ライフサイエンスコーパス: analyses were performed

1 ed at multiple time points, and comprehensive immunological analyses were performed.

2 were harmonized across the three datasets and standardized analyses were performed.

3 eproducibility of the finite element method, three separate analyses were performed: a test-retest reproducibility analys

4 Primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat p

5 e study aimed at noninferiority of reduced-intensity P-III; analyses were performed according to treatment given.

6 Meta-analyses were performed and multiple testing corrections were

7 Genetic analyses were performed at the Center for Familial Breast and

8 Gene expression analyses were performed by RT-PCR.

9 Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad software.

10 ellar DNs resting-state network; first-level and high-level analyses were performed by using software tools.

11 Analyses were performed by using software.

12 The analyses were performed during the first 3 months of 2016.

13 x regression, and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed for diagnostic and prognostic perform

14 based on reproducibility, machine learning, and correlation analyses were performed for selecting features, enabling the

15 The analyses were performed from February 8, 2017, through May 31

16 Analyses were performed from November 2016 to February 2017.

17 Main analyses were performed in blocks from cingulate cortex and c

18 Stratified analyses were performed in consideration of potential modifie

19 mmunohistochemical, biochemical, functional, and behavioral analyses were performed in nerves harvested from each group a

20 Genome-wide association analyses were performed in pediatric and adult asthma cases a

21 to elucidate IgE and IgG reactivity, and putative function analyses were performed in silico according to Gene Ontology

22 Cross-sectional analyses were performed in two independent population-based c

23 Sensitivity and supplementary analyses were performed, including fecal immunochemical test

24 METHODS AND Retrospective analyses were performed on 53,452 National Lung Screening Tri

25 WGS and phylogenetic analyses were performed on a sample of USA300 BSI isolates.

26 Central histo-morphometry analyses were performed on all other biopsies and cases were

27 an Sharing, competing risk, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed on first-time liver transplant regist

28 In situ analyses were performed on glutaraldehyde-fixed thin sections

29 Between-within twin-pair analyses were performed on twins reared apart to assess famil

30 Several sensitivity analyses were performed restricting the study population by p

31 Sensitivity analyses were performed stratified by TBI severity (no TBI, T

32 Univariate tests and logistic regression analyses were performed, studying the effects of reconstructi

33 Meta-analyses were performed that compared MR imaging studies to d

34 Analyses were performed to adjust for age, sex, educational l

35 Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between th

36 Similar analyses were performed to classify subjects with good glycem

37 Raw and inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses were performed to compare patients undergoing TAVR w

38 Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated w

39 Further analyses were performed to determine the resistance mechanism

40 Additional analyses were performed to determine whether age and brain le

41 Immunohistologic and Western blot analyses were performed to evaluate NIS protein expression in

42 Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were performed to examine the associations of geneti

43 and regression tree (CART) analysis and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify protein combinations that

44 Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the effect of colonosc

45 Sensitivity analyses were performed to test alternative definitions of ag

46 McNemar tests, as well as receiver-operating-characteristic analyses, were performed to compare variables and diagnostic

47 Survival analyses were performed using models adjusted for traditional

48 The analyses were performed using summary statistics obtained for

49 Association analyses were performed using univariable and multivariable s

50 Sensitivity analyses were performed where denosumab SRE probabilities wer