ライフサイエンスコーパス: appendix

1 se-DNA encounters occur is presented in the "Appendix".

2 ugh rates for some sites have decreased (eg, appendix).

3 h Resources and Services Administration (see Appendix).

4 Changes were recommended (see Appendix).

5 to contact these investigators directly (see APPENDIX).

6 of the key parameters (fully described in an Appendix).

7 that were not reported during the interview (appendix).

8 s were compared using the two sample t-test (appendix).

9 h all degrees of movement for the TAP group (appendix).

10 e sham group was missing parity information (appendix).

11 ) and the specificity was 97.7% (96.9-98.3%; appendix).

12 ntly correlated with the inflammation of the appendix.

13 ave been constructed and are available in an appendix.

14 natures that differentiate carcinoids of the appendix.

15 te-induced isomerization are analyzed in the Appendix.

16 es, and demonstrating a healthy or unhealthy appendix.

17 bitory factor(+) cells in inflammatory human appendix.

18 ssion observed in normal goblet cells of the appendix.

19 out for a general model, are provided in an Appendix.

20 lementation of the algorithm is given in the Appendix.

21 ton exchange experiments is discussed in the Appendix.

22 dicitis (perforated or not) or with a normal appendix.

23 construction of the model is included in an appendix.

24 s are verified by more formal methods in the appendix.

25 patients (20%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix.

26 ss data reduction is freely available in the Appendix.

27 (HEV) in lymphoid organs, such as tonsil and appendix.

28 derived from a single site, most likely the appendix.

29 can be insufficient for demonstration of the appendix.

30 ion is restricted to lymph nodes, thymus and appendix.

31 lobase transcript on lymph node, thymus, and Appendix.

32 th at least a 3-cm length of normal proximal appendix.

33 ro-/pre-B cells were present in young rabbit appendix.

34 ts with appendicitis and those with a normal appendix.

35 uring B lymphocyte development in the rabbit appendix.

36 rationale for the peptides is included in an appendix.

37 al concomitant intussusceptions and inflamed appendix.

38 y assessment methodology are reported in the appendix.

39 everal earlier cohorts) are described in the appendix.

40 n lymphoreticular tissues such as spleen and appendix.

41 g salpingo-oophorectomy is highly likely the appendix.

42 a primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix.

43 ng early retrieval are also described in the Appendix.

44 l's metacommunity dynamics is deferred to an appendix.

45 ppendix and 253 with a fully visualized (FV) appendix.

46 t difference from cases with a PV or even FV appendix.

47 f CT imaging and laparoscopic surgery on the appendix.

48 nstration of the doubly robust property (Web Appendix 1) and a description of a SAS macro (SAS Instit

49 Web Appendixes 1 and 2, which are posted on the Journal's We

50 d by using a six-point scale: 0 meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter w

51 9.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 99.99%); that with a PV appendix, 100% (95% CI: 97.8%, 100%); and that with a FV

52 ey are most common in small intestine (25%), appendix (12%), and rectum (14%).

53 ite (44.7%), followed by the rectum (19.6%), appendix (16.7%), colon (10.6%), and stomach (7.2%).

54 ons addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.)

55 istribution of tumors was ileojejunum (37%), appendix (31 %), colon (13%), rectum (12%), stomach (4%)

56 meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter without other abnormality); 2, a

57 Canadian patients had higher rates of normal appendix (6.3% vs 4.3%; P < .001) and perforated appendi

58 patients (7%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix; 7 patients did not have CT, 5 patients had sur

59 re stomach (75.1%), small intestine (76.1%), appendix (76.3%), and rectum (87.5%).

60 0% (95% CI: 97.8%, 100%); and that with a FV appendix, 99.6% (95% CI: 97.8%, 99.99%).

