戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 on study (GWAS) on the slope of BHR in adult asthmatics.
2 arker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatics.
3  and the complex immune response in blood of asthmatics.
4 id-sensitive (SS) and steroid-resistant (SR) asthmatics.
5 biopsy sections from smoking and non-smoking asthmatics.
6 mation in all compartments in both groups of asthmatics.
7 ced sensitivity of ASM cells to GC in severe asthmatics.
8 hmatic adults aged under 56 than among older asthmatics.
9 thelial and bronchial lavage cells in atopic asthmatics.
10 ronchial hyperresponsiveness in adult stable asthmatics.
11                 Cross-sectional study of 431 asthmatics.
12 cies of total DCs and pDCs in both SS and SR asthmatics.
13 hilic inflammation compared to mild/moderate asthmatics.
14 une response in a large proportion of atopic asthmatics.
15 rsecretion and decreased ciliary function of asthmatics.
16  bundles in endobronchial biopsies in severe asthmatics.
17 requency of mDCs in SS, but reduced it in SR asthmatics.
18 re analysed in a cohort of poorly controlled asthmatics.
19 om control and airflow obstruction in severe asthmatics.
20 (EoP) were assayed in 21 severe eosinophilic asthmatics, 19 mild asthmatics, eight COPD patients and
21                     Thirty-two mild/moderate asthmatics, 50 severe asthmatics and 35 healthy subjects
22                          Eighty-five elderly asthmatics, 74 younger asthma patients, and 114 age-matc
23 asthma, a total of 231 asthmatic and 225 non-asthmatic adolescents were selected from northern Taiwan
24  sensitization are more common among Finnish asthmatic adults aged under 56 than among older asthmati
25 metabolism sustains arginine availability in asthmatic airway epithelium with consequences for bioene
26 se (iNOS) and arginase (ARG), are typical in asthmatic airway epithelium; however, little is known ab
27          A role for smooth muscle ARHGEF1 in asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness is worthy of furth
28 tial therapeutic target for the treatment of asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness.
29 n periostin-rich extracellular matrix in the asthmatic airway in an ADAM8-dependent manner, making AD
30 airway obstruction in the context of chronic asthmatic airway inflammation.
31        To investigate the role of calpain in asthmatic airway remodelling as well as the underlying m
32                                              Asthmatic airways are inflamed and undergo remodelling.
33   Our data suggest that BPIFA1 deficiency in asthmatic airways promotes Orai1 hyperactivity, increase
34 nslational modification (PTM) of proteins in asthmatic airways through a process called carbamylation
35 own to be co-localized with EPO within human asthmatic airways.
36 rmones and associated asthma, a total of 231 asthmatic and 225 non-asthmatic adolescents were selecte
37         In a nested case-control study of 35 asthmatic and 49 nonasthmatic children, 42 FAs were quan
38 ed for sncRNA profiling in BSM cells (from 8 asthmatic and 6 nonasthmatic subjects).
39 ral infections (CCL8/CXCL11), we screened 92 asthmatic and 69 healthy children without illness for re
40                                              Asthmatic and allergic inflammation is mediated by TH2 c
41 ated with reduced ST2 in blood cells of both asthmatic and control children and reduced IL-33 levels
42 nti-bacterial immune responses in pre-school asthmatic and control children within the EU-wide study
43  this interaction remained in both groups of asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects.
44                   Lung biopsy specimens from asthmatic and nonasthmatic patients revealed a predomina
45                            DNA from blood of asthmatic and normal subjects was genotyped for Tollip S
46 helial brushings from healthy, steroid-naive asthmatic and steroid-treated asthmatic subjects.
47 condary assay identified CMV DNA in 41.5% of asthmatics and 13.3% of control subjects (P < .001).
48 irty-two mild/moderate asthmatics, 50 severe asthmatics and 35 healthy subjects took part.
49 /bronchial IL-17F for discriminating between asthmatics and controls, between MAs and SAs and between
50 ease in nitrotyrosine in HBECs in cells from asthmatics and controls.
51 uman bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) from asthmatics and healthy controls to evaluate: (i) ADMA-me
52 nt in uncontrolled as compared to controlled asthmatics and healthy controls.
