ライフサイエンスコーパス: appendectomy

1 s reporting the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy.

2 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy.

3 d criterion for noninferiority compared with appendectomy.

4 group were assigned to undergo standard open appendectomy.

5 bowel resection and 13% risk for incomplete appendectomy.

6 rvention was the successful completion of an appendectomy.

7 of 2 videos discussing open and laparoscopic appendectomy.

8 repair, pancreatic resection, colectomy, and appendectomy.

9 ation when considering timing of nonelective appendectomy.

10 e prior to surgery among adults treated with appendectomy.

11 on was an intra-abdominal abscess after a TV appendectomy.

12 re common after abdominal surgery, including appendectomy.

13 d clinical behavior related to the timing of appendectomy.

14 ation of appendicitis in patients undergoing appendectomy.

15 , 1953, and December 31, 2010, who underwent appendectomy.

16 ble alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

17 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoing interval appendectomy.

18 seen as a feasible technique for performing appendectomy.

19 th those of controls undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

20 factor for postoperative complications after appendectomy.

21 itis on the histopathological specimen after appendectomy.

22 pendicitis and 4108 (91%) patients underwent appendectomy.

23 saline, or suction only during laparoscopic appendectomy.

24 o 1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.42), P < 0.0001] after appendectomy.

25 ter or comparable clinical benefit than open appendectomy.

26 122 patients (42.1%) without appendicitis or appendectomy.

27 roscopic appendectomy to 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

28 ove recovery in pediatric acute laparoscopic appendectomy.

29 ians in the choice of operative approach for appendectomy.

30 year postoperative mortality after emergency appendectomy.

31 citis, 11,714 (16%) underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy.

32 me from emergency department presentation to appendectomy.

33 department with abdominal pain and underwent appendectomy.

34 eporting on the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy.

35 on of safety-net burden with the outcomes of appendectomy.

36 management was defined as not undergoing an appendectomy.

37 ed to NHS-England hospitals for an emergency appendectomy.

38 e between nonoperative management and urgent appendectomy.

39 by all reviews was lower after laparoscopic appendectomy.

40 pendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies.

41 ing the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomies.

42 uding all neoplasms associated with interval appendectomies.

43 n, children's hospital status, and volume of appendectomies.

44 (IQR 2.8-19.9), 2.2 per 1000 operations for appendectomy (0.0-17.2), and 4.9 per 1000 operations for

45 d TIA [transient ischemic attack]), 164-167 (Appendectomy), 082 (Lung Cancer), 182-183 (Upper Gastroi

46 appendectomies in DGHs had 28% more negative appendectomies, 11% more complications, and 11% more rea

47 ) 1.79; colectomy, 32% versus 13%, AOR 2.06; appendectomy, 12% versus 2%, AOR 3.27; cholecystectomy,

48 e overall 30-day rates of SSIs were 5.4% for appendectomy, 12.1% for colectomy, 2.8% for hysterectomy

49 A total of 9048 adults underwent appendectomy (15.8% perforated).

50 5 most common were cholecystectomy (48.5%), appendectomy (16.2%), groin hernia repair (10.0%), abdom

51 Prior to urgent appendectomy, 18.5% of patients underwent preoperative C

52 als with >50 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy (2006-2007).

53 ed a history of abdominal surgery, including appendectomy (23%), cholecystectomy (16.4%), and hystere

54 urred in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (29.4%).

55 tients undergoing MIS vs open procedures for appendectomy (3.8% vs 7.0%; P < .001), colectomy (9.3% v

56 r 1 of 4 common types of surgical procedures-appendectomy, 3467 for critical access and 151,867 for n

57 Laparoscopic appendectomy (35.2%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1

58 ures in the matched cohort (n = 83,790) were appendectomy (39.9%), exploratory laparotomy (8.8%), and

59 For 5097 children undergoing appendectomy, 4514 surgical procedures (88.6%) were perf

60 = 0.36), and similar times from admission to appendectomy (5.5 hours (1.9-10.2) versus 4.3 hours (1.4

61 19,327 patients (47.9% female) who underwent appendectomy, 5.4% had NA.

62 res analyzed were increasingly regionalized: appendectomy (52% in HVCs in 2000 to 60% in 2009, P < 0.

63 ibiotic treatment who subsequently underwent appendectomy, 58 (82.9%; 95% CI, 72.0% to 90.8%) had unc

64 (CT) scans performed for patients undergoing appendectomy across a diverse group of hospitals.

