ライフサイエンスコーパス: appendiceal

1 neous melanoma = 32, cholangiocarcinoma = 3, appendiceal = 1, and breast = 1).

2 spective studies, conservative management of appendiceal abscess is recommended as a first line treat

3 Sixty adult patients diagnosed with appendiceal abscess were randomly assigned to either lap

4 ized that immediate laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal abscess would result in faster recovery than

5 s safe and feasible first-line treatment for appendiceal abscess.

6 ic invasion; n = 7), and mixed (goblet) cell appendiceal adenocarcinoids (n = 3), normal appendiceal

7 Appendiceal adenocarcinomas are uncommon, and the geneti

8 of chromosome 18q loss and DPC4 mutations in appendiceal adenocarcinomas suggests involvement of DPC4

9 he DPC4 (SMAD4) and beta-catenin genes in 28 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, consisting of 17 mucinous a

10 We analyzed a total of 2469 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, of which 1375 had mucinous

11 jor prognostic impact in metastatic mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas, the prognostic impact of gr

12 8q (DCC and/or JV-18) in the pathogenesis of appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

13 emonstrated identical K-ras mutations in the appendiceal adenoma and corresponding synchronous ovaria

14 ied, 38% and 37% had diagnoses of metastatic appendiceal and colorectal cancers, respectively.

15 tumors, including both benign and malignant appendiceal and ovarian tumors.

16 pler waveforms were obtained from intramural appendiceal arteries identified with color Doppler imagi

17 t least 90 degrees were predictive of a high appendiceal base level with a specificity of 98% (95% co

18 to help differentiate between a high and low appendiceal base level.

19 tilt angles showed moderate correlation with appendiceal base levels (Spearman correlation coefficien

20 uate the relationship among gestational age, appendiceal base location, and cecal tilt angle.

21 The location of the appendiceal base relative to the lumbosacral spine was r

22 nalysis assessed the risk of intraperitoneal appendiceal cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers after RRBSO to de

23 g the 694 sampled cases, 14% of patients had appendiceal cancer, 11% had primary peritoneal cancer, a

24 l neoplasm (low-grade pseudomyxoma, n = 117; appendiceal cancer, n = 57) underwent cytoreduction.

25 in the appendicitis-associated and malignant appendiceal carcinoids but was significantly decreased (

26 agent from 42 appendiceal samples, including appendiceal carcinoids identified at exploration for app

27 n of NAP1L1, MAGE-D2, and MTA1 compared with appendiceal carcinoids identified at surgery for appendi

28 s were higher (approximately 2-4-fold) in NE appendiceal carcinoids than in adenocarcinoids, but in G

29 osome 18q loss was present in 57% (12/21) of appendiceal carcinomas including 54% (7/13) of mucinous

30 logy, prognosis, detection and treatment for appendiceal, colonic and rectal carcinoids.

31 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of appendiceal computed tomography (CT) availability on neg

32 lly suspected appendicitis underwent focused appendiceal CT (5-mm section thickness, 15-cm coverage i

33 n patients with suspected appendicitis), and appendiceal CT (from data on all pelvic CT examinations

34 Appendiceal CT can be advocated in nearly all female and

35 The availability of appendiceal CT coincided with a drop in the negative app

36 endiceal CT), and 206 patients who underwent appendiceal CT in 1997 without subsequent appendectomy.

37 We performed appendiceal CT on 100 consecutive patients in the emerge

38 The effects of performing appendiceal CT on the use of hospital resources included

39 Routine appendiceal CT performed in patients who present with su

40 Appendiceal CT scans and initial reports were reviewed r

41 The interpretations of the appendiceal CT scans were 98 percent accurate.

42 After the cost of 100 appendiceal CT studies ($22,800) was subtracted, the ove

43 erwent appendectomy in 1997 (59% of whom had appendiceal CT), and 206 patients who underwent appendic

44 Before appendiceal CT, 98/493 patients (20%) taken to surgery h

45 d 97.9% specificity with focused nonenhanced appendiceal CT.

46 e dysplasia, multifocal colon cancer, and an appendiceal cystadenoma is described.

47 Presence of appendiceal diameter above 6.5 mm on CT, periappendiceal

48 The correlation between appendiceal diameter and Alvarado score was 78.7% (P=0.0

49 The correlation between appendiceal diameter and WBC was 80% (P=0.01 <0.05).

50 though there was a significant difference in appendiceal diameter between the patients in whom laparo

51 endiceal lumen and thickened wall (n = 5) or appendiceal diameter enlargement (n = 9).

52 An appendiceal diameter greater than 15 mm and/or a morphol

53 The optimal cut-off value of the appendiceal diameter was 6.5 mm.

54 The appendiceal diameter was greater than 15 mm (mean diamet

55 CT criteria of appendiceal diameter, presence of periappendiceal inflam

56 es available in 22 patients showed increased appendiceal diameter, wall thickening, and periappendice

57 erforation at multivariate analysis: maximum appendiceal diameter, wall thickness, loss of mural stra

58 e base of the appendix, lymphadenopathy, and appendiceal diameter.

59 Groups also differed with respect to appendiceal diameter: 15 mm +/- 4.9 for perforated appen

60 decrease in surgical-pathologic severity of appendiceal disease and hospital stay.

61 orbidity, surgical approach, and severity of appendiceal disease.

62 region not typically scanned during focused appendiceal imaging.