53           The severity of BHR varies between asthmatics and is associated with lack of asthma control
54  PP5 were increased in ASM cells from severe asthmatics and PP5 knockdown using siRNA restored flutic
55 ghest loads of fungus are observed in severe asthmatics and the most common fungus is Aspergillus fum
56 frequency is elevated in SR compared with SS asthmatics, and mDC shows a differential response to ora
57 a few studies involving healthy individuals, asthmatics, and smokers.
58                                      Elderly asthmatics are at a higher risk for morbidity and mortal
59               Evidence suggests that elderly asthmatics are more likely to be underdiagnosed and unde
60  from ASMCs was increased in the presence of asthmatic ASMCs that expressed more mRNA for FGF2b compa
61                                           In asthmatics, basophils were positively correlated with sp
62                                              Asthmatic bronchial biopsies were immunostained for CD48
63                                           In asthmatic bronchial biopsies, mCD48 was expressed predom
64 e immunity and increased localization to the asthmatic bronchial epithelium, we investigated whether
65 to diagnose or evaluate effect of therapy in asthmatics, but invasive.
66 m basophil numbers are increased in allergic asthmatics, but it is unclear what role airway basophils
67  The mycobiome was highly varied with severe asthmatics carrying higher loads of fungus.
68 re validated in an independent population of asthmatic children (n = 30) by using a shared healthy co
69                                              Asthmatic children aged 6 to 17 years underwent baseline
70                      A total of 229 dyads of asthmatic children and their parents enroled in public i
71 pment of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic children at school age.
72                                 Furthermore, asthmatic children had more episodes of infection that r
73                                        Obese asthmatic children have nonatopic TH1-polarized systemic
74 nts (n = 196) were selected from a cohort of asthmatic children in Connecticut and Massachusetts.
75                                  Over 89% of asthmatic children in underdeveloped countries demonstra
76 ylated regions, was selectively increased in asthmatic children of asthmatic mothers and was associat
77 ide differential gene expression among obese asthmatic children was enriched for genes, including VAV
78  IL33R-ST2 was found induced in the blood of asthmatic children with additional Gram + bacteria in th
79 health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among asthmatic children, especially from low-income families,
80                  These data suggest that, in asthmatic children, Gram- bacteria, which persist after
81                 In this cohort of pre-school asthmatic children, nasopharyngeal colonization with Gra
82 get that is upregulated in TH cells of obese asthmatic children, suggesting its role in nonatopic TH1
83  We performed HC in a rich data set from 613 asthmatic children, using 45 clinical variables (Model 1
84  in the blood of control children but not of asthmatic children.
85 n and reduced IL-33 levels in the airways of asthmatic children.
86 ed in epidemiologic studies mainly including asthmatic children.
87 e and dexamethasone in ASM cells from severe asthmatic compared to that in healthy subjects.
88 gnificantly reduced in ASM cells from severe asthmatics compared to responses in healthy subjects.
89 -beta, IFN-lambda1/IL-29, OAS and viperin in asthmatics compared with healthy subjects, while IL-28 w
90 gative answers to all three questions as non-asthmatic controls.
91                         In poorly controlled asthmatics, DARC SNPs were associated with worse asthma
92 features more usually associated with severe asthmatic disease.
93          Neutrophilic, but not eosinophilic, asthmatics display overexpression of IFN-beta, IFN-lambd
94 ident in eosinophils derived from atopic and asthmatic donors; (iii) enhanced F-actin formation; (iv)
95 ed form in eosinophils from healthy, but not asthmatic, donors (143 +/- 21% and 108 +/- 11% of contro
96 n 21 severe eosinophilic asthmatics, 19 mild asthmatics, eight COPD patients and eight normal subject
97                               In the smoking asthmatics, eosinophil numbers also correlated with expr
98 P2X5 receptors were expressed in healthy and asthmatic eosinophils.
99 ions closely approximated gene expression in asthmatic epithelial brushings.
