戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  donor-vs-recipient natural killer [NK]-cell alloreactivity).
2 ogen-specificity and evidence of nonspecific alloreactivity.
3 kine receptor CCR5 appears to play a role in alloreactivity.
4 e evidence that aging enhances CD8(+) T cell alloreactivity.
5 th allogeneic MHC, is the primary limiter on alloreactivity.
6 , even in the absence of detectable indirect alloreactivity.
7 MHC molecules, is the primary determinant of alloreactivity.
8 n and thereby favors the indirect pathway of alloreactivity.
9 D target tissues without abolishing antihost alloreactivity.
10  both capable of inducing direct CD4+ T-cell alloreactivity.
11 hy associated with enhanced recipient T-cell alloreactivity.
12 perative transplant period may modulate host alloreactivity.
13 ajor feature of the TCR repertoire is strong alloreactivity.
14 ) proteins in an enigmatic phenomenon termed alloreactivity.
15 r contributing to graft rejection along with alloreactivity.
16 y a pivotal immunosuppressive role in T cell alloreactivity.
17 ients, we performed several assays to assess alloreactivity.
18 the specific involvement of self-peptides in alloreactivity.
19  the skin, whereas imiquimod augmented their alloreactivity.
20 T and greatly reduced donor anti-host T cell alloreactivity.
21 ell population to suppress CD4 cell-mediated alloreactivity.
22 ndings in the context of TCR restriction and alloreactivity.
23 cell repertoire exhibits a high frequency of alloreactivity.
24 igen-negative cells are markedly depleted of alloreactivity.
25 consistently attained (90%-95%) depletion of alloreactivity.
26 ponsible for a major part of the observed NK alloreactivity.
27 interactions between CMV and the recipient's alloreactivity.
28 fts that experience the added insult of host alloreactivity.
29 nagement requires understanding the basis of alloreactivity.
30  antigens in Dark Agouti (DA) rats modulates alloreactivity.
31 n in vivo graft-versus-host disease model of alloreactivity.
32  antigen presentation to T cells and abolish alloreactivity.
33 ersensitivity (DTH) were used as measures of alloreactivity.
34 y of high-dose cyclophosphamide to eliminate alloreactivity.
35 ns in the regulation of donor-anti-recipient alloreactivity.
36 d mice showed limited capacities to generate alloreactivity.
37 nds partly on donor natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity.
38 or cells or a third party to assess relative alloreactivity.
39 y explain both self MHC restriction and high alloreactivity.
40 me was related to serum IgG anti-HLA class I alloreactivity.
41 ved tumor-induced Mphi suppression of T cell alloreactivity.
42 llogenic) MHC molecules, a phenomenon called alloreactivity.
43 t such effects decrease rather than increase alloreactivity.
44 AC6-specific inhibitor (KA1010) in models of alloreactivity.
45 ibiting GVHD while preserving GVL effects of alloreactivity.
46 ated to failed negative selection or altered alloreactivity.
47 ing less IgG and IgM RBC xenoreactivity than alloreactivity.
48 nsplant setting and its impact on anti-graft alloreactivity.
49 rved, likely by augmenting underlying T-cell alloreactivity.
50  possible role of iTreg in the regulation of alloreactivity.
51 e CD8 T-cell clone, confirming no semidirect alloreactivity.
52 lay a role in CD28/CTLA-4 blockade-resistant alloreactivity.
53 is associated with a lack of indirect T cell alloreactivity.
54  molecular pathways that regulate pathogenic alloreactivity.
55 tent and selective approach to inhibition of alloreactivity.
56 on in vivo while inhibiting IFN-gamma driven alloreactivity.
57 SCT and could represent a target to modulate alloreactivity.
58 ity assays were performed to evaluate T-cell alloreactivity.
59 al trials demonstrate that nTreg can control alloreactivity.
60  generated cells exhibited significant lower alloreactivity.
61 etween patients with or without predicted NK alloreactivity (42% vs 52% at 1 year, P = NS).
