ライフサイエンスコーパス: appointment

1 ce of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

2 linic (n=210; outcome: risk of stroke before appointment).

3 erative month 1 and at the last noted clinic appointment.

4 3 (7.9%) are awaiting an upcoming scheduled appointment.

5 gimen of systemic antibiotics at the initial appointment.

6 complaints about your vision?" before their appointment.

7 for failing to attend an initial HIV clinic appointment.

8 ade 2 or 3 days before a scheduled follow-up appointment.

9 n the control group attended their scheduled appointment.

10 ss any electronic information also booked an appointment.

11 "drop in" gastroscopy and 101 gastroscopy by appointment.

12 e care services for a fixed price without an appointment.

13 and (3) difficulty in scheduling an eye care appointment.

14 le they were waiting to be seen for a clinic appointment.

15 mely manner or of not returning for a second appointment.

16 efore and 1,279 after the neurointensivist's appointment.

17 1%) rescheduled and, of these, 64% kept that appointment.

18 were granted to the author with an academic appointment.

19 2015, who did not attend their first offered appointment.

20 at the respective sites at a 6-month recall appointment.

21 event of non-attendance at the first offered appointment.

22 ly associated with attendance at a follow-up appointment.

23 oot planing of the tooth prior to a surgical appointment.

24 ome will be whether or not they attend their appointment.

25 d opening and served both urgent and routine appointments.

26 increase attendance at subsequent follow-up appointments.

27 ne, 1 month, and 6 months after dermatologic appointments.

28 ctivities (28%) to provide transportation to appointments.

29 d enrollees seeking new-patient primary care appointments.

30 ent schedules rewarded on-time attendance at appointments.

31 r the patient to schedule additional imaging appointments.

32 ent at baseline and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month appointments.

33 cidence of acute rejection and missed clinic appointments.

34 charged, 29 referred, and 141 offered review appointments.

35 S practices for hospital first and follow-up appointments.

36 for improving patient access to primary care appointments.

37 the implant, and agree to return for recall appointments.

38 eographical location) on the risk of missing appointments.

39 IBI) were recorded at baseline and following appointments.

40 st likely to have patients who serially miss appointments.

41 o the likelihood of missing general practice appointments.

42 ) significantly more likely to miss multiple appointments.

43 ite visits and, ultimately, more new patient appointments.

44 period timed in accordance with dermatologic appointments.

45 ples were taken at initial and re-evaluation appointments.

46 compromised in 48/105 (46%) of the recorded appointments.

47 after completion of the first 4 group clinic appointments (2 months post randomization).

48 t differ in nonadherence to attending clinic appointments (27%), exercise (44%), or alcohol limitatio

49 g a voucher for pound10 if they attend their appointment) 3.

50 nation of copay (46%), and transportation to appointment (39%).

51 have had at least 1 mental health specialty appointment (41.1% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.025), to have receiv

52 r proportion attending a scheduled follow-up appointment (45 of 153 [29.4%] vs 38 of 201 [18.9%]; adj

53 d to participate, 509 attended an evaluation appointment, 450 were found eligible to participate, and

54 up arranged (52%), of whom 97 attended their appointment (61%).

55 by reminder message (73%), transportation to appointment (63%), and elimination of copayment (59%).

56 At the 2-month postoperative appointment, a highly esthetic outcome was obtained util

57 mentation of open-access scheduling improved appointment access in some practices.

58 % [39 departments]); (c) access, in terms of appointment access to magnetic resonance imaging (80% [4

59 ns conveyed equipoise during RCT recruitment appointments across six RCTs, with a view to (i) identif

60 ial determinants of health, including missed appointments, active substance abuse, homelessness, and

61 ates eight weeks prior to enrollment, median appointment adherence after using the system increased b

62 A cross-over study design evaluated appointment adherence between intervention and control g

63 lysis demonstrates a 1:36 savings ratio from appointment adherence.

64 ntions related to time (weekend appointment, appointment after 5 pm) and telemedicine.

65 patients had a stroke before their scheduled appointment, all with a score of 4 or greater.

66 The mean (range) wait time for appointments among the remaining listings was 45.5 (1-41

67 s (24.6 %) attended the recommended referral appointment and 153 (75.4 %) did not.

68 or suspected condition prior to their first appointment and 62.5% of all patients sought that inform

69 ed men, 100,444 (44%) attended their initial appointment and 82,429 (82%) of attenders had a PSA test

70 CCM (control) group received a primary care appointment and a list of treatment resources including

71 d, the physician ensured the patient made an appointment and offered follow-up.

