ライフサイエンスコーパス: aftereffect

1 tical lines seem oppositely tilted (the tilt aftereffect).

2 not interfere with the orientation-specific aftereffect.

3 of the face does not interfere with the face aftereffect.

4 nutes, a phenomenon termed the ventriloquism aftereffect.

5 myopes were most susceptible to the nearwork aftereffect.

6 context of the phenomenon known as the shape aftereffect.

7 iases that are consistent with the direction aftereffect.

8 he adapting motion face led to a significant aftereffect.

9 thin STS predict the magnitude of behavioral aftereffects.

10 sugars inferred reduced perception of bitter aftereffects.

11 able motion can generate consistent rotation aftereffects.

12 pe to account for well-documented perceptual aftereffects.

13 t's report for inducing stimuli versus their aftereffects.

14 ming at the same rate and showed significant aftereffects.

15 ing negative afterimages, fading, and motion aftereffects.

16 ocessing, we examined the transfer of motion aftereffects.

17 on duration resembled traditional perceptual aftereffects.

18 is a general property for facial-expression aftereffects.

19 sort of adaptive coding is the face-identity aftereffect [2, 3, 4, 5], in which adaptation to a parti

20 ry on the buildup of the threshold elevation aftereffect, a form of contrast adaptation thought to tr

21 irection, observers experienced a consistent aftereffect: a bistable PL walker, which could be percei

22 In the well-known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in one direction

23 participants briefly exhibit an error-based aftereffect against the direction of the constraint, fol

24 daptation is sufficient to generate a motion aftereffect, an illusory sensation of movement experienc

25 test is to assess this initial accommodative aftereffect and its subsequent decay in the light under

26 orrelation between the magnitude of the tilt aftereffect and that of fMRI response adaptation in V1,

27 Results showed that the threshold-elevation aftereffect and the translational motion aftereffect wer

28 essing, because both the threshold-elevation aftereffect and translational motion aftereffect arise,

29 of adaptation is consistent with perceptual aftereffects and indicates that different cortical regio

30 r prolonged exposure to movement (the motion aftereffect), and exposure to tilted lines can make vert

31 oth psychophysically, by the behavioral tilt aftereffect, and physiologically, using fMRI response ad

32 ventriloquism effect, and the ventriloquism aftereffect are also reviewed.

33 However, the neural mechanisms underlying PA aftereffects are poorly understood as only little neuroi

34 These characteristics of tactile distance aftereffects are similar to those of low-level visual af

35 Shape aftereffects are suppressed when the adaptor contour is

36 evation aftereffect and translational motion aftereffect arise, at least in part, from adaptation at

37 We tested the novel hypothesis that the null aftereffect arises from the large difference in the back

38 the adapting and test stimuli can influence aftereffects, as in contingent adaptation; (2) weak or n

39 We have recently discovered a paradoxical aftereffect associated with inhibition in the gerbil aud

40 , adaptation to these stimuli induced a tilt aftereffect at the target location, consistent with sign

41 is procedure allowed dissociating adaptation aftereffects at retinal and spatiotopic positions.

42 but also exhibited neural signatures of view aftereffect before neurons with narrower tuning.

43 irst time, present counterintuitive magnetic aftereffect behavior that is consistent with the mechani

44 cluding the correlation and forward/backward aftereffects between two reported orientations in a tria

45 re to tactile motion induces a visual motion aftereffect, biasing the perceived direction of counterp

46 Our aim was to further characterize PA aftereffects by using an approach that allows distinguis

47 by a new demonstration that a gaze direction aftereffect can be influenced by beliefs about the gazer

48 This aftereffect can be obtained with spatially nonoverlappin

49 The rotation aftereffect can only be observed when the adapting and t

50 We show that opposite viewpoint aftereffects can simultaneously be induced for forwards

51 Thus, this heading direction aftereffect cannot be explained by local, disparity-spec

52 we report a novel cross-category adaptation aftereffect demonstrating that prolonged viewing of a hu

53 We further investigated the nature of the aftereffects, demonstrating that they are orientation- a

54 Moreover, for both eyes, blur aftereffects depended on whether the adapting blur was s

55 The magnitude of this aftereffect depends on the angular difference between th

56 The ventriloquism aftereffect describes an enduring shift in the perceptio

57 The size of the tilt aftereffect did not differ between the groups.

58 spatially disparate visual stimulus, and the aftereffect did not transfer across sounds that differed

59 This suggests that tsDCS-induced aftereffects did not occur at brainstem or cortical leve

60 ze or appeared on opposite sides of fixation aftereffects did occur.

