戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bstrate modification of complex fractionated atrial electrograms.
2  electrodes per patient showed interpretable atrial electrograms.
3 0.49; P<0.001), but not complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.18
4 ior wall isolation with complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (persistent and longstanding
5 oach of PVI followed by complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation and linear ablation (Substra
6  group 1 in addition to complex-fractionated atrial electrogram ablation while in AF (group 2).
7 I in AF with additional complex-fractionated atrial electrogram ablation.
8                                   During AF, atrial electrograms (AEGs) were recorded for 1 to 5 minu
9 iscrete potential (P) was noted after the CS atrial electrogram and during tachycardia, the CS (P) pr
10 se approach of PVI plus complex fractionated atrial electrogram and linear ablation.
11                         Complex-fractionated atrial electrograms and atrial fibrosis are associated w
12 refractory periods associated with organized atrial electrograms and long effective refractory period
13  In each patient, simultaneous intracavitary atrial electrograms and surface electrocardiograms were
14                             Various types of atrial electrograms are present at different locations d
15                       The characteristics of atrial electrograms associated with atrial fibrillation
16 The differential response of the SVE and the atrial electrogram at the initiation of continuous right
17 was performed to target complex fractionated atrial electrograms at the pulmonary vein ostial and ant
18 formed 80 Holter recordings with telemetered atrial electrograms, both to validate the continuous det
19 gram mapping, including complex fractionated atrial electrogram but not spectral parameter mapping, C
20 of chronic AF guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms, but only after a second ablation pr
21 blation+linear ablation+complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation (CFAE arm) in patient
22 rate ablation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) mapping in 674 high-risk AF pa
23 dy compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective C
24                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) are targets of atrial fibrill
25 trogram voltage and (2) complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE), using CFAE mean (the mean in
26 ram features, including complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE).
27 ine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after antral pulmonary vein
28 on strategies targeting complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) are commonly employed to ide
29             Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) has been proposed as a strat
30 ied rotor sites did not exhibit quantitative atrial electrogram characteristics expected from rotors
31                                          The atrial electrogram characteristics of atrial fibrillatio
32                          During AF, unipolar atrial electrograms collected from a 64-pole basket cath
33 mentally demonstrated that positive unipolar atrial electrogram completion, when applying radiofreque
34 f these signals was used to calculate a left atrial electrogram density before, during, and after pac
35 s no significant change in the baseline left atrial electrogram density compared with baseline when p
36                                     The left atrial electrogram density was significantly greater tha
37 y domain analysis of a filtered wide bipolar atrial electrogram describes the global organization of
38                           Different types of atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation have been
39 nt (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and atrial electrograms (Egms) in persistent atrial fibrilla
40 illation (AF) guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms has been reported to eliminate AF in
41  demonstrated by a long stimulus to upstream atrial electrogram interval (S-Au) >75% TCL and was cons
42 with an increase in the complex fractionated atrial electrogram interval confidence level score, but
43 ctrograms, resulting in complex fractionated atrial electrogram-like activity.
44                                  During left atrial electrogram mapping, including complex fractionat
45 tions lasting 30 seconds irrespective of the atrial electrogram modification.
46                                          The atrial electrogram of atrial fibrillation and the atrial
47        During AF, multiple foci (QS unipolar atrial electrograms) of different cycle lengths (mean, 1
48 rsus delayed pace-related advancement of the atrial electrogram, once the local septal parahisian ven
49 on of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram (R morphology completion) during radi
50                                 In addition, atrial electrograms recorded close to the His bundle cha
51 pe I AF and consistently influences the left atrial electrograms recorded in the coronary sinus.
52                     The intracardiac bipolar atrial electrogram recordings were characterized by (1)
53 on of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram reflects, in general, irreversible tr
54                 ICNA might contaminate local atrial electrograms, resulting in complex fractionated a
55 oth), but no changes in complex fractionated atrial electrogram scores, dominant frequency or organiz
56 ed in these 16 patients by recording bipolar atrial electrograms simultaneously with at least one ele
57 with intracardiac standard deviations of: 1) atrial electrograms (temporal variability), and 2) bi-at
58                           The correlation of atrial electrogram type with the atrial effective refrac
59 refractory period corresponding to organized atrial electrograms (type I) and the longest atrial effe
60                    In both models, organized atrial electrograms (type I) were predominantly observed
61 right atrial appendage, whereas disorganized atrial electrograms (type III) were mainly observed at t
62 ractory period corresponding to disorganized atrial electrograms (type III).
63                      The distribution of the atrial electrogram types closely followed that of the at
64 cing group, p = 0.09) but did not change the atrial electrogram types during atrial fibrillation.
65 stribution types and possible determinant of atrial electrogram types during atrial fibrillation.
66 by analyzing quantitative characteristics of atrial electrograms used to identify rotors and describe
67 nated or all identified complex fractionated atrial electrograms were eliminated.
68                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms were found in seven of nine regions
69 al effective refractory period, disorganized atrial electrograms were observed at sites with the long
70                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms were observed during ICNA discharges
71                                              Atrial electrograms were recorded from a 20-pole cathete
72 activation sites (initial r or R in unipolar atrial electrograms) were also found.
73  and ablation targeting complex-fractionated atrial electrograms while in AF.
74 ctivity, left vagal nerve activity, and left atrial electrogram without pacing for 24 hours.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。