ライフサイエンスコーパス: anal sex

1 , be HIV positive, and engage in unprotected anal sex.

2 han a versatile role (both practices) during anal sex.

3 of HIV-infected sex partner and unprotected anal sex.

4 with patients in general, and profoundly for anal sex.

5 use as well as condom use during commercial anal sex (46.5% to 55.0%, p < 0.001) were increasing.

6 Self-reported anal sex and anal symptoms were independently associated

7 Engaging in unprotected vaginal or anal sex and having lower risk partners was reported by

8 cies of vaginal sex and alcohol consumption, anal sex, and certain characteristics of partners (regul

9 One-third of men and women had ever had anal sex, and three-quarters had ever had oral sex.

10 among young women, even those who report no anal sex, and was associated with cervical HPV infection

11 When adjusted for age, condomless receptive anal sex, depression, interpersonal stigma, law enforcem

12 Prevalence of unprotected anal sex during the past 6 months was high (overall, 41%

13 female who engages in unprotected receptive anal sex (HR, 6.8), having short-term sex partners (HR,

14 past 3 months, and never using a condom for anal sex in the past 6 months were independently associa

15 e more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex in the prior 12 months (OR 2.44, 95% CI 2.05-2.

16 MSM) is closely related to the role taken in anal sex (insertive, receptive or both), but little is k

17 have sex with men (MSM) reporting insertive anal sex only (insMSM; n = 156); and (4) MSM reporting r

18 th a partner of the opposite sex, or oral or anal sex or genital contact with a partner of the same s

19 Testing on indication of self-reported anal sex or symptoms is used to manage anorectal Chlamyd

20 = 185) of women had an indication (reported anal sex or symptoms), 72.5% (n = 689) did not have an i

21 I)(2) 0%-91%), and engagement in unprotected anal sex (OR = 1.72, 95% CI(OR) 1.44-2.05, I(2) = 0.0%,

22 .6; 95% CI, 1.2-10.7), unprotected receptive anal sex (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2), condom failure (OR,

23 sexual repertoires--particularly in oral and anal sex--over time.

24 anal sex (P = .04), and no condom use during anal sex (P = .04) were associated with HPV-16 persisten

25 anal touching during sex (P = .045), recent anal sex (P = .04), and no condom use during anal sex (P

26 STDs (P =.02); more partners (P<.001); more anal sex (P<.001); and more sexual exposure to men (P<.0

27 6% among YMSM with a history of 1 receptive anal sex partner and 31% among YMSM with >/= 2 partners.

28 ex to 47.3% in men reporting >/= 4 receptive anal sex partners (P < .001).A similar pattern was also

29 ex to 14.8% in men reporting >/= 4 insertive anal sex partners (P = .014).

30 -risk HPV was associated with number of male anal sex partners and inversely associated with number o

31 ong MSM, a younger age, reporting >/= 2 male anal sex partners in the past 3 months, and never using

32 The number of lifetime male receptive anal sex partners was significantly associated with HPV

33 M; n = 156); and (4) MSM reporting receptive anal sex (recMSM; n = 415).

34 tcome measure was serodiscordant unprotected anal sex (SDUA).

35 Among MSM who primarily engaged in insertive anal sex, the association between male circumcision and

36 eraction of gender with condomless receptive anal sex, the odds of HIV infection for transgender wome

37 rom 3.7% in men reporting no prior insertive anal sex to 14.8% in men reporting >/= 4 insertive anal

38 om 10.0% in men reporting no prior receptive anal sex to 47.3% in men reporting >/= 4 receptive anal

39 he upper 95% confidence limit for condomless anal sex was 0.71 per 100 couple-years of follow-up.

40 te models for men and women, having ever had anal sex was associated with white race, age of 20-44 ye

41 Condom use during last oral or anal sex was relatively uncommon.

42 teria for screening nor history of receptive anal sex was significantly associated with HSIL.

43 black, mixed, or other race; having ever had anal sex with a man (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-13.8); or havi

44 primary sex partner and ever having oral or anal sex with a man was associated with infection with a

45 Men reporting consensual oral/anal sex with a man were more likely to be HIV+ than men

46 y (one or more occasion of vaginal, oral, or anal sex with a partner of the opposite sex, or oral or

47 an an insertive sex toy before use, and oral-anal sex with female partners.

48 All 46 ES reported frequent unprotected anal sex with known HIV-1-infected partners at enrollmen

49 In contrast, commercial anal sex with male (11.9% to 7.1%, p < 0.001) and drug u

50 duration, and who have a history of oral or anal sex with men were most likely to have an anal HPV i

51 1 prophylaxis among men who have unprotected anal sex with men.

52 nt partners, P = .003; episodes of insertive anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .001).

53 umber of male partners, P = .04; episodes of anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .003; episode

54 partners, P = .003; episodes of unprotected anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .003; episode

55 ificantly more often than those reporting no anal sex without a condom (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 5

56 Having one partner and insertive anal sex without a condom had the highest NNTs (100 and