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (> 6 mm

98 ent strategy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, incurring less morbidity and lower c

99 Acute appendicitis is a common clinical problem.

100 Acute appendicitis is an emergent surgically treated dis

101 formed first in children suspected of having acute appendicitis is highly accurate and offers the opp

102 Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal e

103 ise for evaluation of pregnant women in whom acute appendicitis is suspected by enabling diagnosis of

104 Acute appendicitis is the most common nonobstetric surgi

105 Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency

106 Acute appendicitis may be missed at initial clinical exa

107 Since patients with acute appendicitis may not always show the typical signs

108 The natural history of acute appendicitis nonoperatively treated with antibioti

109 tor CT scans in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis, nonvisualization of the appendix was

110 The cohort study included 2510 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 812 (32.4%) had complex find

111 n developing histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis or a clinical diagnosis of recurrent

112 r no insurance who underwent a procedure for acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis at inpatient h

113 m clinical records were reviewed to document acute appendicitis or other causes of abdominal pain.

114 Scans were read as positive or negative for acute appendicitis or other intraabdominal infection.

115 -standardized incidence of appendectomy with acute appendicitis (perforated or not) or with a normal

116 of a carcinoid tumor were identified in one acute appendicitis sample with no histologic evidence of

117 were performed on 31 patients, 2 of whom had acute appendicitis secondary to malignant obstruction an

118 t women are less likely to be diagnosed with acute appendicitis than nonpregnant women, with the lowe

119 areas have higher rates of perforation with acute appendicitis than urban patients.

120 -located appendix cases, including four with acute appendicitis that presented to our emergency depar

121 ed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests

122 In patients with acute appendicitis, the presence of an in-house acute ca

123 In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced path

124 In the traditional model of acute appendicitis, time is the major driver of disease

125 cal diagnosis, and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis; to describe the state-of-the art use

126 We studied 134 patients with acute appendicitis treated at an urban hospital.

127 hildren with histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis under active observation was 12% (95%

128 In pediatric patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy, SDD is not a

129 cutive patients clinically suspected to have acute appendicitis underwent abdominal and pelvic CT.

130 with the time outside pregnancy, the rate of acute appendicitis was 35% lower during the antepartum p

131 Acute appendicitis was favored in 371 of 1571 (23.6%) pa

132 .35-0.64) for all ages; no increased risk of acute appendicitis was observed in the postpartum period

133 ts who presented clinically with symptoms of acute appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively and in

134 Absolute rates of acute appendicitis were calculated during the antepartum

135 rgoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were selected from the 2012 American

136 ange, 4-83 years) with pathologically proved acute appendicitis who underwent abdominopelvic multidet

137 Eligible children had acute appendicitis with an appendix mass and were succes

138 review the CT findings of atypically located acute appendicitis with cases and remind the clinicians