ライフサイエンスコーパス: anastomotic

1 The anastomotic allograft group demonstrated significantly l

2 s after the first PBBD between strictures at anastomotic and nonanastomotic sites (P = .75).

3 stenosis after PBBD of biliary strictures at anastomotic and nonanastomotic sites.

4 Two left and six right Kugel anastomotic arteries were detected as supplying the AVN

5 s to the AVN, including left and right Kugel anastomotic arteries, were investigated.

6 its own motor nerve and feed artery with an anastomotic arteriole (resting diameter 25 microm) that

7 (ROV; diameter change, 10 +/- 1 mum) of the anastomotic arteriole along the active (Inferior) muscle

8 nitiated dilatation that travelled along the anastomotic arteriole from the Inferior into the Superio

9 enoreceptors enabled ROV to spread along the anastomotic arteriole into the inactive muscle region (d

10 No difference in anastomotic biliary leakage was observed between groups.

11 2 patients (12 men, aged 51+/-11 years) with anastomotic biliary stricture after LDLT.

12 cally feasible and safe for the treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after LDLT.

13 The anastomotic BL enclosed extraparenchymal cells that netw

14 In addition, the anastomotic BL overlying macrophages contained numerous

15 econd, another form of BL projection, termed anastomotic BL, was found between capillaries in dense c

16 n immunoreactivity was often detected in the anastomotic BL.

17 rmanent stoma (38.0% vs 29.8%, P = 0.13) and anastomotic breakdown (7.1% vs 3.5%, P = 0.26) rates fav

18 , respectively (P < 0.05), without affecting anastomotic burst pressure.

19 mals undergoing delayed operations have less anastomotic collagen deposition and ischemic injury than

20 ts compensatory recruitment of microvascular anastomotic collateral networks that augment stenotic be

21 Clinical leakage was defined as anastomotic complication requiring intervention or inter

22 was higher for all patients with pancreatic anastomotic complications (n = 19), regardless of random

23 was associated with readmissions related to anastomotic complications (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36).

24 c regression modeling to assess the risk for anastomotic complications (reoperation, rescue stoma, re

25 ated with a significantly increased risk for anastomotic complications among patients undergoing none

26 timodal group had less cardiorespiratory and anastomotic complications but more readmissions.

27 When anastomotic complications do occur, there is less need f

28 he LLT group, but the incidence of bronchial anastomotic complications was higher in the PDLT group b

29 transfusions and resulted in more pancreatic anastomotic complications, likely related to greater int

30 to esophagogastrectomy, potentially reducing anastomotic complications.

31 on rates, sphincter preservations, and wound/anastomotic complications.

32 and compression colorectal anastomosis, and anastomotic configuration.

33 sels had few branch points and many vascular anastomotic connections among larger vessels.

34 of the surgery such as urinary incontinence, anastomotic contracture, erectile dysfunction and rectou

35 A subset of anastomotic contractures following radical prostatectomy

36 graft fashioned in a manner to achieve large anastomotic cross-sectional area on the confluence of th

37 erposition isografts were completed using an anastomotic cuff technique.

38 phere was markedly diminished, suggesting an anastomotic deficiency within the CW.

39 omplications included pelvic abscess (1.3%), anastomotic dehiscence (6.4%), bowel obstruction (11.7%)

40 rom mechanical ventilation and management of anastomotic dehiscence are the unique attributes of this

41 One patient died following rectosigmoid anastomotic dehiscence during cycle 4.

42 At laparostomy revision, the incidence of anastomotic dehiscence was greater than that of primary

43 rs) for tracheobronchomalacia, stenosis, and anastomotic dehiscence, including one patient referred f

44 a composite of mortality, pneumonia, sepsis, anastomotic dehiscence, wound infection, noncardiac resp

45 y may reduce the risk of pelvic sepsis after anastomotic dehiscence.

46 ulated to be involved in the pathogenesis of anastomotic device stenosis, possibly similar to in-sten

47 ssisted CABG using automated one-shot distal anastomotic devices.

