戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ings were correlated with those at clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic examination.
2                                  We focus on arthroscopic approaches to problems of the hip, wrist, e
3                                              Arthroscopic assessment of patients with knee osteoarthr
4                                              Arthroscopic cartilage assessment with use of a modified
5                                  Second-look arthroscopic confirmation of meniscal status was availab
6                          One of the five had arthroscopic confirmation.
7                                    There was arthroscopic correlation of findings in five patients.
8                                  Surgical or arthroscopic correlation was available as the so-called
9               Surgical treatment ranges from arthroscopic debridement to implantation of autologous c
10 e, the outcomes after arthroscopic lavage or arthroscopic debridement were no better than those after
11 f the knee were randomly assigned to receive arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic lavage, or placeb
12                                 Clinical and arthroscopic diagnoses of rotator interval abnormalities
13                                              Arthroscopic examination of the anterior horn of the lat
14 ties of the cartilage that were evident upon arthroscopic examination.
15       The imaging results were compared with arthroscopic findings for patient.
16 t's level of experience and knowledge of the arthroscopic findings, the sensitivity for diagnosis of
17 l bone marrow edema without knowledge of the arthroscopic findings.
18 review; the second was with knowledge of the arthroscopic findings.
19  the reported MR signs correlate poorly with arthroscopic findings.
20             MR findings were correlated with arthroscopic findings.
21           The results were compared with the arthroscopic findings.
22 d co-localization between the MR imaging and arthroscopic findings.
23 es of the shoulder in patients who underwent arthroscopic follow-up were retrospectively reviewed by
24 gs of subchondral bone marrow edema with the arthroscopic grade of articular cartilage degeneration.
25                                              Arthroscopic grades showed cartilage abnormality in 23 o
26 ssified according to a modified standardized arthroscopic grading system.
27 l sulcus was the most frequent finding after arthroscopic hip surgery in both asymptomatic and sympto
28  asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after arthroscopic hip surgery.
29 tilage was graded blindly on both the MR and arthroscopic images with a modification of the Noyes cla
30 mages, 77% were graded identically on MR and arthroscopic images.
31  age, 41.6 years) who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery.
32 , 39.1 years), who also underwent subsequent arthroscopic knee surgery.
33  age of 33 years) who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery.
34 roposterior radiography of the knee prior to arthroscopic knee surgery.
35 erwent MR imaging of the knee and subsequent arthroscopic knee surgery.
36 teoarthritis of the knee, the outcomes after arthroscopic lavage or arthroscopic debridement were no
37 ssigned to receive arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic lavage, or placebo surgery.
38 for samples obtained by needle aspiration or arthroscopic lavage, suggesting a widespread applicabili
39 ts with early OA cartilage damage undergoing arthroscopic meniscal procedures.
40 s without evidence of OA who were undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy for meniscal injuries were rec
41 e patients without evidence of OA undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy for meniscal injuries were rec
42 ts with traumatic meniscal injury undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without clinical or radiograph
43 ts with traumatic meniscal injury undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without radiographic evidence
44  treatments, a subset should be treated with arthroscopic or open surgery.
45 c classification showed correlation with the arthroscopic or surgical classification in 13 of 17 pati
46                   Recent evidence shows that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) offers no benefi
47 data exist to identify who will benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) versus nonoperat
48                                      Whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic patien
49                                              Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the most com
50           Patients were randomly assigned to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or sham surgery.
51 ate of injured human meniscus at the time of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy through transcriptome-
52 ive medial meniscus tear, the outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than th
53 1 patients, resulting in significantly fewer arthroscopic procedures (P < .01).
54 f indications for diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopic procedures involving virtually every periph
55                             Complications of arthroscopic procedures occur very rarely.
56 cute knee injury by decreasing the number of arthroscopic procedures, improving clinician diagnostic
57 ith the preponderance of data generated with arthroscopic procedures.
58 nagement plans included 37% (27 of 73) fewer arthroscopic procedures.
59        For the remaining 23%, MR imaging and arthroscopic ratings were within one grade of each other
60 9,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively.
61 e 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively.
62                                         With arthroscopic results as the reference standard, the sens
63                           Medical charts and arthroscopic results, when available, were reviewed for
64 on by three radiologists who were blinded to arthroscopic results.
65               US findings were compared with arthroscopic results.
66  labrum while blinded to patient history and arthroscopic results.
67  meniscocapsular injury were correlated with arthroscopic results.
68 n time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair).
69   DeBerardino et al. prospectively evaluated arthroscopic stabilization of acute shoulder dislocation
70  of a prospective randomized trial comparing arthroscopic stabilization to nonoperative treatment of
71                                              Arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression (decompressing t
72 We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1) to arthroscopic subacromial decompression, investigational
73  120 minutes or more (OR = 1.69, P = 0.027), arthroscopic surgery (OR = 5.16, P < 0.001), saphenofemo
74                            She has undergone arthroscopic surgery for a meniscal tear and has taken n
75              We assessed these effects after arthroscopic surgery in patients with and without histol
76 ed among medical management, rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery with post-operative rehabilitation,
77 tact rotator cuff tendons, were eligible for arthroscopic surgery, and had previously completed a non
78 an age, 35.5 years) who underwent subsequent arthroscopic surgery.
79                All 16 patients had undergone arthroscopic surgery.
80                               Five underwent arthroscopic surgery.
81       To examine recent trends in the use of arthroscopic surgical techniques to address musculoskele
82                                              Arthroscopic synovectomy effectively controls the hypert
83 ms and refinements in the use of imaging and arthroscopic tools are reviewed.
84 ce (MR) arthrography of the hip 1 year after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.
85 njury, treatment may include immobilization, arthroscopic treatment, or open reduction and internal f

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。