72 to undesirable level when waiting times for appointment and on gastroscopy day exceeded 1 month and

73 Waiting times for appointment and on gastroscopy day, and discomfort durin

74 r pack failed to return for their subsequent appointment and therefore defaulted prior to receiving a

75 even percent of patients failed to attend an appointment and were considered "no-show".

76 up intervention consisted of 4 weekly clinic appointments and 1 booster clinic at month 6, where mult

77 y result in non-adherence, failure to attend appointments and a decline in health post-transfer.

78 h improved drug provision via antenatal-care appointments and community health workers; and 3) all in

79 esigned to take place during routine service appointments and conducted in a community-based pain man

80 tive in reducing the frequency of outpatient appointments and emergency/critical care admissions.

81 umber of missed appointments from individual appointments and investigated the risk of missing a gene

82 The two groups were equally adherent to appointments and medication treatment.

83 Academic appointments and promotions, grant funding, and salary s

84 ess to hemodialysis care may decrease missed appointments and reduce patient morbidity.

85 In the SIM group, both partners attended appointments and shared decisions about illness manageme

86 Only the rate of nonadherence to clinic appointments and tests varied by transplant type: heart

87 s of transplantation, nonadherence to clinic appointments and tests was most prevalent, at 12.9 cases

88 the management of patients who miss multiple appointments and the effectiveness of existing strategie

89 investigated factors associated with missed appointments and whether such nonadherence poses signifi

90 of patients attending a previously scheduled appointment) and efficiency (attendance/[measures of sta

91 (appointment near home, transportation, home appointment) and reminder for visit compared with low-ra

92 baseline, 2 weeks after the initial therapy appointment, and 8 weeks after the completion of treatme

93 as to why Turner did not receive an academic appointment, and similar data of racial disparity are pr

94 nvitation, provision of results or follow-up appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level

95 tient education, arranging timely outpatient appointments, and providing telephone follow-up) have su

96 llected at baseline and at one- and two-year appointments, and sera were analyzed for bone resorption

97 d, the numbers of patients failing to attend appointments, and the numbers not accepting a hearing ai

98 lity of information received during clinical appointments, and the potential benefits of communicatio

99 ood caries, one study on adherence to dental appointments, and two studies on abstinence of illicit d

100 are those who have been invited to screening appointments annually, but who have not attended, or tel

101 nking interventions related to time (weekend appointment, appointment after 5 pm) and telemedicine.

102 People who miss multiple appointments are an under-researched group who might hav

103 His research talent at du Pont earned him an appointment as a Research Associate allowing him to purs

104 aid-CHIP callers (179 of 273) were denied an appointment as compared with 11% of privately insured ca

105 had been intended, declined to leave his new appointment as first Director of the John Innes Horticul

106 % of those who did not attend the follow-up appointment as the reason for non-attendance.

107 s who accompanied their adult relative to an appointment at a low-vision rehabilitation clinic and se

108 9 or 10) or DSM-IV code, or inferred from an appointment at a specialist eating disorder clinic.

109 er) was two failures to attend an outpatient appointment at least 1 month apart, despite a written re

110 maintained hospital privileges and academic appointment at the parent institution in the United Stat

111 choices between hypothetical painful dental appointments at time points of up to approximately eight

112 Among physicians with faculty appointments at US medical schools, there were sex diffe

113 atients at a regularly scheduled periodontal appointment, at which each patient was told that periodo

114 n as well as what motivated HIV primary care appointment attendance in the absence of ART.

115 The pooled effect on appointment attendance using text message (short message

116 asured as the proportion of scheduled clinic appointments attended (i.e., visit adherence) or the pro

117 d, and 21 (55.3%) individuals with confirmed appointments attended their initial visit with a liver s

118 l written consent to be interviewed and have appointments audio-recorded.

119 tatus) and practice-level factors (including appointment availability and geographical location) on t

120 Appointment availability and wait time.RESULTS Among 475

121 ted in the ACA, was associated with improved appointment availability for Medicaid enrollees among pa

122 ries of participating dermatologists,and the appointment availability of listed physicians.DESIGN, SE

123 tes, and patient and staff satisfaction with appointment availability.

124 arge planning, and scheduling of a follow-up appointment before discharge.

