ライフサイエンスコーパス: aerodynamic

1 nteraction of these systems with free-flight aerodynamics.

2 otential flow, which has widely been used in aerodynamics.

3 These aerodynamic accomplishments were previously not thought

4 V-formation pelicans, pigeons do not gain an aerodynamic advantage from flying in a flock.

5 y reveals how flies achieve their remarkable aerodynamic agility with only a small number of wing mus

6 ifunctional organs, capable of sophisticated aerodynamic and inertial dynamics not previously observe

7 el of rat nasal cavity to simulate the nasal aerodynamics and sorption patterns for a large number of

8 cence are promising as 'turn on' sensors for aerodynamics applications, and that nanoparticles fabric

9 spatially integrated LAD when differences in aerodynamic attributes (e.g., foliage drag) were account

10 eling, we have experimented with an array of aerodynamic baffles on the surface behind a set of turbo

11 ians utilized arm, leg and tail function for aerodynamic benefit.

12 Further, flying in a flock can result in aerodynamic benefits, thus reducing power requirements,

13 These results suggest that the aerodynamic breakup of the droplets plays a significant

14 datory dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaurs with aerodynamic capacity.

15 This system is designed to provide optimal aerodynamic carrier size for deep lung delivery, improve

16 However, their aerodynamic characteristics in actual use have yet to be

17 instructor in DPI use should be aware of the aerodynamic characteristics of each individual trainer.

18 The effect of aerodynamic conductance on G1 was sufficiently captured

19 : (i) non-transpirational water fluxes; (ii) aerodynamic conductance; (iii) meteorological deviations

20 What are the aerodynamic consequences of flying in the more usual 'cl

21 We examined the aerodynamic consequences of this change in wing motion b

22 g birds maintain environmental awareness and aerodynamic control by sleeping with only one eye closed

23 This novel aerodynamic device, herein termed remote analyte samplin

24 The use of aerodynamic devices in ambient ionization source develop

25 igh levels [74 mug/m(3) for PM(2.5) (PM with aerodynamic diamater <2.5 microm)].

26 nent of the coarse organic matter (OMCOARSE, aerodynamic diameter > 2.5 mum).

27 e-based estimates of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 microm (PM(2).(5)) and nitrog

28 term exposures to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 mum (PM2.5) in urban and nonu

29 ine particulate pollution (particles with an aerodynamic diameter < or = 2.5 microm; PM2.5) elevated

30 m effects of fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter < or =2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) on risk

31 llutants: NO2, fine particulate matter (with aerodynamic diameter < or =2.5 microm), and elemental ca

32 ts of exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter </= 10 mum (PM10) and to nitrogen d

33 r ozone and/or PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </= 10 mum) to estimate and compare

34 eported associations between fine particles (aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 microm; PM2.5) and mortalit

35 O2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum (PM2.5) and 10 mum (PM1

36 carbon, total and nontraffic particles with aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum (PM2.5), carbon monoxid

37 pollution exposure [particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum (PM2.5), nitrogen oxide

38 ust (200 mug/m(3) particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum [PM2.5]) and filtered a

39 vidence that fine particulate matter (PM2.5; aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum) can exacerbate asthmat

40 bient PM2.5, (i.e., fine particulate matter, aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum) has been associated wi

41 Ambient PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </= 2.5 mum) is an emerging determi

42 0 mug/m3 increase of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </=10 mum.

43 Using mortality and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) component d

44 We measured particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 microm (PM2.5), black carbon

45 concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 microm (PM2.5), black carbon

46 itrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 microm) and umbilical cord b

47 , fine particulate matter (particles with an aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 microm; PM(2.5)), speciated

48 aternal residential PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 mum) exposure during pregnan

49 -of-hospital cardiac arrests and fine PM (of aerodynamic diameter </=2.5 mum, or PM(2.5)), ozone, nit

50 alth effects of PM1 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <1 mum), which are a major part of

51 <2.5 mum, 7% for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <10 mum, and 22% for sulfur dioxide

52 en dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 (PM2.5) had adverse effects on

53 ual oil fly ash fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mum (ROFA PM(2.5)) to morbidit

54 major part of PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mum) and even potentially more

55 n oxides, 10% for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mum, 7% for particulate matter

56 ly life exposure to fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mum; PM2.5) and its joint effe

57 Modeled estimates of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5microm (PM2.5) (1999-2004), nit

58 ution [black carbon, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5mum (PM2.5), nitrogen oxides],

59 eath and annual mean particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5mum, 2.5-10mum, and <10mum (PM2

60 ropogenic radionuclides, the activity median aerodynamic diameter (AMAD) ranged between 0.25 and 0.71

61 and a micro-orifice impactor with the cutoff aerodynamic diameter (d(pa50)) of 4 mum and 100 nm, resp

62 ent levels of particulate matter <2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM(2.5)) and the risk of preterm b

63 the effect of particulate matter <2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM(2.5)) on heart rate variability

64 m exposure to particulate matter <2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM(2.5)), are linked with cardiova

65 ave linked fine particles [</= 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM(2.5))] and health.