100                The lasting alteration of the asthmatic epithelial cell transcriptome implicates regul
101 findings in epithelial brushings and primary asthmatic epithelial cells cultured in different biologi
102 re not required for development of pulmonary asthmatic features yet contributed to TH2 expansion in t
103              Exosomes of severe eosinophilic asthmatics' fibroblasts can contribute to airway remodel
104        Overexpression of TGF-beta2 in severe asthmatics' fibroblasts induced enhanced TGF-beta2 in ex
105 We performed a GWAS on BHR severity in adult asthmatics from the Dutch Asthma GWAS cohort (n = 650),
106  of subjects into type 2-high and type 2-low asthmatic groups, but in the ADEPT study population CCL2
107                  At baseline, both groups of asthmatics had a lower FEV1 and Pc20 and increased eosin
108                                     Severely asthmatic horses (6 horses/group) were treated with flut
109 secreted basolaterally from healthy, but not asthmatic human bronchial epithelial cultures (HBECs), w
110 ands, it will be critical to include elderly asthmatics in large clinical trials so that therapy may
111 d viperin in unstimulated sputum cells in 57 asthmatics (including 16 mild, 19 moderate and 22 severe
112       In a murine model of ASIT for allergic asthmatic inflammation, we found that OVA released from
113 ma and may contribute to the pathogenesis of asthmatic inflammation.
114 clinical glucocorticoid sensitivity of these asthmatics is reflected in differences in peripheral blo
115 alance also occurs in bronchial epitheliumof asthmatics is unknown.
116 ate from obese asthmatic (OA) patients, lean asthmatic (LA) patients, and obese nonasthmatic (ONA) su
117 ate from obese asthmatic (OA) patients, lean asthmatic (LA) patients, and obese nonasthmatic (ONA) su
118 ore, RV1B infection led to susceptibility to asthmatic lung disease when mice subsequently re-encount
119                             Fibroblasts from asthmatic lung exhibited increased TRPV4 activity and en
120  and that this can lead to susceptibility to asthmatic lung inflammation.
121 sue enhances M2-mediated inflammation in the asthmatic lung.
122 al/bronchial biopsies from controls and mild asthmatics (MAs) to severe asthmatics (SAs) in relation
123 lectively increased in asthmatic children of asthmatic mothers and was associated with childhood asth
124 istent asthma was observed among children of asthmatic mothers with mild uncontrolled (PR, 1.19; 95%
125 etons, of which 15,014 children were born to asthmatic mothers.
126 evels were determined in control (n = 9) and asthmatic (n = 27) bronchial biopsies using immunohistoc
127 asophils were significantly increased in all asthmatics (n=26) compared with healthy controls (n=8) (
128 mics of exhaled breath condensate from obese asthmatic (OA) patients, lean asthmatic (LA) patients, a
129 mics of exhaled breath condensate from obese asthmatic (OA) patients, lean asthmatic (LA) patients, a
130 the odds of airway obstruction by 75% within asthmatics only.
131 ased with farm exposure and increased within asthmatics, opposite to age 4.5 years.
132 bserved in the blood of SR as compared to SS asthmatics (P = .03).
133 stering was applied to a training set of 266 asthmatic participants from the European Unbiased Biomar
134 y disease but crucial in maintaining chronic asthmatic pathology.
135 presence of allergy and eosinophilia in each asthmatic patient.
136 ents with COPD (mean, 0.922 [SD, 0.037]) and asthmatic patients (mean, 0.852 [SD, 0.061]) compared wi
137 independent population of white adult atopic asthmatic patients (n = 12) and control subjects (n = 12
138                                           In asthmatic patients (n = 63) CNTO3157 provided no protect
139 le patients (P = .0001) and 71% lower in all asthmatic patients (P = .0008).
140 ma had a 21% lower Emax value than nonatopic asthmatic patients (P = .04).
141     This was a retrospective cohort study of asthmatic patients 18 years and older in the 2000-2014 M
142                                           In asthmatic patients abnormalities in many aspects of epit
143                                           In asthmatic patients airway microbial composition was asso
144   We studied human blood and lung ILC2s from asthmatic patients and control subjects using flow cytom
145 ed with small hairpin RNA lentivirus in both asthmatic patients and control subjects with BSM cell pr
146 e uniquely expressed in patients with AR and asthmatic patients and have potential for use as noninva
147 patients and in peripheral blood of allergic asthmatic patients and healthy control subjects.
