戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1       One of the proposed mechanisms for its antireflux action is that it reduces lower esophageal sp
2               Based on this mechanism of the antireflux actions of fundoplication, it might be possib
3 formed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variati
4 formed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variati
5 d: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.
6 d: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.
7 c antireflux therapies aiming at creating an antireflux barrier and reducing or eliminating the need
8 iculties in objectively proving an effective antireflux barrier.
9 toms suggestive of GER who do not respond to antireflux management may need to be treated for eosinop
10 nction as well as a compromise of the native antireflux mechanism.
11  of symptoms necessitating reintroduction of antireflux medication (ie, "intention to treat") and pos
12  was recurrence of reflux, defined as use of antireflux medication (proton pump inhibitors or histami
13 x recurrence; 393 (83.6%) received long-term antireflux medication and 77 (16.4%) underwent secondary
14 t difference between the need for restarting antireflux medication between both groups because of rec
15 bitor test results, long-term treatment with antireflux medication is warranted.
16 37 surgical patients reported that they used antireflux medications regularly (P<.001).
17  of obesity; common infectious diagnoses and antireflux medications were not.
18 isolated to the esophagus despite the use of antireflux medications.
19  records of 130 children undergoing a second antireflux operation for recurrent GER from January 1985
20  The addition of a Collis gastroplasty to an antireflux operation is an effective strategy in patient
21 tment of esophageal stricture and subsequent antireflux operations, SF-36 standardized physical and m
22 tic endoscopy, for example, may soon include antireflux operations.
23                                   Aggressive antireflux pharmacotherapy and, sometimes, surgery help
24 in patients with asthma or stridor following antireflux pharmacotherapy or surgery.
25  on appropriate indications for a concurrent antireflux procedure as well as alternatives to fundopli
26 hageal acid exposure, and the addition of an antireflux procedure is not required.
27              A safe and effective endoscopic antireflux procedure remains elusive.
28 n case series, many surgeons believe that an antireflux procedure should be added to the Heller myoto
29 views the most notable results of endoscopic antireflux procedure studies published in 2005.
30                              Inclusion of an antireflux procedure, incidence of subsequent hernia rec
31  Laparoscopic myotomy, when combined with an antireflux procedure, provided better symptom relief (90
32 ux symptoms was unrelated to inclusion of an antireflux procedure.
33 verticulopexy with esophageal myotomy and an antireflux procedure.
34 bdominal exploration (nontrauma) (4.4%), and antireflux procedures (3.6%).
35 .2% MIS), vagotomy (1.8% MIS), and pediatric antireflux procedures (35.9% MIS); P < .001.
36 my 6.5%; colectomy 22.8%; gastrectomy 23.4%; antireflux procedures 23.4%; pancreatic resection 37.4%;
37 s the available literature on new endoscopic antireflux procedures along with other advances that giv
38                                              Antireflux procedures are most commonly performed in chi
39                Feeding access and associated antireflux procedures continue to be some of the most co
40                        Additional endoscopic antireflux procedures have been introduced, although the
41                                   Endoscopic antireflux procedures have generated much interest among
42 n that many surgeons will not perform enough antireflux procedures to become familiar with its diagno
43              Sac removal, crural repair, and antireflux procedures were performed (72 Nissen, 27 Coll
44 rial was performed to determine which of two antireflux procedures, a complete wrap (Nissen) or a 200
45 antly open to MIS approach for appendectomy, antireflux procedures, thoracic wedge resection, and par
46 ization should be a part of all laparoscopic antireflux procedures.
47                   Fifteen patients underwent antireflux procedures.
48                                A study on an antireflux stent will not measurably change the current
49 gus (BE) are frequently offered laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) to treat symptoms.
50 common in the learning curve of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS).
51 n regarding "success" rates for laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS).
52        Among all 2655 patients who underwent antireflux surgery (median age, 51.0 years; interquartil
53 ectomy (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.3; P < 0.01), antireflux surgery (OR: 24.7; 95% CI: 2.6-580.9; P < 0.0
54 ithout fistula (P = 0.03), previous multiple antireflux surgery (P = 0.04), esophageal dilation (P =
55 ing 2655 patients who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery according to the Swedish Patient Regi
56          Since 1991, all patients undergoing antireflux surgery across 2 hospital sites have been fol
57 Anatomic fundoplication failure occurs after antireflux surgery and may be more common in the learnin
58  There was no difference in EAC risk between antireflux surgery and medical treatment in GERD patient
59                                 Laparoscopic antireflux surgery and repair of small hiatal hernias ar
60 risk of reflux recurrence after laparoscopic antireflux surgery and to identify risk factors for recu
61 up, 53 patients (76%) underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery because of symptoms refractory to med
62 ased case-control study was nested within an antireflux surgery cohort from the Swedish Patient Regis
63            From 14,102 patients in the total antireflux surgery cohort, 55 cases and 240 controls wer
64 EAC risk remained elevated in patients after antireflux surgery compared with the background populati
65 otal of 345 patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery completed at least one questionnaire
66 e overrepresented among patients who despite antireflux surgery develop esophageal adenocarcinoma.
