1 tion of models, perhaps through detailed web appendices.

2 ons for allelic inclusion are treated in the Appendices.

3 es had a significantly higher rate of normal appendices (19% vs. 9%) and a lower rate of perforation

4            Supplementary figures, tables and appendices are available at Bioinformatics online.

5                                        Last, appendices are included that provide a table of symbols

6       Conclusion In patients with visualized appendices at US, those with appendicitis exhibit signif

7                              Inflamed distal appendices averaged 13.2 mm in diameter and were associa

8        Alongside this manuscript, we provide appendices containing background information on common p

9 osimetry, highlighted sections, examples and appendices have been included to provide calculational d

10 upported by information tables in the online appendices, is intended to aid in clinical decision maki

11 ave been approved for listing in 2017 in the appendices of the Convention on International Trade in E

12 demonstrated all of the atypically localised appendices successfully, which were left-sided in a malr

13 ls of 3 mm and 6 mm on edge are given in the appendices to this pamphlet.

14                                       Normal appendices were identified in 75% (n = 39) and 52% (n =

15 the 48 cases of acute appendicitis, abnormal appendices were identified in 94% (n = 45) and 69% (n =

16 0% (93 of 155) of consecutive patients whose appendices were visualized at graded compression ultraso