1 can be attributed to type of surgery and not
aftercare.
2 are themselves for this increasing amount of
aftercare.
3 guidelines for professional intervention in
aftercare.
4 rm (3.1 [1.7-5.7]), suicidal thoughts during
aftercare (
1.9 [1.0-3.5]) and the most recent admission
5 l craving were associated with fewer days in
aftercare alcohol treatment.
6 facility were randomized to MBRP, RP, or TAU
aftercare and monitored for 12 months.
7 way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of
aftercare and not to type of surgery (P = 0.033).
8 based and lasted 8 weeks, with 10 months of
aftercare available.
9 Third,
aftercare by ICU follow-up clinic reduced Impact of Even
10 The
aftercare category (alphabetic) measured access to 4 bas
11 For individuals in
aftercare following initial treatment for substance use
12 ence interval [CI], 34%-49%) and 11 items in
aftercare instruction increased from 31 % at baseline to
13 revention (MBRP), a group-based psychosocial
aftercare,
integrates evidence-based practices from mind
14 eatments, highlighting the need for improved
aftercare interventions.
15 from hospital should be an integral part of
aftercare management.
16 Effective
aftercare of individuals who self-harm is therefore impo
17 can be attributed to type of surgery and not
aftercare (
P = 0.001).
18 can be attributed to type of surgery and not
aftercare (
P = 0.002).
19 can be attributed to type of surgery and not
aftercare (
P = 0.022).
20 that included experienced multidisciplinary
aftercare played an important role in recovery.
21 nown, although shortcomings in treatment and
aftercare provision contribute to adverse outcomes.
22 ctured cognitive assessment, aging-sensitive
aftercare referral, and monitoring of psychopharmacologi
23 for 6 months, and 6 months of (nonmethadone)
aftercare services.
24 In providing cancer
aftercare there is a requisite shift to proactive care,
25 h cardiac catheterization laboratory and all
aftercare within 1 hour).