ライフサイエンスコーパス: anodal

1 nscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (anodal, 1.5 mA, 10 min) were applied contralaterally aft

2 bi-parietal return electrodes before sleep (anodal 'activation', cathodal 'deactivation', and sham s

3 polarity of hypha emergence from cathodal to anodal, an effect augmented by Ca(2+).

4 Both anodal and cathodal stimulation of the left pLPFC disrup

5 ction times were analyzed for the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (compared with sham tDCS).

6 ical perfusion being demonstrated after both anodal and cathodal tDCS compared to the period during s

7 ull DC intensity range (0.5-2.0 mA) for both anodal and cathodal tDCS in a sham-controlled repeated m

8 VPM nucleus (mediating sensory input) during anodal and cathodal tDCS suggest that tDCS modifies thal

9 ndicated a main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tDCS.

10 healthy subjects were divided into groups of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

11 sity-dependent neuroplastic after-effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

12 5, 10, and 20 mg or placebo medication) with anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulat

13 The impact on plasticity induced by anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulat

14 Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase

15 annot be explained by mere add-on effects of anodal and concurrent cathodal stimulation, but rather b

16 le cathodal activation (0.3 ms) or end-cycle anodal black (30-60 ms) at approximately 1 Hz through th

17 via a vascularly isolated carotid sinus and anodal block of baroreceptor afferent fibers in the caro

18 e isolated sinus was compared to that during anodal block of large A-fibers in the carotid sinus nerv

19 activity (46% compared to 3%), and generate anodal break action potentials (58% compared to 19%).

20 hreshold calcium current (It) giving rise to anodal break depolarisations.

21 l for distinguishing between anodal-make and anodal-break excitation.

22 f biphasic waveforms with the same tilts for anodal but not cathodal phase 1 at the right ventricular

23 After anodal, but not cathodal, tDCS, we found a reduced item

24 d working memory impairment was prevented by anodal, but not sham or cathodal, stimulation of the dlP

25 Anodal Ca2+ waves and resistance to Na+ and Ca2+ channel

26 n response to nsPEF: 1-20 nsPEF caused local anodal Ca2+ waves without Ca2+ transients, and > or =20

27 ranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS(anodal)) can induce perceptual learning in healthy human

28 li from 10 healthy subjects before and after anodal, cathodal and sham transcranial direct current st

29 ossover approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5

30 While participants completed the tasks, anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS was applied over the righ

31 pted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS.

32 rainstem, and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current st

33 human participants were randomly assigned to anodal, cathodal, or sham-control groups.

34 mA and 2 mA) in two experiments: 1 mA tDCS (anodal, cathodal, sham) did not affect any of the TVA pa

35 ine of the angle of migration in relation to anodal-cathodal orientation.

36 We applied anodal, cathoP:dal or sham transcranial direct current s

37 on of acetylcholine (ACH; delivered using an anodal charge) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; administere

38 Thirty-minute 2-mA anodal constant current transscleral and transcorneal io

39 y was induced in conscious dogs by a 150-muA anodal current applied to the intimal surface of the cir

40 The anterior tongue was stimulated with anodal current pulses to determine the time course of dr

41 lowest threshold was found by searching with anodal current pulses; in the other cells, cathodal curr

42 s received bilateral lesions of the LC using anodal current.

43 Over left IPC, tDCS(anodal) did not modulate learning but instead introduced

44 Our study implies that the application of anodal direct currents to the right DLPFC represents a p

45 basic response consisted of a tilt in space (anodal ear down) of all three segments.

46 leaning and bending of the body towards the anodal ear.

47 consisted of a sway of the body towards the anodal ear.

48 showed significantly increased Glx under the anodal electrode, but not in homologous regions of the c

49 gatively, the effect was evident only during anodal excitation, requiring significantly less stimulus

50 We used anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), and sham tra

51 heric inhibition, we applied left hemisphere anodal-excitatory and right hemisphere cathodal-inhibito

52 Anodal (facilitatory) stimulation to the ipsilesional he

53 the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anodal, facilitatory tDCS has been shown to improve symp

54 In contrast, anodal fields decreased most active behaviors below base

55 urface therefore influenced the frequency of anodal galvanotropism but a reversal in surface charge w

56 oreover, the larger skill improvement in the anodal group was predominantly mediated by reductions in

57 In contrast, unlike both the sham and anodal groups, the cathodal group exhibited no RIF.

58 (2)): 39.3 +/- 8.42] received 15 sessions of anodal (i.e., enhancing cortical activity) or sham tDCS

59 onse of HeLa cells from cathodal to slightly anodal in a PP1-dependent manner.