66 te matter less than or equal to 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) were positively associated w

67 xide, particulate matter less than 10 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM10), sulfur dioxide, and warm-se

68 ter than 2.5 microm and 10 microm or less in aerodynamic diameter (PM10-2.5) is limited.

69 ient particulate matter less than 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) across the contiguous Unite

70 g particulate matter less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and blood pressure measures

71 ween daily particles less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and deaths, but they have b

72 bient fine particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and incidence and mortality

73 e matter less than or equal to 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and particulate matter less

74 re to fine particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and term low birth weight (

75 daytime, nighttime, and 24 h PM of <2.5 mum aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and total suspended particu

76 ls of fine particulate matter <2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) are associated with increas

77 rce-specific particulate matter < 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) based on a chemical mass ba

78 Particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) has been consistently assoc

79 Particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) has been variably associate

80 particulate matter of 2.5 microm or less in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) have been studied extensive

81 articulate matter of less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) with cardiovascular events.

82 ter (particulate matter < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5)), nitrogen dioxide, carbon

83 Particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), acrolein, and formaldehyde

84 ncluding ambient particulate matter <2.5 mum aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), black carbon, sulfate, par

85 easured particulate matter less than 2.5 mum aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), formaldehyde, nitrogen dio

86 an ambient particulate matter </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitr

87 which estimates fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter 2.5 microm or less (PM(2.5)) concen

88 ter (particles that are < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter [PM(2.5)]) were obtained for the ye

89 cles (particulate matter < or =2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter [PM2.5]) is limited.

90 m in aerodynamic diameter and <2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter after controlling for age, sex, rac

91 xposures to particulate matter <10 microm in aerodynamic diameter and <2.5 microm in aerodynamic diam

92 ticulate matter less than 2.5 mum (PM2.5) in aerodynamic diameter and adverse health outcomes.

93 ween particulate matter < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter and heart rate variability in 518 o

94 d particulate matter less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter and inverse associations with expos

95 .26, 3.29), particulate matter <10 microm in aerodynamic diameter and isolated atrial septal defects

96 n to particle mass in the range 0.9-11.5 mum aerodynamic diameter and mean contributions (+/- s.e.) a

97 HBCD was partitioned into particles with an aerodynamic diameter at the nanometer scale.

98 e matter <or=10 microm and <or=2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter continue to be associated with incr

99 tely 1.8 mobility diameter Dm </= 1 mum, and aerodynamic diameter Da </= 300 nm.

100 e in particulate matter < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter during the 48 hours before heart ra

101 erage particulate matter less than 10 mum in aerodynamic diameter exposure during the first year of l

102 hly porous internal structure and an optimal aerodynamic diameter for effective deep lung delivery.

103 to avoid ambiguities during measurements of aerodynamic diameter in instruments that utilize low-pre

104 and particulate matter < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter in relation to heart rate variabili

105 in 2002 for particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter less than 10 (PM(10)) and less than

106 level of ozone or particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microm and lung functi

107 concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 mum (PM(10)) from road

108 emical components of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 mum (PM10) and daily e

109 in 3-day average exposure to particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum (3.6-mug/m(3) IQR

110 ed mean concentrations of particle mass with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum (PM2.5) and ozone

111 rticulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum [PM2.5]) on daily

112 the relationship of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum and nitrogen diox

113 justed estimates for particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum indicated that fo

114 trogen dioxide or particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum, the negative ass

115 rogen dioxide and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum.

116 ted the impact of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 mum (PM10)

117 r values of particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 mum in dia

118 /m(3) increase in particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microm (o

119 posure to outdoor particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microm (P

120 ution, defined as particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microm (P

121 ues of fine particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mum (PM(2

122 concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mum (PM2.

123 rticulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mum (PM2.

124 rticulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mum (PM2.

125 fect of ozone and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of < or =10 microm (PM10) on respir

126 rticle mass [particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter of </= 2.5 mum (PM2.5)] and in the

127 ulate (particulate matter with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of </=2.5 mum (PM(2.5))) exposure.

