ライフサイエンスコーパス: assortative

1 ustering, whereas the transmodal network was assortative.

2 cation, with work-place contacts being least assortative.

3 to error unless the network is transitive or assortative.

4 ncluding heritability of network position or assortative associations, can be understood as consequen

5 Group assortative biases are stronger in regions where pathoge

6 different genetic backgrounds suggests that assortative (entire gene) recombination has also contrib

7 ing a history of horizontal DNA transfer and assortative (entire gene) recombination.

8 Involving either positive assortative fertilization (as opposed to self-incompatib

9 Potential mechanisms leading to assortative fertilization are discussed, as are their ev

10 Examples of assortative fertilization in Drosophila are reviewed and

11 opposed to self-incompatibility) or negative assortative fertilization, it occurs after mating but pr

12 ity, resulting in an increased proportion of assortative GRNs that are simultaneously robust and evol

13 ave emerged, they contribute towards greater assortative interactions among individuals using a share

14 blic goods game that involves no repeated or assortative interactions, so that non-cooperation would

15 n which symbols become the dominant force in assortative interactions.

16 based preferential node selection and degree-assortative link placement are necessary to replicate th

17 butterflies exhibited partial, color-based, assortative mate preference.

18 ed by size-dependent competition that drives assortative mate-pair formation.

19 t increase by 1.5-fold after 1 generation of assortative mating (>/=2.4-fold in the long term) depend

20 r the diversification of seahorses, and that assortative mating (in this case as a result of male par

21 ncrease by more than 5% from 1 generation of assortative mating (maximally 13% across multiple genera

22 igations have described benefits of positive assortative mating (PAM) for forest tree breeding, the a

23 ted to favour evolution of traits that allow assortative mating (reinforcement).

24 few studies have assessed the robustness of assortative mating against temporal changes in social co

25 the effects of gene drift and consanguinity, assortative mating also may have played a key role in th

26 ecently proposed that the intense phenotypic assortative mating among the deaf might have greatly acc

27 Patterns of assortative mating and a low incidence of invasive sperm

28 oid heterospecifics during adulthood promote assortative mating and hence speciation.

29 amework can be used to estimate the rates of assortative mating and sex-specific gene flow in hybrid

30 se conspicuous genotypic patterns are due to assortative mating and strong postzygotic barriers, rath

31 ossibility that spouse effects may be due to assortative mating and the relatively small polygenic ri

32 ed for recombination between loci underlying assortative mating and those under divergent ecological

33 logical selection on frequency might lead to assortative mating and ultimately reproductive isolation

34 Few studies have distinguished between assortative mating arising from preferences for similar

35 ous trait in samples with the same levels of assortative mating as those considered for the two-locus

36 es an opportunity to understand evolution of assortative mating at a molecular level.

37 shows that sub-population-specific positive assortative mating at the genotypic level results in pop

38 ion, driven by intraspecific competition and assortative mating based on ecological characters values

39 fic fertilization advantage have been shown: assortative mating based on gamete type, rare allele adv

40 populations can be largely accounted for by assortative mating based on one trait, body size, which

41 Assortative mating between the sister species means that

42 d Anopheles gambiae, have been attributed to assortative mating between the two species.

43 via reduced hybrid viability and/or positive assortative mating but are then replenished by dispersal

44 Males and females exhibited significant assortative mating by body size: the largest males and f

45 robiome, was reported to result in immediate assortative mating by diet, which could be eliminated by

46 y selection and evolved significant positive assortative mating by diet.

47 netic similarity explains at most 10% of the assortative mating by education levels.

48 ts of the alternate type, and some degree of assortative mating by form may exist as well.

49 s also displayed two contrasting patterns of assortative mating by personality (activity level).