61 5% CI: 95.5%, 99.8%); that with a visualized appendix, 99.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 99.99%); that with a PV

62 s Adequacy Clinical Practice Guideline 1 and Appendix A offered the first formal in-depth discussion

63 Appendix A summarizes the recommendations concerning the

64 In the Appendix, a crude model of ionized polymer chains that f

65 ystem (where a score of 1 indicated a normal appendix; a score of 2, an incompletely visualized norma

66 core of 2, an incompletely visualized normal appendix; a score of 3, a nonvisualized appendix; a scor

67 rmal appendix; a score of 3, a nonvisualized appendix; a score of 4, equivocal; a score of 5a, nonper

68 tomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the appendix after the development of postoperative complica

69 Visualization of the proximal appendix alone is insufficient to exclude distal appendi

70 nality disorder was introduced into DSM-IV's appendix amid controversy.

71 68 subjects with a partially visualized (PV) appendix and 253 with a fully visualized (FV) appendix.

72 uorescein concentration) are described in an Appendix and are reported in arbitrary units.

73 vCJD appendix and blood (Buffy coat fraction) were negative f

74 t MR imaging, 143 had MR images in which the appendix and cecum were identifiable in the sagittal pla

75 dary tubercles in the lymphoid tissue of the appendix and ileocecal junction.

76 The technique of ligation/division of the appendix and mesoappendix was left to the surgeon's disc

77 onclusion that mucinous tumors involving the appendix and ovaries in women with PMP are clonal and de

78 Dilated thick-walled appendix and periappendiceal inflammation were detected

79 The young rabbit appendix and the chicken bursa of Fabricius are primary

80 ften have mucinous tumors involving both the appendix and the ovaries.

81 n peripheral lymphoid organs such as spleen, appendix, and lymph nodes, but not in bone marrow.

82 nlarged mesenteric lymph nodes with a normal appendix, and there may be associated ileitis or ileocol

83 ary gland, small intestine, large intestine, appendix, and tonsils.

84 de, spleen, small intestine, stomach, colon, appendix, and trachea.

85 may reflect the function of the young rabbit appendix as a site of both B cell development and divers

86 most common gastrointestinal site is not the appendix (as is often quoted), but the small intestine,

87 e neuroendocrine neoplasms, primarily of the appendix, associated with carcinoid syndrome in 10% of p

88 s, and few mammals other than humans have an appendix at all.

89 One (8%) of 13 had a normal appendix at eventual surgery.

90 h right lower quadrant pain, a nonvisualized appendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute app

91 Clonally related appendix B cells developed different amino acid sequence

92 during clonal expansion, we collected single appendix B cells from 3- to 9-wk-old rabbits and sequenc

93 A few small sets of clonally related appendix B cells were found at 3-5 wk; by 5.5 wk, some l

94 atic diversification of VDJ-C micro genes in appendix B cells.

95 %-5% of premenopausal women, was included in Appendix B of DSMIV, "Criterion Sets and Axes Provided f

96 Cluster A, B, and C PDs and DSM-IV Appendix B PDs during adolescence were all associated wi

97 ial-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the appendix between December 2013 and November 2014 and Dec

98 this disease may result from invasion of the appendix by specific pathogens.

99 spectively assessed the visualization of the appendix by using a 5-point scale.

100 d relative infrequency with which the normal appendix can be visualized in this population.

101 We presented five atypically-located appendix cases, including four with acute appendicitis t

102 ells were observed in the diseased colon and appendix (cecal patch) of TCRalpha(-/-) mice, but not ge

103 escending colon, sigmoid colon, or rectum vs appendix, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or tr

104 escending colon, sigmoid colon, or rectum vs appendix, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or tr

105 fragments selectively bind CD5 molecules in appendix cell lysates.

106 AID and isolation of AID protein from rabbit appendix-cell nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts.

107 Appendix cells from 6- to 9-wk-old rabbits were stained

108 We separated appendix cells from a 6-wk-old Alicia rabbit by FACS bas

109 he stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, appendix, colon and rectum.

