ライフサイエンスコーパス: appraise

1 otherwise be difficult to locate, read, and appraise.

2 are effective on the method efficiency, were appraised.

3 Ts with nonsignificant primary outcomes were appraised.

4 nguages between 1990 and 2009 was critically appraised.

5 iological aging in divers were specified and appraised.

6 ge of device architectures are presented and appraised.

7 and identification of candidate foulants is appraised.

8 ristics and indicators for quality were also appraised.

9 nd these have been summarized and critically appraised.

10 atalytic applications are also presented and appraised.

11 in mtDNA maintenance in vertebrates is also appraised.

12 tudies, each of which needs to be critically appraised.

13 rapyramidal presentations will be critically appraised.

14 nce for its use has not been comprehensively appraised.

15 ilt an epidemiological mathematical model to appraise 18 pricing policies, with English data from the

16 n for Prevention of Acute Ischemic Events 2 (APPRAISE-2), Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Ou

17 A total of 385 papers were critically appraised; 53 studies reported on the prevalence and inc

18 Two investigators appraised 6498 abstracts and 648 articles.

19 Studies were scrutinized and critically appraised according to agreed exclusion and inclusion cr

20 viewers-studies were classified, graded, and appraised according to standardized algorithms and check

21 In this review, we appraise advances in the study of flat and depressed col

22 Mobile technology has been used to appraise allergic rhinitis control, but more data are ne

23 Evidence-based criteria were used to appraise and assign a "level of evidence" to retrieved a

24 o be aware of this variability and carefully appraise and select the guidelines that they apply to pa

25 To identify, critically appraise and synthesise primary research exploring adole

26 The aim of this study was to appraise and synthesise the evidence for topical applica

27 The purpose of this integrative review is to appraise and synthesize the current literature on barrie

28 This study aimed to appraise and to evaluate the current evidence on minimal

29 Study findings were critically appraised and analyzed using critical interpretive synth

30 All studies were critically appraised and data were extracted and meta-analyzed usin

31 multidisciplinary expert panel of 17 experts appraised and prioritized these potential QIs.

32 Risk of bias of included studies was appraised and random-effects model meta-analyses were pe

33 At least 2 independent reviewers critically appraised and rated the quality of studies and used stan

34 The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated using the

35 ments, is enacted and contextualised, and is appraised and reconfigured.

36 These three guidelines were appraised and selected for adaptation.

37 Existing evidence was appraised and summarized, and then salient knowledge gap

38 st and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews o

39 activation in prefrontal regions involved in appraising and regulating responses to social signals of

40 ystematic reviews (SRs) aimed to synthesize, appraise, and present all SR evidence on the efficacy an

41 We aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize the current evidence comparing

42 Two reviewers independently selected, appraised, and extracted articles using predefined field

43 t questions were posed, related evidence was appraised, and questions were answered with evidence-bas

44 Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusio

45 studies were extracted into evidence tables, appraised, and synthesized.

46 article presents an approach to identifying, appraising, and adapt-ing an established curriculum as a

47 ht to intercommissural diameter ratio, which appraises annular saddle-shape depth) were measured thro

48 t results when stigma-relevant stressors are appraised as potentially harmful to one's social identit

49 and external demands of situations that are appraised as stressful, has been a focus of research in

50 Each one was appraised as suitable for inclusion using a published ap

51 group of experts was convened to review and appraise available evidence and practice-based opinion,

52 Each study was appraised based on 4 quality indicators adapted from the

53 ion to tangible costs, the vaccine should be appraised based on the less tangible value of preventing

54 frequency cholesteric liquid-crystal host to appraise both their compatibility with the host and the

55 Study quality was critically appraised by 2 reviewers using established criteria.

56 ibility criteria, data extracted and quality appraised by at least one reviewer and checked by a seco

57 Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document t

58 Adherence to MD was appraised by either the MD Score (MDS) or the Italian Me

59 e FDA and EMA between 2003 and 2013, 53 were appraised by English, French, or Australian HTA agencies

60 s associated with overweight or obesity were appraised by principal component analyses.

61 Each study was appraised by using design-specific quality criteria.

62 od type diets were identified and critically appraised by using the Grading of Recommendations, Asses

63 Quality was appraised by using the Strengthening Reporting of Observ

64 erive no aggregate survival benefit and must appraise carefully the high risk of decreased post-trans

65 n (MR) is an increasingly important tool for appraising causality in observational epidemiology.