48 intersuture distance, suture distance to the anastomotic edge, and tension on the suture.

49 of both pressure-induced rhabdomyolysis and anastomotic failure after bariatric surgery are also rev

50 t, including postoperative complications and anastomotic failure as outcome variables in 2 separate m

51 liary stents were protective factors against anastomotic failure.

52 Excellent anastomotic function was achieved in 107/112 (95%).

53 95% excellent anastomotic function without intervention attests to the

54 rmines postoperative morbidity and long-term anastomotic function.

55 murine long bone involves the extension and anastomotic fusion of endothelial buds.

56 loss was significantly more than that of the anastomotic group at 2 weeks (89.5%+/-13, P=0.004) and 4

57 Complications of anastomotic healing are a common source of morbidity and

58 s with experts, we advocate stop considering anastomotic healing in the gastrointestinal tract and cu

59 tudies have suggested that NSAIDs may impair anastomotic healing in the gastrointestinal tract.

60 Since knowledge on anastomotic healing is lacking, it remains difficult to

61 rvention studies should at least address the anastomotic healing process in terms of histology and ce

62 Finally, the anastomotic healing process ought to be further elucidat

63 les on colorectal anastomotic techniques and anastomotic healing published in the past 4 decades were

64 While many researchers compare anastomotic healing with wound healing in the skin, ther

65 transposition, and ischemia/reperfusion and anastomotic healing, are reviewed.

66 ical relationship between good perfusion and anastomotic healing.

67 t occurs and examine the effects of delay on anastomotic healing.

68 The anastomotic height was 3.5 +/- 1.9 cm from the anal verg

69 When anastomotic insufficiency was suspected but no extravasa

70 diation developed a significant incidence of anastomotic leak (>60%; p<0.01) when colonized by P. aer

71 the literature, we achieved a lower rate of anastomotic leak (0.3% vs. 2%, P = 0.001) and stomal ste

72 vs. 52%); mean blood loss (677 vs. 368 mL); anastomotic leak (14% vs. 9%); and discharge within 10 d

73 Anastomotic leak (15.5% vs 21.2%, P = 0.028) and reinter

74 t differences in complications were seen for anastomotic leak (17.2% v 10.7%; P = .007) and surgical

75 ions (61, 9.9%), chest infection (50, 8.1%), anastomotic leak (27, 4.4%), hemorrhage (14, 2.3%), and

76 cluding mortality (2.9% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001), anastomotic leak (4.3% vs 1.4%, P = 0.002), and a higher

77 ed as potential independent risk factors for anastomotic leak (60-day follow-up).

78 Grade 3 or higher adverse events included anastomotic leak (8.6%), acute respiratory distress synd

79 The risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) after anterior resection have been

80 CT) might be an early and reliable marker of anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery.

81 ical factors that may predispose patients to anastomotic leak (AL) after large bowel surgery.

82 as to evaluate failure-to-rescue (FTR) after anastomotic leak (AL) in colectomy patients.

83 l stents (61 PSEMS, 15 FSEMS, 7 SEPS) for an anastomotic leak (n=32), iatrogenic rupture (n=13), Boer

84 ere associated with a 24% increased risk for anastomotic leak (odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.01-1.56];

85 t, was independently associated with reduced anastomotic leak (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.94), SSI (OR

86 psis (OR = 2.18 [1.50-3.16], P < 0.001); and anastomotic leak (OR = 1.32 [1.02-1.71], P = 0.03).

87 medical complications (OR = 13.2, RR = 2.5), anastomotic leak (OR = 13.7, RR = 3.3), reoperations (OR

88 as no difference in conversion (P = 0.2835), anastomotic leak (P = 0.8342), or mortality (P = 0.5680)

89 to the determine impact of severe esophageal anastomotic leak (SEAL) upon long-term survival and loco

90 Anastomotic leak after anterior resection increased mort

91 ate, but multicentric prospective studies on anastomotic leak after colon resection are lacking.

