1 d activation for those locations bound by an attended object.

2 ity of the neural population representing an attended object.

3 isual cortex, including larger responses for attended objects.

4  this nearly exclusive representation of the attended object, an increase in the salience of nonatten

5 how that reward boosts the representation of attended objects and reduces the representation of unatt

6 k, synchrony emerged with ignored as well as attended objects, and higher synchrony was associated wi

7 hanisms that direct and fit the field to the attended object are not known.

8 and orientation information in the pulvinar: attended objects are encoded with high precision, while

9                Subsequently, recognizing the attended object as identically shaped as the distractors

10 trengthens the perceptual representations of attended objects at the level of visual area LOC.

11 ther this spread of spatial attention within attended objects can be guided by objects defined by ill

12 to memory positions located on the currently attended object compared with equidistant positions on a

13 encode and maintain a variable subset of the attended objects, depending on their complexity.

14 relevant locations but belonging to the same attended object elicited larger posterior N1 amplitudes

15  spreads to the colour representation of non-attended objects in VWM.

16 happens to attention after perception of the attended object is complete.

17  object-based processing, all features of an attended object may be encoded together, even when these

18 d processing for task-irrelevant features of attended objects thus does exist, as reported previously

19 rminate attention after the perception of an attended object was complete.