66 ess must have sound statistical knowledge to appraise critically the articles submitted for publicati

67 This review seeks to critically appraise current volatile use in critical care medicine

68 enesis of cocaine-related cerebral ischemia, appraised current knowledge of its sequelae, and assesse

69 s subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger.

70 interference (RNAi) in Schistosoma mansoni, appraises delivery systems for transgenesis and stable g

71 fter elaborative encoding, future events are appraised differently and result in a redirected emotion

72 dence that the way psychotic experiences are appraised differs between individuals with and without a

73 st to assess their ability and confidence to appraise each article.

74 Two reviewers independently appraised each selected article using a validated, stand

75 Two reviewers independently appraised each study using a predetermined protocol.

76 tracted cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and appraised economic assessments for their methodological

77 medical education requires rigorous studies appraising educational efficacy.

78 We critically appraise evidence for associations between retina and br

79 Here we appraise evidence for SCIT versus SLIT based on indirect

80 highlight the challenges individuals face in appraising evidence quality, particularly that of their

81 Among EBP skills, acquiring evidence and appraising evidence were most commonly evaluated, but ne

82 iews offer a systematic method to critically appraise existing research and to identify unaddressed c

83 ying preclinical principals to realistically appraise expectations for clinical benefit.

84 (n = 4449) were reviewed for eligibility and appraised for evidence levels.

85 ns, and morning BP surge) is then critically appraised for its elements of strength and weakness.

86 elected according to predefined criteria and appraised for methodologic quality using the Assessment

87 Data were appraised for quality and content.

88 wo investigators independently, and data was appraised for quality and content.

89 Data were appraised for quality; reduced through sub-categorizatio

90 The aim of this integrative review is to appraise healthcare professionals' management of childho

91 This review appraises healthcare professionals' perceptions of the v

92 anic and inorganic MV systems are critically appraised here in view of these prerequisites.

93 hydrolases and endoglucanases needs to be re-appraised in both species.

94 ed cytokine effects on outflow facility were appraised in perfused anterior segment organ culture.

95 ficacy of such interactions have rarely been appraised in plants.

96 lgorithms described above were comparatively appraised in terms of both functional cohesion and intra

97 Studies were critically appraised in terms of design and methodology, inclusion

98 malignant hyperthermia phenotype must now be appraised in view of significant locus and allelic genet

99 carbon quantum dots (CQDs), are also briefly appraised in view of their special role in special selec

100 The quality of the included studies was appraised independently by 2 authors who used the Effect

101 ecommendations for reporting, reviewing, and appraising interventions in medical education.

102 e seismicity is crucial to understanding and appraising intraplate seismic hazard.

103 In this review we critically appraise key studies on NAFLD-associated extrahepatic di

104 This review critically appraises key articles in the field, detailing the spect

105 ould help health-care providers and users to appraise media reports more critically.

106 In this critical review, the authors appraise neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder in em

107 at a cellular level, also points to ways of appraising new therapeutic avenues focused on synaptic i

108 Herein, we appraise novel strategies that exploit the patient's imm

109 Selected studies were critically appraised on 50 study criteria, in accordance with the r

110 osis and treatment of OSA are presently best appraised on an individualized patient basis.

111 Retrospective medical record review appraising outcomes of 6 consecutive patients with third

112 Then, we present how we appraise PaperBrowser's navigational functionalities in

113 We also appraise potential future therapeutic strategies to limi

114 We provide these tools that appraise protein structures in the form of a web server

115 Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research.

116 irmatory trials, clinicians should carefully appraise published studies and decide whether the result

117 We comprehensively sought and critically appraised published studies of associations between any

118 ment, Development and Evaluation criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

119 We used the GRADE criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

120 velopment and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

121 this review was to summarize and critically appraise randomized trials in mechanically ventilated pa

122 Therapeutic strategies in the pipeline are appraised, ranging from SMN1 gene replacement to modulat

123 This review serves to appraise recent recommendations and determine the applic

124 To critically appraise recent research into associations between perio

125 This review appraises recent articles that discuss the need for nati

126 This review appraises recent developments in the use of OCT for asse

127 to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise relevant evidence and then to formulate evidenc

128 ar to improve both ability and confidence to appraise relevant medical literature.

129 reened in duplicate, then extracted data and appraised risk of bias in duplicate with a pre-tested fo

130 y screened the studies, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias.

131 ss wearing cochlear implants or hearing aids appraise self-esteem.

132 These beers were appraised sensorially to determine the impacts of varyin

133 observing the biosensor's performance whilst appraising several labelled antibody and glass slide con

134 This review appraised speckle-tracking echocardiography in a clinica

135 Here, we critically appraise strategies available to generate imaging biomar

136 ience results from a generalized tendency to appraise stressful circumstances positively.

