ライフサイエンスコーパス: age difference

1 ing that endothelial NOS likely explains the age difference.

2 ding to a 13.8 +/- 5.3 million year apparent age difference.

3 tch of potential transplant, and donor-donor age difference.

4 dative peak velocities showed no significant age differences.

5 eness and Conscientiousness paralleled human age differences.

6 nted tremendous obstacles due to species and age differences.

7 efficients were included to test for sex and age differences.

8 Glu3 receptor mRNA levels showed substantial age differences.

9 source of dysregulated Ca2+ should eliminate aging differences.

10 --but does this approach capture even coarse age differences?

11 Daughters of tea consumers had a later mean age (difference = 0.41 years at >/= 3 cups (0.7 liter)/d

12 males and four females in each group; median age difference: 1 year; age range: 29-63 for patients an

13 n the overall AMD cohort after adjusting for age (difference, -19.9% [95% CI, -25.6% to -12.7%], P <

14 CT cohort; P = .06) did not differ in either age (difference, 69.20 years; 95% CI, 62.84-72.07 years;

15 and five (8.3%) were aged 41-49 years: mean age difference 8.7 years (95% CI 6.8-10.6; p<0.0001).

16 ively associated with BMD and BMC at 20 y of age [differences: 8.6 mg/cm(2) (95% CI: 3.0, 14.1 mg/cm(

17 erences in 99th percentile values paralleled age differences across cohorts.

18 two experiments, one in which we manipulated age differences among nestlings within broods, and anoth

19 There were important race, sex, and age differences among the victims who had used cocaine a

20 This age difference appeared to be because of the old rats be

21 n but more salient during mental replay, and age differences at perception could not account for olde

22 ation on the nascent centrioles, erasing the age difference between centrioles in one cell.

23 Measurements of the age difference between coexisting benthic and planktic f

24 The substantial age difference between female and male sexual partners i

25 tionwide Inpatient Sample, we calculated the age difference between patients with SLE and their race-

26 rther supported independently by the stellar age difference between quiescent and star-forming galaxi

27 s were found to only be significant when the age difference between siblings was less than 2 years.

28 In addition, we calculated the age difference between white patients with SLE and sex-m

29 The mean age difference between women with and those without SLE

30 significant (P < .05) after consideration of age differences between groups of subjects.

31 hout pancreatitis; there were no significant age differences between groups.

32 Mother-daughter pairs and pairs with large age differences between members interacted and associate

33 Patterns of age differences between sexual partners - "age-mixing" -

34 characteristics (accuracy 69%) but not when age differences between the groups were taken into accou

35 Age differences between these clusters can indicate the

36 All age differences between women with SLE (n = 3,627) and w

37 uration (height, weight, body mass index for age, difference between current and expected adult heigh

38 Up to 14 d of age, differences between mutant and control PCs were not

39 ut recipient age, donor age, recipient-donor age difference, donor gender, donor type, or cold ischem

40 ings with the 56 women aged 25-40 years, the age difference dropped to 1.1 years (95% CI -0.6 to 2.8;

41 Focal age differences emerged in regions related to emotional

42 Age difference for these groups was not statistically si

43 ons between relationship characteristics and age differences for 1,922 participants.

44 life, which resulted in a 2.98-cm height-for-age difference (HAD) between sexes in the village and a

45 age-related differences in LTD induction, no age difference in LTP magnitude was revealed.

46 Adult age differences in a variety of cognitive abilities are

47 The conditions under which age differences in anxiety are observed in rodents are u

48 present findings support the hypothesis that age differences in brain signal variability reflect agin

49 number of CRH-BP positive fibers revealed no age differences in CeA; however, with regards to CRH-pos

50 nths) demonstrated statistically significant age differences in cerebellum-dependent delay eyeblink c

51 , 50-64, and 65-75 years) and assess whether age differences in chemotherapy matched survival gains a

52 However, age differences in choice behavior may be reduced if old

53 o alter dopamine neuron activity, eliminated age differences in cocaine self-administration.

