コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 -101 reported at least one treatment-related adverse event.
2 370 patients had a serious treatment-related adverse event.
3 , and no participants withdrew because of an adverse event.
4 nt with oral morphine, with similar rates of adverse events.
5 perglycemia among the most common high grade adverse events.
6 d in any study, but there were no reports of adverse events.
7 n hemodynamic outcomes, and low incidence of adverse events.
8 rained by reliance on voluntary reporting of adverse events.
9 and 2 discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events.
10 There was no difference in adverse events.
11 dy drugs were well tolerated with no serious adverse events.
12 (n=6; 20%); four patients (13%) had serious adverse events.
13 formulations caused comparable, mainly local adverse events.
14 dentification of persons at risk for serious adverse events.
15 the intervention was high and there were no adverse events.
16 imumab plus methotrexate discontinued due to adverse events.
17 Special care was taken to include all adverse events.
18 t MRI was not associated with an increase in adverse events.
19 ed safety, assessed as the rate and grade of adverse events.
20 Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
21 ction is associated with a high rate of late adverse events.
22 idence of neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events.
23 ll laborious and carries substantial risk of adverse events.
24 4) being the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.
25 analyses by intention-to-treat and assessed adverse events.
26 Secondary outcomes were adverse events.
27 ed discontinuation of therapy due to serious adverse events.
28 creased risk of complicated appendicitis and adverse events.
29 The main safety measure was adverse events.
30 rding to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
31 mal peak flow, antibiotic use, or nonserious adverse events.
32 ce of death, sudden death, and other cardiac adverse events.
33 us adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events.
34 fety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events.
35 crease in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events.
36 up discontinued the trial regimen because of adverse events.
37 ade 1-2); none discontinued treatment due to adverse events.
38 dies reported low rates of death and serious adverse events (0% to 1.25%) in nontransported patients
42 ab emtansine plus pertuzumab had a grade 3-4 adverse event (29 [13%] of 223 vs 141 [64%] of 219) or a
44 patients in the control group) and grade 3-4 adverse events (52 [7%] patients vs 31 [8%] patients) we
45 n the atazanavir group reported drug-related adverse events (83 [33%] vs 121 [49%]) or adverse events
46 n the olaparib group had a treatment-related adverse event (acute myeloid leukaemia) with an outcome
57 the placebo group; the most frequent serious adverse events (affecting >/=2% of patients) were elevat
59 The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse events among vaccine and placebo recipients thro
61 in dementia patients, the increased risk of adverse events and cognitive decline, there is an unmet
64 al, body region scanned, type, dose, related adverse events and route of administration of sedatives
65 ATION: Despite an increase in haematological adverse events and second primary malignancies, lenalido
66 bamazepine-CR had serious treatment-emergent adverse events, and 47 (11%) and 69 (16%), respectively,
68 , including time to death, the occurrence of adverse events, and intensive care unit resource use.
71 r 92% of the 48 hours cooling period without adverse events, and was lower than the controls (34.35 d
73 Secondary objectives included assessment of adverse events, antidrug antibodies, and factors contrib
76 150 mug had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, as did all three (100%) placebo recipient
77 of blood-product use, infection, and serious adverse events, as well as 28-day mortality, did not dif
78 trointestinal disorders were the most common adverse event associated with drug discontinuation or do
79 370 patients died from non-treatment-related adverse events associated with death, and one patient di
85 53 patients had a serious treatment-related adverse event: autoimmune disorder (two [13%]), lower ab
86 arge differences in risk of systemic serious adverse events between these two anti-VEGF drugs; i.e.,
91 secondary objectives included evaluation of adverse events, changes in sexual quality of life using
93 s included safety (rate of treatment-related adverse events), CLSS grade, and Global Aesthetic Improv
94 (42%) patients in the benralizumab group had adverse events compared with 49 (47%) in the placebo gro
96 tudy drug, which were grade 2 neurocognitive adverse events comprising slowed speech and mentation an
97 Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) via tablet computers at 5 success
98 pneumonia, five [5%]); four deaths were from adverse events deemed treatment-related (pneumonia, two
103 er, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the
110 the transition from desired drug effects to adverse events following administration of either therap
117 art failure, or CVD death), and (ii) serious adverse events (hypotension, syncope, electrolyte abnorm
118 outcome mainly relies on the declaration of adverse events, identification of their predictors, self