148                      AECs were obtained from asthmatic patients and healthy subjects and treated with
149 EF1 expression was also enhanced in ASMCs of asthmatic patients and in lungs of ovalbumin-sensitized
150 role of p53 in proliferation of BSM cells in asthmatic patients and mitochondrial biogenesis.
151 s also enhanced in airway smooth muscle from asthmatic patients and ovalbumin-sensitized mice.
152 odeling, air trapping, and emphysema between asthmatic patients and patients with COPD and explore th
153 sthma review, we discuss viral infections in asthmatic patients and potential therapeutic agents, the
154 rations in glycolysis in sputum samples from asthmatic patients and primary human nasal cells and use
155 A1 levels are reduced in sputum samples from asthmatic patients and that BPIFA1 is secreted basolater
156 istance of human blood and airway ILC2s from asthmatic patients and to examine its mechanism of induc
157 olyclonal autoimmune event in the airways of asthmatic patients and to identify associated clinical a
158 inflammatory patterns of aged versus younger asthmatic patients are associated with increased sputum
159                                 BSM cells of asthmatic patients are characterized by aberrant sncRNA
160 ng function, asthma control, and symptoms in asthmatic patients but suppressed cold symptoms in healt
161 nt knowledge on pathogenic CD4(+) T cells in asthmatic patients by drawing on observations in mouse m
162 tion and progression of airway remodeling in asthmatic patients by recruiting fibroblasts that produc
163 [alpha-SMA](+)) fibrocytes were increased in asthmatic patients compared with control subjects.
164 vWF (142% vs 87%, overall P < .01) levels in asthmatic patients compared with healthy control subject
165 levels were increased in induced sputum from asthmatic patients compared with that from control subje
166 nd IFN-lambda levels were lower in AECs from asthmatic patients compared with those from healthy subj
167 counts are often increased in the airways of asthmatic patients despite their typical association wit
168                                         Aged asthmatic patients experience increased morbidity and mo
169 -SMA(+)CXCR4(+) fibrocytes were increased in asthmatic patients experiencing an asthma exacerbation i
170 rentiated fibrocytes in circulating blood of asthmatic patients experiencing an exacerbation in the p
171                          A total of 36.2% of asthmatic patients expressed at least 1 sign of asthma s
172                                              Asthmatic patients had higher Emax and lower ED50 values
173                                         Aged asthmatic patients had higher sputum IL-6 (P < .01) and
174                                         Aged asthmatic patients had higher sputum neutrophil (30.5 x
175                               BAL fluid from asthmatic patients had increased TSLP but not IL-7 level
176 unger (mean age, 30.8 +/- 5.9 years; n = 37) asthmatic patients had significantly worse asthma contro
177                                    Nonatopic asthmatic patients had the highest cough responses, sugg
178                    A substantial subgroup of asthmatic patients have "nonallergic" or idiopathic asth
179                                              Asthmatic patients have higher microbiome diversity and
180 of phenotypic signs of asthma severity among asthmatic patients in a general population and to descri
181 eated rolling cohorts of pediatric and adult asthmatic patients in the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Data
182                                      In aged asthmatic patients increased sputum IL-6 and macrophage
183          Primary nasal epithelial cells from asthmatic patients intrinsically produced more lactate c
184                                     Cough in asthmatic patients is a common and troublesome symptom.
185 r data demonstrate that barrier leakiness in asthmatic patients is induced by TH2 cells, IL-4, and IL
186                           Sputum analysis in asthmatic patients is used to define airway inflammatory
187                             Consistently, in asthmatic patients pDC numbers were markedly increased d
188  can contribute to IL-13-driven pathology in asthmatic patients remain unclear.
189                             More than 1 in 3 asthmatic patients show at least 1 sign of asthma severi
190                                   HBECs from asthmatic patients showed a significantly low TJ integri
191 ronchial hyperresponsiveness in adult stable asthmatic patients taking inhaled corticosteroids.
192 ercome barriers to T-cell discovery in human asthmatic patients that could transform our understandin
193 synthesis of TJ molecules in epithelium from asthmatic patients to the level seen in HBECs from contr
194                               A total of 240 asthmatic patients were categorized into the four phenot
195                                              Asthmatic patients were grouped as having nonsevere dise
196     Four reproducible and stable clusters of asthmatic patients were identified.
197  patients were obese, 62% (178/289) of obese asthmatic patients were IL-6 low.