50 ects of differential migration of the sexes, assortative mating by pure type females, and census time

51 Demonstrations of 'parallel speciation', or assortative mating by selective environment, link ecolog

52 or population structure and ancestry-related assortative mating by using individual-specific allele f

53 ng evidence for the important influence that assortative mating can have on the frequency of common g

54 the form of predation, mimicry pattern-based assortative mating caused community-level mimetic divers

55 The results show that (1) introduction of assortative mating does not, in itself, markedly affect

56 ing involve high-stakes decision making, and assortative mating ensures that status matters for fitne

57 t enforces habitat specialization and causes assortative mating even in sympatry.

58 t enforces habitat specialization and causes assortative mating even in sympatry.

59 Most studies quantifying assortative mating focus on testing for correlations amo

60 Raw spousal correlations showed assortative mating for age, weight, body mass index, lea

61 erns of host acceptance that in turn lead to assortative mating for insects that mate exclusively on

62 om random mating, suggesting strong negative-assortative mating for MHC is not present in these South

63 We aimed to assess the level of assortative mating for obesity by using dual-energy X-ra

64 These data confirm that assortative mating for obesity exists when dual-energy X

65 Previous studies of assortative mating for obesity have indicated that it ma

66 This suggests that assortative mating has been enhanced in sympatry.

67 demonstrate that during a brief breakdown in assortative mating in 2006, A. coluzzii inherited the en

68 nts (P < 0.05), demonstrating height-related assortative mating in both populations.

69 Alleles conferring high or low assortative mating in D. pseudoobscura produce the same

70 eight to assess the degree of height-related assortative mating in European-American and African-Amer

71 Prior studies of assortative mating in humans focused on trait similarity

72 The finding of possible assortative mating in OCD is intriguing and should be in

73 the theoretical and empirical importance of assortative mating in speciation with the ease with whic

74 ly arose via pollution-mediated breakdown of assortative mating in the 1990s.

75 omones mediating mate selection resulting in assortative mating in the Mus musculus species complex.

76 lly smaller than the strength of educational assortative mating in the same sample.

77 We provide evidence for genetic assortative mating in this population but the strength o

78 (iii) Assortative mating is greater for intelligence (spouse c

79 Assortative mating is the nonrandom mating of individual

80 generation after generation to a limit, but assortative mating is unlikely to balance the impact of

81 A temporal analysis revealed that assortative mating is unstable and periodically breaks d

82 ural selection and traits that contribute to assortative mating maintained?

83 nforcement, suggesting that the evolution of assortative mating may be more complicated than expected

84 Thus, our findings suggest that assortative mating may constitute an intermittent and un

85 We hypothesize that assortative mating may have contributed to the obesity e

86 frequencies strongly reflect the directional assortative mating observed in behavioral trials, illust

87 We furthermore found evidence for assortative mating of females with males from their own

88 out the effects of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis.

89 % CI, 1.31-6.25), suggesting either positive assortative mating or a shared environmental contributio

90 ng because it might lead to the evolution of assortative mating or dominance [1, 2].

91 Biologists have devoted much attention to assortative mating or homogamy, the tendency for sexual

92 elated risks and traits to quantifying human assortative mating patterns.

93 We showed that ancestry-positive assortative mating permeated Brazilian history.

94 Assortative mating pumps additive genetic variance into

95 tion; they are selected to evolve or enhance assortative mating to prevent costly intergroup matings

96 ecological conditions, the process requires assortative mating to protect the nascent species from h

97 However, we also find that assortative mating was plastic, varying in strength over

98 This route to assortative mating was suggested by Parker.

99 g across generations as a result of positive assortative mating with obese husbands and wives contrib

100 Such preferences induce assortative mating with respect to ecological characters

101 empirical evidence that genetic coupling of assortative mating with traits under divergent ecologica

102 e been reports of nonrandom mating (negative-assortative mating) or preference for individuals of dif

103 cautious that cryptic population structure, assortative mating, and dynastic effects may influence t

104 s process results from geographic sorting or assortative mating, and it is unknown whether genotypes

105 n causal inference by biological pleiotropy, assortative mating, and the nonrandom sampling of study

106 ted if ecological adaptation directly causes assortative mating, but few natural examples are known.

