ライフサイエンスコーパス: ancestral gene

1 scades, which probably evolved from the same ancestral gene.

2 uggesting a recent duplication of the entire ancestral gene.

3 an cbl genes arose by two duplications of an ancestral gene.

4 ng that these genes originated from a common ancestral gene.

5 ntagonist seem to have evolved from a common ancestral gene.

6 that these genes have evolved from a common ancestral gene.

7 at MKP-1 and MKP-2 are derived from the same ancestral gene.

8 e, suggesting they are derived from a common ancestral gene.

9 alternate splice variants of a p63/p73-like ancestral gene.

10 d patterns of activity to that of the single ancestral gene.

11 issue-specific patterns of expression of the ancestral gene.

12 ltransferases may have evolved from a common ancestral gene.

13 suggests that they are derived from the same ancestral gene.

14 nequal genomic recombination of a duplicated ancestral gene.

15 egion has retained the basic function of its ancestral gene.

16 , suggesting that they evolved from a common ancestral gene.

17 rose from the duplication of a single common ancestral gene.

18 vin, derived from an early duplication of an ancestral gene.

19 mily, which has evolved from a single common ancestral gene.

20 at these two genes are evolved from a common ancestral gene.

21 insect CYP6B genes are derived from a common ancestral gene.

22 t the conclusion of derivation from a common ancestral gene.

23 different flavonoid regulators from a common ancestral gene.

24 family may have evolved from the most likely ancestral gene.

25 as evolved by gene duplication from a single ancestral gene.

26 ave evolved at different rates from a common ancestral gene.

27 tary sense and antisense strands of the same ancestral gene.

28 y with FANCD2, likely evolving from a common ancestral gene.

29 a different one of the two functions of the ancestral gene.

30 plete expression pattern and function of the ancestral gene.

31 ne groups, each of which originated from one ancestral gene.

32 d patterns of activity to that of the single ancestral gene.

33 mes, and X-chromosomes mostly conserve their ancestral genes.

34 n as few as 67 different genetic loci and 54 ancestral genes.

35 the X retained and the Y gradually lost most ancestral genes.

36 uggests that they have evolved from distinct ancestral genes.

37 ctive pressures that preserved the surviving ancestral genes.

38 copies possess functions similar to those of ancestral genes.

39 degradation due to inactivation and loss of ancestral genes.

40 evolve differently and retain most of their ancestral genes.

41 ing that they have arisen via duplication of ancestral genes.

42 ated new hybrid genes as well as eliminating ancestral genes.

43 half of all rice expansins arising from two ancestral genes.

44 ivergent function that evolved from a common ancestral gene after a duplication event.

45 sult of regulatory changes to the peripherin ancestral gene along each lineage.

46 pendently in fish, birds and mammals from an ancestral gene also shared by TLR6 and TLR10.

47 pectively, by vertical descent from a single ancestral gene and by duplication.

48 l3, mdl4, and mdl5 are derived from a common ancestral gene and constitute members of a gene family.

49 T-II are the result of the duplication of an ancestral gene and subsequent divergence.

50 When the crossover rate between the ancestral gene and the copy-number variant is low, the e

51 ing evolutionary processes: massive decay of ancestral genes and convergent acquisition and amplifica

52 en biased, with one subgenome retaining more ancestral genes and the other sustaining more gene delet

53 ements are recent pseudogenes with conserved ancestral genes; and (ii) when analyzing metagenomic DNA

54 s and remodeling of the human genome from an ancestral gene, ANKRD26.

55 It is shown that the codon biases of the ancestral genes are much stronger than all extant flower

56 more than 80 non-syntenic genes and only 13 ancestral genes are shared among these grass species.

57 each evolved from its respective human-mouse ancestral gene around 90 million years ago.

58 The 73 V1Rs arose from seven ancestral genes around the time of mouse-rat speciation

59 paralogues arose from a single bifunctional ancestral gene as is still present in Kluyveromyces lact

60 s clear that they were derived from the same ancestral gene as the IgG-expressing CLL B cell, thus do

61 bers arose by gene duplication from a single ancestral gene at a relatively early stage in the evolut

62 l similarity and common origin from a single ancestral gene at the onset of chordate evolution.

63 ction of genome size, involving loss of most ancestral genes, Buchnera retains capabilities for biosy

64 descended relatively recently from the same ancestral gene but have diverged to carry out very diffe

65 shed that the human and mouse loci shared an ancestral gene, but that independent duplication events

66 t that ubiquitin and E1 are derived from two ancestral genes closely related to moaD and moeB.

67 predicts the existence of a beta-alpha-gamma ancestral gene cluster in which internal duplication of

68 rily as the result of two duplications of an ancestral gene containing multiple alternatively spliced

69 ort for a common evolutionary origin from an ancestral gene containing one link module encoding exon.

