ライフサイエンスコーパス: amputee

1 trafascicular stimulation in one transradial amputee.

2 ck be provided to the tetraplegic patient or amputee.

3 th legs of athletes with BKA compared to non-amputees.

4 ostheses can improve the quality of life for amputees.

5 s relationship to phantom pain in upper limb amputees.

6 e to the development of novel treatments for amputees.

7 e a functional remapping of S1 in lower limb amputees.

8 t towards embodiment of the device for these amputees.

9 areas of the hand in targeted reinnervation amputees.

10 ena observed in human targeted reinnervation amputees.

11 t, phantom sensations in spinal patients and amputees.

12 lished touch input in targeted reinnervation amputees.

13 e motor intent and evoke sensory precepts in amputees.

14 igit on the normal, contralateral hand in 15 amputees.

15 Tissue specimens obtained from an amputee 10 weeks after gene therapy showed foci of proli

16 ugh such intrusions are commonly reported in amputees [5, 6].

17 n may be a satisfactory treatment option for amputees, a careful selection of candidates and a rigoro

18 gn of prosthetic arms have helped upper limb amputees achieve greater levels of function.

19 study, we found that toe tapping of all the amputees activated the bilateral hand area, including ca

20 Relative to controls, amputees also showed increased activity within the forme

21 Here, we investigated how each system (i.e. amputee and powered prosthesis) responds to changes in t

22 es between digits in the amputees or between amputees and control subjects.

23 for direct neuroprosthetic applications for amputees and disabled individuals.

24 nd reaction time) on 12 upper and lower limb amputees and found that consistently reported perceiving

25 al normal skin of the targeted reinnervation amputees and on analogous sites in able-bodied controls.

26 applied to restore arm and hand function for amputees and paralysed persons.

27 he primary motor cortex in upper-extremities amputees and to determine if the acquisition of special

28 he contralateral chest and arm skin of these amputees, as well as on the chest and arm skin of a cont

29 advantage of at least 0.13 m compared to non-amputee athletes.

30 Amputees cannot feel what they touch with their artifici

31 structural changes in the corpus callosum of amputees, compatible with the hypothesis that phantom se

32 to be similar to normal ranges for both the amputees' contralateral skin and also for the control po

33 Our results suggest transfemoral amputees could benefit from load-adaptive powered knee c

34 s used to map CN in controls and in forelimb amputees during the first 12 weeks following deafferenta

35 -knee amputation expend more energy than non-amputees during walking and exhibit reduced push-off wor

36 nnervated chest skin of three shoulder-level amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery.

37 o areas became significantly stronger in the amputee group.

38 a presented, it seems that the bilateral arm amputees have a strong potential to develop new skills i

39 rforming an analogous optimization for a non-amputee human, we predict that an amputee walking with a

40 nd tested it with two targeted reinnervation amputees in a series of experiments fashioned after the

41 In a camp for amputees in the capital city Freetown, Medecins Sans Fro

42 elevant cutaneous touch feedback may help an amputee incorporate an artificial limb into his or her s

43 at tactile stimulation of the intact foot in amputees induced a greater activation of ipsilateral S1,

44 After chronic deafferentation in amputees, MEP amplitudes and motor output curves in smal

45 discovery of persistent digit topography of amputees' missing hand could be exploited for the develo

46 preserved, though latent, representation of amputees' missing hand.

47 ntrollers, and controller adjustments affect amputees more when they walk with (versus without) load.

48 einnervation, a novel surgical technique for amputees, offers the potential for returning this lost s

49 in recognition scores between digits in the amputees or between amputees and control subjects.

50 A regression analysis comparing controls and amputees over the first 12 weeks post-amputation found s

51 ese data were compared with those of control amputee patients (n = 6) and healthy controls (n = 12).

52 Neuroprosthetics research in amputee patients aims at developing new prostheses that

53 When this reinnervated skin is touched, the amputees perceive that they are being touched on their m

54 Amputees' precision drawing performances with their left

55 their control, thus ultimately improving the amputees' quality of life.

56 n eight elderly persons and two transfemoral amputees revealed that stability against falls improved

57 cost--even lower than assuming that the non-amputee's ankle torques are cost-free.

58 ically relevant aspects of a lower extremity amputee's gait, it is currently unknown what the complia

59 ensory expression of the missing limb in the amputee's reinnervated skin.

60 In contrast to some amputee simulations which track experimentally determine

61 able-bodied individuals and one transradial amputee, the two methods were similarly influenced by no

62 come a burgeoning treatment option for adult amputees, there have been no successful cases previously

63 For the two unilateral amputees, these thresholds were similar to measures on t

64 developed as a neural-machine interface for amputees to address these issues.

65 We suggest that this may help amputees to more effectively incorporate an artificial l

66 the interaction between powered prostheses, amputee users, and various environments may allow resear

67 We obtain simulations of an amputee using an ankle-foot prosthesis by simultaneously

68 Bilateral arm amputees usually are excellent foot users.

69 fit evaluation was demonstrated in an adult amputee volunteer who underwent CT evaluation while wear

70 become mechanically coupled when lower limb amputees walk with powered prostheses, but these two con

71 Five transfemoral amputees walked with and without load (i.e. weighted bac

72 ns which track experimentally determined non-amputee walking kinematics, here, we explicitly model th

73 for a non-amputee human, we predict that an amputee walking with an appropriately optimized robotic

74 In amputees, we observed an expansion of activation maps of

75 Point localization thresholds for these amputees were found to be lower for their reinnervated s

76 nnervated skin of the targeted reinnervation amputees were found to be similar to normal ranges for b

77 ion and direct control in eight transhumeral amputees who had TMR in a balanced randomized cross-over

78 lds and point localization thresholds on two amputees who had undergone the targeted reinnervation su

79 om the biceps brachii in 5 male transhumeral amputees who underwent targeted reinnervation of this mu

80 Conversely, amputees who wish to replace a lost limb must assimilate

81 Amputees who wish to rid themselves of a phantom limb mu

82 fferentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain.

83 g task and fMRI to investigate 8 adult human amputees with chronic (mean 33 years) unilateral dominan

84 Existing prosthetic limbs do not provide amputees with cutaneous feedback.

85 We investigated 6 bilateral arm amputees with or without special foot movement skill.

86 nal MRI (fMRI) we investigated 13 upper limb amputees with phantom limb pain (PLP) during hand and li

87 asping movements by a paralytic person or an amputee would greatly facilitate her/his activities of d