110 A supplemental Appendix contains a Medline and ProQuest literature sear

111 The appendix contains an analysis of several binding curves

112 Among the patients without AA, the normal appendix could be visualized on US images in less than 2

113 In one patient with appendicitis, the appendix could not be visualized, but inflammation was p

114 Appendix CT examination can help diagnose or exclude app

115 One hundred patients prospectively underwent appendix CT examination, with use of oral and colon cont

116 the association of lymphoid tissue with the appendix, (d) the potential for biofilms to protect and

117 we found that levels of Rad51 were higher in appendix-derived B lymphocytes of 6-wk-old rabbits, a ti

118 Patients with adenocarcinoma of the appendix diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 were identified

119 L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter of 10 mm or smaller.

120 eter without other abnormality); 2, abnormal appendix (diameter > or = 6 mm with wall enhancement) wi

121 rast, equations presented in an accompanying appendix do not lessen a paper's impact.

122 onfidence in visualization of any portion of appendix, entire appendix, wall thickening, distention,

123 oliferation in the lymphoid follicles of the appendix estimated by in vivo incorporation of 5-bromo-2

124 B cells at the base of appendix follicles begin proliferating and diversifying

125 Our results suggest that after entering appendix follicles, B cells home sequentially to the fol

126 ately 5 d after B cells first begin entering appendix follicles.

127 om injection to LeuTech visualization in the appendix for cases positive for appendicitis was 9 min.

128 ients prospectively evaluated with CT of the appendix for clinically suspected appendicitis.

129 of bacteria from the genus Fusobacterium in appendixes from patients with AA.

130 tion during expansion of cells in splenic or appendix germinal centers used hydraulic micromanipulati

131 A supplemental appendix gives additional details not in the main text.

132 s of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (> 6 mm) and periappendiceal inflammation.

133 An enlarged fluid-filled appendix (>7 mm in diameter) was considered an abnormal

134 ia were introduced into rabbits in which the appendix had been rendered germfree by microsurgery (we

135 We found that the normal human appendix harbors populations of Fusobacteria that are ge

136 The function of the human appendix has long been a matter of debate, with the stru

137 abdominopelvic CT images with nonvisualized appendix have a high negative predictive value, without

138 il and peripheral lymph node, is absent from appendix HEVs or HEVs in some samples of chronically inf

139 rvature and Gaussian curvature, explained in Appendix I), should act best when the assembling shell i

140 In the Appendix, I use previous derivations for natural direct

141 d in the right lower quadrant, with a normal appendix identified.

142 patients were assigned a diagnosis of normal appendix in 632 (13%) cases, acute appendicitis in 3286

143 B cell clones supports the proposed role of appendix in generating the preimmune repertoire.

144 ons enhanced confidence in identification of appendix in mean of 57 patients.

145 ecal tilt angle is useful for localizing the appendix in pregnant patients at MR imaging and helps pr

146 ions to experimental data are explored in SI Appendix In the presence of experimental-like shot noise

147 a DALM (mucinous cystadenoma) arising in the appendix in the setting of UC.

148 rectly identify pelvic abscesses and healthy appendix in two patients.

149 At no stage of appendix inflammation did LA significantly increase intr

150 verall 5-year survival for carcinoids of the appendix is 98%, gastric (types I/II) is 81%, rectum is

151 The human vermiform ("worm-like") appendix is a 5-10cm long and 0.5-1cm wide pouch that ex

152 The young rabbit appendix is a dynamic site for primary B cell repertoire

153 The appendix is available at http://gsp.tamu.edu/Publication

154 The appendix is available from http://gspsnap.tamu.edu/gspwe

155 The most common location of the appendix is descending intraperitoneal.

156 An Appendix is included showing that the experimental data

157 th acute abdominal pain and in whom a normal appendix is not visualized at US.