62 Notch was found to be a central regulator of alloreactivity across clinically relevant models of tran
63                      The influence of sex on alloreactivity, acute rejection, transplant-related coro
64 ed donor Th9 cells would augment or restrict alloreactivity after experimental bone marrow transplant
65 improve immune reconstitution while limiting alloreactivity after HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem c
66 ansplantation than in patients who showed no alloreactivity after the first 6 mo after transplantatio
67                                              Alloreactivity after transplantation is associated with
68 alloresponses but failed to develop indirect alloreactivity after transplantation.
69 m provides a useful in vitro tool to analyze alloreactivity against a single class I allele and to ai
70 o model with which it is possible to examine alloreactivity against a single HLA class I allotype.
71 ord blood KIR3DL1 NK cells exhibited a basal alloreactivity against Bw4 target cells that increased u
72  CD8(+) T suppressor cells that inhibited Th alloreactivity against graft HLA antigens.
73                                              Alloreactivity against micromismatches in MHC class I mo
74                    Expanded lymphocytes lack alloreactivity against recipient and other allogeneic ce
75 nd likely promotes damaging autoimmunity and alloreactivity against transplanted islets.
76                                              Alloreactivity against unrelated third-party cells was p
77 inically useful method of measuring indirect alloreactivity among human renal transplant recipients w
78 ionale for the prospective study of indirect alloreactivity among transplant recipients, to allow pre
79 , impaired eicosanoid secretion, and reduced alloreactivity and alloantigen-driven IL-2/IL-4 producti
80                     In DOCK2-deficient mice, alloreactivity and allocytotoxicity were suppressed sign
81 d, focusing on structural data pertaining to alloreactivity and auto-reactivity and discuss implicati
82 ests important mechanistic variances between alloreactivity and autoimmunity in terms islet graft los
83                   Our analysis suggests that alloreactivity and average self MHC restriction both can
84                              We investigated alloreactivity and chimerism in a highly sensitized 40-y
85 -/-)) allogeneic Tconv, which possess normal alloreactivity and cytotoxicity, induce significantly le
86  endogenous TCR and HLA genes, which removes alloreactivity and decreases immunogenicity of third-par
87  historical development of assays to measure alloreactivity and discuss how high-throughput T cell re
88    Understanding the determinants of NK cell alloreactivity and function will support improvements in
89                      The influence of sex on alloreactivity and graft outcome after heart transplanta
90       In contrast, PKCtheta was required for alloreactivity and GVHD induction.
91 onuclear cells (PBMCs), which showed minimal alloreactivity and high levels of HLA tetramer binding,
92 eceptor blockade is effective for preventing alloreactivity and high-grade rejection in cardiac trans
93  monitoring posttransplant changes in T cell alloreactivity and immunosuppression.
94 ested the hypothesis that ubiquitin inhibits alloreactivity and increases allograft survival in a mur
95     TI is required in this model to overcome alloreactivity and possibly to make "space" in the recip
96 ications for the mechanisms and frequency of alloreactivity and promiscuity in T cell responses.
97 ying administration effectively inhibits the alloreactivity and promotes the dominance of intragraft
98 iac transplantation, reducing serum anti-HLA alloreactivity and shortening the duration to transplant
99  immunity by reducing graft-vs-host directed alloreactivity and the associated elimination of the rec
100 e involved; however, the molecular basis for alloreactivity and the contribution of self-peptides are
101 al CD4(+) T(reg) are critical in controlling alloreactivity and the establishment of tolerance.
102   Here we review the determinants of NK cell alloreactivity and their implications for adoptive NK ce
103 ceptor sequestration model in the context of alloreactivity and transplantation.
104    The effects of these regimens on anti-HLA alloreactivity and waiting time to transplantation were
105 ce showed increased frequency of CD8+ T cell alloreactivity and, interestingly, expansion of virus-in
106 type splenocytes in proliferation responses, alloreactivity, and expression of cell surface markers i
107 vivo transduction, expansion, maintenance of alloreactivity, and ganciclovir-mediated ablation of can
108 and effects, suggests a structural basis for alloreactivity, and illustrates how bacterial superantig
109 cts of anti-CD154 treatment on autoimmunity, alloreactivity, and inflammatory events mediated by macr
110 cts of anti-CD154 treatment on autoimmunity, alloreactivity, and proinflammatory events mediated by m
111  the impact of the alarmin interleukin-33 on alloreactivity, and the role of Notch ligands expressed
112                                              Alloreactivity appeared to contribute to the in vitro an
113  curtails self specificity without affecting alloreactivity are discussed.
