戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 en the left superior pulmonary vein and left atrial appendage.
2 to the rest of the atria, ending at the left atrial appendage.
3 nantly because of interference from the left atrial appendage.
4 into the distal coronary sinus and the right atrial appendage.
5  was inserted into the incision in the right atrial appendage.
6 e normal pericardial space through the right atrial appendage.
7 oach from a femoral vein to pierce the right atrial appendage.
8 e distal coronary sinus and one in the right atrial appendage.
9 culae and the crista terminalis of the right atrial appendage.
10 Myofibroblasts were not detected in the left atrial appendage.
11   All patients underwent closure of the left atrial appendage.
12 gament disruption, and exclusion of the left atrial appendage.
13 n the posterior left atrium than in the left atrial appendage.
14 y in CV was found between the right and left atrial appendages.
15               HCAs were dissected from right atrial appendages.
16 ime of first AF recurrence at both the right atrial appendage (161+/-22 vs 167+/-26 ms, P=0.05) and d
17 MV leaflets), interatrial septum (84%), left atrial appendage (86%), and left ventricle (77%) was obs
18  NO* concentration was decreased in the left atrial appendage, although NOS expression was not affect
19      Electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage and coronary sinus in 13 patients.
20                We measured AFCL at the right atrial appendage and distal coronary sinus before attemp
21 he coronary sinus (CS) cephalad, between the atrial appendage and left pulmonary veins, was dissected
22 s, the anterior part of the septum, the left atrial appendage and the superior vena cava.
23        CACs and CSCs were cultured from left atrial appendages and blood samples obtained from patien
24  of AF, emphasize the importance of the left atrial appendage, and consider challenges and future dir
25 d from the left ventricle (VP, n=29) or left atrial appendage (AP, n=12) to induce CM.
26 premature atrial contractions, from the left atrial appendage at a coupling interval of 200 ms in 7 h
27 cro m, n=71) were dissected from human right atrial appendages at the time of cardiac surgery and can
28 +/-5 microm, n=70) were dissected from right atrial appendages at the time of cardiac surgery and can
29 itional sites including the tip of the right atrial appendage, at the fossa ovalis, and in the distal
30        Biopsies were obtained from the right atrial appendage before and after aortic cross-clamping.
31  of decorin protein core, uncovered in human atrial appendages, can regulate the local bioavailabilit
32                                         Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and nonwarfarin oral ant
33 ught to assess composite data regarding left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in 2 randomized trials c
34               The risk-benefit ratio of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) versus systemic therapy
35                                         Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was approved by the U.S.
36 to evaluate the results associated with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the AMPLATZER Cardi
37 l Fibrillation) trial demonstrated that left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device
38 AF trial who underwent attempted device left atrial appendage closure (n=542 patients) and those from
39  (PROTECT AF) randomized trial compared left atrial appendage closure against warfarin in atrial fibr
40             Safety data on percutaneous left atrial appendage closure arises from centers with consid
41                     The implantation of left atrial appendage closure device (WATCHMAN, Boston Scient
42 tack, or thromboembolism) score >/=1, a left atrial appendage closure device is noninferior to long-t
43 dated overview of current transcatheter left atrial appendage closure devices and review the results
44      Over the past decade, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has emerged as a valid alternat
45 ular AF at risk for stroke treated with left atrial appendage closure have favorable QOL changes at 1
46 e outcomes associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is higher in the real-world pop
47                 The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" an
48 erse outcomes and costs of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure procedure in the US.
49 , including radiofrequency ablation and left atrial appendage closure procedures for patients with AF
50  Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology [ASAP]; NCT00851578)
51             In the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protecti
52 ucted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman)
53 t improvement in the safety of Watchman left atrial appendage closure with increased operator experie
54                                         Left atrial appendage closure with the device (n = 463) or wa
55  and review the results associated with left atrial appendage closure, focusing on procedural and lat
56                                  During left atrial appendage closure, the estimated dose absorbed by
57 xperience on the safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.
58              In the study, we performed left atrial appendage closure.
59 profound and of longer duration for the left atrial appendage compared with the left atrium as a whol
60     This study compared left atrial and left atrial appendage contraction velocities in sinus rhythm
61                            In patients, left atrial appendage contraction velocities measured during
62                                    Peak left atrial appendage contraction velocities were significant
63 on at all time intervals as assessed by left atrial appendage contraction velocity (LAACV) was signif
64 ld (DFT) testing was performed using a right atrial appendage/coronary sinus lead configuration in 38
65 nscatheter aortic valve replacement and left atrial appendage device occlusion, is being increasingly
66 ardiac myocytes were isolated from the right atrial appendage during CABG.
