戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 that retained full coverage (P<0.001 for the adjusted analysis).
2 sits variation) of the untreated fellow eye (adjusted analysis).
3  [CI], 5.2-40.8;P= .0109, using a propensity-adjusted analysis).
4 o, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.13; adjusted analysis).
5 lihood of hyperphosphatemia in multivariable-adjusted analysis.
6 pared with higher levels of each variable in adjusted analysis.
7 sians or Hispanics compared with NHWs in the adjusted analysis.
8 9, 95% CI 1.50-6.37, overall P=0.007) in the adjusted analysis.
9  and race-adjusted analysis to 0.89 in fully adjusted analysis.
10 ations between GB and CPQ11-14 scores in the adjusted analysis.
11 found to be associated with infection in the adjusted analysis.
12 (34.4%; P=.04) by the prespecified covariate-adjusted analysis.
13 nd 0.74 (0.46-1.20) for the propensity score-adjusted analysis.
14 ted only with higher risk of ESRD in a fully adjusted analysis.
15 , but the association was not significant in adjusted analysis.
16 cant comorbid conditions through matched and adjusted analysis.
17 and WRF on outcome was not significant in an adjusted analysis.
18  postoperative pressure ulcer development on adjusted analysis.
19 re TBI (HR 5 11.4, 95% CI 5 7.4-17.5) in age-adjusted analysis.
20 were tested using multivariate time-to-event adjusted analysis.
21 d odds of nvAMD in unadjusted and confounder-adjusted analysis.
22 CI, 1.03-1.74; P = 0.02) in propensity score-adjusted analysis.
23 ly associated with cancer mortality in fully adjusted analysis.
24 ) in East Europe compared to South Europe in adjusted analysis.
25                                       In age-adjusted analysis, a longer duration of exercise episode
26                                           In adjusted analysis, actual and physician-perceived patien
27 stimate was attenuated and nonsignificant in adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.77, 95% con
28 ype seemed to be associated with worse OS on adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% CI,
29 gh this was not statistically significant in adjusted analysis (adjusted HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.05 to 2.
30                                       In the adjusted analysis, age (beta=0.2 mL/m(2) per year, P<0.0
31                                        In an adjusted analysis, age, gender, racial ancestry, HIV-1 i
32                                           In adjusted analysis, all noncentral PICC tip locations-mid
33                                           On adjusted analysis, an independent association with a hig
34 dence interval], 8.7 [2.0-37.3]; P=0.004 for adjusted analysis and 3.4 [0.8-13.8]; P=0.07 for the una
35                                       In the adjusted analysis being under insulin treatment (OR = 3.
36 requency repeated measures did not differ in adjusted analysis between groups post baseline (mean dif
37                                           In adjusted analysis, black patients were significantly les
38                             In a demographic-adjusted analysis, blacks had a higher risk for all asse
39 ality plus HF hospitalization (>100 days) on adjusted analysis (both P>0.1).
40                      In pooled multivariable-adjusted analysis, both PDI and hPDI were inversely asso
41                                      In risk-adjusted analysis, both per-patient obstructive (hazard
42                                           In adjusted analysis, buildings using well water had 21% hi
43 I, 1.14-1.28) than were white patients in an adjusted analysis, but there were no significant racial
44  to the current practice of prospective risk-adjusted analysis by a National Surgical Quality Improve
45                                        In an adjusted analysis, catheter-associated UTI rates decreas
46                                           In adjusted analysis, children with nondilated CMP were at
47             A propensity score-weighted risk-adjusted analysis confirmed the early better survival as
48 s for both complications were significant in adjusted analysis (Cox regression).
49                                              Adjusted analysis demonstrated decreased mortality in th
50 >/=15 mm in thickness and in those with LGE; adjusted analysis demonstrated that segmental presence o
51                                     After an adjusted analysis designed to balance background prevale
52                              In multivariate-adjusted analysis, diabetes remained unassociated with a
53                                           In adjusted analysis, epitope spreading at baseline was ass
54                                       In the adjusted analysis, factors associated with new smoking i
55                             In multivariable-adjusted analysis, factors associated with prevalent ret
56                                           In adjusted analysis, factors independently associated with
57 ociated with higher in-hospital mortality in adjusted analysis (GFR, 60-89; odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95%
58 tality was observed for the entire cohort on adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04
59  associated with cardiovascular events in an adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence in
60 ot associated with risk for heart failure in adjusted analysis (hazard ratios, 1.0 [reference], 0.77
61                                           In adjusted analysis, HCV specialist assessment was associa
62                                           In adjusted analysis, HCV treatment was associated with non
63              In this international, case-mix-adjusted analysis, higher annual hospital ECMO volume wa
64                                           In adjusted analysis, higher serum creatinine level, black
65                                        In an adjusted analysis, HIV infection significantly increased
66 nterval [CI] 0.62 to 0.87; p < 0.001) and in adjusted analysis (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.0
67 nce interval [CI]: 1.2-1.5) and multivariate-adjusted analysis (HR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.5).