114 sensitization and effector phases of humoral alloreactivity as well as efficacy testing of future imm
115 ic splenocytes in vivo resulted in increased alloreactivity, as determined by IFNgamma production.
116 layed protocol significantly inhibited donor alloreactivity at d30 as compared to the early protocol.
117 he failure of Mer-deficient hosts to provoke alloreactivity, because Mer(-/-) spleen cells were recog
118                           Patients with high alloreactivity but low anti-GalT-KO xenoreactivity were
119 dose (3 g/kg) IVIg was effective in reducing alloreactivity but was associated with a high incidence
120 of Th1 differentiation was shown in indirect alloreactivity, but this suppression could also be media
121 erleukin-2 yielded lymphocyte clones without alloreactivity, but with strong proliferative responsive
122 s that in patients with cGVHD, ECP modulates alloreactivity by affecting activated lymphocyte populat
123          Our results suggest that ECP alters alloreactivity by affecting allo-targeted effector T cel
124 e able to delay graft rejection after direct alloreactivity by controlling proliferation and differen
125 lls have made it difficult to study indirect alloreactivity by using currently available assays.
126                      Tolerance induction and alloreactivity can be applied to the clinic for the tran
127 rscored by the growing body of evidence that alloreactivity can be profoundly influenced by infection
128               These findings confirm that NK alloreactivity can occur in HLA-matched HSCT, where tole
129                      However, paradoxically, alloreactivity can proceed with high peptide and MHC spe
130 ors able to exert donor-vs-recipient NK-cell alloreactivity carry KIR2DS1 and/or KIR3DS1, searching f
131 etermining in vitro proliferation responses, alloreactivity, cell surface marker expression, and anti
132 tation, these cells did not exhibit enhanced alloreactivity compared with young memory T cells.
133 that in the absence of Th1 immunity, CD8 T17 alloreactivity constitutes a barrier to transplantation
134  determine if "classical" in vitro assays of alloreactivity could also detect linked suppression and
135                                  Such direct alloreactivity could be detected for more than 1 y after
136                                     Antihost alloreactivity could be reactivated in stable graft-vers
137 nificantly suppressed capacity to induce MHC alloreactivity, CTL responses, and IL-12 production.
138 matched molecules, the probability of T cell alloreactivity decreases.
139 ges of transplantation is the development of alloreactivity despite the use of multiagent immunoproph
140                     Natural killer (NK)-cell alloreactivity, determined by donor killer-cell immunogl
141 ts were PRA+/PRT-75+, indicating that T cell alloreactivity did not routinely imply B cell sensitizat
142 In the absence of donor-vs-recipient NK-cell alloreactivity, donor activating KIRs had no effects on
143                                       Intact alloreactivity-driven antitumor cytokine responses resul
144  the strategies directed primarily at T-cell alloreactivity enhanced engraftment in sensitized mice.
145                          Despite uninhibited alloreactivity, exogenous IL-22 administration posttrans
146  identifying a dual TCR T cell with distinct alloreactivities for each TCR.
147 rnatants do not differentiate primary T-cell alloreactivity from recall responses in allograft-primed
148                                      NK cell alloreactivity has been defined by the absence of recipi
149                 Because pretransplant T-cell alloreactivity has been shown to increase the risk of po
150    The beneficial clinical effect of NK-cell alloreactivity has not been uniformly demonstrated, like
151                      In an in vitro model of alloreactivity, human lymphoma B cells with TNFRSF14 abe
152 ible that there will be a benefit of NK cell alloreactivity if strategies of haploidentical transplan
153                               Limitations on alloreactivity imposed by a requirement for recognition
154         The remaining T cells had negligible alloreactivity in a secondary MLR.
155 ery amino acid difference will affect T cell alloreactivity in a similar way; we hypothesized that th
156 ually serve as a disease biomarker of T-cell alloreactivity in aGVHD.