125 age point; P=0.002), (4) arranging follow-up appointments before discharge (0.19 percentage point; P=

126 Patients with physician appointments between January 26 and July 24, 2012, were

127 tion scores were higher for waiting time for appointment but lower for personal manner of nurses/staf

128 dependence, CCM compared with a primary care appointment but no CCM did not increase self-reported ab

129 rch their conditions online prior to initial appointments, but are unlikely to discuss that research

130 n levels, including post-discharge follow-up appointment by day 3 to 5 of age.

131 with anesthesia is increasing and no-show to appointments carries significant patient health and fina

132 A dental appointment commonly prompts fear of a painful experienc

133 ing their hospital stay to arrange follow-up appointments, confirm medication reconciliation, and con

134 e number to call to book their new screening appointment (control) in the event of non-attendance at

135 travel and parking associated with hospital appointments; costs of procedures; increased household b

136 evant plan, and asked for the next available appointment date.

137 The median waiting time for a new patient appointment decreased from 21 days to 10 days.

138 s of absence and departures and increases in appointment demand when practices reopened to new patien

139 online information gathering prior to first appointment, demographics, health status, information us

140 e MRI unit, concluding that delayed terms of appointments, despite numerous facilities being availabl

141 03; P < 0.0001) and "Ease of scheduling your appointment" (Diff[1-2]=0.99; P < 0.0001) best correlate

142 care being delayed because of wait times for appointments (difference-in-differences estimate, 2.6 pe

143 Questions expired if not answered on time (appointment dynamic).

144 Approximately 78 hours prior to the surgical appointment, each subject began a 3-day regimen of cipro

145 were randomized to receive a CR orientation appointment either within 10 days (early) or at 35 days

146 o interval recommendations for follow-up eye appointments, even though cost and accessibility were mi

147 Two FAQ items (remembering appointments, family occasions, holidays, and medication

148 Two IADLs--remembering appointments, family occasions, holidays, and medication

149 The third available rheumatology appointment fell from about 60 days to <2 days.

150 telephone survey was used to try to make an appointment for a fictional patient who was obese and he

151 es were invited to attend a specialist nurse appointment for a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

152 ble,accepted the listed plan, and offered an appointment for our fictitious patient.

153 We confirmed initial follow-up appointments for 38 (70.4%) RNA-positive individuals suc

154 obile-phone-based reminders of scheduled HIV appointments for carers of paediatric patients in low-re

155 come was the number of unscheduled physician appointments for concerning lesions.

156 Early appointments for CR significantly improve attendance at

157 le phone call increase attendance at medical appointments for HIV care in a population of children in

158 aid to assess whether willingness to provide appointments for new Medicaid enrollees was related to t

159 (none MMS, 39 USS), failure to attend three appointments for the screen (72 MMS, 757 USS), and parti

160 9%) vs 17,354 men (28.6%) had full-professor appointments, for an absolute difference of -16.7% (95%

161 reduced their mean wait for third available appointments from 21 to 8 days for 15-minute visits and

162 calculated the per-patient number of missed appointments from individual appointments and investigat

163 onal (teaching, board certification, faculty appointment, general cardiology practice, and hospital e

164 s in the "drop in" group and 14 weeks in the appointment group.

165 applicable]) days for the early and standard appointment groups, respectively (P<0.001).

166 versus 59% (44/74) in the early and standard appointment groups, respectively, which demonstrates a s

167 iates, survivors given follow-up psychiatric appointments had significantly lower likelihood of subse

168 health services outcomes (attending medical appointments, having a medical home, and avoidance of un

169 ls with at least 1 attended scheduled clinic appointment (i.e., visit constancy).

170 patients lost Snellen' visual acuity before appointment in group B compared to 12 in group A.

171 aught in the Bonn Anatomy Department, had an appointment in the University Clinic, and ran a small pr

172 ed the availability of and waiting times for appointments in 10 states during two periods: from Novem

173 Among 3810 cardiologists with faculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% of all US cardiologists), 63

174 of US physicians with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 (91,073 physicians; 9.1% of all US

175 US cardiologists with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 by using the American Association o

176 adiologists with U.S. medical school faculty appointments in 2014, men and women were similarly likel

177 rimester of pregnancy, attended four or more appointments in antenatal care, and received four compon

178 tion adherence became erratic, and he missed appointments in clinic.

179 reasing attendance at diabetic eye screening appointments in London.

180 English-speaking adults presenting for first appointments in rheumatology.

181 04 461 (19.0%) patients missed more than two appointments in the 3 year study period.

182 women, but were somewhat more likely to miss appointments in the adjusted model (1.05, 1.04-1.06).

