ライフサイエンスコーパス: arthroscopy

1 ohort of 255 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy.

2 Each articular surface was then evaluated at arthroscopy.

3 There were 28 pulley lesions noted at arthroscopy.

4 ge defect was seen at the site of the SAF at arthroscopy.

5 degeneration scores (0-4 scale) assigned at arthroscopy.

6 ients had been evaluated with MR imaging and arthroscopy.

7 54 articular cartilage defects identified at arthroscopy.

8 8 articular surfaces that appeared normal at arthroscopy.

9 face of the tibiofemoral joint was graded at arthroscopy.

10 of their knee performed immediately prior to arthroscopy.

11 and had undergone total joint replacement or arthroscopy.

12 and compared the results with those of wrist arthroscopy.

13 triquetral ligament tears were identified at arthroscopy.

14 of these 100 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy.

15 = 20) or an anterior labral tear (n = 38) at arthroscopy.

16 ith a sublabral foramen or Buford complex at arthroscopy.

17 were correlated with results from subsequent arthroscopy.

18 s who underwent both MR imaging and shoulder arthroscopy.

19 m laterally without meniscocapsular tears at arthroscopy.

20 3D FLASH sequence and subsequently underwent arthroscopy.

21 ing of gross changes in the unstable knee at arthroscopy 16 weeks after cruciate ligament transection

22 5% CI 0.5-5.2], p=0.0186; mean difference vs arthroscopy 4.2 [1.8-6.6], p=0.0014) but these differenc

23 rcondylar notch, in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy (ACL injury) or arthroplasty (late-stage pri

24 , 13-74 years; mean, 38 years) who underwent arthroscopy after MR imaging, knee MR images that showed

25 A-compliant study, 21 patients who underwent arthroscopy and 24 patients who did not, all of whom wer

26 patients with a type 2, 3, or 4 SLAP tear at arthroscopy and 31 age-matched control patients with an

27 e, by comparing US findings with findings of arthroscopy and clinical examination.

28 MR arthrograms in 80 patients who underwent arthroscopy and MR arthrography during a 54-month period

29 ients; age range, 13-57 years) who underwent arthroscopy and MR imaging within 4 weeks of surgery wer

30 management of elderly outpatients undergoing arthroscopy and other procedures, reconsideration of the

31 th PsA (median duration 18 months) underwent arthroscopy and synovial biopsy of an inflamed knee befo

32 90 patients assigned to decompression, 94 to arthroscopy, and 90 to no treatment.

33 e subjects completing preoperative 3.0T MRI, arthroscopy, and intraoperative OCT comprised the study

34 of patients with ACL injury was assessed at arthroscopy, and the knee function of patients with prim

35 Nineteen patients underwent arthroscopy, and the peripheral capsular attachment, deg

36 ial, which included patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, and the POT-CAST trial, which included pati

37 the knee with a reference standard, such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or magnetic resonance imaging.

38 We included studies that used arthroscopy as the gold standard for measuring the accur

39 With the use of arthroscopy as the gold standard, US had a higher sensit

40 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity a

41 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity a

42 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity,

43 g cartilage lesions were determined by using arthroscopy as the reference standard.

44 in MR imaging being preferred to diagnostic arthroscopy by most leading orthopedic surgeons.

45 All articular surfaces were graded at arthroscopy by using the Noyes classification system.

46 s (joint injection, aspiration, lithotripsy; arthroscopy, carpal tunnel; or cataract; 2.02 million) i

47 In contrast, FLS from arthroscopy controls lack adhesive or T cell growth-prom

48 er with superficial fibrillation observed at arthroscopy demonstrated marked spatial heterogeneity an

49 At the time of arthroscopy, each articular cartilage lesion was graded

50 Patients undergoing arthroscopy for degenerative meniscal tears were recruit

51 injections as alternative treatments to knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

52 controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

53 Elbow arthroscopy has been especially helpful in the managemen

54 Ankle arthroscopy has been especially helpful with soft tissue

55 Wrist arthroscopy has provided novel approaches to ligament te

56 R arthrography were compared with those from arthroscopy in four hip joints with SAF type 1 and 13 wi

57 lecular-weight heparin (for the 8 days after arthroscopy in the POT-KAST trial or during the full per

58 ion, and the absence of cartilage defects at arthroscopy indicate that the SAF of the acetabulum like

59 Although arthroscopy is considered the standard of reference for

60 Hip arthroscopy is permitting novel, minimally invasive appr

61 evaluated in 31 patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy less than 6 months after MR imaging.

62 (decompression mean 32.7 points [SD 11.6] vs arthroscopy mean 34.2 points [9.2]; mean difference -1.3

63 s report symptomatic relief after undergoing arthroscopy of the knee for osteoarthritis, but it is un

64 , respectively) who underwent MR imaging and arthroscopy of the knee joint.

65 Thirty-four patients underwent needle arthroscopy of the knee joint; 12 had early rheumatoid a

66 Arthroscopy only was a placebo as the essential surgical

67 groups (106 to decompression surgery, 103 to arthroscopy only, and 104 to no treatment).

68 43 [42%], and 12 [12%] of the decompression, arthroscopy only, and no treatment groups, respectively,

69 c subacromial decompression, investigational arthroscopy only, or no treatment (attendance of one rea

70 sion appeared to offer no extra benefit over arthroscopy only.

71 y apparent venous thromboembolism after knee arthroscopy or casting of the lower leg is disputed.

72 lar-weight heparin for the 8 days after knee arthroscopy or during the full period of immobilization

73 Fifty-two patients underwent arthroscopy or open surgery 12 days to 5 months after MR

74 The increased number of patients undergoing arthroscopy or surgery of the knee for sports medicine i

75 Virtually all the literature on arthroscopy outcomes comes from small uncontrolled studi

76 Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, wa

77 Arthroscopy provides a safe alternative to arthrotomy in

78 Arthroscopy provides exciting direct visual information

79 uantitative OCT strongly correlated with the arthroscopy results (P = 0.004 and P = 0.0002, respectiv

80 ppa value for intrareader reproducibility of arthroscopy results was 0.88.

81 gnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 values and arthroscopy results.

82 ge degeneration that strongly correlate with arthroscopy results.

83 deep cartilage T2 values correlated with the arthroscopy results.

84 Arthroscopy revealed 21 full-thickness tears, five bursa

85 of several treatment options, including hip arthroscopy, safe surgical dislocation of the hip and pe

86 iple and often invasive procedures including arthroscopy/synovial biopsy (18 [11.8%] of 152), but non

87 At arthroscopy, there were 25 SLAP tears: type II (n = 22),

88 RA) with knee synovitis who were undergoing arthroscopy were assessed.