92 Anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer is a f

93 Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is a severe co

94 l entities may be considered to represent an anastomotic leak after low anterior resection, with diff

95 nt (SEPS) for a benign esophageal rupture or anastomotic leak after upper gastrointestinal surgery in

96 ith LAA correlated with the likelihood of an anastomotic leak and confirmed the critical relationship

97 Two Immediate animals developed anastomotic leak and died; the Delay group had no compli

98 eal perforation and postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak are often encountered.

99 am was created to easily predict the risk of anastomotic leak for a given patient.

100 Anastomotic leak has a large overall effect on 30-day cl

101 ly postoperative cholangiography revealed an anastomotic leak in 4.6% of patients and extravasation a

102 mpair wound healing and increase the risk of anastomotic leak in colon surgery.

103 e tissue destructive phenotype and prevented anastomotic leak in rats.

104 We developed a novel model of anastomotic leak in which rats were exposed to pre-opera

105 Abscess/anastomotic leak increased time to adjuvant chemotherapy

106 Anastomotic leak is a potentially devastating complicati

107 Anastomotic leak is still one of the most devastating co

108 Anastomotic leak is still the most dreaded complication

109 Patients who had an anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess were include

110 It has been hypothesized that anastomotic leak predisposes rectal cancer patients to l

111 MBP+/ABX+ was also associated with lower anastomotic leak rate than no-prep [OR = 0.45 (95% CI: 0

112 Anastomotic leak rate was 11.7% (n = 26).

113 The short-term anastomotic leak rate was 8%.

114 The anastomotic leak rate was 8.7%, and widely varied betwee

115 agement has improved outcomes as measured by anastomotic leak rates and colon related mortality.

116 derwent oesophagogastrectomy, post-operative anastomotic leak rates were higher in the chemotherapy p

117 ts traditionally considered at high risk for anastomotic leak remains unclear.

118 tal are all important determining factors of anastomotic leak risk.

119 Anastomotic leak significantly increased mortality (15.2

120 The incidence of clinical anastomotic leak was 3.5%.

121 or permanent stoma creation, while only free anastomotic leak was associated with an increased incide

122 Anastomotic leak was associated with the incidence of en

123 Anastomotic leak was correlated with the requirement for

124 Anastomotic leak was the most commonly reported morbidit

125 -stage procedures did not change the risk of anastomotic leak when all operations were taken into acc

126 resent early after esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with limited mediastinal or pleural con

127 incisional hernia in 5 patients (1.8%), and anastomotic leak with peritonitis in 14 patients (5.1%).

128 djuvant treatment, distance from anal verge, anastomotic leak) were collected.

129 ive perioperative outcome domains (including anastomotic leak), four quality of life outcome domains

130 .5% (86.4% associated with perforation, 9.5% anastomotic leak, 4.5% patient managed nonoperatively).

131 , and early postoperative mortality, whereas anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and recurrent l

132 ral antibiotics reduces by nearly half, SSI, anastomotic leak, and ileus, the most common and trouble

133 urinary tract infection, urinary retention, anastomotic leak, and postoperative ileus.

134 198 study patients, 168 had no demonstrated anastomotic leak, free fluid, or abscess at any time aft

135 any of 5 common complications (wound, chest, anastomotic leak, hemorrhage, and cardiac event).

136 incidence of respiratory failure, pneumonia, anastomotic leak, ileus, or urinary retention.

137 re was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak, nonroutine discharges or readmission a

138 re was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak, nonroutine discharges or readmission a

139 mortality (15.2% vs 1.9% in patients without anastomotic leak, P < 0.0001) and length of hospitalizat

140 ere was no significant difference in risk of anastomotic leak, pneumonia, nasogastric tube reinsertio

141 ciated with a reduction in wound dehiscence, anastomotic leak, pneumonia, prolonged requirement of me

142 ial SSI, deep SSI, organ space SSI, any SSI, anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, sepsis, readmissi

143 Follow-up complications include anastomotic leak, staple-line disruption, stomal stenosi

144 paration (no-prep) on outcomes, particularly anastomotic leak, surgical site infection (SSI), and ile

145 t and to correlate perfusion with subsequent anastomotic leak.