157 sents an opportunity to efficiently modulate alloreactivity in allo-HCT to either exacerbate it for a
158 how high specificity for EBV with negligible alloreactivity in both proliferation and cytotoxicity as
159 (IL)-2 receptor effectively prevented T-cell alloreactivity in cardiac transplantation.
160 he CD8(+)TCR- population demonstrated strong alloreactivity in culture.
161 ith ITx and can likely substitute for T-cell alloreactivity in estimating rejection risk in this rare
162          Earlier diagnosis and management of alloreactivity in female recipients before development o
163 ts to manipulate TCR recognition, as well as alloreactivity in general.
164               Donor natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity in HCT can control leukemic relapse, but
165 actions allow predicting natural killer cell alloreactivity in hematopoietic stem cell transplantatio
166  can control leukemic relapse, but capturing alloreactivity in HLA-matched HCT has been elusive.
167 ter understanding of the T cells involved in alloreactivity in humans, we developed a cytokine flow c
168                 Twenty-four-hour analysis of alloreactivity in mice that rejected fully MHC-disparate
169 the potential benefits of exploiting NK cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic stem cell tra
170 id organs in vivo and despite their in vitro alloreactivity in mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) assays
171                       To better characterize alloreactivity in naive and skin allograft-primed mice,
172 moral immunity as playing a dominant role in alloreactivity in sensitized recipients.
173  tested for correlations with donor-specific alloreactivity in simultaneous mixed lymphocyte co-cultu
174 uthors discuss myeloid self-antigen-directed alloreactivity in the context of our evolving understand
175  time, the significant impact of KIR NK cell alloreactivity in the determination of which UCB unit wi
176                           The development of alloreactivity in the host was confirmed by mixed lympho
177  upon PT-Cy administration, blunting NK cell alloreactivity in this transplantation setting.
178 ass I allele and to aid in the prediction of alloreactivity in unrelated marrow transplantation.
179 nhibitory activity of soluble ILT3 on T cell alloreactivity in vitro and in vivo suggests the potenti
180 g) cells have been implicated in suppressing alloreactivity in vitro and in vivo.
181 e antigen-specific and showed no nonspecific alloreactivity in vitro and in vivo.
182 is absent on leukemic target cells can exert alloreactivity in vitro and in vivo.
183 49s3-expressing NK cells drastically reduced alloreactivity in vitro, indicating that this subpopulat
184 ntigen-1 (LFA-1) interaction in human T cell alloreactivity in vitro.
185  Therefore, these data indicate that NK cell alloreactivity in vivo is dependent on the combination o
186 ce process dynamically modulates the NK cell alloreactivity in vivo.
187 on of humoral (circulating IgM/IgG allo-Abs) alloreactivity in vivo.
188 so endowed with the capacity to downregulate alloreactivity inducing tolerogenic responses.
189    Thymic positive selection and the mode of alloreactivity induction are the major independent facto
190 nt pairs may correlate with the magnitude of alloreactivity influencing the development of DGF.
191                                Direct T-cell alloreactivity involves recognition of the allogeneic mo
192 rism correlated negatively with DLI-mediated alloreactivity irrespective of the timing of their admin
193                   This ratio is at best 5 if alloreactivity is 5%.
194 her complete elimination of all rejection or alloreactivity is a desirable goal in liver transplantat
195                     Natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity is favored after double umbilical cord bl
196  affects natural killer (NK) cells and their alloreactivity is largely unknown.
197         In view of the growing evidence that alloreactivity is mainly derived from human naive T cell
198                                   Given that alloreactivity is predominantly a cross-reactive phenome
199 rsus-host disease (GVHD), but whether direct alloreactivity is sufficient for the propagation of GVHD
200                                              Alloreactivity is the response of T cells to MHC molecul
201  higher in patients who displayed persistent alloreactivity late after transplantation than in patien
202 that intragraft nTreg are unable to restrain alloreactivity leading to rejection.