123 febrile neutropenia (27 [17%] of 155 serious adverse events in patients who received doxorubicin and
124 ived doxorubicin and 15 [12%] of 130 serious adverse events in patients who received gemcitabine and
127 than 10 mm Hg greater than baseline; ocular adverse events in the bevacizumab group included 1 parti
129 most common in both groups (six [27%] of 22 adverse events in the ketamine group vs seven [54%] of 1
130 domisation; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the remaining 16 patients evaluable fo
131 ry endpoint was the number and percentage of adverse events in the treatment period in an intention-t
132 the placebo group, or in the risk of serious adverse events (in 8.3% in the vaccine group and in 9.1%
135 A variety of dermatologic immune-related adverse events including maculopapular eruption, licheno
136 ed antitoxin (n = 193), 23 (12%) reported an adverse event, including rash, fever, serum sickness, an
142 even patients (61%) experienced drug-related adverse events (mostly grade 1-2); none discontinued tre
145 and one patient died from treatment-related adverse events (myositis in addition to grade 3 thyroidi
147 There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, no treatment-related unsolicited grade 3
148 %) patients had 11 grade 3 treatment-related adverse events; no single event occurred in more than on
149 management group reported treatment-emergent adverse events; no treatment-related deaths occurred.
166 een treatment groups, although some specific adverse events occurred more often in the intensive grou
171 ociated with a higher risk of the well-known adverse events of fever, rash, and convulsions within th
179 significant differences in local or systemic adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between the P
181 occurred because of adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths in patients who received lanad
183 tional cohort study, we compared time to any adverse event (primary outcome); serious or nonserious e
184 the placebo groups were reportedly suspected adverse events, probably related to the vaccine; however
187 ondary end points included anatomic patency, adverse event rate, and return to operating room within
189 th an increase in overall treatment-emergent adverse event rates or neurocognitive events, although c
192 s, representing 111 (39%) of all 285 serious adverse events recorded, were febrile neutropenia (27 [1
196 The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events reported, irrespective of attribution, we
202 icant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.09) or renal
203 nd 3-, 6-, and 12-months for safety (serious adverse events [SAE]), and efficacy endpoints: ejection
204 ontraindications were predefined and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported to ethics committees
205 arcoma group) had treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs), five of whom had immune-related S
206 powered to identify risk factors for serious adverse events (SAEs), thereby limiting their influence
208 No discontinuations occurred because of adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths in pat
211 nts with T2MI had higher rates of subsequent adverse events than those without T2MI (per 100 person-y
212 (20%) of 265 assigned placebo had a serious adverse event that was judged by the investigator to be
213 ed adverse events (83 [33%] vs 121 [49%]) or adverse events that led to discontinuation (ten [4%] vs
215 nd headache were the only treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of participa
218 d placebo reported at least one on-treatment adverse event, the most common of which were headache (i
219 Fifteen patients experienced grade 3 to 4 adverse events; the most common were fluid retention and
224 ed in phase 3 trials), the most common local adverse events versus placebo within the first 14 days w
228 , whereas the most common non-haematological adverse event was hypokalaemia (25 [17%] of 147 vs 22 [1
232 al ACC volume, and the magnitude of lifetime adverse events was inversely associated with left hippoc
240 kers and plasma cardiac injury biomarkers in adverse events, we conducted a multicenter prospective c
247 he most frequently reported grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (103 [21%] of 488 patients
260 and placebo (n=260) groups, the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (38 [14%] vs 36 [12%
261 in the 30 enrolled patients the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (n=7; 23%) and fall
286 2) The most common grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (47%), neutropenia
287 The most frequently observed grade 3 and 4 adverse events were transaminase increases (40% alanine
288 ons with obstruction as a severe and serious adverse event, which was considered as unrelated to stud
290 cant between-group difference in the risk of adverse events, which were reported in 68.7% of the infa
292 patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events with atezolizumab (90 [15%] of 609 patien
297 e incidence of study product-related serious adverse events within 180 days, grade 3 solicited or uns
298 ic illnesses within 180 days and unsolicited adverse events within 28 days, all analysed by intention
299 n 180 days, grade 3 solicited or unsolicited adverse events within 28 days, and solicited injection s
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。