128 iations between particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter of </=2.5 mum (PM2.5) and adult mor

129 dioxide, particulate matter with an average aerodynamic diameter of <10 microm (PM(10)), and sulfur

130 pollutant models, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of <10 microm (PM(10)), carbon mono

131 oxides [NOx] and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of <10 mum [PM10]) for residential,

132 Exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) increases

133 tween exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 microm (PM2.5) and onset of

134 ed urban PM(2.5) (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 mum).

135 associations between particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microm or less (PM2.5) and p

136 related, exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microm or less (PM2.5).

137 e, and among them particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less (PM2.5)

138 concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mum or less (PM(2).(5)) and

139 Average particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mum or less (PM(2.5)) and 10

140 hanges in ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mum or less (PM2.5) amount t

141 al concentrations of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mum or less (PM2.5) and cogn

142 ease and exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mum or less (PM2.5) in a coh

143 ed to an aerosol of AlPCS with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 390 nm and geometric standard de

144 n dioxide, ozone, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microm (PM10) and l

145 risk associated with particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microns was higher

146 than 2.5 microns and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microns, ozone (O3)

147 of exhaust particles, and particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 mum (PM(10)), mainl

148 ze, and levels of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 mum (PM10), as well

149 osure to prenatal particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) an

150 maternal asthma and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 microns and partic

151 1 and FVC) and of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mum (P= 0.008 for

152 concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mum (PM2.5), less

153 outdoor levels of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mum (PM2.5), the m

154 iculate matter (particles with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mum [PM2.5]) and o

155 ogical agents are functions of the effective aerodynamic diameter of the particles, environmental ass

156 rticulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 mum [PM2.5]) and NO2 c

157 ects of particulate matter <or=2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter on all-cause mortality for 1999-200

158 fects of particulate matter <or=10 microm in aerodynamic diameter on all-cause, cardiovascular, and r

159 fects of particulate matter <or=10 microm in aerodynamic diameter on mortality declined during 1987-2

160 t of particulate matter < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter on the high-frequency component bet

161 increase in particulate matter <10 microm in aerodynamic diameter or a 12.5-microg/m(3) increase in p

162 ed particulate matter (PM), including PM2.5 (aerodynamic diameter</=2.5 mum), black carbon (BC), and

163 M2.5 levels (particulate matter < 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter) affected the probability of becomi

164 full size distribution (from 0 to 100 mum in aerodynamic diameter) and chemical/biological compositio

165 (PM2.5; particulate matter </= 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter) and health end points has been obs

166 tter air pollution (PM(2.5); < 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter) induces endothelial dysfunction an

167 rticle concentrations (PM2.5; </= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter) were monitored continuously.

168 oarse particulate matter (PM10; </=10 mum in aerodynamic diameter), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and carbo

169 ncrease in particulate matter <2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter).

170 birth; PM2.5 (particulate matter </=2.5mm in aerodynamic diameter); breast feeding duration; child's

171 red in all aerosol fractions (5.0% in >4 mum aerodynamic diameter, 75.5% in 1-4 mum, and 19.5% in <1

172 um-containing particles peaking at 150 nm in aerodynamic diameter, a value similar to that measured f

173 to particulate matter less than 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monox

174 black carbon, particulate matter <2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter, nitrogen dioxide, and nitric oxide

175 late matter less than or equal to 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter, nitrogen dioxide, and nitric oxide

176 ss than 10 microm or less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide,

177 particulate matter </= 2.5 and </= 10 microm aerodynamic diameter, respectively) exposures for 940 pa

178 a size distribution peaking at 100-320 nm in aerodynamic diameter.

179 airborne particulates of less than 100 nm in aerodynamic diameter.

180 exposed to ultrafine particles (< 100 nm in aerodynamic diameter; CAPS) using the Harvard University

181 ine particulate matter (PM </= 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter; PM(2.5)), are associated with prem

182 ions with particulate matter (</= 2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter; PM2.5) pollution measured by commu

183 ine particulate matter (PM </= 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter; PM2.5), posing health risks.

184 Aerodynamic-diameter-dependent scaling factors are used

185 ent fine particulate matter (PM2.5 : PM with aerodynamic diameters <2.5mum) on brain volumes in older

186 apalapa, a municipality of Mexico City, with aerodynamic diameters below 2.5 mum (PM2.5) and 10 mum (

187 Particles with aerodynamic diameters between 0.056-18 mum were collecte

188 aerosol particles (especially particles with aerodynamic diameters equal to or less than 2.5 mum, cal

189 tween specific fine-particle (particles with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 microm; PM2.5) const

190 nt amount of RSV was found in particles with aerodynamic diameters less than 5 mum.