203                        We also find that the alloreactivity level can be inferred directly from data
204 t macrophages, although unlikely to initiate alloreactivity, may contribute to GVHD by sustaining the
205                               Donor-specific alloreactivity measured with CD154(+) T-cytotoxic memory
206                 We hypothesize, that NK cell alloreactivity mediated by killer cell immunoglobulin-li
207 erentially inhibited cytokine production and alloreactivity mediated by naive and central memory huma
208 ells are excluded to limit the potential for alloreactivity mediated by native TCR coexpressed by HA-
209          Functional analysis showed that the alloreactivity mediated by these infiltrating MIP-3alpha
210 lts suggest that serial immune monitoring of alloreactivity might be beneficial when immunizations ar
211                    It has been proposed that alloreactivity occurs because self and foreign MHCs bind
212                      In HLA-mismatched HSCT, alloreactivity occurs when licensed donor NK cells expre
213  and activation are affinity-driven, then an alloreactivity of 1-24% is incompatible with the textboo
214                         We examined the I-Ep alloreactivity of a well-characterized Hb(64-76)/I-Ek-sp
215 .006) and inversely correlated with enhanced alloreactivity of CD154+ T-cytotoxic memory cells (r=-0.
216 therapy with T-regulatory cells controls the alloreactivity of conventional T lymphocytes in animal m
217 eactivated memory cells were reduced and the alloreactivity of DCs was diminished.
218                                              Alloreactivity of donor lymphocytes leads to graft-versu
219 aft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is induced by alloreactivity of donor T cells toward host antigens pre
220 m tumor immunization of donors, the in vitro alloreactivity of immune recipients was more restricted
221                                              Alloreactivity of KIR2DL1(+) NK cell subsets against C1C
222               Instead, we observed increased alloreactivity of primed LN cells against 3T3 targets as
223 ession by miR-181a may contribute to altered alloreactivity of T cells in aGvHD.
224 ve demonstrated the clinical benefit of such alloreactivity of the donor-derived NK cell system in pa
225               In this study, we examined the alloreactivity of the innate NK cells in Rag(-/-) mice u
226 ype morphology in lymph nodes, and increased alloreactivity of third-party responders to peripheral b
227    We investigated the impact of KIR NK cell alloreactivities on the dominance of 1 full UCB unit in
228                              The presence of alloreactivity on day 100 was confirmed in vivo by adopt
229 erism influences the potency of DLI-mediated alloreactivity only in the MHC-mismatched but not MHC-ma
230  T cells with unwanted specificities such as alloreactivity or autoreactivity are a consequence of si
231 eration by heterogeneous Tregs is not due to alloreactivity or crossreactivity.
232 , similar results were found in the indirect alloreactivity pathway only when nTregs were used in hig
233                                 Human T-cell alloreactivity plays an important role in many disease p
234 plantation, despite potential donor antihost alloreactivity present in most transplants.
235 effects against EL4 depended on CD8-mediated alloreactivity, protection was not observed in recipient
236                          Natural killer cell alloreactivity reduces graft-versus-host disease while a
237 plantation; however, the molecular basis for alloreactivity remains elusive.
238 C-matched chimeras, the induction of optimal alloreactivity requires not only donor T cells and host
239 his approach, we determined that most T-cell alloreactivity resided within the CD4(+) T-cell subset,
240      Thus, infections can result in enhanced alloreactivity, resistance to tolerance induction, and d
241 isplayed a polyclonal repertoire in terms of alloreactivity, responses to foreign protein antigens, a
242 s tested and was largely responsible for the alloreactivity resulting from tumor immunization of dono
243 een in patients with SJS/TEN, as well as the alloreactivity seen in patients with GVHD.
244               This unique alteration in host alloreactivity, seen not only in peripheral lymphocytes
245 nt for the experimentally observed levels of alloreactivity, self MHC restriction and the frequency o
246                                  Analysis of alloreactivity showed that CD18-/- and WT T cells had co
247 and LFA-1 resulted in profound inhibition of alloreactivity, suggesting that combined anti-CD154/anti
248 opoietic cell transplantation (HCT) if donor alloreactivity targets the recipient.