183 to the recommended interval of follow-up eye appointments in the facility's ophthalmology service as

184 The availability of primary care appointments in the Medicaid group increased by 7.7 perc

185 Appointments in which these clinicians presented the RCT

186 me-day access, and waits for third available appointments increased during 2 years of follow-up.

187 sign of a standard process in cases where an appointment is not available in 7 days, use subspecialty

188 Physician appointment-keeping behavior predicted attendance to col

189 recovery due to impaired self-management and appointment-keeping, clinicians may consider serious men

190 etention and 79.3% met the target for clinic appointment-keeping.

191 ing patient-specialist visits and minimizing appointment lead time.

192 Missed scheduled HIV appointments lead to increased mortality, resistance to

193 be adherent at 6 weeks if they had follow-up appointments made before discharge and had a provider ex

194 After controlling for the number of appointments made, patterns of non-attendance could be d

195 negative binomial model offset by number of appointments made.

196 al-level patterns of missed general practice appointments might thus provide a risk marker for vulner

197 both patient and practice factors to predict appointments missed gave a higher pseudo R(2) value (0.6

198 waited to start treatment and percentage of appointments missed were negatively associated with outc

199 At each subsequent appointment, most enrollees (80% to 85%) reported sympto

200 re similarly ranked: reminder message (48%), appointment near home (46%), elimination of copay (46%),

201 h-ranking interventions related to location (appointment near home, transportation, home appointment)

202 low-income patients hospitalized with HF, an appointment near the patient's home and a reminder messa

203 An appointment near the patient's home was the most desired

204 Time to third available appointments, no-show rates, and patient and staff satis

205 At the second- and third-year follow-up appointments, none of the volunteers received treatment

206 developed symptoms between outpatient clinic appointments; none were diagnosed with routine visual ac

207 n two 19-month periods, before and after the appointment of a neurointensivist.

208 s purport to solve this problem by automatic appointment of one person among the disputing family mem

209 Our success was probably due to (1) appointment of staff to oversee implementation, (2) enga

210 r chiral markers that would allow for source appointments of anthropogenic versus biogenic carbon emi

211 The caller sought an appointment on behalf of his fictitious father who had s

212 ot associated with attendance at a follow-up appointment on multivariate analysis.

213 he effects of multidisciplinary group clinic appointments on the primary outcome of time to first hea

214 s find opportunities for discussion at later appointments or if results become relevant as medical ne

215 e followed for up to 2 yrs at regular recall appointments, or as dictated by tooth symptoms.

216 or home care as needed, and recommendations, appointments, or both for follow-up care with physicians

217 ic floor muscle training (five physiotherapy appointments over 16 weeks, and annual review) plus Pila

218 Men missed fewer appointments overall than women, but were somewhat more

219 Significantly more patients kept first appointment (p = 0.0002) in group B.

220 Failure was associated with missed appointments (P = .05) and missed doses (P < .01).

221 ociated with treatment limitation were proxy appointment prior to study entry (time of tracheotomy/RC

222 aseline, defined as the average IOP of the 2 appointments prior to the SLT procedure, was 18.7 mm Hg.

223 be: design of a standard, simple new patient appointment process, design of a standard process in cas

224 time for same-day patients, and retooled the appointments process to be more efficient and patient fo

225 ribute to non-attendance of general practice appointments raise important questions for both the mana

226 ry care clinicians may eliminate unnecessary appointments, reduce wait time for treatment, lower cost

227 ds, waiting times to a scheduled new-patient appointment remained stable over time in the two study g

228 eturning for care visit, interim visit call, appointment reminder calls, missed visit call); EC + ski

229 SMS appointment reminders have modest benefits and may be ap

230 reatment-eligible participants, mobile phone appointment reminders, health educational packages, and

231 rt message service (SMS) health messages and appointment reminders.

232 iage call disposition for patient 'same-day' appointment requests in general practice using multivari

233 freshed frequently, increasing the number of appointments required and leading to patient non-complia

234 as a triage mechanism to reduce face-to-face appointment requirements.

235 ed interactive computer alerts, facilitating appointment rescheduling and repeated laboratory testing

236 ith "drop in" gastroscopy and gastroscopy by appointment, respectively.

237 Physician and patient appointment satisfaction was significantly higher when I

238 At the surgical appointment (scheduled approximately 6 hours after the l

239 time spent with the practitioner and ease of appointment scheduling are the 2 variables that best cor

240 inate prescheduling requirements, centralize appointment scheduling, and creation and reporting of 7-

241 6; 95% CI, 1.92-2.81), were unable to get an appointment soon enough (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.73-2.41), h

242 iers to implementation included decreases in appointment supply from provider leaves of absence and d

243 escribed medications and miss more scheduled appointments than their more literate peers.