65 We compared the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy across the world and evaluated temporal tre

66 her current practice where residents perform appendectomies affects quality of care.

67 The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated

68 king, lifestyle choices, enteric infections, appendectomy, air pollution, and the use of medications,

69 in a patient who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy, an occurrence not previously described in

70 ted, nonperforated, negative, and incidental appendectomies and analyzed over time and by various dem

71 The TV appendectomies and ventral hernia repairs were pure NOTE

72 mmediate surgical consultation for potential appendectomy and (2) which children with equivocal prese

73 icitis, including 2 diagnosed at the time of appendectomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the app

74 A total of 9047 adults underwent appendectomy and 8089 (89.4%) underwent CT, 54.1% of the

75 it to children undergoing acute laparoscopic appendectomy and cannot be recommended in this setting.

76 ctors for adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy and cholecystectomy during pregnancy and st

77 ctors for adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy and cholecystectomy during pregnancy is nec

78 icant negative relationship between negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

79 iation between resident participation during appendectomy and postoperative complication rates.

80 sed to evaluate associations between time to appendectomy and SSI.

81 d conflicting relationships between delaying appendectomy and the risk of increasing surgical site in

82 ate surgical evaluation for consideration of appendectomy and which children may warrant further diag

83 o 54.0 (Central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 appendectomies, and 0.3 (Andean Latin America) to 25.5 (

84 to 6.4 (central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 appendectomies, and 3.5 (tropical Latin America) to 33.9

85 es, including 72 TV cholecystectomies, 24 TV appendectomies, and 6 TV ventral hernia repairs, were pe

86 sgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies, appendectomies, and hernia repairs, have been performed.

87 or bleeding duodenal ulcer, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and colectomy, n = 70,719).

88 mon surgical procedures--caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin (inguinal and femoral) hernia re

89 ly performed operations: caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair.

90 lcer disease, lysis of peritoneal adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy.

91 fice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) appendectomy, and to analyze separately the transvaginal

92 rom a predominantly open to MIS approach for appendectomy, antireflux procedures, thoracic wedge rese

93 ectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with

94 ectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with

95 r trends and their association with negative appendectomy, appendiceal perforation, and 3-day ED revi

96 Laparoscopic and open appendectomy are both safe and effective procedures for

97 erformed to determine whether outcomes after appendectomy are influenced by the postgraduate training

98 clinical benefits and disadvantages of LESS appendectomy are uncertain.

99 for adult patients who underwent nonelective appendectomy at 56 hospitals over a 2-year period.

100 with acute appendicitis and later underwent appendectomy at our hospital between 1996 and 2014.

101 ) for general surgical procedures (including appendectomy) at most Washington State hospitals.

102 th private insurance undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy being significantly higher than those witho

103 s (range, 18-95 years]) who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007.

104 Patients undergoing appendectomy by surgeons, supervised residents, and unsu

105 These results support the premise that appendectomy can be safely performed as an urgent rather

106 Recent studies have shown that laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed by residents.

107 A total of 39,950 appendectomy cases were included of which 30,575 (77%) w

108 patients who underwent open or laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, antireflux surgery, and g

109 For 8 common procedures examined (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colorectal cancer resecti

110 ated appendicitis and the recent increase in appendectomies coincident with more frequent use of CT i

111 open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

112 open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

113 a national annual increased risk of negative appendectomy, complication, reintervention, and readmiss

114 to determine whether elective risk-reduction appendectomy could reduce the incidence of intraperitone

115 The proportion of negative appendectomy declined during the 4-year study period fro

116 ained stable, and the proportion of negative appendectomy declined slightly.

117 0% to 1.7% (P < .0001), the annual number of appendectomies decreased significantly from 217 per year

118 In this series, appendectomy delay did not increase the risk of perforat

119 frequent use of CT imaging and laparoscopic appendectomies did not result in expected decreases in p

120 ear follow-up period, and those who required appendectomy did not experience significant complication

121 Another 6 patients have had an appendectomy due to recurrent abdominal pain (n = 5) or

122 r uncomplicated appendicitis did not require appendectomy during the 1-year follow-up period, and tho

123 Overall, 62% of patients have not had an appendectomy during the follow-up period.

124 ted appendicitis who were treated with early appendectomy during the study period were included in th