67  fibrillation are depressed relative to left atrial appendage emptying velocities measured during atr
68  4.9 cm, p < 0.0001 and lower mean peak left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEV), 38 versus 56
69  spontaneous echo contrast, we measured left atrial appendage emptying velocity and calculated shear
70 ntricular diastolic function, and lower left atrial appendage emptying velocity were independently as
71 -determined transmitral diastolic flow, left atrial appendage emptying, and pulmonary venous flow), c
72  vein, ganglionated plexi ablation, and left atrial appendage excision with optional additional lines
73 llow-up continues to support a role for left atrial appendage exclusion from the central circulation
74  atrial fibrillation, left atrial size, left atrial appendage flow velocities and thrombus.
75 s with atrial flutter exhibited greater left atrial appendage flow velocities before cardioversion th
76                    After cardioversion, left atrial appendage flow velocities decreased compared with
77                                         Left atrial appendages from 239 patients stratified by corona
78                    Human CPCs from the right atrial appendages from children of different ages underg
79        METHODS AND Human CPCs from the right atrial appendages from children of different ages underg
80                                        Right-atrial appendages from control sinus rhythm patients or
81 proteins (Kv1.5 and Kv2.1) in left and right atrial appendages from patients (n = 28) in normal sinus
82                                 In contrast, atrial appendages from patients in persistent atrial fib
83 rbored a cleavage site that was not found in atrial appendages from patients in sinus rhythm.
84 iques and immunoconfocal microscopy in right atrial appendages from patients with ischemic heart dise
85 coproteins were identified in left and right atrial appendages from the same patients.
86                            The impaired left atrial appendage function after cardioversion was less p
87 ents with atrial flutter and to compare left atrial appendage function in the pericardioversion perio
88 ibrillation because of better preserved left atrial appendage function.
89                      Tissue samples from the atrial appendages had a greater concentration of norepin
90            CSCs were isolated from the right atrial appendage harvested and processed during surgery.
91        In this setting, thrombus in the left atrial appendage has been found to be the source of stro
92  typically results from thrombus in the left atrial appendage has led to the development of mechanica
93 he intramyocardial blood vessels of the left atrial appendage have an increased CML presence and proi
94 ficantly higher in blood vessels of the left atrial appendage in AF patients as compared to controls,
95 has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial
96 trial fibrillation, suggesting that the left atrial appendage is mechanically "stunned."
97 ssigned to undergo empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation along with extensive ablation
98 e effectiveness of empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation for the treatment of LSPAF.
99                    (Effect of Empirical Left Atrial Appendage Isolation on Long-term Procedure Outcom
100 repeat procedures, empirical electrical left atrial appendage isolation was performed in all patients
101 x coronary artery, and catheters in the left atrial appendage, jugular and carotid vessels.
102 , or by equivalent test pacing from the left atrial appendage (LAA) at 5% or 50% greater than the sin
103 ard for the exclusion of thrombi in the left atrial appendage (LAA) before ablation for atrial fibril
104             This study investigated the left atrial appendage (LAA) by computed tomography (CT) and m
105 as to assess the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in nonvalvular atrial fib
106 o determine which surgical technique of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is most successful by ass
107 to determine the efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure via a percutaneous LAA li
108                    Randomized trials of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with the Watchman device
109 e empirical electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) could improve success at follow-u
110 incidence of incomplete ligation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) during mitral valve surgery.
111                                         Left atrial appendage (LAA) electric isolation is reported to
112 term effect of a brief episode of AF on left atrial appendage (LAA) emptying velocity is unknown.
113 haracterization of left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) flow dynamics in patients with at
114                                     The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been identified as a predomin
115                                     The left atrial appendage (LAA) is an underestimated site of init
116           Prophylactic exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is often performed during cardiac
117                                     The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the source of the vast majorit
118                                Electric left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation (LAAI) may occur during
119                           Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation may represent an alterna
120                                         Left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation with the Lariat device i
121                            Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion and novel pharmacologic
122 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion was noninferior to warf
123                                         Left atrial appendage (LAA) procedures have been developed to
124 uency and clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing and consequent peri-devic
125  a CHADS(2) score with left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) spontaneous echo contrast, sludge
126 stroke is thought to be associated with left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi.
127 e due almost exclusively to emboli from left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi.
128                                     The left atrial appendage (LAA) was snap-frozen in situ after pac
129  modality of choice for visualizing the left atrial appendage (LAA).
130 crometers; n=120) dissected from human right atrial appendages (n=78) were cannulated at a distending
131                            We evaluated left atrial appendage obliteration in high-risk patients with
132 myofibers prepared from samples of the right atrial appendage obtained from nondiabetic (n = 13) and
133              HCRAs were dissected from right atrial appendages obtained from patients during cardiac
134 pare miR-21 levels in isolated myocytes from atrial appendages obtained from patients in sinus rhythm
135 ere novel oral anticoagulants, Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion device (DEVICE), and warfarin
136 roke, site-specific therapy directed at left atrial appendage occlusion has been now studied for stro
137  after cardioversion, and techniques of left atrial appendage occlusion.
