ライフサイエンスコーパス: assisted ventilation

1 = 86 breathing unassisted, n = 97 receiving assisted ventilation).

2 vival (time to death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation).

3 in weight for gestational age or the use of assisted ventilation.

4 4.0-78.4) times higher among cases receiving assisted ventilation.

5 older, had ARDS, and were being treated with assisted ventilation.

6 rimary safety outcome was the performance of assisted ventilation.

7 f the 42 patients with RF, 37 (88%) required assisted ventilation.

8 ity seen in critically ill patients who need assisted ventilation.

9 compressions only or chest compressions plus assisted ventilation.

10 zard ratio for death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation, 0.53; P=0.005).

11 Twenty-six patients in each group required assisted ventilation (16.0% given diazepam and 17.6% giv

12 Peak power output decreased 20% with assisted ventilation and 41% with controlled ventilation

13 Tetanic force decreased by 14% with assisted ventilation and 48% with controlled ventilation

14 ed to increase with controlled compared with assisted ventilation and control.

15 The primary outcomes were requirement of assisted ventilation and of drugs to control muscle spas

16 We compared changes over time in the use of assisted ventilation and oxygen therapy during the newbo

17 lide antibiotic therapy and intubation, with assisted ventilation and oxygen.

18 the newborn period shortens the duration of assisted ventilation and reduces the incidence of bronch

19 ad no structural heart disease, and required assisted ventilation and whose oxygenation index was 25

20 tation, were 4 days old or younger, required assisted ventilation, and had hypoxemic respiratory fail

21 more pronounced and 50% of neonates may need assisted ventilation, and occasionally naloxone.

22 y into control animals, those with 3 days of assisted ventilation, and those with controlled ventilat

23 ENO over 4 h to seven neonates who required assisted ventilation, and who had an oxygenation index o

24 age, weight for gestational age, and use of assisted ventilation are presented to describe the cohor

25 ors for survival duration included requiring assisted ventilation at the time of transplant, continuo

26 They were then placed on assisted ventilation, awakened, and resuscitated with la

27 No assisted ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation resul

28 randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC

29 of prehospital single-rescuer bystander CPR, assisted ventilation did not improve outcome.

30 hom the rate of respiratory events requiring assisted ventilation differed from the overall rate of e

31 We evaluated the need for assisted ventilation during simulated single-rescuer bys

32 We evaluated the need for assisted ventilation during simulated single-rescuer bys

33 Assisted ventilation for extremely preterm infants (<28

34 ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardia

35 titoxin and supportive care that may include assisted ventilation for weeks or months.

36 ve pressure ventilation compared with the no assisted ventilation group (117 +/- 29 and 41 +/- 21 vs.

37 Patients who were receiving assisted ventilation, had an invasive airway in place, o

38 tilation (PAV) is a newer mode that delivers assisted ventilation in proportion to patient effort.

39 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with ass

40 ditis were more likely to be listed while on assisted ventilation, mechanical circulatory support and

41 s chest compressions (100/min) and either no assisted ventilation (n = 9) or 10 positive pressure ven

42 ic and pathologic comparison of two modes of assisted ventilation, nasal intermittent positive-pressu

43 Aspects of care including assisted ventilation, nutrition, and patient autonomy ar

44 cial to the management of children requiring assisted ventilation on Paediatric Intensive Care Units

45 lation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (cont

46 thing unassisted versus 89 (91.8%) receiving assisted ventilation (P < 0.001).

47 erse events including the use of flumazenil, assisted ventilation, permanent injury or death, and tem

48 After 24 hrs, four of nine no assisted ventilation pigs were alive with a mean cerebra

49 g unassisted versus 39.6% of those receiving assisted ventilation presented without an arterial pulse

50 , including data on the duration and type of assisted ventilation provided, the duration of oxygen th

51 ion of continuous chest compressions without assisted ventilations resulted in significantly better 2

52 The duration of assisted ventilation rose substantially over time, with

53 The rate of respiratory events requiring assisted ventilation was not significantly different amo

54 ted, the majority (70.4%) of those receiving assisted ventilation who experienced hypotension or card

55 , animals were randomly assigned to 6 hrs of assisted ventilation with pressure support ventilation,

56 ons of continuous chest compressions without assisted ventilations with 30:2 CPR in a swine model of