191 nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters of </=2.5 microm (PM2.5), 2.5 micr

192 e capture efficiency was 97.7+% for particle aerodynamic diameters ranging from 0.28 to 3.88 microm.

193 06 mum (DCH) to 3.47 +/- 0.05 mum (MCD); the aerodynamic diameters were about 1.1 mum and their drug

194 ure individual particle compositions, vacuum aerodynamic diameters, and particle DSFs in two flow reg

195 tre-sized objects) are first concentrated by aerodynamic drag and then gravitationally collapse to fo

196 analogous to how drag coefficient quantifies aerodynamic drag on vehicles.

197 hable Surfaces enable switchable and tunable aerodynamic drag reduction of bluff bodies.

198 to rolling resistance and less sensitive to aerodynamic drag.

199 3D printed dog's nose revealed the external aerodynamics during canine sniffing, where ventral-later

200 the dilution parameters into two groups: (1) aerodynamics (e.g., mixing types, mixing enhancers, dilu

201 To separate the aerodynamic effects of stroke velocity from those due to

202 r improving pollination by producing complex aerodynamic effects.

203 flexibility is known to be important to the aerodynamic efficiency of insect wings, and to the funct

204 n removing the ultrafine particles (PMs with aerodynamic equivalent diameters of less than 100 nm) in

205 in sensorimotor flight control by providing aerodynamic feedback.

206 The net aerodynamic force averaged over the downstroke was maint

207 he two muscles that generate the majority of aerodynamic force for flight show unmodified contractile

208 , stroke amplitude is large, and most of the aerodynamic force is produced halfway through a stroke w

209 How birds coordinate aerodynamic force production relative to changes in body

210 ole-body rotations to alter the direction of aerodynamic force production to change their flight traj

211 amiliar separated flow patterns, much of the aerodynamic force that supports their weight is generate

212 entation primarily redirected the downstroke aerodynamic force, affecting the bird's flight trajector

213 s , when referenced to gravity, that directs aerodynamic forces about 40 degrees above horizontal, pe

214 and body mass distributions, we examined net aerodynamic forces and body orientations in slowly flyin

215 We hypothesized that pigeons produce aerodynamic forces in a uniform direction relative to th

216 rajectory can only be achieved by modulating aerodynamic forces relative to gravity.

217 urprisingly, the pigeon's upstroke generated aerodynamic forces that were approximately 50% of those

218 at higher frequencies to generate sufficient aerodynamic forces to stay aloft; it also poses challeng

219 lso show that this maneuver does not rely on aerodynamic forces, and furthermore that a fruit fly, wi

220 ng maneuvers, with minimal contribution from aerodynamic forces.

221 Uncharged droplets first break up due to aerodynamics forces until they are in the 2-4 mum size r

222 feathers first evolved in dinosaurs for non-aerodynamic functions, later being adapted to form lifti

223 ospheric stability were calculated using the Aerodynamic Gradient and Eddy Correlation techniques.

224 veal that a potential unifying parameter for aerodynamics, i.e., the dilution rate of exhaust, plays

225 g bird, although a definitive account of the aerodynamic implications of these formations has remaine

226 rine and geosciences, intracellular sensing, aerodynamics, industry and biotechnology, among others.

227 hese insects take advantage of a stabilizing aerodynamic influence and active torque generation to re

228 rticles in the aerosol are drawn through the aerodynamic inlet, focused through the ion guide, and ca

229 The NAMS includes an aerodynamic inlet, quadrupole ion guide, quadrupole ion

230 critically important for the blowfly, whose aerodynamic instability permits outstanding maneuverabil

231 reased flap frequency, whether due to direct aerodynamic interactions or requirements for increased s

232 ospheric pressure and are focused through an aerodynamic lens assembly into the mass spectrometer.

233 particles, during their transport through an aerodynamic lens inlet.

234 ter in instruments that utilize low-pressure aerodynamic lens inlets is to dry the particles prior to

235 ely high particle transmission efficiency of aerodynamic lens inlets resulted in their wide use in ae

236 An aerodynamic lens-based inlet system created a well-colli

237 n flowing gases of varying composition in an aerodynamic levitation furnace.

238 and wide-angle x-ray scattering (WAXS) with aerodynamic levitation techniques to study in situ phase

239 By distributing the aerodynamic lift and drag across an array of baffles, ea

240 Constrained by the aerodynamic limit and measured rate of air-sea sensible

241 ages, as well as inertial, gravitational and aerodynamic loads on the wing.

242 died, we found no evidence that turbine-like aerodynamics made a significant contribution to pollen a

243 hat all species tested employ the myoelastic-aerodynamic (MEAD) mechanism, the same mechanism used to

244 omated tracking of flies in combination with aerodynamic measurements on flapping robots, we show tha

245 study shows that hovering bats use the same aerodynamic mechanisms as do moths and other insects.