249                         Using an established alloreactivity TCR transgenic model, blockade of TIM-3 i
250 ost LCLs more consistently depleted in vitro alloreactivity than stimulation with host PBMCs, as asse
251 lts demonstrate the complex character of the alloreactivity that develops during ongoing immunoprophy
252 intage may also explain the increased T cell alloreactivity that previously was observed in black kid
253 ematical expressions giving the frequency of alloreactivity, the level of self-MHC restriction, and t
254 gous and allogeneic tumors and are devoid of alloreactivity, these results provide preclinical proof
255 tion may provide a strategy to decrease host alloreactivity through the production of a chimeric stat
256  and IFN-gamma reduces the potential of this alloreactivity to cause epithelial tissue GVHD.
257 t spot assay can be used to monitor indirect alloreactivity to donor HLA-DR peptides among renal tran
258 array assays allows characterization of host alloreactivity to individual HLA antigens with sufficien
259 plasmapheresis caused a similar reduction in alloreactivity to IVIg, this effect was achieved after l
260 DC marker; low phagocytic activity; and high alloreactivity to naive T cells.
261 herapeutic natural killer (NK)-cell-mediated alloreactivity toward acute myeloid leukemia has largely
262 e three TCRs exhibited differing patterns of alloreactivity toward closely related or distinct HLA-I
263 ion model that NK cells mediate considerable alloreactivity toward pediatric BCP-ALL in vivo.
264 splant pairs with donor-vs-recipient NK-cell alloreactivity, transplantation from donors with KIR2DS1
265                      The ultimate outcome of alloreactivity versus tolerance following transplantatio
266 tor-responder pairs, the median reduction of alloreactivity was 474-fold (range, 43-fold to 864-fold)
267                   A similar lack of indirect alloreactivity was also observed after placement of diff
268                                     Antihost alloreactivity was associated with reduction of posttran
269 s stimulators, a 100-fold (99%) reduction in alloreactivity was attained, resulting in abrogation of
270                                    Decreased alloreactivity was indicated by phenotypic and functiona
271     Although both were efficiently taken up, alloreactivity was limited to the semi-direct pathway, a
272          Suppression of donor-anti-recipient alloreactivity was not observed in mixed lymphocyte co-c
273              However, loss of posttransplant alloreactivity was observed at 3 weeks.
274                                Additionally, alloreactivity was observed between the genetically drif
275 ion experiments, we further showed that this alloreactivity was restricted to the class II molecule I
276        The potency of Th9 cell inhibition of alloreactivity was similar to that of rapamycin resistan
277 lpha inhibition on dendritic cell-stimulated alloreactivity, we demonstrate here that JAK2 represents
278 ossible mechanism by which IL-17 may promote alloreactivity, we examined the influence of IL-17 on th
279 e corresponding phenotype and donor-specific alloreactivity were characterized in peripheral blood.
280 ocytes from these tolerant mice have reduced alloreactivity when restimulated in vitro.
281 eir physicochemical properties affect T cell alloreactivity, whereas in the alpha helices, both compa
282 enge of transplantation: lifelong control of alloreactivity while maintaining an otherwise intact imm
283 llografts might constitute a way of reducing alloreactivity while maintaining memory T-cell responsiv
284  major goal in transplantation is to prevent alloreactivity while preserving activity against tumors
285                          This method reduces alloreactivity while retaining reactivity against third-
286 of a single T-cell manipulation to eliminate alloreactivity while sparing antiviral and antitumor T c
287 sgenic (TCR-tg) mouse models with direct CD4 alloreactivity will help elucidate mechanisms of transpl
288 rmissive mismatches mediating limited T-cell alloreactivity with minimal toxicity, and describes futu
289            Reconciling the high frequency of alloreactivity with the fact that only 1 T cell in 10(4)
290  a mean reduction of 33% in anti-HLA class I alloreactivity within 1 week.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top