ライフサイエンスコーパス: affluent

1 en people in public spaces frequented by the affluent.

2 the age of 70 years than those who are more affluent.

3 er puzzle is their lower frequency among the affluent.

4 18%-40%); more so in deprived (37%) than in affluent (25%) areas.

5 consumption adversely affecting younger and affluent age groups.

6 r being older and more female, educated, and affluent, although all strata are represented.

7 rom the United States tended to live in more-affluent and better-educated neighborhoods than the aver

8 More affluent and educated enrollees had higher odds of filli

9 The results show that, for affluent and mature cities, higher gasoline prices combi

10 diets and the prevalence of obesity between affluent and poor countries have been used to support a

11 Comparisons of women in affluent and poor countries have recorded mean populatio

12 self-regulation that mainly affects the less affluent and whose failures may play an important role i

13 patients who seek homeopathic care are more affluent and younger and more often seek treatment for s

14 ties in the delivery of care if practices in affluent areas are more able to respond to the incentive

15 Children from more affluent areas had a higher relative risk of developing

16 thout access to a car and living in the most affluent areas or in rural areas.

17 attendance patterns, with urban practices in affluent areas that typically have appointment waiting t

18 ng function compared with children from more affluent areas, but these inequalities do not widen with

19 In affluent areas, disparities in tooth retention were negl

20 me adults appeared to benefit from living in affluent areas, while wealthier adults living in poor ne

21 individuals, and patients who lived in more affluent areas.

22 mary care for the top tier will cater to the affluent as "full-service brokers" and will be delivered

23 ome HIV testing will attract a predominantly affluent clientele, composed disproportionately of HIV-u

24 CI, 0.67 to 0.74]) than those from the most affluent communities (C, 0.80 [CI, 0.78 to 0.81]).

25 e of ensuring that children who live in less affluent communities have access to the necessary servic

26 Patients treated at hospitals in affluent communities were more likely to receive CRT-D t

27 Limitations: Patients from affluent communities were overrepresented.

28 clines in SSB sales, even in this relatively affluent community, accompanied by revenue used for prev

29 ger association seen in non-affluent than in affluent countries (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% C

30 ylation levels were generally higher in more affluent countries and in more urban communities.

31 Populations of vegetarians living in affluent countries appear to enjoy unusually good health

32 The recent escalation of obesity in affluent countries has been suggested to contribute to t

33 The prevalence of autoimmune disorders in affluent countries has reached epidemic proportions.

34 Africa, and lastly the sample of relatively affluent countries in Europe, North America, and Oceania

35 In non-affluent countries organisations tend to promote social

36 ation have been found fairly consistently in affluent countries, but little is known about these rela

37 is prevalent in certain population groups in affluent countries, but the functional significance of t

38 Nevertheless, in affluent countries, the deliberate infection of patients

39 gic disease) are mainly a phenomenon of more affluent countries, whereas greater severity of symptoms

40 ts into the increase in allergy incidence in affluent countries.

41 e significantly (P < 0.005) stronger in more affluent countries.

42 e is known about these relationships in less affluent countries.

43 miliaris) affects 5-10% of the population in affluent countries.

44 ements in healthy, nonobese adults living in affluent countries.

45 confidence interval: 1.28, 1.77) and in more affluent couples (P = 0.035).

46 sis assay would be useful especially in less affluent deprived areas of the world where SCD is most p

47 with technologies of low efficiency in less affluent, developing countries.

48 ng the prepubescent period (indicative of an affluent diet and good general health) were at increased

49 g for racial minorities and youths from less affluent families.

50 ng food demand by a growing and increasingly affluent global population is placing unprecedented pres

51 so earlier in life than those from the most affluent group (adjusted difference -3.51 years, 95% CI

52 tive most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 26 percent lower among whites and 39

53 tive most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 33 percent lower among whites and 22

54 th immunization rates in the respective most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 2

55 ith mammography rates in the respective most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 3

56 her in deprived socioeconomic groups than in affluent groups, especially in people younger than 65 ye

57 s per week difference between most and least affluent groups; p=0.0008), zBMI (0.15 to 0.18; p<0.0001

58 gitudinal Study (FGLS), we studied educated, affluent, healthy women, with adequate nutritional statu

59 re likely to develop heart failure than were affluent individuals (incidence rate ratio 1.61, 95% CI

60 unities seem to have greater risks than more affluent individuals partly because of fetal and postnat

61 rld-setting exposure to inequality decreases affluent individuals' willingness to redistribute.

62 status of a global pandemic, spreading from affluent industrialized nations to the emerging economie

63 And a more affluent lifestyle in high-income countries was still as

64 n Mexican Pima Indians not yet exposed to an affluent lifestyle than in non-Pima Mexicans living in t

65 are probably similar to those of children in affluent nations except for the additional needs imposed

66 nd is one of the most common malignancies in affluent nations, in part due to the application of new

67 nce in a poor neighborhood (compared with an affluent neighborhood) equaled 1.3 (95% confidence inter

68 the patients came from a disadvantaged or an affluent neighborhood.

69 at follow-up (2002), and total time spent in affluent neighborhoods and duration-weighted poverty.

70 We tested the hypothesis that, in affluent neighborhoods, low-income adults retain more te

71 -BP and 2,4OH-BP tended to be higher in more affluent, older, and leaner women.

72 7 as compared with deprivation score 1 (most affluent, P = 0.033).

73 Affluent patients in nations with long waiting lists do

74 Relative to their affluent peers, children of low socioeconomic status (SE

75 ransport of suspended solids from one of its affluents, polluted by an industrial point source.

76 levels of allergic disease in the relatively affluent populations compared with those who maintain a

77 cades and the rarity of this disease in less affluent populations confirms the importance of environm

78 decrease health disparities between poor and affluent populations.

79 s significantly (p<0.01) higher for the most affluent quintile of area-based income deprivation than

80 by bus was significantly lower for the most affluent quintile than for other quintiles in urban area

81 e most deprived to 29% (16%-42%) in the most affluent quintile.

82 England, with the steepest falls in the most affluent quintiles.

83 on are epidemics of the impoverished and the affluent, respectively, in India, and this association i

84 nt urban areas, 1.22 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.46) in affluent rural areas and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.51, 1.79) in th

85 s and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.51, 1.79) in the least affluent rural areas.

86 is one of the commonest chronic diseases of affluent societies.

87 nic differences (which tend to be largest in affluent socio-economic groups) are not explained by NS-

88 The risk of underweight was lower in affluent states, but this was seen mainly in women of hi

89 reas with large minority populations to more affluent suburban and rural areas with primarily white p

90 ear, with a stronger association seen in non-affluent than in affluent countries (adjusted odds ratio

91 ree areas: deprived urban area, a relatively affluent urban area and a deprived rural area were purpo

92 were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.54) in the least affluent urban areas, 1.22 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.46) in afflu

93 Compared to more affluent urban areas, rate ratios for all-cause mortalit

94 ersons receive fewer cardiac procedures than affluent white male patients do, but rates of use are cr

95 e most deprived areas compared with the most affluent, with socioeconomic deprivation particularly as

96 Feeding a growing and increasingly affluent world will require expanded agricultural produc

97 Accelerometry counts were highest in the affluent younger group, followed by the deprived younger