54 In this study, we investigate age differences in distractor rejection by presenting ta

55 rences in EaI/E(LV)I during exercise, due to age differences in EaI, E(LV)I, or both, may help to exp

56 Thus, age differences in EaI/E(LV)I during exercise, due to ag

57 Gender and age differences in ERalpha mRNA expression were observed

58 In this study, we examined age differences in financial decisions across the adult

59 This cross-sectional study examined whether age differences in frontostriatal white matter integrity

60 Controlling for age differences in full sibling pairs, the hazard rate f

61 lated to general task demands and to examine age differences in functional connectivity both within a

62 These results demonstrate age differences in GABAergic regulation of the LAT, and

63 Many complex human diseases exhibit sex or age differences in gene expression.

64 Age differences in height derived from cross-sectional s

65 Our analysis suggests that age differences in interference control have multiple so

66 be performed within the focus of attention, age differences in interference control may be more easi

67 Are age differences in interference control more myth than r

68 riatal paths could statistically account for age differences in learning.

69 Our findings reveal age differences in LT and Wnt pathways during airway inf

70 However, after age differences in memory were taken into account, none

71 creased gray matter volume in these regions, age differences in motor distinctiveness remained signif

72 This study assessed age differences in navigational behavior in a virtual Mo

73 from safety cues to test these hypotheses on age differences in neurodevelopment.

74 ced in the field (Trials 7-8), there were no age differences in new object exploration.

75 However, age differences in performance on measures of interferen

76 cline, we used functional MRI to investigate age differences in PFC activity during separate WM task

77 ondom during sex were associated with larger age differences in relationships of both men and women.

78 se "compensatory" activations simply reflect age differences in response to experimental task demands

79 tal white matter integrity could account for age differences in reward learning in a community life s

80 No age differences in sensitivity to MK-801 were found betw

81 Thus, age differences in spatial memory do not appear to be ex

82 Of greater significance, however, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms.

83 captured by this pattern is associated with age differences in the differential encoding of unique m

84 ated the contributions of brain structure to age differences in the distinctiveness of motor represen

85 nces in GABAergic regulation of the LAT, and age differences in the mechanism for the effects of repe

86 To examine age differences in the neurophysiological mechanisms of

87 Here, we investigated age differences in the relationships between handedness,

88 Sex and age differences in the sympathetic control of resting bl

89 However, the lack of significant age differences in toe clearance suggests this strategy

90 e using neuroimaging methodology, identified age differences in trust and their neural underpinnings.

91 In contrast, we found no evidence for age differences in value-related processing or age-relat

92 f this study were to characterize the normal age differences in white matter integrity in several bra

93 Vascular risk factors modified age differences in white matter integrity.

94 properties, inter-animal variability, animal age, differences in spike timing between the synaptic re

95 neurons and, notably, reduced or eliminated aging differences in the biomarkers.

96 (OR=3.7, 1.6-8.6, p=0.0007) and fell as the age difference increased (p for trend=0.004).

97 ity increased with age, and the magnitude of age differences increased beginning with the middle of t

98 the shift to reproductive status rather than age differences matched the pattern of changes in olfact

99 Three age difference measures were explored as predictors of p

100 Although age differences narrowed over time, women older than 70

101 5; P = .07), trisomy 8 (HR = 2.26; P = .02), age (difference of 10 years, HR = 1.46; P = .01), and th

102 rida couples were Hispanic; there was a mean age difference of 18 years between perpetrators and vict

103 y older blood donors representing an average age difference of approximately 27 y.

104 No age difference or correlations with behavior were found

105 k was used to integrate 44 studies reporting age differences or changes in coping from infancy throug

106 timated to be "older," with a mean predicted age difference (PAD) between chronological and estimated

107 To attempt to understand this sex and age difference, potential mechanisms by which i.c.v. CRH

108 Modest age differences remained for a few types of cancer, whic

109 sults are often confounded by small numbers, age differences, severity of symptoms, comorbidity, use

110 of unconnected folds associated with higher age differences than bridged folds, but this difference

111 This significant age difference was paired with a shift in perceptual per

112 These age differences were consistent across all body sites.

113 Age differences were found in feature-selective attentio

114 Gamma frequency age differences were not observed in hippocampus.

115 That these age differences were observed among both male and female

116 Considerable race, sex, and age differences were observed in the association between

117 ents relative to emerging adults, whereas no age differences were observed in the POC.

118 At 12 weeks of age, differences were found in body weight and islet TAG

119 At 2 or 4 weeks of age, differences were not detectable.

120 ncrease in male participant age, the average age difference with their partners increased by 0.26 yea

121 This study was successful in determining age differences within the empty cases, which to date, h