ライフサイエンスコーパス: antimicrobial susceptibility test

1 y of an isolate allows for strain typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing).

2 sm identification and automated-system-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

3 nating the need for biochemical analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

4 ime needed for phenotypic identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

5 gel electrophoresis (PFGE), serotyping, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

6 quence typing (MLST), plasmid profiling, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

7 nce of accurate organism identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

8 ted by the NCCLS Subcommittee for Veterinary Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

9 tion's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

10 bolic profiling provides an avenue for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

11 phoresis, extended virulence genotyping, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

12 demonstrated an added value for LC-MS/MS in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

13 ria promulgated by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

14 for broad-based bacterial identification or antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

15 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

16 t bacilli smears, and microbial cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

17 Antimicrobial susceptibility tests against thirteen anti

18 Typhi strains has emerged worldwide, making antimicrobial susceptibility testing an important functi

19 s of 2004 to 2005 and 2009 to 2010 underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing and characterizatio

20 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and examined for th

21 ne can expect to see changes in guidance for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation.

22 Isolates of C. difficile underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing and molecular typin

23 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field ge

24 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field ge

25 istance mechanisms in staphylococci, current antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting recom

26 Isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing and subtyping by pu

27 Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and analysis of genom

28 ion between the results of existing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests and clinical outcome

29 ovides an effective quantitative measure for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and determination

30 e now using WGS for pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and epidemiologica

31 by the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and the results we

32 In January 2015, the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing approved these rang

33 which were outside of the United States, for antimicrobial susceptibility testing as part of the Worl

34 Our results suggest that a rapid and robust antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) can be construct

35 icular, the absence of FDA-cleared automated antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) devices that use

36 Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and appropria

37 Here, we report a single cell antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) approach for

38 Accurate and timely performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by the clinic

39 Routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can prevent d

40 The long turnaround time in antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) endangers pat

41 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a fundamen

42 The speed of conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is intrinsica

43 Three commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods were

44 oenix system for the identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of 251 isolat

45 Sparks, MD) for the identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of challenge

46 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinical i

47 signed for the rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinically

48 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of these isol

49 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of these prob

50 rovide rapid species identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for t

51 The present study compared the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results gener

52 ast majority of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results were

53 boring MRSA, including three (semi)automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems and f

54 sistant Klebsiella pneumoniae demands faster antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to guide anti

55 atory practice in the preanalytical phase of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was evaluated

56 determining the optimal frequency of repeat antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) when an organ

57 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with 13 agent

58 Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) would decreas

59 ISA (hVISA) are pathogens for which accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) would rule ou

60 harmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), and how thes

61 assay was adapted for use in broad-spectrum antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).

62 n and facilitates rapid bacterial growth for antimicrobial susceptibility testing at the point of car

63 large surface-to-volume ratio, toward rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing at the point of car

64 dy were approved by the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing at their June 2015

65 simple microfluidic device that can perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing automatically via a

66 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, broth enriched cul

67 through 10 May 2016 underwent routine Etest antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Hawaii Depar

68 enotypic analysis, including biochemical and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, cellular fatty aci

69 em, were determined by the dielectrophoretic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (dAST) and by the c

70 ical clustering results for MS, genomic, and antimicrobial susceptibility test data to hierarchical c

71 Notably, antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated good o

72 or =1 microg/ml by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing]; disk diffusion br

73 tion's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EQAS-AST) from Jan

74 s Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth micr

75 s Institute (CLSI) and European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methodolog

76 k breakpoints, and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) S. pseudin

77 on (BMD) method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) was compar

78 e data collated by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

79 stitute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

80 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing expense may be a si

81 ew method developed and evaluated as a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test for B. anthracis This

82 enterococci following a laboratory change in antimicrobial susceptibility testing from disk diffusion

83 The NCCLS Subcommittee for Veterinary Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing has recently approv

84 ofluidic device provides a simple method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in an automated for

85 ds were approved by the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in January 2015 and

86 terobacteriaceae family poses a challenge to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the clinical lab

87 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the presence of

88 tandards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing interpretative stan

89 The applicability of microfluidic rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing is demonstrated in

90 Because antimicrobial susceptibility testing is not routinely do

91 Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing is vital for patien

92 Antimicrobial-susceptibility testing is performed to det

93 f identification to bacterial species level, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, macrolide resistan

94 atory Standards Institute (CLSI) revised the antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for telavanc

95 should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate

96 Each organism was tested by the routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing method used by each

97 train was tested by the laboratory's routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing method.

98 g was performed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing methodology.

99 up organisms on the selection of appropriate antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and interpr

100 However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecti

101 To assess the abilities of various antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect E

102 WGS was as sensitive and specific as routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

103 me geographic area using broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing, multilocus sequenc

104 Significantly, the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing obtained for our is

105 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 66 isolates reve

106 uld be developed, and the optimal method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of A. xylosoxidans

107 Thus, the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of B. pertussis can

108 Present methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bordetella pertu

109 tion and the agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter we

110 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from 47

111 as been used to reduce the time required for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tu

112 s for the performance and quality control of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma pneum

113 methods decrease the time to identification/antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. aureus and de

114 ods take several days for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococcal i

115 It appears to be an acceptable method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococci an

116 in S. aureus, Vitek 2 performed reliably for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococci an

117 Seven commercial systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pn

118 control limits and interpretive criteria for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pn

119 In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the conjugate ag

120 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the samples iden

121 lity control (QC) standards for the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of two fastidious v

122 The utility of Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Yersinia pestis

123 We performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing on all 2767 sero19A

124 A bloodstream isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PCR analysis of vi

125 Isolates were serotyped and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed.

126 e isolates were characterized by serotyping, antimicrobial-susceptibility testing, phage typing, and

127 The isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel e

128 ble S. aureus isolates were characterized by antimicrobial-susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel e

129 The delayed reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing remains a limiting

130 ysis interpretation, culture thresholds, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, require special co

131 ) CD-ROM on AST, and (iv) the CDC Multilevel Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Resource website.

132 Antimicrobial susceptibility test results for trimethopr

133 cultures, and BD Phoenix identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results were comparabl

134 high degree of correlation of serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results between fou

135 increased the importance of having accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for guiding

136 We compared the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results generated b

137 NS category, the organism identification and antimicrobial-susceptibility test results should be conf

138 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed several di

139 tant but clindamycin susceptible by in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be tested fo

140 ified selection for changes in motility, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing suggested that the

141 ed in conjunction with the VITEK 2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility test system to ascertain th

142 nc., Durham, NC) is a widely used commercial antimicrobial susceptibility test system.

143 nc., Durham, NC) is a widely used commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing system.

144 pid quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test that utilizes amplific

145 In antimicrobial susceptibility tests, this cephalothin ana

146 apid ID 32 Strep identification methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine their

147 , relevant interpretations of the results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests to clinicians, clinic

148 esis (PFGE) following SmaI macrorestriction, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, urease production,

149 human clinical specimens, were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a MicroScan W

150 We present a method for rapid and scalable antimicrobial susceptibility testing using stationary na

151 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the agar dilu

152 lobacter spp. and E. coli were isolated, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using

153 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Se

154 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by st

155 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed follo

156 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 21

157 Whole genome sequencing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were done on 168 co

158 ngoing national surveillance, serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were done on all pn

159 culture, manual speciation, serotyping, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed at M

160 Pneumococcal serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed on 4

161 apid ID 32 Strep identification methods; and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed on t

162 Culture-based identification methods and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used as the re

163 Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done by the disc

164 Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the

165 i clinical strain WCHEC13-8 was subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests, whole genome sequenc

166 od, Mo.), an established automated method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the ability to