125 These included appendectomies (eight), liver biopsies (three), tubal li

126 Current practice where residents perform appendectomies either unsupervised or supervised by an e

127 stay for patients undergoing open emergency appendectomy exceeded that for patients undergoing the l

128 wabs were collected from children undergoing appendectomy for AA (n = 60), incidental appendectomy fo

129 ospitals; 1901 (96.3%) of these underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis and laparoscopy was

130 ive review of 1081 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 200

131 of SDD on 30-day readmission rates following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pediatric patient

132 to 18 years undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were selected from t

133 to reduce infectious complications after an appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis remains

134 Appendectomy for acute or complicated (perforated and ga

135 es among pediatric patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute, nonperforated appendicitis.

136 ween January 2010 and June 2012 for cases of appendectomy for appendicitis at 6 institutions (preoper

137 Among 72,189 children undergoing an appendectomy for appendicitis, 11,714 (16%) underwent a

138 d all patients aged 3 to 18 years undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, who received

139 Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated or perforated appendicitis

140 y of irrigating the peritoneal cavity during appendectomy for perforated appendicitis has been debate

141 avity over suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

142 ing appendectomy for AA (n = 60), incidental appendectomy for reasons other than appendicitis (n = 18

143 All children undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolin

144 All children undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolin

145 on between in-hospital surgical delay before appendectomy for suspected appendicitis and the finding

146 5.9%) did not have appendicitis but received appendectomy for suspected recurrence.

147 re between ages 0 and 17 years and underwent appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis between Janu

148 Laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis resulted in

149 falling, especially in women, and incidental appendectomies, frequent in prior decades, have been rar

150 rnia state inpatient database that performed appendectomies from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 201

151 Children (<15 years) undergoing appendectomy from 1996 to 2002 were identified in the Na

152 n among patients (>/=18 years) who underwent appendectomy from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2011.

153 Although laparoscopic appendectomy has been associated with lower rates of inc

154 Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acut

155 Laparoscopic appendectomy has rare but relevant complications, namely

156 ls (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy have been published, but there has been no

157 , laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, transuret

158 ocioeconomic factors and the method used for appendectomies in children (open vs. laparoscopic).

159 Children who had appendectomies in DGHs had 28% more negative appendectom

160 uctions in the number of pediatric emergency appendectomies in England over the past decade were asso

161 nown whether these results are applicable on appendectomies in general.

162 reduction in both the NAR and the number of appendectomies in patients who presented to the emergenc

163 Although 88% of appendectomies in this population were performed laparos

164 iagnosis of appendicitis or who underwent an appendectomy in 35 US pediatric institutions from Januar

165 vic abscess with O. anthropi after a routine appendectomy in an immunocompetent patient and review th

166 e-related differences in use of laparoscopic appendectomy in children that are most evident at nonchi

167 In-hospital delay of acute appendectomy in children was not associated with an incr

168 In-hospital delay of acute appendectomy in children was not associated with an incr

169 en 1992 and 2004 of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children were included.

170 etic (IPLA) on pain after acute laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

171 igation to suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

172 ents undergoing traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in England between April 1, 1996, and March

173 All patients undergoing appendectomy in our hospital between January 1, 2000, an

174 major complications associated with delayed appendectomy in patients randomized to antibiotic treatm

175 pendectomy is superior or comparable to open appendectomy in terms of several surgical outcome measur

176 han 18 years coded for nonincidental, urgent appendectomy in the 2006 and 2009 Kids' Inpatient Databa

177 toperative day were lower after laparoscopic appendectomy in two out of three reviews.

178 proportion of patients undergoing each year appendectomy in which the appendix was healthy were eval

179 tury the pooled incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy (in per 100,000 person-years) was 100 (95%

180 33) reduced the risk, whereas having a prior appendectomy increased the risk (OR: 5.048; 95% CI: 1.63

181 very (IQR 3-14), 4.0 per 1000 operations for appendectomy (IQR 0-17), and 4.7 per 1000 operations for

182 ollective so far indicates that hybrid NOTES appendectomy is a safe procedure, with advantages for th

183 st century, the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy is high in newly industrialized countries i

184 edical help are difficult to control, prompt appendectomy is mandatory.

185 Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and associated with lower postopera

186 uggested that same-day discharge (SDD) after appendectomy is safe and does not result in higher-than-

187 Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior or comparable to open appendect

188 Appendectomy is the most common abdominal operation perf

189 Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for most patient

190 ions increases with time; therefore, delayed appendectomy is unsafe.

