戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  cardiac output under changes of preload and afterload.
2 rtension is due strictly to the increased RV afterload.
3 that of wild type hearts, especially at high afterload.
4 cardiac hypertrophy in response to increased afterload.
5 onically raising the lymphatic smooth muscle afterload.
6 and relaxation delay from increased arterial afterload.
7 at greatest risk for abnormalities of FS and afterload.
8 y inflated to increase left ventricular (LV) afterload.
9 odilator that can decrease right ventricular afterload.
10 ripheral vasoconstriction is contributing to afterload.
11 tionship to a zone of high contractility for afterload.
12  dysfunction with increased left ventricular afterload.
13  function due to increased right ventricular afterload.
14 icular afterload and not to left ventricular afterload.
15 mediated primarily by an increase in cardiac afterload.
16  over time as the RV adapts to the increased afterload.
17 n (EF) decreased secondary to an increase in afterload.
18 monly falls because of a concomitant rise in afterload.
19 ng stress, at least in part, by manipulating afterload.
20 m examination, despite a progressive fall in afterload.
21 ntricular performance is highly sensitive to afterload.
22 d negatively with baseline EF and changes in afterload.
23 response of the right ventricle to increased afterload.
24 t ventricular function and right ventricular afterload.
25 n and strain rate were heavily influenced by afterload.
26 ion (Emax: 2.8+/-1.0 mm Hg/mL), preload, and afterload.
27 ggesting a decrease of the right ventricular afterload.
28 usside to reduce blood pressure and arterial afterload.
29 or the estimation of global left ventricular afterload.
30 diuresis, while reducing cardiac preload and afterload.
31 in the clinical context of acute increase in afterload.
32 nd fractional shortening and above normal LV afterload.
33  cardiac myocyte sense changes in preload or afterload?
34 -4.2% in end-systolic elastance) and lowered afterload (-14.2+/-2% in systemic resistance, both P<0.0
35 (23 +/- 6 versus 17 +/- 6 mm Hg for RAP) and afterload (20 +/- 9 versus 13 +/- 6 mm Hg for TPG; 5.9 +
36 tween VCF and ESS (a preload-insensitive and afterload-adjusted index of contractility) was increased
37  relaxation, and lowered cardiac preload and afterload (all P < 0.001) without altering plasma cGMP.
38                   The distribution of FS and afterload among NR survivors did not differ from that of
39 ining the effects of alterations in preload, afterload and contractile state.
40                      Noninvasive measures of afterload and contractility appear useful for monitoring
41 r performance and its determinants: preload, afterload and contractility.
42 (LV) wall thickness resulting in elevated LV afterload and depressed LV function.
43                    The influence of arterial afterload and diastolic dysfunction on the hemodynamic p
44 solated ejecting guinea pig hearts (constant afterload and heart rate) were studied before and after
45  groups, decreasing RV volumes, preload, and afterload and increasing RVEF in all patients, but post-
46 ve implantation (TAVI) decreases ventricular afterload and is expected to improve microvascular funct
47 rophy and dysfunction secondary to increased afterload and left ventricular dilatation secondary to v
48                        Nitroprusside reduces afterload and left ventricular filling pressures in pati
49                           Despite similar RV afterload and mass some patients develop adaptive RVH (c
50                    These changes decrease LV afterload and myocardial oxygen demand and reduce the nu
51 pressure and increases left ventricular (LV) afterload and myocardial oxygen demand.
52  related to alterations in right ventricular afterload and not intrinsic right ventricular contractil
53 oxemia is due to increased right ventricular afterload and not to left ventricular afterload.
54 ress syndrome treatment on right ventricular afterload and outcome.
55 ed intraabdominal pressure include increased afterload and preload and decreased cardiac output, wher
56 n infusion to evaluate the response to acute afterload and preload changes (interventional substudy).
57 d lower wall stress in the face of increased afterload and preload.
58 V contractility because of its dependence on afterload and preload.
59 ase progression, decreased right ventricular afterload and pulmonary vascular remodeling, and restore
60               Optimal LV function reduces RV afterload and PVR.
61  fraction and is associated with high global afterload and reduced longitudinal systolic function.
62 dividual components of left ventricular (LV) afterload and tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) velo
63 trics are able to estimate right ventricular afterload and track acute changes in pulmonary hemodynam
64  could be used to estimate right ventricular afterload and track acute changes in pulmonary hemodynam
65        Valvuloarterial impedance (ie, global afterload) and myocardial oxygen consumption were reduce
66 ach involves adjustments of cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility to balance oxygen delivery
67  in arterial elastance, indicating increased afterload, and elevated plasma angiotensin II.