60 Participants received excitatory (anodal), inhibitory (cathodal), or sham stimulation befo

61 326 mug (13.40%) for MN in combination with anodal ITP (p<0.001).

62 Six-week treatment of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right prefrontal tDCS (twelve 30-mi

63 rmed the Balloon Analog Risk Task: (1) right anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right c

64 As predicted, during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over the DLPFC, partici

65 We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal would decrease risk-taking behavior

66 ife was observed among patients who received anodal M1 stimulation.

67 s that are useful for distinguishing between anodal-make and anodal-break excitation.

68 ibrinogens revealed a slight increase in the anodal mobility of fibrinogen Philadelphia.

69 ears) both before and after 20 min of 1.5 mA anodal (n = 18) or sham (n = 14) tDCS applied to the rig

70 m motor learning: (1) stimulation protocols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the c

71 star rats (n = 16) were randomized to either anodal or cathodal stimulation for either 5 or 10 consec

72 went a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effect

73 depressed by the simultaneous application of anodal or cathodal tDCS, respectively, when stimulation

74 nd downregulating neuronal excitability with anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulati

75 was seen if the magnetic S2 was replaced by anodal or cathodal transcranial electrical stimulation.

76 nd sixteen males a cognitive ToM task during anodal or placebo tDCS over the mPFC.

77 sixteen females completed the task receiving anodal or placebo tDCS over the vertex.

78 roblems before and after receiving cathodal, anodal or sham tDCS to the left DLPFC.

79 nstraints than the participants who received anodal or sham tDCS.

80 ere measured before and after 20 min of 1 mA anodal or sham tDCS.

81 Anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (

82 the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with cathodal over the right DLPFC,

83 med the risk task while they received either anodal over the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC,

84 he three following intervention groups: tDCS(anodal) over left IFG, IPC, or sham.

85 he results will improve our understanding of anodal pacing and its risks and benefits in patients.

86 urinergic signaling and is dominant over the anodal pathway at neutral pH.

87 CS (F(1,9) = 8.98, P < 0.02, mean difference anodal pre-post: -1.02 muV) and a significant reduction

88 f) to depolarize the cell on the break of an anodal pulse.

89 essentially negative (hyperpolarized) during anodal pulses and positive (depolarized) during cathodal

90 the skill measure, we assessed the impact of anodal (relative to sham) tDCS on both within-day (onlin

91 ht anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPFC tDCS, or (3) sham tDCS.

92 ease risk-taking behavior compared with left anodal/right cathodal or sham stimulation.

93 (2) For anodal S2 stimulation with the S1 wavefront propagating

94 (3) For anodal S2 stimulation with the S1 wavefront propagating

95 With anodal search and stimulation, cell body median threshol

96 Repetitive Ca2+ waves arising at the anodal side and Ca2+ destabilization occurred after repe

97 Dye uptake was restricted to the anodal side of strands with the largest negative DeltaVm

98 duced arrhythmias, the V(m) waveforms on the anodal side revealed a positive V(m) shift that followed

99 Anodal stimulation (1 mA, 20 min) was applied over the D

100 e notion of increased cortical arousal after anodal stimulation and decreased cortical arousal after

101 (Luo-Rudy phase I and II, or Oxsoft) predict anodal stimulation at the single-cell level.

102 -Anodal stimulation by external pacemakers has been expla

103 To determine whether anodal stimulation has a cellular basis, we measured mem

104 Next, we found that anodal stimulation improved acuity enough to be measurab

105 Twenty minutes of anodal stimulation improved subjects' vernier acuity by

106 Anodal stimulation improved the on-line control of self-

107 The basis of this anodal stimulation in single cells is recruitment of the

108 Anodal stimulation is routinely observed in cardiac tiss

109 xpected to yield the highest payout, whereas anodal stimulation led to choices that were less influen

110 ulation, participants receiving simultaneous anodal stimulation of left DLPFC and cathodal stimulatio

111 ith cathodal stimulation and attenuated with anodal stimulation of primary visual cortex.

