1 tween objects using a metric that depends on associative strength.

2 n areas and adapts dynamically to changes in associative strength.

3 to the sum of cue-outcome and cue-no-outcome associative strengths.

4  accepted as interchangeable measures of the associative strength activated by the conditioned stimul

5                       Both the connectivity (associative strength) and the network size (number of as

6 le and highly general method of updating the associative strength between different stimuli.

7 nt value of a paired trial diminishes as the associative strength between the presented stimuli incre

8 temporal cortex were sensitive to cue-target-associative strength, but not competition, consistent wi

9 uring fMRI: judgment specificity, cue-target-associative strength, competitor dominance, and number o

10         Furthermore, we show that changes in associative strength modulate the excitability profile o

11 models reliant on reward prediction error or associative strength routinely fail to perform these inf

12                      Because any increase in associative strength stemming from the sample experience

13 ead to reflect the increase in an underlying associative strength, then a negligible portion of the f

14  negligible portion of the function relating associative strength to amount of experience is behavior

15 .g., taste-sweet-candy) that were similar in associative strength to discordant subordinate-related c

16 trongly-related targets that were similar in associative strength to discordant subordinate-related c

17 eparate the effects of meaning frequency and associative strength, unambiguous words were paired with

18 mory networks on the basis of their relative associative strength with the shared element.