158 The appendix is thought to have some immune function based o

159 The architecture of the human appendix is unique among mammals, and few mammals other

160 f the human bowel, we propose that the human appendix is well suited as a "safe house" for commensal

161 In the Appendix, it is shown that flow under a stationary lipid

162 s correlated with the following CT findings: appendix location, appendicolith, cecal wall thickening

163 al wall thickening involving the base of the appendix, lymphadenopathy, and appendiceal diameter.

164 protein in the four subpopulations of rabbit appendix lymphocytes, distinguished by surface CD43 and

165 inflammation, we examined the changes in the appendix lymphoid follicle (ALF) and Peyer's patches (PP

166 after successful non-operative treatment of appendix mass (active observation group) and incidence o

167 ible children had acute appendicitis with an appendix mass and were successfully treated without appe

168 ter successful non-operative treatment of an appendix mass in children.

169 dicitis or a clinical diagnosis of recurrent appendix mass within 1 year of enrolment after successfu

170 ter successful non-operative treatment of an appendix mass.

171 ion about this archive may be included as an appendix of a report generated by Sweave or knitR.

172 A comprehensive appendix of IL biodegradation data published since 2010

173 n microscopy of the cells of the thermogenic appendix of Sauromatum guttatum has revealed a fusion ev

174 data are included in a summary table in the appendix of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery.

175 ansion of a2 allotype-bearing B cells in the appendix of young mutant ali/ali rabbits.

176 The appendix of young rabbits is a site of primary heavy cha

177 , leaving a final study group (nonvisualized appendix) of 156 patients (mean age, 9.6 years; boys, 7.

178 10.2 years) and a control group (visualized appendix) of 421 patients (mean age, 11.0 years; boys, 9

179 However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use o

180 re assigned to the H01-Emergency excision of appendix OPCS-4 3-digit code procedure between 1996 and

181 Perforation was defined as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen.

182 ers or one of four disorders included in the appendix or in DSM-III-R) or a healthy, high-functioning

183 Most abscesses were due to either perforated appendix or recent appendectomy.

184 nent catheterizable channel, either with the appendix or reconfigured intestinal segments.

185 0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001).

186 a is predominantly expressed in lymph nodes, appendix, PBL, fetal liver, fetal lung and several cell

187 ood, essentially all VDJ genes of cells from appendix, peripheral blood, and bone marrow were diversi

188 reports were reviewed for visibility of the appendix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perfo

189 gnant melanoma with metastatic spread to the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis has rarely bee

190 We describe cases of melanoma of the appendix presenting with appendicitis and review our ins

191 ures coded to the "H01-Emergency Excision of Appendix" procedure code in the Hospital Episode Statist

192 Developing rabbit appendix provides a particularly good site for studying

193 In addition, the appendix provides an overview of asthma outcome measures

194 rgery (we refer to these rabbits as germfree-appendix rabbits).

195 esponse mutants of B. subtilis into germfree-appendix rabbits.

196 The presence of RAG gene products in appendix raised the possibility that pro-/pre-B cells we

197 Perforation rate, normal appendix rate, and length of hospital stay.

198 ere no differences in perforation and normal appendix rates between those operations performed in tea

199 en are derived from mucinous adenomas of the appendix rather than from primary ovarian tumors.

200 c diversification, we surgically removed the appendix, sacculus rotundus, and Peyer's patches from ne

201 The proportion of appendixes seen at MR imaging and at CT also was similar

202 Because mucinous tumors of the appendix similarly express MUC2, the MUC2 expression pro

203 In an Appendix, some objections to the conventional scheme for

204 intra-abdominal peritoneal carcinoma from an appendix source.

205 Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded preserved appendix specimens were reexamined by periodic acid-Schi

206 wing antagonism of NaV 1.7 in resected human appendix stimulated by noxious distending pressures.