63 as both alleles were retained in the matched appendiceal lesion, suggesting tumor progression in a se

64 points consisted of a progressively narrowed appendiceal lumen and thickened wall (n = 5) or appendic

65 e and no small bowel involvement mainly from appendiceal malignancies.

66 mutations were identified in 11 of 16 (69%) appendiceal MAs unassociated with PMP and in 12 of 16 (7

67 th appendicitis in addition to profiling the appendiceal microbiota in a population of children witho

68 ovarian and appendiceal tumors as well as in appendiceal mucinous adenomas (MAs) and ovarian mucinous

69 domyxoma peritonei (PMP) originating from an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm remains a biologically het

70 Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms sometimes present with pe

71 kindred who developed a low-grade malignant appendiceal mucocele 2 years after risk-reducing salping

72 A total of 174 patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm (low-grade pseudomyxoma, n = 117; a

73 predict outcome in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm undergoing cytoreduction and intrap

74 th tumor biology in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasm undergoing cytoreduction and intrap

75 intraperitoneal chemotherapy for epithelial appendiceal neoplasm.

76 rrent peritoneal surface dissemination of an appendiceal neoplasm.

77 arded as the standard of care for epithelial appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrom

78 Twenty-six (40%) of the 65 patients with appendiceal neoplasms had presented with symptoms of acu

79 a 10-year period in 65 patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms were reviewed.

80 The outcome of patients with mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal surface disseminat

81 These results indicate that the appendiceal niche harbors distinct microbial populations

82 All appendicitis and appendiceal operations reported to the National Hospital

83 CT scans were evaluated for the presence of appendiceal or other disease.

84 l after maximal surgical resection of PMC of appendiceal origin is associated with improved OS and di

85 r peritoneal dissemination from neoplasms of appendiceal origin is indicated.

86 epithelial peritoneal surface malignancy of appendiceal origin underwent surgery during a 12-year pe

87 cally significant independent predictors for appendiceal perforation and are associated with increase

88 quality measures, including the frequency of appendiceal perforation and ED revisits, remained stable

89 Appendiceal perforation has been associated with increas

90 The risk for developing appendiceal perforation or gangrene may be determined, i

91 Appendiceal perforation rates dropped from 22% to 14% af

92 ver, its impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates has not been reported.

93 T) availability on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates.

94 heir association with negative appendectomy, appendiceal perforation, and 3-day ED revisits.

95 f the appendix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation, and establishment of an alterna

96 and CT also was comparable for detection of appendiceal perforation, with MR imaging (n = 103) sensi

97 vals (CIs) for diagnosis of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation.

98 nosis 9 (ICD-9) codes were used to determine appendiceal perforation.

99 various findings that may be associated with appendiceal perforation.

100 Twenty-one (24%) of the 86 patients had appendiceal perforation.

101 leus (93%) had the highest specificities for appendiceal perforation; however, the sensitivities of t

102 the MUC2 expression profile also supports an appendiceal rather than ovarian origin for pseudomyxoma

103 pply in critical shortage areas could reduce appendiceal rupture and improve surgical access more gen

104 The rates of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in childre

105 ed health care costs and morbidity linked to appendiceal rupture are considered preventable in most c

106 with public insurance had increased odds of appendiceal rupture compared with children who had priva

107 The rate of appendiceal rupture in school-aged children was associat

108 Recent arguments suggest that high rates of appendiceal rupture may be unrelated to the quality of h

109 ate was 3.06% (range, 1%-12%) and the median appendiceal rupture rate was 35.08% (range, 22%-62%).

110 d race, health insurance status, or hospital appendiceal rupture rate.

111 The adjusted OR for appendiceal rupture was higher in Asian children (1.66;

112 NA was isolated using TRIzol reagent from 42 appendiceal samples, including appendiceal carcinoids id

113 describe the first reported case of primary appendiceal signet ring cell carcinoma arising in a CDH1

114 As appendiceal signet ring cell carcinoma is exceedingly ra

115 Purpose To test the hypothesis that appendiceal spectral Doppler waveforms can distinguish p

116 apler is currently the most common method of appendiceal stump closure (83.6%).

117 appendiceal adenocarcinoids (n = 3), normal appendiceal tissue (n = 5), and 5 colorectal cancers.

118 The molecular delineation of malignant appendiceal tumor potential provides a scientific basis

119 , appendicitis specimens (n = 11), malignant appendiceal tumors (> 1.5 cm, evidence of metastatic inv

120 estinal and metastases, n=17, gastric, n=5), appendiceal tumors (n=10), and adenocarcinomas (gastric,

121 CgA identified all appendiceal tumors as well as covert lesions, which may

122 rm cases of PMP with synchronous ovarian and appendiceal tumors as well as in appendiceal mucinous ad

123 tern of allelic loss between the ovarian and appendiceal tumors at one or two of the loci tested was

124 The mean age of all patients with appendiceal tumors was 49 years (range, 35-74 years).

125 al allelic losses in the matched ovarian and appendiceal tumors.

126 specificity, a focal defect in the enhancing appendiceal wall achieved the highest sensitivity.

127 appendicolith, and focal defect in enhancing appendiceal wall individually were 36%, 46%, 36%, 21%, a

128 A focal defect in enhancing appendiceal wall was significantly associated with perfo

129 l lymph nodes, and enhancement defect in the appendiceal wall were neither highly sensitive nor highl