246 ait, its date of origin, and the fundamental aerodynamic mechanisms by which unidirectional flow aris

247 This finding suggests that passive aerodynamic mechanisms can act to reduce the neural feed

248 The analysis indicates that passive aerodynamic mechanisms contribute to stability, which ma

249 s (Trochilidae) are widely thought to employ aerodynamic mechanisms similar to those used by insects.

250 ch freely flying insects make use of passive aerodynamic mechanisms to provide proverse roll-yaw turn

251 support away from the translation-dominated, aerodynamic mechanisms used by most insects, as well as

252 The aerodynamics model is considered as forcing upon rigid b

253 The quasi-steady wing aerodynamics model is extended by including perturbation

254 In this study, an empirically derived aerodynamics model is used with a transformation involvi

255 ruque and Humbert to extend the quasi-steady aerodynamics model via inclusion of perturbations from t

256 her explicitly or implicitly, in widely used aerodynamic models and in a variety of empirical tests.

257 solutions of this paradox based on wind-gust aerodynamic models of fungal-spore liberation.

258 Despite recent advances in aerodynamic, neuromuscular and kinematic aspects of avia

259 t due to naturally selected variation in the aerodynamic optimum for each individual.

260 ted by other considerations like ergonomics, aerodynamics or aesthetics.

261 ot sensitive to gas-phase species due to the aerodynamic particle focusing inlet system which reduces

262 conditions on delivered dose uniformity and aerodynamic particle size distribution.

263 from a dry powder inhaler while sampling for aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSD) by inerti

264 anning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) and revealed four size

265 scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) were utilized for parti

266 izer (SMPS) combined with a light scattering aerodynamic particle sizer (APS).

267 ence number concentrations from a co-located aerodynamic particle sizer (APS).

268 Understanding the aerodynamic performance of feathered, non-avialan dinosa

269 fect of time-varying twist and camber on the aerodynamic performance of these insects.

270 osition would have made little difference to aerodynamic performance.

271 twofold during flight and to correlate with aerodynamic power generation and wing beat frequency.

272 But how general is an aerodynamic power reduction due to group-flight?

273 frequency with increases in all conventional aerodynamic power requirements; and (3) increase flap fr

274 cular flight behaviours can be assessed with aerodynamic predictions and placed in an ecomorphologica

275 sitions, in that they agree with theoretical aerodynamic predictions.

276 materials include airfoils that change their aerodynamic profile, vehicles with camouflage abilities,

277 imilar deposits, that these leg feathers had aerodynamic properties and so might have been used in so

278 non-specificity, and difficulty in combining aerodynamic properties with efficient cellular uptake.

279 heir unusually heavy wings-rather than their aerodynamic properties-to help them perform acrobatic ma

280 These results suggest that the aerodynamic property of silk can provide an airborne aco

281 mponents (along with dendritic river basins, aerodynamic raindrops, and atmospheric and oceanic circu

282 air toward the nose, thereby extending the "aerodynamic reach" for inspiration of otherwise inaccess

283 ower output and muscle kinetics to match the aerodynamic requirements.

284 a 1.2-fold variation in speed, matching the aerodynamic requirements.

285 n Koshihikari; however, the presence of high aerodynamic resistance in the natural field and lower ca

286 For the former, we demonstrate enhanced aerodynamic sampling of ions from the mobility cell into

287 ements provide continuous information on the aerodynamic size and chemical composition of individual

288 The vacuum aerodynamic size distribution was found to be bimodal wi

289 Four aerodynamic size fractions (<3, 3-10, 10-30, and >30 mum

290 tive analysis of aerosols according to their aerodynamic size were performed in France, Austria, the

291 forest loss on albedo, eco-physiological and aerodynamic surface properties, and turbulent energy flu

292 e conductance for water vapour and decreases aerodynamic surface temperature.

293 plants, water desalination, and de-icing of aerodynamic surfaces, to list a few.

294 te the wing motions that generate corrective aerodynamic torque.

295 energy savings can be achieved by using the aerodynamic up-wash produced by the preceding bird.

296 rs or other physical mechanisms, and similar aerodynamic valves seem to be present in crocodilians.

297 Unidirectional flow in birds results from aerodynamic valves, rather than from sphincters or other

298 Gross anatomy, hemodynamics, and aerodynamics were evaluated; neutrophil and bacterial co

299 lack carbon, fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic with diameter less than 2.5 mum, sulfur diox

300 patterns imposed by the interaction of nasal aerodynamics with physiochemical properties of odorants,