146 ot cigarette smoking) increased the risk for anastomotic leak.

147 s seemed to meet usual clinical criteria for anastomotic leak.

148 f the technique with the lowest incidence of anastomotic leak.

149 helps reduce risk of clinically significant anastomotic leak.

150 mportant implications in the pathogenesis of anastomotic leak.

151 reactive protein (CRP) (P<0.05) but not with anastomotic leak/conduit necrosis or mortality.

152 variables were independent risk factors for anastomotic leak: obesity [P = 0.003, odds ratio (OR) =

153 related to pulmonary complications (25.7%), anastomotic leakage (15.9%), and cardiac events (13.5%).

154 al site infection (3.2% vs 9.0%, P < 0.001), anastomotic leakage (2.8% vs 5.7%, P = 0.001), and proce

155 Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most dreaded compli

156 larly, 92% of COX-2-deficient mice developed anastomotic leakage (P = 0.003) compared to WT.

157 2-administered COX-2 knockout mice developed anastomotic leakage (P = 0.02).

158 Rate of anastomotic leakage (stapler: 3.0%, hand suture: 1.8%, P

159 stric tube is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

160 efine the true incidence and presentation of anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis.

161 Little is known about late detected anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rec

162 ore, we investigated the association between anastomotic leakage and a human polymorphism of the COX-

163 usion and will thus contribute to preventing anastomotic leakage and failure caused by tissue necrosi

164 oluble contrast swallow for the detection of anastomotic leakage and its clinical symptoms were analy

165 When symptoms of anastomotic leakage are present, a CT-scan and endoscopy

166 Independent predictors for anastomotic leakage at any time during follow-up were ne

167 ns, the corresponding risks were reduced for anastomotic leakage by 24%, for deep infection/abscess b

168 nflammatory drug inhibiting COX-2, increased anastomotic leakage compared to vehicle-treated mice (10

169 this study were to test the hypothesis that anastomotic leakage develops when pathogens colonizing a

170 often used as a routine screening to exclude anastomotic leakage during the first postoperative week.

171 ly enteral nutrition is associated with less anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing extensive rec

172 Anastomotic leakage is associated with higher rates of r

173 Anastomotic leakage occurred in 8% of the patients after

174 Moreover, anastomotic leakage occurred significantly less frequent

175 Sarcopenia was not predictive for anastomotic leakage or sepsis.

176 COX-2 expression, was associated with higher anastomotic leakage rates.

177 cans and upper endoscopy, the true number of anastomotic leakage was 15.

178 Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 13.4% within 30 day

179 In this cohort, anastomotic leakage was not associated with risk of loca

180 Independent predictors for anastomotic leakage were determined using a binary logis

181 dence of incisional surgical site infection, anastomotic leakage, and hospital readmission when compa

182 teral nutrition reduced postoperative ileus, anastomotic leakage, and hospital stay.

183 us mice were subjected to a model of colonic anastomotic leakage, and were treated with vehicle, dicl

184 reatment of obesity include i.a.: intestinal anastomotic leakage, impaired intestinal permeability an

185 We assessed anastomotic leakage, mortality, angiogenesis, and inflam

186 ty, cardiovascular complications, bleedings, anastomotic leakage, or allograft rejection.

187 d as the absence of surgical-site infection, anastomotic leakage, or antibiotic use 4 weeks postopera

188 psis within 30 postoperative days, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and peritonitis.

189 In patients with anastomotic leakage, presence and severity of calcificat

190 Predictors for anastomotic leakage, sepsis, and mortality were analyzed

191 related to the operation, especially due to anastomotic leakage.

192 k factor for postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage.

193 mplication following intestinal resection is anastomotic leakage.

194 ts without clinical or radiological signs of anastomotic leakage.

195 asation of the contrast agent was defined as anastomotic leakage.

196 Of 246 patients, 58 (24%) experienced anastomotic leakage.

197 inhibitors have been associated with colonic anastomotic leakage.