198          Although 80% (111/138) of IL-6 high asthmatic patients were obese, 62% (178/289) of obese as
199 ronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid ILC2s from asthmatic patients were resistant to dexamethasone.
200                               62 adult-onset asthmatic patients who had prolonged coughs and chest di
201  the ability to provide personalized care to asthmatic patients will follow.
202 rring in the airways of prednisone-dependent asthmatic patients with increased eosinophil activity, r
203                         BAL fluid ILC2s from asthmatic patients with increased TSLP levels were stero
204 onas, and Aeribacillus species compared with asthmatic patients with more eosinophils and healthy con
205                                  Sputum from asthmatic patients with stable disease or acute exacerba
206 ith the lowest levels of eosinophils but not asthmatic patients with the highest levels of eosinophil
207                                              Asthmatic patients with the lowest levels of eosinophils
208 rall composition of the airway microbiome of asthmatic patients with the lowest levels of eosinophils
209 t cohort (n = 60; 10 healthy subjects and 50 asthmatic patients).
210        In a previously reported cohort of 60 asthmatic patients, 16 patients were immunophenotyped wi
211 role of TH1 cells and other non-TH2 types in asthmatic patients, and the features of T-cell pathogeni
212  techniques being used for the evaluation of asthmatic patients, both from a clinical and research pe
213 tic resonance imaging (MRI) are prevalent in asthmatic patients, but the clinical importance of venti
214        Epidemiologic studies have shown that asthmatic patients, in particular those with severe dise
215 philic inflammation, and disease severity in asthmatic patients, metabolomics (using target aliphatic
216 ificantly higher in sputum supernatants from asthmatic patients, notably those with greater than 61%
217                        However, unlike older asthmatic patients, OW preschool children do not demonst
218 he concept of the environmental epigenome in asthmatic patients, summarize previous publications of r
219 tanding the origins of atypical TH2 cells in asthmatic patients, the role of TH1 cells and other non-
220 ount for the majority of hospitalizations in asthmatic patients, there is still very little known abo
221 tes with variations in the microbiome across asthmatic patients, whereas neutrophilic airway inflamma
222 tive inspiration and expiration scans of 248 asthmatic patients.
223 r when implementing personalized medicine in asthmatic patients.
224 tions of these alterations in SP-A levels in asthmatic patients.
225 he aberrant phenotype observed in ASMCs from asthmatic patients.
226 repeated in a separate validation set of 152 asthmatic patients.
227  during experimental rhinovirus infection of asthmatic patients.
228 een shown to work with TH2 cells from atopic asthmatic patients.
229 moral immune responses in healthy adults and asthmatic patients.
230  and 7 were significantly high in HBECs from asthmatic patients.
231 l HRV-16 inoculation in healthy subjects and asthmatic patients.
232 resting new topical treatment opportunity in asthmatic patients.
233  to identify and target lung inflammation in asthmatic patients.
234 g to increased proliferation of BSM cells in asthmatic patients.
235 the pathophysiology of airway obstruction in asthmatic patients.
236 reported in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of asthmatic patients.
237 controlled asthma in a large cohort of young asthmatic patients.
238 nt increase in ERp57 levels in epithelium of asthmatic patients.
239 therapeutic target against BSM remodeling in asthmatic patients.
240 NAs could be used to characterize or subtype asthmatic patients.
241 orticosteroids indicates disease severity in asthmatic patients.
242  from control subjects but not in HBECs from asthmatic patients.
243 patients and in peripheral blood of allergic asthmatic patients.
244 e effective in reducing airway remodeling in asthmatic patients.
245 on changes in nasal epithelia of adult white asthmatic patients.
246 ter segmental allergen challenge in allergic asthmatic patients.
247 Spls elicited IgE antibody responses in most asthmatic patients.
248 urs almost exclusively in cystic fibrosis or asthmatic patients.
249               The results showed that, among asthmatics, PFASs were positively associated with estrad
250 acteristics can be used to identify specific asthmatic phenotypes and provide a more detailed underst
251 olled despite optimal treatment represent an asthmatic population that requires further study for pot
252 quid interface (ALI) cultures of control and asthmatic primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC
253                                 Fifty severe asthmatics received prednisone 40 mg/d for 2 weeks and m
254 is sufficient to mediate key features of the asthmatic responses to IL-13 in murine models.