107 DERSON's experiment, in the form of negative assortative mating, could also account for the mtDNA fre

108 ional transmission process occurring through assortative mating, genetic inheritance, and the inherit

109 report, we show by computer simulation that assortative mating, in fact, can accelerate dramatically

110 les, including partial self-mating, positive assortative mating, non-random outbreeding, and simulati

111 nsition zone, neutral genetic divergence and assortative mating, suggesting that divergent selection

112 To study the evolution of assortative mating, we evolved mating discrimination in

113 Assortative mating, when individuals of similar phenotyp

114 servations provided evidence of asymmetrical assortative mating, while reduced brood sizes and male-b

115 ng, when the female choice strategy produces assortative mating.

116 icularly rapid when such shifts also promote assortative mating.

117 a nearby population did not show evidence of assortative mating.

118 formation increases the strength of positive assortative mating.

119 resident, although there was no evidence of assortative mating.

120 over 25 generations through strong ancestry-assortative mating.

121 as well as the fitness consequences of rare assortative mating.

122 ffects at different loci, which is caused by assortative mating.

123 the integrity of species boundaries through assortative mating.

124 h has quantified the genetic consequences of assortative mating.

125 patterns of thermotolerance differences and assortative mating.

126 polymorphism is maintained through negative assortative mating.

127 parapatric speciation even in the absence of assortative mating.

128 is maintained in the population by negative assortative mating.

129 f power is greater with increasing levels of assortative mating; and (3) for a heterogeneous genetic

130 mate recognition, an essential precursor to assortative mating; frequency matching occurs more consi

131 Random-mating and assortative-mating samples were generated.

132 four different mixing scenarios ranging from assortative (maximising within-group mixing) to disassor

133 Race-assortative mixing alone could not sustain a pre-existin

134 ite lower numbers of contacts in workplaces, assortative mixing among adults with high rates of smear

135 and vice versa), which mimicked the observed assortative mixing among playmates.

136 While evidence of this type of assortative mixing and temporal clustering of behaviors

137 ence data, large differences in the level of assortative mixing were seen between the fits identified

138 % (0.7%, 42.5%) to 11.8% (1.2%, 32.5%) under assortative mixing.

139 An assortative model based on node population size captures

140 ppen if one accounts for male heterogeneity, assortative pair formation, and evolution of female choi

141 However, there was no evidence of assortative pairing with respect to migratory strategy:

142 ocial network structure and (5) emergence of assortative population structure with spatial clusters o

143 allow subspecific mate discrimination, with assortative preferences evident in the hybrid zone but n

144 ed in the LOD scores, is somewhat lower with assortative rather than random mating.

145 the extent to which social interactions are assortative rather than random, and the distribution of

146 opulation structure, with little evidence of assortative recombination between strains of different s

147 and number of groups in the population, and assortative relatedness due to the distribution of genot

148 of parasite-stress while devaluing in-group assortative sociality in areas with low levels of parasi

149 logical adaptation that facilitates in-group assortative sociality in the face of high levels of para

150 This is because in-group assortative sociality is more important for the avoidanc

151 Thornhill (F&T) present a model of in-group assortative sociality resulting from differing levels of

152 al and the interstate analyses that in-group assortative sociality was positively associated with par

153 a causal factor in the variation of in-group assortative sociality, cross-nationally and across the U

154 account for intra-regional heterogeneity in assortative sociality, which, we argue, can be better ex

155 derlies certain cultural practices promoting assortative sociality.

156 Contacts are highly assortative with age across all countries considered, bu

157 sertive or receptive role) and the extent of assortative (within-group) mixing are known to affect HI

158 , mixing scenarios with increased amounts of assortative (within-group) mixing tended to give rise to