244 n=64 each) at the baseline and 1- and 2-year appointments; the volume was determined; and the samples

245 if WES were performed at the first genetics appointment, there would be an incremental cost savings

246 accination completion with full adherence to appointment times and within a 3 month window.

247 ose randomised to the USS group were sent an appointment to attend for a transvaginal scan.

248 red included year of board certification and appointment to program director, academic rank, National

249 nvitations for breast screening with a timed appointment to women who did not attend their first offe

250 ch' book plus 3-4 short face to face support appointments totalling up to 2 hours of guided support,

251 was common to cancel or postpone a physician appointment until losing weight.

252 rent practice, in particular on the separate appointments used, the numbers of patients failing to at

253 gated the risk of missing a general practice appointment using a negative binomial model offset by nu

254 ecutive patients attending outpatient clinic appointments viewed a video in which a physician describ

255 d samples were collected at routine clinical appointment visits, clinical data were collected within

256 visit length) and 2 access-to-care metrics (appointment wait time and no-show rate) were tracked.

257 ese inaccuracies occurred in areas with long appointment wait times and where plans are terminating s

258 the accuracy of network directories and the appointment wait times varied substantially by health pl

259 ipment and staffing availability, as well as appointment waiting times for screening and diagnostic m

260 ctices in affluent areas that typically have appointment waiting times of 2-3 days the most likely to

261 to assistance in making a follow-up eye care appointment was associated with nonadherence (odds ratio

262 had more convenient hours (36.6%), no office appointment was available (25.2%), they did not want to

263 Median time to next scheduled appointment was shorter in the intervention group than i

264 cipation within 90 days of the first offered appointment was significantly higher in the intervention

265 in the pregnancy and who attended screening appointments was beneficial in encouraging the responsib

266 A sample of appointments was independently coded by three researcher

267 he pooled effects on the number of cancelled appointments was not significantly increased RR 1.08 (95

268 hin 90 days of the date of the first offered appointment; we used Poisson regression to compare the p

269 each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follo

270 h implant, the radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the last follow-

271 years who did not attend their first offered appointment were eligible for the analysis.

272 The appointments were analysed using thematic and content an

273 Multidisciplinary group clinic appointments were associated with greater adherence to s

274 Factors associated with adhering to interval appointments were having an advanced age (odds ratio, 1.

275 Postoperative appointments were scheduled at 2, 4, and 8 weeks.

276 Appointments were scheduled every 6 months during the fi

277 s also associated with longer wait times for appointments, which suggests that challenges in access t

278 Each patient received one 30- to 40-minute appointment with a primary care nurse.

279 2009, 228,966 men were invited to attend an appointment with a specialist nurse.

280 no treatment (attendance of one reassessment appointment with a specialist shoulder clinician 3 month

281 on leaflet or an information leaflet plus an appointment with an alcohol health worker.

282 0.81), patients who attended a pre-operative appointment with an anesthesiologist (OR 0.52; CI 0.32-0

283 r 1 plan, our caller was unable to obtain an appointment with any listed dermatologist.

284 d (1:1) to receive an invitation to a second appointment with fixed date and time (intervention) or a

285 nrolled during their preoperative outpatient appointment with the following criteria: greater than 1

286 es and beliefs to inability to book a timely appointment with their local medical practice.

287 y outcome was the elimination of unnecessary appointments with a dermatologist.

288 The PPT group had four appointments with a nurse who assessed nine symptoms on

289 These findings show that a policy of second appointments with fixed date and time for non-attenders

290 ociation criteria and adherence to follow-up appointments with primary care clinicians.

291 tely did not improve attendance at follow-up appointments with primary care providers, improve asthma

292 to screen for risk factors into their usual appointments with the family.

293 lier with shorter waiting times for hospital appointments with the new Scottish general ophthalmic se

294 Patients were stratified according to appointment (with a dentist or hygienist).

295 We hypothesized that an appointment within 10 days would improve attendance at C

296 ient attended the first outpatient treatment appointment within 30 days of hospital discharge and whe

297 women who did not attend their first offered appointment within the NHS Breast Screening Programme (N

298 ed by a member of the adult team and a first appointment within this new healthcare setting, were imp

299 not attended, or telephoned to rearrange an appointment, within the last 24 months.

300 After the appointment, women and their surgeons completed question