68 uent and present with less severe AS, normal afterload, and less severe longitudinal dysfunction.
69 d the adverse hemodynamic effects, increased afterload, and LV remodeling in anti-VEGF-treated mice.
70 orse in SScPAH compared with IPAH at similar afterload, and may be because of intrinsic systolic func
71 e and reduces aortic valve gradients, global afterload, and myocardial oxygen requirements.
72 YR reduced pulmonary vascular resistance, RV afterload, and pulmonary vascular remodeling, which was
73  from an acute increase in right ventricular afterload, and was not a consequence of gas-exchange abn
74 rterial stiffness increases left ventricular afterload, any allopurinol-induced improvement in arteri
75                    Significant reductions in afterload (aortic pressure, P=0.030) and myocardial oxyg
76 diac output or loading conditions, including afterload as determined by systemic vascular resistance
77 12.3% +/- 3.2%, p = 0.04), despite a reduced afterload as expressed by the left ventricular end-systo
78 s in blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and afterload as well, thereby improving subendocardial bloo
79 S, and VCFc) were lower in SCA patients, and afterload, as measured by ESSm, was increased.
80 o determine whether higher systemic arterial afterload-as reflected in blood pressure, pulsatile and
81                                           RV afterload assessed by effective arterial elastance rose
82 l pressure dynamics, preload limitation, and afterload augmentation.
83             HR modulates Ea, and, therefore, afterload burden.
84 ed throughout most of pregnancy by a fall in afterload but decreases near term and early postpartum b
85 terial coupling was decreased with increased afterload but not affected by the induction of thoracic
86 c function of the ventricles and the optimum afterload but overestimated the flow and therefore the p
87  left ventricular (LV) preload and increases afterload, but central events do not, obstructive events
88 of elevations in right- and left-ventricular afterload, but, instead, increased O2 extraction ratio (
89 ure appears to enhance net right ventricular afterload by elevating pulsatile, relative to resistive,
90 rterial elastance (Ea) and right ventricular afterload by pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
91 fficulty of reducing total right ventricular afterload by therapies that have a modest impact on mean
92 unction was assessed by 2D-strain and global afterload by valvulo-arterial impedance.
93  2.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 10.6 +/- 1.2 ml min(-1)) or afterload (cardiac output: -5.3 +/- 2.0 vs.1.4 +/- 1.2 m
94 a consequence of a postoperative increase in afterload, caused by closure of a low resistance runoff
95 e function that is unaffected by preload and afterload changes in a physiological range and is able t
96 e function that is unaffected by preload and afterload changes within a physiological range and can b
97  ejection fraction display elevated arterial afterload compared with patients with HGSAS and moderate
98 ending aorta and has the potential to worsen afterload conditions and decrease coronary artery perfus
99 ted to impaired contractility and increasing afterload, consequences of a progressive reduction of ve
100  patients was related to both lower arterial afterload (decreased systemic vascular resistance) and h
101 the pulmonary artery significantly increased afterload (DeltaEa: +0.226 mm Hg/mL, P<0.001).
102 s coronary perfusion (supply) and reduces LV afterload (demand).
103      Vena contracta width appears to be less afterload-dependent than RgV.
104                                   Myocardial afterload depends on left ventricular (LV) cavity size,
105 l as parameters reflecting right ventricular afterload (diastolic pulmonary artery pressure; p < 0.00
106 l or compensated levels of contractility and afterload did poorly in this study.
107 ration of the Laplace relation suggests that afterload does not necessarily increase after the operat
108                     At a matched increase in afterload (effective arterial elastance), L-NMMA increas
109     We invasively examined systemic arterial afterload (effective arterial elastance, Ea; total arter
110  (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension), afterload (end-systolic wall stress) and contractility (
111 e respectively adjusted for left ventricular afterload (end-systolic wall stress) to derive an index
112 ereby double loading the LV, contributing to afterload excess and a deterioration in LV performance t
113 e new HFPEF paradigm shifts emphasis from LV afterload excess to coronary microvascular inflammation.
114     Inadequate ventricular mass with chronic afterload excess was associated with progressive contrac
115 lossal length is substantially influenced by afterload exerted by negative UAP and that genioglossal
116 ength (Lgg) is dynamically influenced by the afterload exerted by negative upper airway pressure duri
117 f PVR and left-sided filling pressures on RV afterload, explaining its strong relation with RV dysfun
118 vement toward normal values in LV dimension, afterload, fractional shortening, and mass, but all thes
119                             Elevated hepatic afterload in Fontan, manifested by high ventricular end-
120 idase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce LV afterload in IHD and may therefore also regress LVH.