198 juvant radiotherapy, shows that one third of anastomotic leakages is diagnosed beyond 30 days, and al

199 Five patients (6.0%) developed small anastomotic leakages with minor clinical symptoms; howev

200 ous adverse events for all patients included anastomotic leaks (30 events in chemotherapy alone group

201 n were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients).

202 Endoscopic management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations with the use of esoph

203 Anastomotic leaks and reinterventions were more frequent

204 tions after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass include anastomotic leaks and strictures, marginal ulcers, jejun

205 Anastomotic leaks are a major source of morbidity after

206 Anastomotic leaks are among the most dreaded complicatio

207 Anastomotic leaks are frequently diagnosed late in the p

208 Benign esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks are life-threatening conditions that a

209 clinical trends in permanent stoma rates and anastomotic leaks in favor of LC but with an increased p

210 Only three patients had anastomotic leaks in the most recent 164 procedures (1.8

211 Anastomotic leaks occurred in 4 of 56 HVI patients (7%)

212 There were no anastomotic leaks or deaths.

213 e bowel obstruction, wound complications, or anastomotic leaks or died.

214 ary outcomes when stenting was performed for anastomotic leaks or perforations.

215 ant chemoradiation is used, the incidence of anastomotic leaks remains unacceptably high ( approximat

216 ormed for plastic versus metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately.

217 The overall 90-day rate of anastomotic leaks was 4.3% for all patients (151 patient

218 for the treatment of esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks with special emphasis on different ste

219 Complications: 4 major wound infections, 2 anastomotic leaks, 10 symptomatic marginal ulcers, 5 sto

220 ses were performed to synthesize outcomes of anastomotic leaks, pneumonia, nasogastric tube reinserti

221 ic stents in the management of postoperative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous esophageal perforations,

222 foration and in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks.

223 y for treating benign esophageal ruptures or anastomotic leaks.

224 ode retrieval, and decrease the incidence of anastomotic leaks.

225 Oral contrast swallow detected 7 anastomotic leaks.

226 n, and its use might affect the incidence of anastomotic leaks.

227 We registered 28 (5.6%) anastomotic leaks.

228 The use of LAA may contribute to reduced anastomotic morbidity.

229 ble to rapidly identify new perforations and anastomotic or primary repair dehiscences; although this

230 phic evaluation demonstrated an overall LIMA anastomotic patency of 96.3% and PCI vessel patency of 6

231 ow, orientation) may contribute to continued anastomotic patency.

232 tecting local ischemia caused by unfavorable anastomotic perfusion and will thus contribute to preven

233 ging is a safe and feasible method to assess anastomotic perfusion, and its use might affect the inci

234 een considered for ileostomy reversal due to anastomotic perineal fistulae.

235 Anastomotic pseudoaneurysm is an underestimated complica

236 obotic surgery allows complex resections and anastomotic reconstructions to be performed with nearly

237 Of the latter, 3 were anastomotic recurrences.

238 "Poor" anastomotic results occurred in 5 patients: 2 patients w

239 he posttransplant period because of arterial anastomotic site bleeding, and one of the left lateral s

240 dium, and 3 patients had an abscess near the anastomotic site without extravasation of contrast mediu

241 c leakage develops when pathogens colonizing anastomotic sites become in vivo transformed to express

242 16 subjects, MRA detected moderate to severe anastomotic stenoses, which were confirmed at catheter a

243 ents (29.6%) required reintervention, 1 LIMA anastomotic stenosis (3.7%), 3 after bare metal stent (3

244 a significantly higher incidence of arterial anastomotic stenosis (6.8% vs. 0.4%, P=0.02) and hydrone

245 ovascular stent graft for revision of venous anastomotic stenosis in failing hemodialysis grafts.

246 cence (6.4%), bowel obstruction (11.7%), and anastomotic stenosis in need of mechanical dilatation (1

247 this study, percutaneous revision of venous anastomotic stenosis in patients with a prosthetic hemod

248 undergoing hemodialysis and who had a venous anastomotic stenosis to undergo either balloon angioplas

249 dilatation of the stomach, gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis, marginal ulceration, incisional he

250 tively; his only major complication was late anastomotic stenosis, which was treated successfully wit

251 iovenous hemodialysis-access graft is venous anastomotic stenosis.