61 Period aftereffects following entrainment to T-cycles were simi

62 The aftereffect from processing motion language gained stren

63 Humans can experience aftereffects from oriented stimuli that are not consciou

64 debated [9-11], though robust tactile motion aftereffects have recently been demonstrated [12, 13].

65 TBS-induced aftereffects, however, vary between subjects, and the me

66 n in the visual system (i.e., cause a motion aftereffect illusion).

67 ealthy participants and patients, due to its aftereffect impacting on a number of visuospatial and vi

68 splaced visual stimuli induced ventriloquism aftereffect in both humans (approximately 50% of the dis

69 mporal motor pattern that is expressed as an aftereffect in regular walking conditions.

70 , followed by a longer-lasting use-dependent aftereffect in the direction of the constraint.

71 This provides novel insight into the PA aftereffect in the healthy brain and may help to inform

72 arent motion produced a robust visual motion aftereffect in the opposite direction, when measured in

73 There was no myopic aftereffect in the remaining two refractive groups.

74 , subjects exhibited a strong and persistent aftereffect in trials in which preparation time was limi

75 The existence of motion aftereffects in the tactile domain was debated [9-11], t

76 correctly predict illusory changes - visual aftereffects - in movement direction, but in V1, they ar

77 Using aftereffects induced by quickly alternating images, we s

78 We demonstrated the presence of a strong aftereffect, induced by the simultaneous presentation of

79 The observed rotation aftereffect is likely due to direction-contingent dispar

80 Overall, we show that the motion aftereffect is not merely an intriguing perceptual illus

81 lus that generates the aftereffect or of the aftereffect itself, both of which can be seen clearly in

82 We used the motion aftereffect (MAE) to psychophysically characterize tunin

83 In the motion aftereffect (MAE), a stationary pattern appears to move

84 elates with the strength of perceived motion aftereffect (MAE), the illusory motion of a stationary p

85 he opposite direction-the traditional motion aftereffect (MAE).

86 ses correlated with perception of the motion aftereffect (MAE).

87 We tested for motion aftereffects (MAEs) following explicit motion imagery, a

88 ielded correspondingly weak cross-cue motion aftereffects (MAEs) in the face of very strong within-cu

89 ceptible to adaptation that generates motion aftereffects (MAEs).

90 osity perception, giving rise to a repulsive aftereffect: motion to the left adapts small numbers, le

91 These aftereffects occur not only for simple stimulus features

92 mporary or chronic tinnitus or to some other aftereffect of long-duration sound.

93 onal visuospatial, processes underlie the PA aftereffect of rightward-deviating prisms in healthy par

94 was often elicited, apparently because of an aftereffect of synaptic inhibition.

95 5 min, which completely cancelled perceptual aftereffects of adaptation.

96 cantly with current symptomatology, and face aftereffects of children with elevated symptoms only one

97 These negative aftereffects of exposure to collisions are spatially loc

98 These aftereffects of habituation have been thought to reflect

99 e to the disturbances and produce short-term aftereffects of increased gait stability once the cables

100 adults showed alterations in USV observed as aftereffects of intoxication, despite greater initial bl

101 ing from occupational bioassay to monitoring aftereffects of nuclear accidents.

102 Under nicotine, the inhibitory aftereffects of PAS were delayed and prolonged, while th

103 erefore all functional changes observed were aftereffects of rotenone toxicity in vivo.

104 wo independent experiments revealed that the aftereffects of stop-signal training are negligible afte

105 additional factor for Caribbean reefs is the aftereffects of the epizootic that reduced the abundance

106 second-order stimuli usually produces little aftereffect on first-order stimuli has been interpreted

107 in the structured environment; the negative aftereffect on path deviation was twice that in the spar

108 der face did not produce a facial-expression aftereffect on the first-order faces.