137 Multiple reviewers appraised studies for inclusion or exclusion using a pri

138 Our multidisciplinary team appraised studies published or presented up to December

139 The authors critically appraised studies using quality criteria specific to the

140 We appraised studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and m

141 rched MEDLINE and EMBASE (to February 2014), appraised studies, and calculated risk differences and r

142 We critically appraised study quality using a mixed methods appraisal

143 wo authors independently identified studies, appraised study quality, and extracted data on the patie

144 Two authors independently appraised study quality, extracted relevant data, and re

145 xt papers, extracted data, and independently appraised study quality.

146 cant confounding influences (ie, metastases, appraised support, and grief), alliance remained signifi

147 The purpose of this Perspective is to appraise synthetic access to complex peptides, particula

148 In this review we describe the process of appraising technologies, and address the recent criticis

149 sed the AGREE II guideline appraisal tool to appraise ten GRC-approved guidelines from nine WHO depar

150 In this brief review, we have elected to appraise the advances pertaining to human studies, with

151 discuss the limitations of present CPGs and appraise the advantages of analog over digital circuits

152 ese new guidelines, and we aim to critically appraise the applicability of the risk assessment tools

153 The aim of this study was to appraise the available evidence by systematically review

154 In this review article, we critically appraise the background developments that have led to ou

155 iation and adaptation paradigm," the authors appraise the biological effects and underlying molecular

156 ummarize recent epilepsy-related studies and appraise the clinical and scientific value of EEG/fMRI.

157 eed to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journal

158 studies on genome evolution, or as a tool to appraise the cost of whole-genome sequencing programs.

159 To critically appraise the current literature on the benefits of lymph

160 The aim of this systematic review is to appraise the current literature on this subject and to c

161 iew of the current state of cancer genomics, appraise the current portals and tools for accessing and

162 Herein, the authors critically appraise the current state of data and offer potential f

163 To report and critically appraise the current state of managing chronic (and suba

164 al of this consensus report is to critically appraise the evidence and to subsequently present interp

165 n patients with a disease, clinicians should appraise the evidence for its validity, results, and app

166 l of this consensus report was to critically appraise the evidence for the available approaches for p

167 The aim of this study was to appraise the evidence for the currently available preser

168 This review aims to appraise the evidence for tight glycaemic control in pat

169 The aim of this review was to critically appraise the evidence on the impact of periodontal treat

170 ific goals of this Research Statement are to appraise the evidence regarding whether long-term advers

171 erest, or fail to employ rigorous methods to appraise the evidence.

172 In this Review we appraise the existing literature on Wolman's disease and

173 We will then critically appraise the existing literature, and discuss suggestion

174 We also appraise the four trials of breast-cancer chemopreventio

175 mmunity has been slow in developing tools to appraise the functional integrity of landscapes.

176 erably.In this review, we seek to critically appraise the literature and evaluate the levels of evide

177 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review will appraise the literature concerning ABL kinase domain mut

178 To critically appraise the literature related to the pathophysiology o

179 ols with which to ask a question, search and appraise the literature, and then apply best current evi

180 In this Seminar we critically appraise the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma in early-s

181 Here we critically appraise the most promising preclinical developments, pl

182 iterature review was performed to critically appraise the ocular safety and efficacy of aqueous chlor

183 two of the three periodontists were able to appraise the pain experienced by their patients, the thi

184 We used periodicity analysis to appraise the possibility that the S6 tail has an alpha-h

185 pharmacology of leukotriene antagonists and appraise the published data from clinical trials, and lo

186 We sought to appraise the quality of health economic analyses in dige

187 ical appraisal, there has been no attempt to appraise the quality of health economic analyses with a

188 , and to ensure that surgeons can critically appraise the quality of published clinical decision mode

189 raisal Program (CASP) was used to critically appraise the quality of sixteen selected quantitative an

190 Appraise the rates of success, outcomes used, statistica

191 To appraise the recent literature dealing with important ad

192 Here we appraise the role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in m

193 They critically appraise the scientific background of the instantaneous

194 helminth therapy for allergy and critically appraise the trials already completed.