68 1 to 0.95; p < 0.001) and multivariable risk-adjusted analysis (HR per unit change for mortality risk
69 or trend < 0.01) but not in the multivariate-adjusted analysis (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.21; P for t
70 y associated with type 2 diabetes in the age-adjusted analysis (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.72, 2.11; P for t
71                                          Our adjusted analysis identified lymph node ratio, administr
72 rmore, the pattern of variation changed: the adjusted analysis identified three new outliers, and two
73 or of outcome for the composite end point in adjusted analysis III (hazard ratio=0.808; 95% CI, 0.689
74                                           In adjusted analysis, impaired CFR remained independently a
75 her systolic blood pressure was confirmed in adjusted analysis in the Chicago Genetics of Hypertensio
76 ve implantation devices were observed at the adjusted analysis in Valve Academic Research Consortium
77                                    In an age-adjusted analysis, individuals with multiclonal P. falci
78                            In a multivariate-adjusted analysis, levels of fluorescent oxidation produ
79                                           In adjusted analysis, low-dose aspirin use was associated w
80                                           In adjusted analysis, LVH was associated with increased ris
81                                 In the fully adjusted analysis, male nurses out-earned female nurses
82                                           In adjusted analysis, median viral load set point and time
83                                        After adjusted analysis, mortality decreased throughout the st
84                                       In the adjusted analysis, mortality increased linearly with eac
85                                  However, in adjusted analysis, myocarditis was not associated with w
86                                In single-SNP adjusted analysis, nine SNPs in the XPC, CYP2C9, PAX4, M
87 vorable neurocognitive outcome in propensity-adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence inte
88                    We performed a propensity-adjusted analysis of a two-center retrospective cohort o
89                                           In adjusted analysis of postoperative outcomes controlling
90 (95% CI, 0.26-0.84; P = .01) for a covariate-adjusted analysis of propensity-matched data to 0.61 (95
91                                    In a risk-adjusted analysis of septic patients, calcium administra
92                                           In adjusted analysis of the workplace programme, lower swit
93                                           In adjusted analysis, older age (>/=70 versus <50 years; ha
94                                           On adjusted analysis, older age, nonelective surgery, histo
95                                           In adjusted analysis, only a non-statistically significant
96 nificantly associated with stroke in the age-adjusted analysis (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03-1.85).
97 gnificantly associated with ASD in partially adjusted analysis (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36), but thi
98                                       An age-adjusted analysis over the past 25 years shows that in w
99 V40) was significantly associated with OS on adjusted analysis ( P < .05).
100 , this effect could not be confirmed in risk-adjusted analysis (p = 0.641).
101 rtality based failure to rescue in the fully adjusted analysis (P<0.05); however, the extended stay b
102                                      In risk-adjusted analysis, per-patient obstructive CAD (hazard r
103                                           In adjusted analysis, pharmacotherapy type was not associat
104                              In age- and sex-adjusted analysis, PMR was associated with a significant
105 d properly, then the resulting ascertainment-adjusted analysis produces parameter estimates that gene
106                                           In adjusted analysis, reinfection/superinfection occurred m
107 and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.22) in the fully adjusted analysis restricted to women with depression.
108  be correctly modeled, then an ascertainment-adjusted analysis returns population-based parameter est
109                                              Adjusted analysis revealed that factors influencing surv
110                                    This risk-adjusted analysis revealed that only rest and exercise e
111                                       In age-adjusted analysis, risk increased for subjects who self-
112  and nonischemic cardiomyopathy groups after adjusted analysis (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15; p = 0.9
113 not present in those taking pravastatin (age-adjusted analysis: RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.47-2.04; P =.046
114                 Three SNPs in the MGMT gene (adjusted analysis, rs3858300; unadjusted analysis, rs107
115                              However, in the adjusted analysis, severity of AD was the main factor as
116               The results of the stratified, adjusted analysis showed a 36% reduction in IMR (0.64, 0
117                                              Adjusted analysis showed no significant association betw
118                                              Adjusted analysis showed that dental caries increment ra
119                                              Adjusted analysis showed that the increased risk attribu
120                                           In adjusted analysis, significantly better survival was obs
121                                              Adjusted analysis stratified by number of involved nodes
122                                           On adjusted analysis, taking 2 or more diabetes medications
123  2.29), and in the maximally (multivariate-) adjusted analysis the relative risk was 1.59 (95% CI: 1.
124                                           In adjusted analysis, the factor with the strongest effect
125                                       In the adjusted analysis, the mortality rate was 16 percent low
126                    In a sex-, race-, and age-adjusted analysis, the odds ratio for having low serum v
127                                           In adjusted analysis, the reduction in DTN time within 1 qu
128                                           In adjusted analysis, the risk of posttransplant graft loss
129                                        In an adjusted analysis, the VLCD group lost 2.8 kg (95% CI: 2
130                                       In age-adjusted analysis, there was a decrease in risk for wome
131                                       In the adjusted analysis, there was a dose-dependent associatio
132                                       In the adjusted analysis, there was an association between each
133          Compared with 1-<2 years of use, in adjusted analysis, there was no association between CCB
134                                           In adjusted analysis, there was no difference in ICU readmi
135                                           In adjusted analysis, there was no difference in mortality
136                                       In the adjusted analysis, those walking (adjusted risk ratio [A
137 education changed from 0.79 in age- and race-adjusted analysis to 0.89 in fully adjusted analysis.
138               However, in a propensity score-adjusted analysis to account for baseline differences be
139                                           In adjusted analysis, two SNPs (rs2756109 [ABCC2] and rs952
140 associated with incident T2D in multivariate-adjusted analysis until body mass index was adjusted: od
141                                           In adjusted analysis, vaccination was associated with a red
142                                           In adjusted analysis, ventricular fibrillation patients dur
143                                       An age-adjusted analysis was performed for each variable to cal
144                                       A risk-adjusted analysis was performed to assess the effect of
145                                           An adjusted analysis was performed, using a multivariate re
146                    Because ATH were younger, adjusted analysis was undertaken in younger HCM patients
147                                        In an adjusted analysis, we analyzed risk of heart failure (HF
148 5-0.82, P < 0.001) had lesser Star scores on adjusted analysis, whereas patients with a cancer diagno
149                           A propensity score-adjusted analysis, which included patient demographics,
150                                         Risk-adjusted analysis without transfused PRBC in the model s
151                                           In adjusted analysis, women appeared to fill more warfarin
152                                          The adjusted analysis yielded the following OR (95%CI) for:

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top