109 r coordination during pointing as well as to aftereffects on a number of sensorimotor and attention t

110 Whereas most adaptation aftereffects on appearance are opposite in direction to

111 Our study suggests that aftereffects on FRP may be an emergent property of the s

112 s of human ultrasociality, and agriculture's aftereffects on large-scale social organization.

113 Impulse activity in axons generates aftereffects on membrane excitability that can alter the

114 us has both acute and sustained long-lasting aftereffects on motor function in parkinsonian nonhuman

115 cles of non-24 h duration (T-cycles) induces aftereffects on period that act to bring the intrinsic p

116 These crossmodal aftereffects, operating both from vision to touch and fr

117 y unaware of the stimulus that generates the aftereffect or of the aftereffect itself, both of which

118 tificial scotoma did not have any additional aftereffects over those of adaptation to a gray screen,

119 sed this issue by implementing an adaptation-aftereffect paradigm with passive touch.

120 eye movements accompanied each blink, and an aftereffect persisted for a few blinks after target disp

121 In the shape aftereffect, prolonged viewing, or adaptation to a parti

122 Importantly, aftereffect reduction was correlated with the proportion

123 c space, it is likely that the ventriloquism aftereffect reflects a change in the cortical representa

124 We also found that the face aftereffect remained intact when the visual distracters

125 here report that the face identity-specific aftereffect requires a visible face; it is effectively c

126 This perceptual adaptation and the resulting aftereffect reveal important characteristics regarding h

127 wareness can nevertheless produce measurable aftereffects, revealing neural processes that do not dir

128 rception by asking whether the strong motion aftereffects seen in the perceptual domain lead to simil

129 daptation; (2) weak or null cross-adaptation aftereffects should be interpreted with caution; and (3)

130 V5 and psychophysical measures of the motion aftereffect showed reduced motion processing during high

131 Analysis of aftereffects showed that walking adaptations are stored

132 macaque monkeys experience the ventriloquism aftereffect similar to the way humans do in all tested r

133 macaque monkeys experience the ventriloquism aftereffect similar to the way humans do.

134 amined, for the first time, the origin of PA aftereffects studying oscillatory brain activity.

135 rameters that give rise to the ventriloquism aftereffect suggest that the changes in the cortical rep

136 onkeys, as well as humans, exhibit face-view aftereffect, suggesting the presence of a view-sensitive

137 cts are similar to those of low-level visual aftereffects, supporting the idea that distance percepti

138 ly striking accommodatively related nearwork aftereffect susceptibility.

139 sphenes correlated with the size of the tilt aftereffect (TAE) in the PPR group only.

140 ntation selective detectors producing a tilt aftereffect (TAE).

141 otosensitivity was assessed using two visual aftereffects that occur after prolonged adaptation.

142 a given direction produced a tactile motion aftereffect, the illusion of motion in the opponent dire

143 To account for such aftereffects, these units must either be able to inhibit

144 We then examined PA aftereffects through changes in known oscillatory EEG si

145 ubjects, and the mechanisms underlying these aftereffects to date remain poorly understood.

146 Here, we report that visual-form aftereffects transfer across separate fixations when ada

147 Additionally, this aftereffect was not due to response bias, because its de

148 The duration of the motion aftereffect was shorter in the PPR group than in the con

149 h manipulation the degree to which the shape aftereffect was suppressed.

150 To artificially induce aftereffects, we photostimulated mitral cells using chan

151 se both the extended response to NPY and any aftereffect were blocked by coapplication of glutamate r

152 ion aftereffect and the translational motion aftereffect were reduced substantially during binocular

153 For excitability-diminishing tDCS and PAS, aftereffects were abolished or converted trendwise into

154 Motion and tilt aftereffects were compared in healthy subjects with (n =

155 Viewpoint aftereffects were found within, but not across, categori

156 Long-lasting aftereffects were not observed with classical deep brain

157 Weaker threshold elevation aftereffects were observed when the adapting image was e

158 n the native blur of the better eye, with no aftereffect when the blur equaled the aberrations of the

159 ception in human subjects, the ventriloquism aftereffect, which presumably reflects a corresponding c

160 We observed this multilevel aftereffect with both cartoon and real test faces when t

161 illusory movement is induced (via the motion aftereffect) within a stationary pattern, it can be show

162 A phase-scrambled adaptor produced no aftereffect, yet when adapting and test walkers differed