191 Ambulatory laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for AA has not been yet reported.

192 fter open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over the last 21 years.

193 all open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) procedures from 2006 to 2008 in adult

194 es (TVAs) to traditional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomies (LAs).

195 Thus, laparoscopic appendectomy may be the preferred technique, irrespectiv

196 SSI had similar times between ED triage and appendectomy (median (interquartile range) 11.5 hours (6

197 ts were enrolled; 65 patients/families chose appendectomy (median age, 12 years; interquartile range

198 Rates of laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, length of stay, and cost.

199 h December 31, 2011, for patients undergoing appendectomy (n = 97,780), colectomy (n = 118,407), hyst

200 e out appendicitis, safely reducing negative appendectomies (NAs); however, some within the surgical

201 ss changes in therapy and outcome after open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) ove

202 A 3-year discharge data of all open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) pro

203 lower odds of SSIs in patients treated with appendectomy (odds ratio [OR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.48-0.58];

204 analysis to examine the effects of delaying appendectomy on surgical site infections.

205 Patients were randomly assigned to early appendectomy or antibiotic treatment with a 1-year follo

206 mes was performed for 19926 women undergoing appendectomy or cholecystectomy during pregnancy and a s

207 xperience adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy or cholecystectomy during pregnancy.

208 Same-day discharge after appendectomy or discharge 1 or 2 days after surgery.

209 Urgent appendectomy or nonoperative management entailing at lea

210 Significant adjusted ORs were seen for appendectomy (OR = 4.3, P = .001), eczema (OR = 4.2, P =

211 were collected prospectively for consecutive appendectomy patients (age > 15 years) at nearly 60 hosp

212 measures included the NAR, the proportion of appendectomy patients who underwent preoperative CT, and

213 ogy databases to determine the proportion of appendectomy patients who underwent preoperative imaging

214 The cohort study compared appendectomies performed by SGSs and GSRs in the general

215 To compare the outcomes of appendectomies performed by SGSs with those performed by

216 incidence of complications and mortality in appendectomies performed by surgeons (S), supervised res

217 erature of reports comparing the outcomes of appendectomies performed by unsupervised general surgery

218 e innovations should influence the number of appendectomies performed in the United States.

219 nt preoperative CT, and the annual number of appendectomies performed.

220 Fowler was a pioneer who refined the appendectomy, performed the first lung decortication, ad

221 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program appendectomy pilot database, 2429 children younger than

222 Among 1649 appendectomy procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 33.7 [13

223 A total of 40,337 appendectomy procedures performed during 2006 to 2008 in

224 A total of 54,467 appendectomy procedures were included in our analysis.

225 ngle site umbilical laparoscopic approach to appendectomy produces longer operative times resulting i

226 The sensitivity, specificity, negative appendectomy rate (number of appendectomies with normal

227 no significant trend toward a lower negative appendectomy rate for men regardless of age or for women

228 gy coincided with a decrease in the negative appendectomy rate for women 45 years and younger but not

229 The negative appendectomy rate for women 45 years of age and younger

230 Since 1995 the negative appendectomy rate has been falling, especially in women,

231 The negative appendectomy rate was 8.1% (19 of 235 patients), and the

232 to OR) and outcomes (rupture rate, negative appendectomy rate, complication rate, and hospital lengt

233 Main outcomes were annual age-sex adjusted appendectomy rates and postoperative risk of readmission

234 Annual age-sex standardized appendectomy rates fell from 87 to 68 per 100,000 popula

235 wever, the timing of the decline in negative appendectomy rates for women 45 years and younger could

236 reinterventions, complications, and negative appendectomy rates than those operated in SPCs.

237 RAD 23.3% vs. ACS 12.3%, P < 0.05); negative appendectomy rates were similar.

238 study the secular trends in appendicitis and appendectomy rates.

239 correlations between perforated and negative appendectomy rates.