70 information from extant species, as well as ancestral gene content and gene order for vertebrates an

71 genetic profiles and a correct species tree, ancestral gene content can be reconstructed with sensiti

72 Here, we use ancestral gene content reconstruction to track the timin

73 Ancestral gene duplication and fusion events have produc

74 d are therefore likely to be as important as ancestral gene duplication events for generating composi

75 omologous WD40 repeat proteins, revealing an ancestral gene duplication leading to two clades in plan

76 en through a three-step process initiated by ancestral gene duplication of the original BspUPG1 locus

77 that the similarities are the remnants of an ancestral gene duplication, which may not have occurred

78 sequence level and has likely arisen due to ancestral gene duplication.

79 AP3 gene is located on 3q13.1, suggesting an ancestral gene duplication/translocation event.

80 core peptides are the products of multiple, ancestral gene duplications followed by divergence, but

81 nate genes that diverged apart from a common ancestral gene during early vertebrate evolution.

82 the product of duplication and fusion of an ancestral gene during the course of biochemical evolutio

83 ed to represent gain and loss of function by ancestral genes during evolution.

84 diminished in size and has lost most of its ancestral genes during evolution.

85 a progenitor gene which has duplicated as an ancestral gene, each copy having diverged prior to speci

86 the evolution of TBX3 and TBX5 from a common ancestral gene, each has acquired specific yet complemen

87 refoil fold arose from the duplication of an ancestral gene encoding a homotrimeric single-repeat pro

88 U gene encoding two proteins evolved from an ancestral gene encoding a single protein by the acquisit

89 135 has evolved by fusion of two independent ancestral genes encoding sialyl- and galactosyltransfera

90 Loss of ancestral gene families has played an important role in

91 This result implies that certain ancestral gene families-and thus the biological function

92 56 populations using new methods for tracing ancestral gene flow, focusing primarily on Island Southe

93 logenetic evidence that epitype evolves from ancestral genes following gene duplication, and the poss

94 By analyzing differentiation from inferred ancestral gene frequencies, we obtained results that are

95 brate genes, suggesting it is similar to the ancestral gene from which the vertebrate Notch family ge

96 icate genes became indispensable because the ancestral gene function was divided between them.

97 3B has remained constrained by selection for ancestral gene function.

98 ing regions and can simplify the analysis of ancestral gene functions obscured by pleiotropy or haplo

99 es strongly supports the interpretation that ancestral gene functions partitioned spatially and tempo

100 ctional roles, new genes must integrate into ancestral gene-gene interaction (GGI) networks.

101 The hypothetical ancestral genes had broader expression patterns than mor

102 Although both ancestral genes had the same incremental gene amplificat

103 s were found that, though closely related to ancestral genes, had diverged by a few nucleotides.

104 es are the TCR, Ig, and MHC genes, but their ancestral genes have not been found in more basal verteb

105 We report here the identification of the ancestral gene ( HERC2 ) and a family of duplicated, tru

106 may have been a precursor to or have had an ancestral gene in common with vancomycin resistance gene

107 previously the large HERC2 transcript as an ancestral gene in this duplicon, with approximately 11 H

108 cental V1R genes suggests multiple losses of ancestral genes in carnivores and artiodactyls and gains

109 ene in the operon, and possible retention of ancestral genes in heterocystous cyanobacteria.

110 most likely represent divergence from common ancestral genes in one or both strains based on analysis

111 tworks coordinates expression from PAIs with ancestral genes in response to diverse environmental cue

112 ceptor may have been lifted directly from an ancestral gene instead of being evolutionary duplication

113 s evolved that divided the regulation of the ancestral gene into two specialized genes, one of which

114 formation entailed the evolution of unknown ancestral genes into those specifying bona fide immunogl

115 For example, Tribolium has retained more ancestral genes involved in cell-cell communication than

116 Furthermore, duplication of an ancestral gene is thought to have led to the co-presence

117 panosoma brucei VSG have recent origins, and ancestral gene lineages have been repeatedly co-opted to

118 ed by the differential loss and retention of ancestral gene lineages, thereby generating variation in

119 her affect gene copy numbers and fractionate ancestral gene linkages across multiple chromosomes.

120 ring evolution, the original function of the ancestral gene might be retained in the different specie

121 e subunits, resulting in displacement of the ancestral genes, might have played a role in several lin

122 gues frequently remain associated with their ancestral gene neighbour, resembling NfeD1a in structure

123 e been interpreted as evidence for a shared, ancestral gene network for insect, arthropod and bilater

124 During evolution, this ancestral gene network was expanded through gene duplica

125 an invariant disulfide bond suggest that the ancestral gene of present-day CuZnSODs evolved in an aer

126 ylogenetic tree reveals that the last common ancestral gene of the family had five introns, which are

127 nd subspecies, demonstrating that toxR is an ancestral gene of the family Vibrionaceae.

