ライフサイエンスコーパス: alveolar ridge

1 ale gender and mostly involves the maxillary alveolar ridge.

2 ransmucosally placed into rat hard palate or alveolar ridge.

3 is frequently performed to augment deficient alveolar ridges.

4 ng severe bilateral erosion of the maxillary alveolar ridges.

5 was to compare extraction socket healing and alveolar ridge alteration after socket augmentation usin

6 ze-dried bone allografts (FDBAs) are used in alveolar ridge (AR) preservation; however, each material

7 Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was c

8 fresh-frozen bone allografts (FFBAs) during alveolar ridge augmentation and to assess 1-year surviva

9 junction with an allograft, provides lateral alveolar ridge augmentation comparable to that achieved

10 The objective of this study was to evaluate alveolar ridge augmentation following surgical implantat

11 Eighty patients requiring local alveolar ridge augmentation for buccal wall defects (> o

12 Alveolar ridge augmentation has been proposed to facilit

13 Alveolar ridge augmentation procedures are often needed

14 dicine as they apply to periodontal disease, alveolar ridge augmentation, and barrier membrane therap

15 SE((R)) for sinus augmentation and localized alveolar ridge augmentation.

16 icating that both membranes are suitable for alveolar ridge augmentation.

17 entistry requires predictable procedures for alveolar ridge augmentation.

18 n extraction sites or in sites that required alveolar ridge augmentation.

19 of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-bea

20 Standardized alveolar ridge defects ( approximately 15 x 8 x 5 mm) we

21 Alveolar ridge defects (approximately 15 x 10 x 10 mm),

22 provide clinically relevant augmentation of alveolar ridge defects for placement of endosseous denta

23 Clinically, alveolar ridge defects receiving rhBMP-2/ACS exhibited a

24 Alveolar ridge deformities are usually the result of tra

25 ficant differences when comparing changes in alveolar ridge dimensions of the two groups.

26 Changes in alveolar ridge dimensions were also determined.

27 eservation of the dimensions of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth extraction.

28 f an easy and noninvasive means of promoting alveolar ridge formation.

29 riance, t test) at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 for alveolar ridge height and width and for markers of infla

30 n ridge height of -0.56 +/- 1.04 mm, whereas alveolar ridge height appeared to remain unchanged in th

31 Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed t

32 ired longer healing periods in patients with alveolar ridge heights varying between <1 to 5 mm.

33 ng guided bone regeneration (GBR) to augment alveolar ridges is not retained during healing.

34 this improved technique offers a predictable alveolar ridge maintenance enhancing the bone quality fo

35 Resorption of the alveolar ridge occurred at all sites with no statistical

36 contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness

37 ft and hard tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using two membranes co

38 e allografts (FDBA) are available for use in alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.

39 P-15 (Putty P15) to determine the effect on alveolar ridge preservation following exodontia.

40 We found that alveolar ridge preservation is effective in limiting phy

41 ockets, suggesting that it may be useful for alveolar ridge preservation prior to dental implant plac

42 Alveolar ridge preservation strategies are indicated to

43 ation, peri-implant tissue regeneration, and alveolar ridge reconstruction.

44 regeneration in mandibular, full-thickness, alveolar ridge, saddle-type defects following surgical i

45 al specimens, the upper lip (coronal plane), alveolar ridge, tooth sockets, point of fusion of primar

46 The alveolar ridge undergoes reabsorption and atrophy subseq

47 rtical and/or horizontal regeneration of the alveolar ridge using titanium grids, in association or n

48 rial has on the prevention of postextraction alveolar ridge volume loss as compared with tooth extrac

49 and postimplantation to determine changes in alveolar ridge volume.

50 The alveolar ridge was measured pre- and postoperatively to

51 se result in narrowing and shortening of the alveolar ridge, which compromise esthetics and complicat

52 Loss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction i

53 R) is a widely used procedure for augmenting alveolar ridge width prior to placement of endosseous im

54 P-2 resulted in an almost 2-fold increase in alveolar ridge width, including a greater percentage of

55 st and control sites lost similar amounts of alveolar ridge, with the loss of buccolingual width occu