戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e estimates, dose response curve regression, and comparison analyses were performed.
2                   Univariate, multivariate, and time-series analyses were performed.
3                                        Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.
4 rd ratios (HRs) and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed.
5                                 Lung and brain histological analyses were performed.
6 e chronically fed EtOH, and ileum RNA-seq and bioinformatic analyses were performed.
7                                       Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed.
8                Adjusted logistic regression models and meta-analyses were performed.
9 lcin [OCN], and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase [TRAP]) analyses were performed.
10                                             Two independent analyses were performed, 1 regression based and 1 simulation
11                                         Logistic regression analyses were performed and adjusted for several parameters.
12            The main limitations of this study are that most analyses were performed at the national rather than individua
13                                      Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed based on prior HF history (i.e., de n
14                                                 Comparative analyses were performed between the early tracheostomy and la
15                                                    Efficacy analyses were performed by applying RECIST 1.1 criteria to CN
16                                                             Analyses were performed by intention to treat.
17                                                     All the analyses were performed by using HPLC-MS/MS followed by pooli
18                                  Multiple linear regression analyses were performed for 12 cortical and subcortical gray
19                                 Standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed for each comparison, and a meta-regre
20                                                             Analyses were performed for hospitalized MM patients.
21                                                    Subgroup analyses were performed for sex, sample size, displacement du
22                                     Linear mixed regression analyses were performed for variables with P < .05.
23                                Lipidomic and transcriptomic analyses were performed in human tricuspid aortic valves.
24 standing this high mortality, detailed clinical virological analyses were performed in specimens from 180 H5N1 patients,
25                                                         All analyses were performed in the overall population and accordi
26                                                 Correlation analyses were performed on both gating signals.
27                                 Bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA analyses were performed on stool samples from 405 HIV-infecte
28                                        Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed on the basis of patient age at time o
29      Additional vital status data collection and subsequent analyses were performed post hoc.Measurements and Main Result
30 ty sensitivity analyses and 1-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess for uncertainty.
31                                      Additional sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of missing data.
32                           Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between ra
33 erating characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses were performed to compare LUCK and Killip classifica
34                                                Network meta-analyses were performed to compare mesh types and locations.
35                                                       Three analyses were performed to control for confounders: propensit
36                                                  Additional analyses were performed to determine the association of patie
37                             Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between m
38 vival (Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier), and center effects analyses were performed to examine the association of ECLS us
39                                                     Cluster analyses were performed to identify locations demonstrating s
40           Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify parameters that were asso
41                                                Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associat
42                                     Mendelian randomization analyses were performed to infer phenome-wide effects of free
43                               Comparative and multivariable analyses were performed to predict grave outcomes (3-month mo
44                                      Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to study the association between demo
45 and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses, were performed to assess the potency and to charact
46                                 Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a log-rank test and Cox proport
47 ined using Illumina HiSeq 2500, and differential expression analyses were performed using DESeq2 (|fold change|>1.5 and f
48                                                 Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric bivariate or mul
49                                                        Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models with inve
50                                                 Statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant.