ライフサイエンスコーパス: array comparative genomic hybridization

1 CNVkit to copy number changes identified by array comparative genomic hybridization.

2 HeLa S3 cells on human chromosomes 14-18 by array comparative genomic hybridization.

3 balances has changed with the application of array comparative genomic hybridization.

4 orescent in situ hybridization and BAC-based array comparative genomic hybridization.

5 ion sequencing and copy number assessment by array comparative genomic hybridization.

6 number analysis using oligonucleotide-based array comparative genomic hybridization.

7 ss copy-number variation in these regions by array comparative genomic hybridization.

8 eading frame was identified with genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization.

9 ber alterations (CNAs) were defined by using array comparative genomic hybridization.

10 g rare copy number variants were detected by array comparative genomic hybridization.

11 ect were analyzed for rare CNVs>300 kb using array comparative genomic hybridization.

12 ected to genome-wide copy number analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization.

13 sability and congenital abnormalities, using array comparative genomic hybridization.

14 no significant regions of genomic loss with array comparative genomic hybridization.

15 in the NHS gene, were further analysed using array comparative genomic hybridization.

16 investigated 14 sporadic EOAD trios first by array-comparative genomic hybridization.

17 We analyzed, by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization, 316 children wi

18 As detected by array comparative genomic hybridization, about one-third

19 of this obesity syndrome using Agilent 185 k array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and Affym

20 netic aberration profiles were studied using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and expre

21 aneuploidy played a role in this phenomenon, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and metap

22 DNA sequencing was complemented with custom array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and RNA s

23 etected deletion calls, 82 were subjected to array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and/or br

24 Of 27 nonsatellited SMCs analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and/or fl

25 Comparison of gene transcription and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) between m

26 We used a custom oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) covering

27 ements of tumor DNA copy numbers assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data.

28 The use of gene-centric high-density array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has revol

29 three years evaluate the diagnostic rate of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in the se

30 ed wuHMM, an algorithm for mapping CNVs from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) platforms

31 luorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) suffer fr

32 ve gene or genomic alterations, we performed array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to invest

33 autism probands and 372 control subjects by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using a 1

34 Oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was perfo

35 Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was perfo

36 Recently, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was used

37 rivation with allogeneic ones and correlated array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) with gene

38 Cytogenetic analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and exom

39 ns were analyzed for deletions by using PCR, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and FISH

40 luding paired-end DNA sequencing/mapping and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), do not i

41 Genomic technologies, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), increasi

42 s of single colorectal cancer-derived CTC by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), mutation

43 g fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), or whole

44 idated this sequence-based CNV call set with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), quantita

45 nsights gained from wider use of genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), specific

46 These CNVs were validated by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

47 sues, we analyzed a cohort of patients using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

48 cted to genome-wide copy number analysis via array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

49 zebrafish (Danio rerio) T-ALL samples using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

50 ify pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors based on array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

51 We performed array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) on 83 dif

52 gnosis in cancer, we retrospectively applied array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to 20 mal

53 16q in 106 breast cancers using tiling-path array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

54 Assessment of the TOP1 locus by array comparative genomic hybridization across the NCI-6

55 ased flow sorting of tumor cells followed by array comparative genomic hybridization allows for high

56 Array comparative genomic hybridization allows quantitat

57 Array comparative genomic hybridization also identified

58 Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis after l

59 Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis demonst

60 a showed several chromosomal aberrations and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis identif

61 Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis was per

62 ith syndromic thrombocytopenia have clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis and app

63 Array comparative genomic hybridization and amplificatio

64 We performed parallel array comparative genomic hybridization and array expres

65 Combined array comparative genomic hybridization and array expres

66 angements, in 23 subjects by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization and breakpoint j

67 BAC-array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence

68 A novel application of array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence

69 y tumors targeted by safety margins, we used array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescent

70 0 individuals with mental retardation by BAC array comparative genomic hybridization and identified 1

71 Here, we discuss the state of the art of array comparative genomic hybridization and its applicat

72 that combines patient outcome analysis with array comparative genomic hybridization and mRNA express

73 echniques, including whole exome sequencing, array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative

74 otyping and array-based techniques including array comparative genomic hybridization and representati

75 c DNA samples from children with T-ALL using array comparative genomic hybridization and sequence ana

76 search using bacterial artificial chromosome array comparative genomic hybridization and single nucle

77 rray technologies, including oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization and SNP genotypi

78 Array comparative genomic hybridization and spectral kar

79 Here we integrate array-comparative genomic hybridization and array-based

80 ng single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and array comparative genomic hybridization, and can reliabl

81 used a combination of spectral karyotyping, array comparative genomic hybridization, and cDNA microa

82 l cytogenetics methods, digital karyotyping, array comparative genomic hybridization, and representat

83 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, custom array comparative genomic hybridization, and semi-quanti

84 uses a combination of somatic cell hybrids, array comparative genomic hybridization, and the specifi

85 We identified by array comparative genomic hybridization, and validated b

86 Applying a two-stage high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization approach to anal

87 field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and public array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) data

88 n chromosomes, we designed a high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) plat

89 We used array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) to d

90 We used high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) to m

91 ole-genome, high-resolution, tiling path BAC array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) was

92 genomic alteration found in CR tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), gen

93 esults of an evolutionary analysis utilizing array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), mea

94 s (CNVs) in modern domesticated cattle using array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), qua

95 proximately 50% mortality rate, we performed array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) on s

96 comparison to CNVs previously identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH).