121 e adverse effect of the sudden imposition of afterload in midsystole.
122        Surprisingly, correction of decreased afterload in septic rats, using the pure alpha-agonist p
123 alanced vasodilation, decreasing preload and afterload in states of cardiac impairment and stimulatin
124 in the stroke volume occurred with increased afterload in the failing heart.
125                                     Although afterload in these disorders differs, clinical differenc
126                                    Increased afterload in treated mice led to concentric LV remodelin
127 ents with HGSAS and moderate AS, measures of afterload, including Ea (4.02 +/- 0.98 versus 3.13 +/- 0
128  dobutamine and during preload reduction and afterload increase by transient balloon occlusion of the
129 e RV so much more vulnerable to failure upon afterload increase compared with the left ventricle?
130                 During preload reduction and afterload increase, IVA remained constant up to a reduct
131 ne and assessed during preload reduction and afterload increase.
132 ncrease in heart work (1 microM epinephrine, afterload increased by 40%) and the involvement of key r
133                                         When afterload increased from 55 mmHg to 90 mmHg, stroke volu
134 chanism to preserve RV contractility, as the afterload increases.
135                                              Afterload independence was demonstrated by preload-adjus
136 eous measurement of peak power, a relatively afterload-independent index of LV contractility, in 21 p
137 stroke volumes, FS, circumferential ESS, and afterload-independent measures of LV performance (stress
138 and remodeling in a murine model of MI by an afterload-independent mechanism, in part by decreasing m
139 re strongly predicted by higher SV and lower afterload-independent MFS than by greater systolic press
140 cular function and its response to increased afterload, induced by temporary, unilateral clamping of
141 type calcium channel activity is critical to afterload-induced hypertrophic growth of the heart.
142    Variations in the ventricular preload and afterload influence pulmonary arterial wave propagation
143 d, suggesting that heightened sensitivity to afterload is a significant contributor to LF-LGSAS patho
144 ose without patent ductus arteriosus because afterload is lower in the former group.
145 r aortic valve replacement, left ventricular afterload is often characterized by the residual valve o
146          ABSTRACT: Elevated left ventricular afterload leads to myocardial hypertrophy, diastolic dys
147   In a subset of nine patients who underwent afterload manipulation to increase diastolic blood press
148     For baseline to 1 minute, an increase in afterload (maximal pressure 95+/-9 to 126+/-7 mm Hg; P<0
149  based upon better understanding of arterial afterload may enable better individualization of therapy
150 lated to changes in chamber size and that LV afterload may fall when chordal preservation techniques
151 nal function is associated with increased RV afterload (mean PAP and PVRI).
152                     It is not clear which RV afterload measure has the greatest impact on RV function
153 erial load and the effect of HF therapies on afterload might vary between individuals.
154  regurgitant orifice), whereas correction of afterload mismatch dominates the response in aortic regu
155               Inhibition of VEGF leads to an afterload mismatch state, increased angiotensin II, and
156     This finding later led to the concept of afterload mismatch with limited pre-load reserve.
157  and with phenylephrine infusion to increase afterload (MR jet/left atrial [LA] area 26 +/- 1% to 7 +
158 ng and cause an increase in left ventricular afterload, myocardial mass, and oxygen consumption.
159  rate (HR) reduction with ivabradine reduces afterload of patients with systolic heart failure.
160 ance (Ea) represents resistive and pulsatile afterload of the heart derived from the pressure volume
161 onstrates that increases in left ventricular afterload of the magnitude seen with the infusion of L-N
162 s of normal or compensated contractility for afterload on a modified stress-velocity relationship to
163 d investigation of the effects of increasing afterload on the normal and failing left ventricle by me
164 nt or suspected decrease in cardiac preload, afterload, or contractility.
165  changes were found in endothelial function, afterload, or metabolism.
166 S (P < .001) and increase in distribution of afterload (P < .001).
167 Both hCSC and Pim1(+) hCSC treatment reduced afterload (p = 0.02 and p = 0.004, respectively).
168 dex, a major determinant of left ventricular afterload (P<0.001).
169  of MR was associated with marked changes in afterload, particularly decreased blood pressure (p = 0.
170 ight ventricle with increased RV preload and afterload predisposes to RVD after LVAD implantation.
171 r agonist isoproterenol (ISO) and by varying afterload pressures.