195 ch is a prospective cohort study designed to appraise the value of coronary calcium and risk factors

196 Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant study data

197 eviously travelled almost exclusively by car appraised the busway positively and perceived it to be a

198 The methodologists appraised the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the quali

199 We appraised the consistency between protocols in terms of

200 We appraised the current status of proteomic investigations

201 The writing group appraised the evidence behind AHA's policies to determin

202 We appraised the feasibility of perfusion reserve estimatio

203 We critically appraised the literature and conducted meta-analyses to

204 Three authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the included stu

205 We critically appraised the papers for inclusion in the review accordi

206 g this action has not been identified, we re-appraised the potential interaction of UAG with GHS-R in

207 h, we systematically reviewed and critically appraised the published literature according to QUADAS,

208 istics, outcomes, assessed risk of bias, and appraised the quality of evidence using the Grading of R

209 endently screened papers for eligibility and appraised the quality of included studies.

210 August 2013 to July 2014 and systematically appraised the quality of reporting and potential bias of

211 Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMST

212 Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMST

213 Three reviewers appraised the quality of the selected studies.

214 Two independent reviewers appraised the studies and extracted the estimates of int

215 Two independent reviewers appraised the studies and qualified the risk of bias usi

216 Two reviewers appraised the studies using appropriate tools.

217 Two reviewers critically appraised the studies using the appropriate tools.

218 atically collates, summarizes and critically appraises the available evidence.

219 This review critically appraises the current clinical evidence regarding glutam

220 This review appraises the current literature to define the clinical

221 This review appraises the current methods of measurement of osteoart

222 This review appraises the evidence from studies that have employed t

223 This report critically appraises the guideline and provides our view of what wa

224 This review critically appraises the preclinical published data with regard to

225 during enteral nutrition and then critically appraises the recent and emerging evidence for the preve

226 This essay, which appraises the scientific and philosophical contributions

227 Because the rACC has been implicated in appraising the affective and motivational significance o

228 Appraising the available literature, we have formulated

229 performed for each question, which included appraising the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the qual

230 blishes the basis for further work aiming at appraising the dynamics between size and stochasticity i

231 Previously, in appraising the effects of different neurochemical factor

232 By systematically appraising the evidence and providing transparent recomm

233 apy against respiratory distress syndrome by appraising the evidence produced from published trials a

234 pes and their microflora could contribute to appraising the impact that modified landscapes have on r

235 This article focuses on appraising the literature and applying retrieved results

236 Secondary outcomes were (1) appraising the utility of adjustable positioning, (2) de

237 40 physicians and 53 critical care nurses to appraise their awareness of the proper management and co

238 sked to report on their emotional states and appraise their feelings throughout the experiment, where

239 efine our current understanding of mtROS and appraise their potential influence on cellular function

240 The clinical group also appraised their psychotic experiences as being more nega

241 r the site-specific construction of ADCs and appraises their merits and disadvantages.

242 ve acquired complex signalling mechanisms to appraise themselves of the environmental milieu in the o

243 ribute to the requirements of the regulators appraising these devices.

244 We appraise this model on an evolutionary time scale by mol

245 This review critically appraises this evidence and also evaluates the data link

246 ifficult threat-safety discriminations while appraising threat and explicit memory of the CS+.

247 n in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex when appraising threat, whereas anxious adolescents exhibited

248 heir healthy counterparts, specifically when appraising threat.

249 nimally processed cilantro leaves (MPCL) was appraised through analysis of their sensory attributes,

250 Trials were independently critically appraised to include only good- or fair-quality trials;

251 rces developed by the department (critically appraised topics [CATs] and Redbook), Best Evidence, JAM

252 opulation surveys across countries is key to appraising trends in population health.

253 als from a patient selection perspective and appraise trial patient selection methodologies in relati

254 the Cochrane Neonatal Group to identify and appraise trials and extract and synthesise data.

255 f risk of performance bias is important when appraising trials investigating an interventional techni

256 e included references (n=42) were critically appraised using a modified version of Downs and Black ch

257 Full text articles were systematically appraised using a standardised data extraction instrumen

258 Methodologic quality of each study was appraised using adapted criteria for systematic reviews

259 s were independently screened and critically appraised using established instruments.

260 Studies were critically appraised using the quality assessment tool for quantita

261 Competitive RT-PCR was used to appraise variation in taurine transporter (TauT) mRNA ab

262 vention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlle

263 After consensus was appraised, we drafted the manuscript in sections during

264 ting challenges that have been overcome, and appraise what has and has not been learned.

265 In this review we appraise what is known, and what is not known, about pat

266 are attractive alternatives; however, can we appraise whether an experimental result is particular to

267 The purpose of this review is to appraise which interventions for children with intellect

268 y for wait-listed patients in both eras were appraised with competing outcomes analysis.