255 controls and mild asthmatics (MAs) to severe asthmatics (SAs) in relation to exacerbation rate.
256  with peach leaf extract was positive in the asthmatic sensitized patients tested.
257 ntly elevated in the bronchial mucosa of the asthmatic smokers compared to the non-smokers.
258         The data support the hypothesis that asthmatic smokers develop neutrophilic inflammation of t
259 tum neutrophils >/= 76%), while eosinophilic asthmatics (sputum eosinophils >/= 3%) did not differ fr
260 verexpression was restricted to neutrophilic asthmatics (sputum neutrophils >/= 76%), while eosinophi
261                                 Adult severe asthmatics (SS n = 12; SR n = 23) were assessed for thei
262  levels were most predictive of allergic and asthmatic status.
263 lls from 36 children (18 nonasthmatic and 18 asthmatic subjects by age 9 years) from the Infant Immun
264 ell proliferation of both healthy and severe asthmatic subjects compared to healthy controls' exosome
265                                     In obese asthmatic subjects conventional biomarkers of inflammati
266                                        Obese asthmatic subjects have lower cut points for IgE levels
267 ate the type of lung inflammation present in asthmatic subjects is increasingly common.
268 ed to delineate eosinophilic inflammation in asthmatic subjects should be approached with caution in
269  smooth muscle cells from healthy and severe asthmatic subjects were treated with TNF-alpha and respo
270                                              Asthmatic subjects were uniquely enriched in members of
271                           Exosomes of severe asthmatic subjects' fibroblasts showed a lower level of
272 protected bronchial brushings from 42 atopic asthmatic subjects, 21 subjects with atopy but no asthma
273 mong these genes in an independent cohort of asthmatic subjects, and identified the presence of commo
274 y on conventional markers of inflammation in asthmatic subjects.
275  steroid-naive asthmatic and steroid-treated asthmatic subjects.
276 remained in both groups of asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects.
277 anced activation potential of Th2 cells from asthmatic subjects.
278  HI is highly prevalent in poorly controlled asthmatics suggesting small airway dysfunction and may r
279  was diagnosed based on a typical history of asthmatic symptoms and lung function tests.
280               After switching to FP/FM-pMDI, asthmatic symptoms and plural values of small-airways fu
281 cal features in bronchial biopsies of severe asthmatics that could be related to symptom control and
282 r outpatient clinic, we recruited 115 stable asthmatics that were being treated with inhaled corticos
283                                           In asthmatics, the risk genotype (AA/AG) was associated wit
284                  We evaluated 14 non-smoking asthmatics using an open-label, randomized crossover des
285 ion of airway proteins recovered from atopic asthmatics versus healthy controls in response to segmen
286 sm with asthma and airway obstruction within asthmatics via multivariate logistic regression.
287 In bronchial epithelial cells recovered from asthmatic vs healthy human subjects, we found FOXa2 and
288                                   Tregs from asthmatics vs nonasthmatics suppressed IFN-gamma (P = 0.
289                    The most common fungus in asthmatics was Aspergillus fumigatus complex and this ta
290                    Symptom control in severe asthmatics was not associated with airway tissue inflamm
291 lation-based sample of largely mild-moderate asthmatics was symptomatically uncontrolled.
292 ession of these receptors is higher in human asthmatics, we determined whether engagement of CD36 or
293      Severe (n = 40) and controlled (n = 31) asthmatics were assessed for allergic sensitization by t
294                                              Asthmatics were more likely to be hospitalized but less
295                                         Mild asthmatics who smoke cigarettes may develop unstable dis
296  and Pc20 for both mild/ moderate and severe asthmatics with a correlation between the baseline eosin
297                          Treatment of severe asthmatics with mepolizumab significantly attenuated blo
298 rting continuous positive airway pressure in asthmatics with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apn
299 ial in asthma pathogenesis, predominantly in asthmatics with neutrophilia and severe refractory disea
300                                              Asthmatics with persistent airflow obstruction had great

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top