240 mized controlled trial in acute laparoscopic appendectomy recruited children aged 8 to 14 years to re

241 safe and effective and may avoid unnecessary appendectomy, reducing operation rate, surgical risks, a

242 and uncomplicated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in a greater or comparable clinica

243 LESS and conventional appendectomy resulted in similar perioperative outcomes.

244 However, LESS appendectomy resulted in worst pain scores upon exertion

245 rgical group, all but 1 underwent successful appendectomy, resulting in a success rate of 99.6% (95%

246 To date, tonsillectomy and appendectomy samples have been used in population preval

247 patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy, SDD is not associated with an increase in

248 Interval appendectomies should be considered in all adult patient

249 rgan space infection (OSI) in children after appendectomy, specifically focusing on the role of opera

250 rtification group for Nissen fundoplication, appendectomy, splenectomy, gastrostomy/jejunostomy, orch

251 In Western countries, the incidence of appendectomy steadily decreased since 1990 (APC after 19

252 ent, with the greatest heterogeneity seen in appendectomy studies.

253 ccurred in hospital within 30 days of "open" appendectomy surgery (0.25%) compared with procedures ut

254 h antibiotics may prevent some patients from appendectomies, surgery represents the definitive, one-t

255 nal appendectomy (TVAE) and the transgastric appendectomy (TGAE) procedures.

256 s were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy than blacks (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03

257 ntra-abdominal infections after laparoscopic appendectomy, this approach has been largely adopted in

258 Laparoscopic appendectomy through a single umbilical incision is an e

259 comparing single site umbilical laparoscopic appendectomy to 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

260 Immediate appendectomy to prevent perforation has been challenged

261 versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA).

262 man NOTES procedures, including transgastric appendectomies, transgastric liver biopsies, transgastri

263 To examine the association between time to appendectomy (TTA) and risk of complicated appendicitis

264 , and to analyze separately the transvaginal appendectomy (TVAE) and the transgastric appendectomy (T

265 rst cohort study comparing pure transvaginal appendectomies (TVAs) to traditional 3-port laparoscopic

266 ecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colecto

267 cluded in the study, of whom, 91 received an appendectomy via a single umbilical incision and 93 via

268 al, patients were randomized to laparoscopic appendectomy via a single umbilical incision or standard

269 l characteristics such as community type and appendectomy volume.

270 The number of patients who underwent urgent appendectomies was 3540.

271 The overall rate of negative findings at appendectomy was 7.5% (CI, 5.8% to 9.7%) (54 of 716 pati

272 r a 12-hour delay from hospital admission to appendectomy was not associated with an increased risk f

273 Delay to appendectomy was not associated with higher perforation

274 An appendectomy was performed at the same time due to a pri

275 Interval appendectomy was performed in 17 patients (4.5%).

276 nical evidence of acute appendicitis, and an appendectomy was performed.

277 An appendectomy was the most commonly performed procedure (

278 A total of 83,679 emergency pediatric appendectomies were performed in 21 SPCs and 183 DGHs in

279 Appendectomies were performed in 57 patients with acute

280 reated at the National Institutes of Health, appendectomies were performed on 31 patients, 2 of whom

281 During the study period, 294 appendectomies were performed.

282 49 hospitals performing 274405 nonincidental appendectomies were stratified based on safety-net burde

283 The highest and lowest rates of negative appendectomy were encountered in the second and the thir

284 ted appendicitis and negative and incidental appendectomy were examined.

285 icitis who would normally have had emergency appendectomy were randomized either to treatment with an

286 Cases of appendectomy were retrieved from the American College of

287 , respectively, for open versus laparoscopic appendectomy, whereas for a high-risk patient, probabili

288 is obligatory in every procedure, including appendectomy, while in others it is not.

289 ), and the proportion of patients undergoing appendectomy who underwent preoperative CT increased sig

290 Hence, adoption of the technique for appendectomy will depend on patient preferences and the

291 icity, negative appendectomy rate (number of appendectomies with normal pathologic findings divided b

292 nfidence interval: 18%, 65%) underwent later appendectomy with proved appendicitis after a mean inter

293 Use of risk-reduction appendectomy with RRBSO in younger BRCA1/2 carriers may

294 rvised surgical residents may safely perform appendectomies, with no difference in postoperative earl

295 ts (27.3%; 95% CI, 22.0% to 33.2%) underwent appendectomy within 1 year of initial presentation for a

296 of patients in the conservative group needed appendectomy within 1 year, resulting in treatment effec

297 children younger than 18 years who underwent appendectomy within 24 hours of presentation at 23 child

298 Delay of appendectomy within 24 hours of presentation was not ass

299 ncy department assessment, and who underwent appendectomy within the subsequent 24 hours.

300 ents in the nonoperative treatment group had appendectomy within the time of primary antibiotic treat