112 Our results indicate that anodal stimulation of the dlPFC may indeed preserve work

113 Second, these differences emerge with anodal stimulation of the mPFC, confirming the crucial r

114 Anodal stimulation over the left LPFC specifically enhan

115 on over the affected cortex and simultaneous anodal stimulation over the unaffected cortex.

116 Bi-frontal anodal stimulation significantly decreased TST, compared

117 ificant behavioural improvements produced by anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere are as

118 stimulation conditions in separate sessions: anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; catho

119 We found that anodal stimulation to the left AG modulated semantic int

120 Specifically, anodal stimulation to the left AG resulted in faster com

121 cilitation of pitch memory was revealed when anodal stimulation was applied over the left SMG.

122 not axons, thresholds for both cathodal and anodal stimulation were dependent on the search method u

123 ility of the primary motor cortex (M1) using anodal stimulation while concurrently downregulating con

124 euronal populations by modulating GABAergic (anodal stimulation) and glutamatergic (cathodal stimulat

125 tivity for cell bodies over axons than would anodal stimulation.

126 eshold but also the excitation mechanism for anodal stimulation.

127 ckward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation.

128 mulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation.

129 Both cathodal and anodal stimuli evoked a neural response in the ganglion

130 enth to one tenth axonal threshold) than did anodal stimuli for both cell bodies and axons.

131 Bidomain models predict that anodal stimuli will hyperpolarize the underlying tissue

132 dal tACS decreased cortical excitability and anodal tACS increased excitability.

133 ounterbalanced, crossover design, we applied anodal tDCS (atDCS), cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), and sham tDC

134 in peak amplitude of somatosensory MMN after anodal tDCS (F(1,9) = 8.98, P < 0.02, mean difference an

135 evealed generally good reliability of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS (ICC(2,1) = 0.74 over the first 30 min).

136 eiving either of five stimulation protocols: anodal tDCS applied over M1, anodal tDCS over DLPFC, sha

137 We found that excitatory anodal tDCS applied over the cerebellum increased skill

138 and gestures was specifically facilitated by anodal tDCS applied over the cytoarchitectonically defin

139 Anodal tDCS applied to the human motor cortex (M1) impro

140 The present study demonstrates that anodal tDCS applied to the left dlPFC improves deficient

141 c explanations for the behavioral effects of anodal tDCS applied to the left DLPFC in terms of modula

142 impairments after acute stress and point to anodal tDCS as a promising tool to reduce cognitive defi

143 ntly the skill measure remained greater with anodal tDCS at 3 months.

144 Together the results suggest that anodal tDCS augments the development of an internal mode

145 enhancement of excitability in the dlPFC by anodal tDCS can be associated with blurred detail memory

146 (online plus offline) skill acquisition with anodal tDCS compared to sham, which was mediated through

147 The magnitude of M1 GABA decrease induced by anodal tDCS correlated positively with both the degree o

148 ated that, compared with sham, both dual and anodal tDCS decreased connectivity of right hippocampus

149 Anodal tDCS did not change the rate of forgetting relati

150 variables.Relative to sham tDCS, short-term anodal tDCS did not influence ad libitum intake of food

151 ed using a novel combination of left frontal anodal tDCS during an overt picture-naming fMRI study.

152 neural correlates of dual and unihemispheric anodal tDCS effects in 20 healthy older subjects in a ra

153 ensitivity correlated negatively with 1.0 mA anodal tDCS effects on excitability.

154 Notably, dual but not anodal tDCS enhanced connectivity of the left dorsal pos

155 In the anodal tDCS group, compared with the sham group, VAS rat

156 tion protocols was observed, suggesting that anodal tDCS had little effect on learning the bimanual t

157 y anatomically connected to the DLPFC during anodal tDCS in conjunction with a decreased functional c

158 can be decreased by non-invasive bi-frontal anodal tDCS in healthy humans.