172                                   Increasing afterload prolonged relaxation more in nontransgenic tha
173 roke volume in failing hearts because of the afterload-reducing benefit (decreased transmural left ve
174 ence in the response to combined preload and afterload reduction (i.e., nitroprusside) in patients wi
175 nism is suppressed in heart failure, so that afterload reduction accounts for CGRP-enhanced function
176   Most importantly, two randomized trials of afterload reduction for preventing left ventricular dila
177 ow characterizes the response to preload and afterload reduction in mitral regurgitation (through a p
178          These data highlight the utility of afterload reduction in the diagnostic assessment of LGSA
179 erformed, with the data supporting long-term afterload reduction in this patient group.
180                                              Afterload reduction is a cornerstone in the management o
181                                              Afterload reduction is the mainstay of pharmacological t
182 jects participating in the Healing and Early Afterload Reduction Therapy (HEART) study, a double-blin
183                  To test the hypothesis that afterload reduction therapy alters hemodynamic variables
184  of decreased systemic output and the use of afterload reduction to stabilize systemic vascular resis
185 ardiomyopathy and treatment with digoxin and afterload reduction was initiated.
186  between baseline SVI and change in SVI with afterload reduction was observed, suggesting that height
187 dulate the indirect responses mediated by RV afterload reduction.
188 ch force-frequency modulation is blunted and afterload relaxation sensitivity increased in associatio
189 load after TAVR limits the procedure's acute afterload relief.
190 t (CO) state because of an acute increase in afterload remains controversial.
191 minated the differential force-frequency and afterload response between TnIDD22,23 and controls.
192 RATIONALE: Pathological increases in cardiac afterload result in myocyte hypertrophy with changes in
193                            Despite a similar afterload, RV function is more severely affected in muta
194                                         Mean afterload (+/- SD) was higher for AR (58 +/- 21 g/cm(2))
195  systolic and diastolic function in vivo and afterload sensitivity of relaxation.
196                           Acute increases in afterload slow diastolic relaxation as assessed invasive
197  regulation of pumping by lymphatic preload, afterload, spontaneous contraction rate, contractility a
198                       Small animal models of afterload stress have contributed much to our present un
199 dly phenotype cardiac changes resulting from afterload stress in a small animal model.
200 lated by treatment with beta-blockers; acute afterload stress induces a deeper impairment of systolic
201  by conventional echocardiography, following afterload stress.
202                        A computer-controlled afterload system either constrained the isolated heart t
203 vo canine heart preparation and computerized afterload system that mimicked the conditions of heart f
204 f LV volume and a significantly increased LV afterload (systolic pressure increase, P<0.001).
205 y be a more useful guide to left ventricular afterload than systemic vascular resistance.
206  able to work against a significantly higher afterload than that of frog hearts.
207 ercise leads to a steep increase in proximal afterload that is underestimated at rest and is associat
208 es cyclic changes in the heart's preload and afterload, thereby influencing the circulation.
209 s due entirely to an effect of the decreased afterload to "unload" the left ventricle.
210 hrony that was attenuated with return of the afterload to baseline levels.
211                         Strategies to reduce afterload, vascular stiffening, and wave reflections may
212 amics, the ventricular response to increased afterload, ventricular-vascular coupling, or the systemi
213 more, prolongation of pressure relaxation by afterload was markedly blunted in cMyBP-C(t/t) hearts.
214                                     Arterial afterload was measured by effective arterial elastance (
215  (70 and 90 beats/min) pig model in which LA afterload was modified by creating LV regional ischemia
216                                           RV afterload was similar in SScPAH and IPAH (pulmonary vasc
217 icardial areas) at comparable LV preload and afterload was similar in the 4 basal areas (P = 0.223, M
218                                           RV afterload was unaffected, however, bisoprolol treatment
219                             Left ventricular afterload was within normal range in the early (0.1 +/-
220   LV end-systolic stress (ESS) (a measure of afterload) was normal (Z score=0.2+/-2.3), whereas short
221 ed laboratory-based technique to increase LV afterload, was performed for 3 min at 40% maximum force
222          Mean fractional shortening (FS) and afterload were compared for survivors who did (at risk [
223 Left ventricular preload, contractility, and afterload were independently manipulated to assess the e
224                              All measures of afterload were reduced with nitroprusside (P<0.001 for a
225            All invasive measures of arterial afterload were related to stroke volume index.
226 3 (P<0.02), whereas contractile responses to afterload were similar between these strains.
227 ts, indicating that the effects of increased afterload were the same before and after thoracic epidur
228 flow assessment over a range of preloads and afterloads were performed.
229 dditionally found to be inversely related to afterload, whereas other measures of contractility were
230  pulsatility and decreasing left ventricular afterload with intra-aortic balloon pump was associated
231 herapy results in a lowering of the total LV afterload, with a decrease in LV filling pressures and p
232 ssue velocities vary inversely with arterial afterload, with late-systolic load having the greatest i

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top