ライフサイエンスコーパス: advisory committee

1 only 26.5% had a clinician on their graduate advisory committee.

2 nd Prevention and the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee.

3 ording to the guidelines of the Malawian STD Advisory Committee.

4 lic hearing, and seek the advice of its Food Advisory Committee.

5 s led to the formation of state and national advisory committees.

6 ported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (1970-2004) for any signals supportin

7 s.The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, a federal advisory committee that pr

8 pite calls from their own Risk Communication Advisory Committee and Congress (in the Affordable Care

9 ion and Research's Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee and the FDA's Pediatric Advisory Comm

10 Using a broad-based advisory committee and working closely with key stakehol

11 ity, the FDA can empanel legally constituted advisory committees and external consultants when the ne

12 ubject Protection Committee, Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, and FDA-approved clinical trial usin

13 oose the membership of a radiopharmaceutical advisory committee, and the FDA should contract with the

14 hat led to its decision and that of the Food Advisory Committee, and the reasons that this is an envi

15 A clinical advisory committee (CAC) of international hematologists

16 mmended by the U.S. EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).

17 pite agreement on these principles by expert advisory committees, data from national surveys of ambul

18 by the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee (DGAC) include 3 cups of low-fat milk

19 ommittee, the OPTN/UNOS Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) and the current A2ALL ancillar

20 The Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) reviewed the records of potent

21 ment Transplant Network Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC), a multidisciplinary committee

22 es must be recommended by major immunization advisory committees, financed in both the public and pri

23 d to the recommendation of the Oncology Drug Advisory Committee for an accelerated approval of brentu

24 This recommendation was made by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices based on i

25 quently presented to members of the Clinical Advisory Committee for the revision of the WHO Classific

26 We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama an

27 nd, in collaboration with the SRTR Technical Advisory Committee, has developed and implemented a new

28 d by the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee in 1980, which assumed a fee-for-serv

29 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committees influence decisions relating to the

30 US Food and Drug Administration's Pediatric Advisory Committee meeting are also reviewed.

31 Food and Drug Administration has convened 2 Advisory Committee meetings and the product labels for O

32 Disclosures of conflicts of interest at drug advisory committee meetings are common, often of conside

33 financial conflict of interest disclosure at advisory committee meetings.

34 In 73% of the meetings, at least 1 advisory committee member or voting consultant disclosed

35 For advisory committee members (n = 1957) and voting consult

36 voting behaviors was detected, but excluding advisory committee members and voting consultants with c

37 all 3 conflict categories, the exclusion of advisory committee members and voting consultants with c

38 consultant disclosed a conflict; only 1% of advisory committee members were recused.

39 etary value, and rarely result in recusal of advisory committee members.

40 Services requested that the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) make recommendations on streng

41 y were obtained first by means of a national advisory committee of academic, scientific, and clinical

42 utine immunizations has prompted the Medical Advisory Committee of the Immune Deficiency Foundation t

43 s, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in M

44 sed by bacteria in solid media culture in an Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogen Containment Lev

45 The British Government's official advisory committee on genetics has recommended a morator

46 nced in the final report of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' illnesses and c

47 eening panel was approved by the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders of Newborns an

48 The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE

49 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) cons

50 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) reco

51 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) reco

52 In June 2005, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) reco

53 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) rega

54 Utilizing Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) rout

55 % had a vaccine indication as defined by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

56 f the universal recommendations in children, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and America

57 esults support recent recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and public

58 commended for use in all infants by both the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the Ame

59 These results support recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the Ame

60 In 1998, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the Ame

61 mmunocompetent persons on 17 March 1995, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices finalized d

62 The recent recommendation by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for a routi

63 Tdap is now recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for all pre

64 Since 1997, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recomme

65 As a consequence, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recomme

66 providers and health systems are to achieve Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices immunizatio

67 s for Disease Control and Prevention and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices issued inte

68 ed vaccine was unchanged from 2015-2016, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices made an int

69 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices no longer e

70 Our findings support the decision of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices not to reco

71 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices now recomme

72 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Cent

73 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Cent

74 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently re

75 ococcal conjugate vaccine in accordance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendat

76 e Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendat

77 These estimates support the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendat

78 In 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended

79 In 1991, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended

80 US rotavirus vaccination outside the current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended

81 In 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended

82 Also in 2014-2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended

83 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends

84 nc, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends

85 from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices regarding c

86 s for use in females aged 9 to 26 years; the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices then recomm

87 of the quadrivalent vaccine published by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, presents d

88 or girls and young women ages 9-26 years and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-recommended

89 s to 99% and was recently recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

90 sted in the Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for America

91 ented on a recent report of the Presidential Advisory Committee on the Future of the U.S. Space Progr

92 tory and structure of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, on various plant food-oriented recom

93 address these concerns, the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) held a symposium, the objective

94 Recent National Vaccine Advisory Committee recommendations need to be considered

95 te 2006, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory committee recommended that the 2004 black box w

96 The 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report contained dietary patterns dev

97 racteristics (regular vs accelerated review, advisory committee review, postmarketing commitments).

98 nd Drug Administration (FDA) Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee reviewed these studies and additional

99 The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee's role should be carried forward to c

100 Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concern

101 Members of the radiopharmaceutical advisory committee should decide on the data to be prese

102 wing the lead of the 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, should emphasize food-based recommen

103 porting Independent Immunization and Vaccine Advisory Committees (SIVAC) Initiative project, provides

104 s Advisory Committee and the FDA's Pediatric Advisory Committee suggested that the number of children

105 trol Practices Advisory Committee, a federal advisory committee that provides advice and guidance to

106 In its role as a federal advisory committee, the ACIP develops written recommenda

107 esearch under federal oversight, a permanent advisory committee to address recurrent ethical issues i

108 mmittee of the Biological Response Modifiers Advisory Committee to discuss particular issues in xenot

109 Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee to identify all patients with an acti

110 ation of this era was the 1964 report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General, a landmark do

111 and effective use in the 1964 Report of the Advisory Committee to the US Surgeon General on Smoking

112 8, a Food and Drug Administration scientific advisory committee voted that, yes, there was a signific

113 in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals wi

114 A total of 221 meetings held by 16 advisory committees were included in the study.

115 t also a well informed national immunisation advisory committee with access to appropriate data for l

116 n, and the report of the UK Standing Medical Advisory Committee with the Framingham risk equation pro