252 patients with E4 injuries had postoperative anastomotic stenting >3 months, and 3 developed strictur

253 l complications (4.3% vs 5.6%; P = .03), and anastomotic stricture (5.8% vs 14.0%; P < .001).

254 CV have increased occurrence of late biliary anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation.

255 fically focused on the current approaches to anastomotic stricture and RUF following radical prostate

256 al or pouch-vaginal fistulae, pelvic sepsis, anastomotic stricture and separation.

257 Rates of urinary incontinence and anastomotic stricture are acceptable, although one third

258 -hospital complications, length of stay, and anastomotic stricture rates.

259 The incidence of leak was 9.6% and of anastomotic stricture was 26%.

260 Biliary anastomotic stricture was confirmed by endoscopic retrog

261 Anastomotic stricture was the most common biliary compli

262 erative mortality, whereas anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and recurrent laryngeal nerve pal

263 nderwent successful balloon dilatation of an anastomotic stricture.

264 r more abnormalities on endoscopy, including anastomotic strictures (53%), marginal ulcers (16%), fun

265 r LT, with special reference to late biliary anastomotic strictures (LBAS).

266 olume hospital patients tended to have fewer anastomotic strictures (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.04)

267 tions (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.70), more anastomotic strictures (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.54 to 3.15),

268 tients of high-volume MIRP experienced fewer anastomotic strictures (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99)

269 ate, -2.99; 95% CI, -3.45 to -2.53) but more anastomotic strictures (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.87)

270 FBD for anastomotic strictures after esophageal atresia repair i

271 In addition, management of biliary anastomotic strictures in liver transplant patients, rol

272 Biliary anastomotic strictures occurred in 1 DCD patient and 3 D

273 scopic balloon dilatation for ureterovesical anastomotic strictures or ureteropelvic junction obstruc

274 The incidence of anastomotic strictures was higher in patients with no T-

275 Fewer anastomotic strictures were found in the T-tube group (n

276 Anastomotic strictures were late complications and were

277 nias and nine adhesions), 16 major leaks, 15 anastomotic strictures, and two fistulas.

278 t are at higher risk for salvage therapy and anastomotic strictures.

279 Of the patients, nine had ureterovesical anastomotic strictures.

280 one case of postoperative bleeding from the anastomotic suture line were reported.

281 , surgical technique (laparoscopic vs open), anastomotic technique (staple vs handsewn), number of ma

282 We believe detailed documentation of the anastomotic technique of all colorectal operations is ne

283 orts have questioned the classical tenets of anastomotic technique such as water-tight anastomoses, t

284 (1.8%) since the routine use of a two-layer anastomotic technique.

285 ical and experimental articles on colorectal anastomotic techniques and anastomotic healing published

286 ed P1) and the strain retrieved from leaking anastomotic tissues (termed P2) demonstrated that P2 was

287 Anastomotic TRAS developed in living donor recipients; p

288 nd should not be automatically attributed to anastomotic tumor recurrence.

289 number of prior resections, family history, anastomotic type, and time to first surgery.

290 resection with urethral stent placement and anastomotic urethroplasty are viable options for achievi

291 Urethral stents and anastomotic urethroplasty have been used with increasing

292 or are not suitable for these procedures, an anastomotic urethroplasty, and if not feasible a substit

293 similar between urethral stent placement and anastomotic urethroplasty, respectively.

294 tes, and connects to the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessel (DLAV).

295 position in the ISVs and dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessel (DLAV).

296 ental vessels and in the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessel, enlarged cerebral ventricles, and pe

297 The higher number of non-anastomotic vessels and capillary beds within the matrix

298 this technique was ineffective in occluding anastomotic vessels and their associated tributaries wit

299 In the present study, anastomotic vessels and their patency were evaluated in

300 Anastomotic vessels in exudative age-related macular deg