67                           The EAC risk after antireflux surgery does not seem to revert to that of th
68                         Primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery due to gastroesophageal reflux diseas
69 sideration should be given to more effective antireflux surgery for transplants, with subsequent test
70 that preventing gastroesophageal reflux with antireflux surgery halts the progression of BE, often be
71                                              Antireflux surgery has become more popular with advanced
72         Reflux recurrence after laparoscopic antireflux surgery has not been assessed in a long-term
73                                              Antireflux surgery has the potential to stop reflux and
74                                              Antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus
75                  Concerns about laparoscopic antireflux surgery include the frequent appearance of tr
76                    As a result, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a common surgical procedure.
77   Studies continue to show that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a cost-effective treatment option
78 tion, the barium esophagram before and after antireflux surgery is a critical examination in patients
79                                 Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a very effective and long-lasting
80    Laparoscopic [correction of Laparascopic] antireflux surgery is an alternative strategy, but neith
81                                 Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an effective therapy for patients
82                                              Antireflux surgery is associated with regression of Barr
83          The management of patients who fail antireflux surgery is complex and not well codified.
84 e aim of this study was to determine whether antireflux surgery is more effective in producing loss o
85                                              Antireflux surgery is often necessary, but a 10% failure
86  LARS has increased the frequency with which antireflux surgery is performed for the treatment of gas
87          Loss of intestinal metaplasia after antireflux surgery is rare in patients with Barrett's, b
88                                              Antireflux surgery is safe and effective in patients wit
89         The entity of the short esophagus in antireflux surgery is seldom discussed in the laparoscop
90  and characterization of hypomotility before antireflux surgery may be less important than systematic
91  BRAVO wireless pH monitoring, suggests that antireflux surgery may halt the progression of Barrett's
92                                              Antireflux surgery may prevent EAC better than medical t
93          To assess the long-term efficacy of antireflux surgery on Barrett's esophagus (BE) using BRA
94              A question exists as to whether antireflux surgery reduces this risk.
95 ght explain the lack of protective effect of antireflux surgery regarding risk of developing esophage
96 sophageal motor dysfunction to outcomes from antireflux surgery remains incompletely understood.
97                     This study suggests that antireflux surgery should not be advised with the expect
98 Studies evaluating ileal pouch formation and antireflux surgery showed conflicting results.
99 phageal disease allows the surgeon to tailor antireflux surgery to esophageal body function and follo
100 agus, and 2 studies comparing EAC risk after antireflux surgery to the background population.
101             The pooled IRR in patients after antireflux surgery was 0.76 (95% CI 0.42-1.39) compared
102                                 Laparoscopic antireflux surgery was associated with a relatively high
103                           Hospital volume of antireflux surgery was not associated with risk of reflu
104                                              Antireflux surgery was performed in 18 patients (17%).
105 prospectively collected research database of antireflux surgery was performed to identify all patient
106                               The outcome of antireflux surgery was studied in 97 patients with Barre
107 with BE and at least 5 years follow up after antireflux surgery were identified.
108 ophageal peristalsis undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery were prospectively studied.
109 entified 10 studies comparing EAC risk after antireflux surgery with nonoperated GERD patients, inclu
110  patients who underwent primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 17.7% experienced recurrent gastroes
111 on, 8% were undernourished, 41% had received antireflux surgery, and 41% presented with GERD symptoms
112  2011 using the keywords achalasia, myotomy, antireflux surgery, and fundoplication.
113  laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, antireflux surgery, and gastric bypass between 2002 and
114 ss level who underwent open cholecystectomy, antireflux surgery, and gastric bypass had a greater ris
115                                              Antireflux surgery, as opposed to medical therapy, may i
116  motility assessments in patients undergoing antireflux surgery, as peristaltic features do not solel
117  likely to have recurrent reflux after their antireflux surgery, compared with those who had not (OR:
118 eration should not alter the indications for antireflux surgery, especially for patients with atypica
119                                        After antireflux surgery, most patients with Barrett's enjoy l
120 ageal adenocarcinoma more than 5 years after antireflux surgery, whereas randomly selected controls w
121 ported high rates of reflux recurrence after antireflux surgery, which may have contributed to a decl
122  be approximately 10% of patients undergoing antireflux surgery.
123 al metaplasia of the esophagus or cardia had antireflux surgery.
124 induced asthma responds convincingly only to antireflux surgery.
125 equivalent in efficacy to open techniques of antireflux surgery.
126 uiring long-term medication use or secondary antireflux surgery.
127 edication and 77 (16.4%) underwent secondary antireflux surgery.
128 ptor antagonists for >6 months) or secondary antireflux surgery.
129 ss index (BMI), tobacco smoking, and type of antireflux surgery.
130 d better elucidate those who will respond to antireflux surgery.
131 pport for any cancer-protective effect after antireflux surgery.
132 regarding age, sex, and calendar year of the antireflux surgery.
133 reatment can be achieved with medication and antireflux surgery; however the possible preventive effe
134                           Several endoscopic antireflux therapies aiming at creating an antireflux ba
135  reports may show some advantage of surgical antireflux therapy in reducing the risk of adenocarcinom
136 antly improves quality of life, and surgical antireflux therapy may gradually cause regression of the
137  scale scores, and overall satisfaction with antireflux therapy.
138 re sensitive tool for judging the success of antireflux therapy.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top