128 on of a primordial defensin gene yielded the ancestral genes of present day HD-5 and HD-6.

129 that these genes have evolved from a common ancestral gene or through gene duplication.

130 hat has been reorganized with respect to the ancestral gene order (a similar order that is ancestral

131 eir mating-type chromosomes, we inferred the ancestral gene order and derived chromosomal arrangement

132 irales may result from immobilization of the ancestral gene order due to the lack of a mechanism for

133 We also show that an inferred ancestral gene order for Arabidopsis reveals more synten

134 relocated within the genome relative to the ancestral gene order of angiosperm chloroplast genomes.

135 om other arthropods, and further clarify the ancestral gene order of this diverse group of arthropods

136 he original maps did to a similarly inferred ancestral gene order predating an independent paleopolyp

137 Compared to a recovered ancestral gene order, CFA9 has undergone 11 reversals of

138 Reconstructing ancestral gene orders in the presence of duplications is

139 w heuristic method, MULTIRES, to reconstruct ancestral gene orders with duplications guided by homolo

140 provides a basic toolbox for reconstructing ancestral gene orders with duplications.

141 The Genomicus server also provides access to ancestral gene orders, to facilitate evolutionary and co

142 hylogenetic tree reconstruction and deriving ancestral gene orders.

143 tely recover the genome phylogeny as well as ancestral gene orders.

144 assicaceae may have originated from a common ancestral gene pair present before speciation.

145 nd TACC genes arose from a physically linked ancestral gene pair.

146 laboratory mouse are derived from a limited ancestral gene pool and thus QTL detected in multiple cr

147 that these individuals emerged from the same ancestral gene pool as early farmers in other parts of E

148 port the sequencing of two diploids from the ancestral gene pools of quinoa, which enables the identi

149 oteins are likely to originate from a common ancestral gene prior to the separation of birds from mam

150 We used ancestral gene reconstruction to generate the most recen

151 Using ancestral gene reconstruction, protein engineering and X

152 ne methylation does not reinforce or replace ancestral gene regulation pathways but instead endows me

153 y of foxa phenotype is due to its role in an ancestral gene regulatory network that controlled interc

154 A parsimonious reconstruction of ancestral gene repertoires shows that 4137 orthologous g

155 Here we use ancestral gene resurrection and manipulative genetic exp

156 Using ancestral gene resurrection, we show that, long before t

157 Tribolium and Drosophila suggests that this ancestral gene served to repress anterior development as

158 tent across the group, and reconstruction of ancestral gene sets indicate a combination of extensive

159 Pax-4/6 and Pax-2/5/8 genes evolved from an ancestral gene similar to cnidarian Pax-B, having both t

160 s functional conservation is reflected in an ancestral gene structure identifiable in both protostome

161 The reconstructed ancestral gene structures for these two families have ei

162 neither retains the complete function of the ancestral gene (subfunctionalization) may result in a re

163 Y chromosome, and only three per cent of its ancestral genes survived.

164 he differentiation of the SLRP genes from an ancestral gene that was most likely composed of 2-3 exon

165 any of these genes appear to be derived from ancestral genes that do not contain introns, this evolut

166 -day human ALDH genes were derived from four ancestral genes that existed prior to the divergence of

167 likely arose through duplication of a single ancestral gene, the relationship is now so distant that

168 lel with mammalian Y chromosomes, preserving ancestral genes through selection to maintain the dosage

169 s/rap families and suggests that tbrlp is an ancestral gene to the ras/rap genes of higher eukaryotes

170 o parsimony-based comparison of the inferred ancestral genes to pinpoint the timings of GDLs onto evo

171 transitioned from rapid, exponential loss of ancestral genes to strict conservation through purifying

172 Phylogenetic analyses reveal that the ancestral gene underwent a fission event in some Brachyc

173 analyses of the r/b genes revealed that the ancestral gene was amplified independently in different

174 Many of these ancestral genes were duplicated and fixed over time to y

175 phylogenetic analyses suggest that different ancestral genes were independently amplified in sea urch

176 rphic ospE alleles are derived from a common ancestral gene which has been modified through mutation

177 st that the four NDSTs evolved from a common ancestral gene, which diverged to give rise to two subty

178 that MGA and SI evolved by duplication of an ancestral gene, which itself had already undergone tande

179 des stable database identifiers for inferred ancestral genes, which are used to associate inferred ge

180 T evolved from the fusion of two neighboring ancestral genes, which exist as separate genes (Lrrc51 a

181 Deletions are likely to contain ancestral genes whose functions are no longer essential

182 , the expected pattern of variability in the ancestral gene will be similar to the predictions of mod

183 e calcium selective channels, share a common ancestral gene with the genes encoding the related nonse

184 ar to lp(A1) and lp(A2), indicating a common ancestral gene with two introns.

185 s is built on the successful evolution of 11 ancestral genes, with very different fates and progenies