207 dix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding and fluid; and 5, i

208 without adjacent fat stranding; 3, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal append

209 Appendix swabs were collected from children undergoing a

210 It is shown in the Appendix that both the excluded volume and the direct in

211 e subjected to an analysis, described in the Appendix, that allows calculation of the fractional satu

212 icipants who had appendicectomy for a normal appendix, the HRs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83-1.15) for muco

213 In the appendix, the size and number of proliferating B cell fo

214 cleus of neutrophils recruited into inflamed appendix tissue, whereas leukotriene A(4) hydrolase rema

215 ct only with occasional endothelial cells in appendix tissues.

216 An Appendix to accompany this article is available at Bioin

217 tochastic model of ep-PCR is developed in an appendix to demonstrate the applicability of the algorit

218 Cary, North Carolina) is given in an online appendix to facilitate use of the approach in routine ep

219 appendicitis, from mild inflammation of the appendix to ruptured appendicitis with diffuse peritonit

220 ALT from newborn Alicia pups and ligated the appendix to sequester it from intestinal microflora.

221 The PSP Appendix Trial is a prospective, multi-center, cohort st

222 METHODS/DESIGN: The PSP Appendix Trial is a prospective, multi-center, cohort st

223 e, weight, sex, body mass index, and removed appendix type.

224 Patients believed to have a perforated appendix underwent interval appendectomy 4-6 weeks after

225 The Appendix uses PNP2 theory to predict ionic currents for

226 used on the questions of the site of origin (appendix versus ovary), mechanisms of peritoneal spread

227 alization of any portion of appendix, entire appendix, wall thickening, distention, inflammation, flu

228 n in pediatric patients with a nonvisualized appendix was 98.7% (95% CI: 95.5%, 99.8%); that with a v

229 The normal appendix was always identified.

230 The proximal appendix was collapsed (n = 6) or was filled with contra

231 The appendix was considered normal at MR imaging if its diam

232 A healthy appendix was depicted in 17 (89.5%) of 19 patients witho

233 Appendix was detected in 20 (86.9%) of 23 patients.

234 The appendix was evaluated on CT scans for morphology, locat

235 dergoing each year appendectomy in which the appendix was healthy were evaluated.

236 A normal appendix was identified by ultrasonography in 2 (2.4%) o

237 The appendix was larger in patients with perforated appendic

238 oire diversification in rabbits in which the appendix was ligated shortly after birth to prevent micr

239 acute appendicitis, nonvisualization of the appendix was negative for appendicitis in 98% (95% CI: 7

240 th focused CT in two patients whose inflamed appendix was not included in the imaging of the right lo

241 hree patients with inconclusive results, the appendix was not seen in two patients and was borderline

242 performed retrospectively for patients whose appendix was not visualized to determine whether appendi

243 In 59 patients (14.8%), the appendix was not visualized.

244 Conversely, when the appendix was seen at multidetector CT and was abnormal,

245 Perforation of the appendix was the only independent risk factor for the de

246 Pathology of the appendix was verified manually.

247 The computer model, described in the Appendix, was used to determine the effect of the mean l

248 In an Appendix, we show that an epidemic percolation network c

249 Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoi

250 Visualization rates for portion or all of appendix were higher for combined transverse and coronal

251 diversification patterns in the clones from appendix were strikingly different from those found prev

252 e whether RAG2 protein was present in rabbit appendix, where cells that recently underwent gene conve

253 tions improve confidence in visualization of appendix (whether diseased or normal) and in diagnosis o

254 Some of this diversification occurs in the appendix, which is a gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GAL

255 organs, particularly lymph node, spleen, and appendix, while murine 6Ckine has a broader tissue distr

256 An appendix with a diameter of 6-7 mm was considered an inc

257 Dilatation of a thick-walled appendix with increased enhancement and adjacent strandi

258 A normal appendix with no other cause for pain was seen in 182 pa

259 1, definitely absent; score 2, nonvisualized appendix with no secondary signs of inflammation; score

260 her sensitivities for detecting the inflamed appendix with nonfocused enhanced CT.

261 maging and helps predict the location of the appendix within the right upper quadrant of the abdomen