138 s from rat left ventricle and from the right atrial appendage of patients undergoing elective cardiac
139 osis on conduction velocity (CV) in the left atrial appendage of patients with AF.
140 e performed on DNA from lymphocytes and left atrial appendages of 34 patients (25 with AF).
141 uced by > 50% in both the left and the right atrial appendages of AF patients.
142 ed to study conduction in the right and left atrial appendages of isolated Langendorff-perfused murin
143                                          The atrial appendages of patients undergoing coronary artery
144        Myostatin expression was decreased in atrial appendages of patients with persistent atrial fib
145 n using differential coronary sinus and left atrial appendage pacing techniques encounters a pitfall,
146 k using differential coronary sinus and left atrial appendage pacing techniques in patients with left
147 eous echo contrast (RR 3.7, p < 0.001), left atrial appendage peak flow velocities < or = 20 cm/s (RR
148      The percutaneous approach via the right atrial appendage provides a rapid, safe route to access
149      Electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RA), left subclavian vein (LSV), proxi
150 s of a shock between electrodes in the right atrial appendage (RAA) and coronary sinus (CS).
151 ir enzymatic sources in samples of the right atrial appendage (RAA) from 303 patients undergoing card
152  and isolated atrial myocytes from the right atrial appendage (RAA) of patients undergoing cardiac su
153 gy of the standard lead configuration, right atrial appendage (RAA) to coronary sinus (CS), was reduc
154 tion electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RAap), distal coronary sinus (DCS), pr
155 NAs were highly correlated in 233 human left atrial appendage samples.
156                                         Left atrial appendage shear rates were also higher in patient
157                                         Left atrial appendage stunning also occurs in patients with a
158                                         Left atrial appendage stunning has recently been proposed as
159  This study sought to determine whether left atrial appendage stunning occurs in patients with atrial
160                The PROTECT AF (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
161 follow-up from the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
162 predominantly from PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
163                The PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
164  multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
165                            The Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patien
166 olic function and regional left atrial (left atrial appendage) systolic function upon resumption of s
167 , as well as the pericardium, right and left atrial appendages, the junction of the right atrium and
168 onferring moderate risk) more frequently had atrial appendage thrombi (RR 2.6, p < 0.001) and reduced
169               Warfarin inhibits formation of atrial appendage thrombi and markedly reduces cardioembo
170                                         Left atrial appendage thrombosis and embolization is the prin
171   Patients without atrial cavity thrombus or atrial appendage thrombus by TEE are cardioverted on ach
172 ng thrombosis may contribute to formation of atrial appendage thrombus, but these conditions remain i
173 serted after induction of GA to exclude left atrial appendage thrombus, define cardiac function, and
174 utine cardiac surgical procedures from right atrial appendage tissue discarded from 2 age groups: neo
175                                         Left atrial appendage tissue from 33 AF patients and 9 contro
176                                        Right atrial appendage tissue was collected from 34 patients,
177                                        Human atrial appendage tissues from matched cohorts in sinus r
178                    Three of these were right atrial appendage-to-right ventricle APs, and epicardial
179 to evaluate the effects of percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO) on the
180 HA functional class, ejection fraction, left atrial appendage velocity, and medications in patients w
181  Cx40 in one allele (Cx40+/-) included bifid atrial appendage, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy o
182 ollow-up of Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention
183 PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention
184 PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention
185 PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention
186 annulus along the posterior base of the left atrial appendage visualized by selective angiography.
187                                        Right atrial appendage was collected from 8 male patients pre
188 ricuspid valve, interatrial septum, and left atrial appendage were obtained, followed by a left ventr
189 is, the distal coronary sinus, and the right atrial appendage were outside the circuit.
190              Arterioles dissected from right atrial appendage were studied with video microscopy, mem
191 ulmonary bypass, paired samples of the right atrial appendages were obtained before venous cannulatio
192                             Thirty-five left atrial appendages were obtained during AF surgery.
193                  Methods and Results-- Right atrial appendages were obtained from AF patients undergo
194 erved at the left atrial sites and the right atrial appendage, whereas disorganized atrial electrogra
195 l parameters of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage which have been shown to be associated
196                       CVL was higher in left atrial appendages with thick compared with thin intersti
197 tropy in the posterior left atrium than left atrial appendage, with the decrease in Shannon entropy c
198 ved an adequate seal of the neck of the left atrial appendage without significant effect on the struc
199 othesized that partial clipping of the right atrial appendage would increase the blood flow to the le

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top