159 e were reduced only after a longer period of anodal tDCS in individuals with obesity.

160 Relative to sham tDCS, anodal tDCS increased activation in right Crus I/II duri

161 resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, whereas anodal tDCS increased it, in the absence of changes afte

162 When applied during encoding of pictures, anodal tDCS increased whereas cathodal stimulation reduc

163 Compared with sham or cathodal stimulation, anodal tDCS led to significantly better working memory p

164 (P = 0.01), after long-term tDCS.Short-term anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC did not have an immediate

165 Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex induced signific

166 periment 2 confirmed this second prediction: anodal tDCS of the TPJ improved lie detection specifical

167 Anodal tDCS over DLPFC by itself did not significantly c

168 tion protocols: anodal tDCS applied over M1, anodal tDCS over DLPFC, sham tDCS over M1, sham tDCS ove

169 In contrast, anodal TDCS over M1 improved initial adaptation in both

170 Anodal tDCS over right DLPFC was associated with a signi

171 ately before and after the administration of anodal tDCS over right parietal cortex.

172 ols, but deterioration in pianists following anodal tDCS over the contralateral cortex and cathodal t

173 as to investigate whether the application of anodal TDCS over the lateral cerebellum and M1 affected

174 We applied anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

175 MG led to an improvement in performance, but anodal tDCS over the left SMG had no significant effect.

176 rolled study was to test the hypothesis that anodal tDCS over the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) sel

177 ted by enhanced ToM in females that received anodal tDCS over the mPFC compared with females that rec

178 The results showed that anodal tDCS over the mPFC enhances ToM in females but no

179 tested whether unilateral DLPFC stimulation (anodal tDCS over the right or left DLPFC with the cathod

180 hythm memory the opposite pattern was found; anodal tDCS over the right SMG led to an improvement in

181 icant effects on pitch memory were found for anodal tDCS over the right SMG or sham condition.

182 One week of daily anodal tDCS reduced overall caloric intake by 14% in com

183 onfirm the previously reported findings that anodal tDCS reduces GABA concentration and increases fun

184 both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to

185 te brain activity.We tested whether repeated anodal tDCS targeted at the left DLPFC (compared with sh

186 Anodal tDCS to the dlPFC was associated with an enhanced

187 er activations in bilateral M1 compared with anodal tDCS when participants used either their left or

188 We hypothesized that anodal tDCS would result in an enhancement of CBI and ca

189 With anodal tDCS, all active intensities resulted in equivale

190 pro-inflammatory effect of both cathodal and anodal tDCS, and a polarity-specific migratory effect on

191 Motor learning is enhanced by anodal tDCS, as long as activity-dependent BDNF secretio

192 of a consolidation mechanism, susceptible to anodal tDCS, which contributes to offline effects but no

193 ariance in the early after-effects of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS, which may be of practical relevance for fut

194 attentional bias was completely abolished by anodal tDCS.

195 d microglia occurred after both cathodal and anodal tDCS.

196 MRS provides evidence that excitatory (anodal) tDCS causes locally reduced GABA while inhibitor

197 Excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) c

198 Here, we assessed immediate effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) o

199 Here we demonstrate that facilitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS(ano

200 the activity of the dlPFC in MDD patients by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) an

201 ehaviors could be decreased using concurrent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of

202 Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) of

203 Using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) th

204 We then went on to show that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a

205 rietal cortex and the facilitatory effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied o

206 Here, we induced neuronal excitation by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation versus sh

207 we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced i

208 ve and 2-mA iontophoretic (both cathodal and anodal) transport experiments were conducted using these

209 Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent increase in tidal vol

210 on both Plastek substrata, the frequency of anodal turning was greater on dishes with a net positive

211 Adhesivity and the frequency of anodal turning were graded over the range of polylysine

212 maging to examine the mechanism of diastolic anodal unipolar stimulation of cardiac tissue under 4 mM

213 The influence of current polarity (anodal vs cathodal) and electrode location (left vs righ

214 Tisch/-TISCH) over a period of 3 d, and tDCS(anodal) was applied during the first 20 min of training.

215 perceptual learning occurred only when tDCS(anodal) was applied over left IFG.