97 To examine for CNVs, ultra-high resolution array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) assa

98 Array comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) is wi

99 A combination of SNP arrays, comparative genomic hybridization arrays, and wh

100 uding fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization as well as large

101 ing (n=6), whole-exome sequencing (n=66) and array comparative genomic hybridization-based copy-numbe

102 These results indicate that array comparative genomic hybridization can identify sig

103 entire GRIA3 (encoding iGluR3) by using an X-array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and four m

104 state cancer through whole-exome sequencing, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and RNA tr

105 cytogeneticists who wish to use genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) assays for

106 Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) can reveal

107 Accurate estimation of DNA copy numbers from array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data is im

108 We used a public array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) database a

109 Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) demonstrat

110 A copy number across amplified regions using array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) may facili

111 progression of breast carcinoma, we did cDNA array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on a panel

112 Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results of

113 High-density array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) showed amp

114 ancer copy number profiles obtained from 107 array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies.

115 Sequencing, quantitative PCR, breeding, and array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) together c

116 Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was perfor

117 Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used t

118 ne for genome-wide copy number changes using array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

119 omprehensive genomic profiling of CTCs using array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and next-g

120 estigated colorectal cancer cell lines using array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for copy n

121 Genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for DGS wa

122 eatment) for circulating cfDNA and performed array comparative genomic hybridization copy number prof

123 Unsupervised analyses of array comparative genomic hybridization data associated

124 We analyzed array comparative genomic hybridization data from 102 pr

125 veloped a new method (BioHMM) for segmenting array comparative genomic hybridization data into states

126 utperformed several algorithms on segmenting array comparative genomic hybridization data.

127 Array comparative genomic hybridization detected 3q24-qt

128 Array comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in

129 Array comparative genomic hybridization has been used wi

130 Over the past several years, array comparative genomic hybridization has proven its v

131 of 22 hybrid neurofibromas/schwannomas using array comparative genomic hybridization, immunohistochem

132 ormation and progression were assessed using array comparative genomic hybridization in 21 squamous c

133 red genome-wide chromosomal imbalances using array comparative genomic hybridization in glial and mes

134 CNV data from 21,470 individuals obtained by array-comparative genomic hybridization in a clinical di

135 of copy number variation by high-resolution array-comparative genomic hybridization in diverse tissu

136 The use of array comparative genomic hybridization is replacing the

137 Here array comparative genomic hybridization is used to chara

138 Using a combination of array comparative genomic hybridization, mate pair and c

139 We have applied whole-genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (median probe sp

140 We first present an array comparative genomic hybridization method capable o

141 us) using a whole-exome tiling array and the array comparative genomic hybridization methodology.

142 n osteosarcoma formation, we have integrated array comparative genomic hybridization, microarray expr

143 High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of 235 high-grad

144 ide copy number changes were monitored using array comparative genomic hybridization of laser-capture

145 Array comparative genomic hybridization of the tumors id

146 Here, array comparative genomic hybridization on a cDNA microa

147 ctual disability (XLID) were investigated by array comparative genomic hybridization on a high-densit

148 ukemia (T-ALL), we performed high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization on diagnostic sp

149 DUF1220 sequences to implement targeted 1q21 array comparative genomic hybridization on individuals (

150 BAC microarray was used for array comparative genomic hybridization on prostate canc

151 s (CNAs) were confirmed using an ultra-dense array comparative genomic hybridization platform.

152 ould only detect large CNVs (> 15 kb) in the array comparative genomic hybridization profiles for the

153 Cytogenetic analysis and array comparative genomic hybridization profiling show i

154 omic instability but not polyploidy based on array comparative genomic hybridization results.

155 aried in size and complexities; in one case, array comparative genomic hybridization revealed 18 copy

156 Array comparative genomic hybridization revealed a parti

157 Additionally, array comparative genomic hybridization revealed that no

158 Investigation by array-comparative genomic hybridization revealed deletio

159 Notably, conventional and array-comparative genomic hybridization revealed frequen

160 Array comparative genomic hybridization showed that PLP1

161 s by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically in

162 anges in 2419 patients referred for clinical array comparative genomic hybridization studies.

163 By using a combination of array-comparative genomic hybridization, TaqMan copy num

164 We performed array comparative genomic hybridization testing in blood

165 tion of genetic changes, we used genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization to analyse copy

166 umbers of six genes previously identified by array comparative genomic hybridization to be involved i

167 We used array comparative genomic hybridization to identify a 21

168 compared with bone marrow at diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization to investigate r

169 We have used array comparative genomic hybridization to map DNA copy-

170 We performed array comparative genomic hybridization to map these del

171 We investigated these factors by using array comparative genomic hybridization to measure genom

172 , we first took advantage of high-resolution array-comparative genomic hybridization to search for AL

173 We performed array comparative genomic hybridization using a custom A

174 We performed array comparative genomic hybridization using Agilent pl

175 mpared to higher grade gliomas, we performed array comparative genomic hybridization using two indepe

176 Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on

177 Array comparative genomic hybridization was used to iden

178 Array comparative genomic hybridization was used to scre

179 Using array comparative genomic hybridization we confirmed tha

180 Using array comparative genomic hybridization, we found that,

181 Through breakpoint-spanning PCR as well as array comparative genomic hybridization, we have identif

182 tourinary tract masculinization disorders by array-comparative genomic hybridization, which revealed

183 monstrate the utility of archived tissue for array comparative genomic hybridization with a 2400 elem

184 In this study, we performed high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization with an array of

185 Array comparative genomic hybridization, with a genome-w

186 luorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization, with a tiling p

187 is elegans for gene copy-number changes with array comparative genomic hybridization yields the first