ライフサイエンスコーパス: attending physician

1 by the intensive care unit team plus another attending physician.

2 rction varied according to the race of their attending physician.

3 pared with patients with access to a private attending physician.

4 es before death than patients with a private attending physician.

5 e patients in the study was conducted by the attending physician.

6 rventions were left to the discretion of the attending physician.

7 erall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician.

8 ges compared with patients without a private attending physician.

9 tion was initiated, at the discretion of the attending physician.

10 of referring diagnoses were answered by the attending physician.

11 te perceptions of overwork and stress in the attending physician.

12 of pre-ESRD nephrology care, as reported by attending physicians.

13 ction with quality of care (p=.005) than did attending physicians.

14 required by protocol but was selected by the attending physicians.

15 eplacement was left to the discretion of the attending physicians.

16 ot protocol mandated but was selected by the attending physicians.

17 mance among a national cohort of experienced attending physicians.

18 receiving routine care were managed by their attending physicians.

19 nue mechanical ventilation, were made by the attending physicians.

20 The palliative care specialists were all attending physicians.

21 ulating pharmaceutical salesperson visits to attending physicians.

22 ubset analyses revealed similar findings for attending physicians.

23 efined as visits involving both resident and attending physicians.

24 xaminations should be performed by different attending physicians.

25 xaminations should be performed by different attending physicians.

26 d performance was poor because only 12 of 67 attending physicians (17.9%) met or exceeded the minimum

27 -in-training (27.2%) and intensive care unit attending physicians (2.6%).

28 chnicians (62%) and nurses (60%) followed by attending physicians (44%) and trainees (19%; p < 0.001)

29 injury, that person was most frequently the attending physician (51%) and least frequently a "signif

30 Four attending physicians (6.2%) initiated low tidal volume v

31 ose surveyed, we received responses from 280 attending physicians (61.0%) and 256 APCs (54.5%).

32 Ninety-seven attending physicians, 63 resident physicians, and 162 st

33 Most respondents were attending physicians (82%) at teaching hospitals (76%) w

34 ormed from January 1999 through June 2008 by attending physicians (86 surgeons and 134 obstetricians/

35 The intensivist group consisted of 11 attending physicians, 9 pulmonary and critical care fell

36 emonstrated that lack of access to a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 23.10; 95% co

37 = 5.6 to 15.6; p < .001); lack of a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 4.4; 95% conf

38 ellows were not significantly different from attending physicians after case-mix adjustment according

39 to evaluate the association between treating attending physician and door-to-antimicrobial time after

40 A total of 108 experienced attending physicians and 143 internal medicine and emerg

41 of which 220 of 300 (73%) self-identified as attending physicians and 47 of 300 (16%) as fellows.

42 The survey was administered to 459 attending physicians and 470 APCs, including certified r

43 Little is known about the reasons why attending physicians and advanced practice clinicians (A

44 Attending physicians and APCs frequently work while sick

45 respondents revealed additional reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick, including

46 These patients' attending physicians and bedside nurses were also enroll

47 rds; for fatal events, it was collected from attending physicians and next of kin.

48 the supervision of a pediatric critical care attending physician, and a 1-month formal curriculum.

49 of invasive procedures, the specialty of the attending physician, and the area of residence of the pa

50 Resident physicians, attending physicians, and graduate medical education (GM

51 were length of stay; trainee evaluations of attending physicians; and attending physician reports of

52 ical ICU setting without access to a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the activ

53 edical ICU, those patients without a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the activ

54 Attending physicians are only required to provide in-hos

55 percent of family members singled out their attending physician as the preferred source of informati

56 domized crossover noninferiority trial, with attending physicians as the unit of crossover randomizat

57 n between January 2006 and June 2012 by 2126 attending physicians at the 19 intervention group AMCs a

58 ation hospital (VAH) and private patients of attending physicians ("attendings") who underwent primar

59 d so much that teaching was ineffective, and attending physicians being rushed and/or eager to finish

60 Critical care attending physicians, bereaved parents, and meeting gues

61 ssociated with better self-rated measures of attending physician burnout and emotional exhaustion but

62 ent levels of training (including cardiology attending physicians, cardiology fellows, internal medic

63 ICU staffing model to increase continuity of attending physician care for patients while also decreas

64 Attending physicians' central venous catheter insertion

65 n 61 (76%) of these events, discussions with attending physicians changed management in 33% (18/54) o

66 in antimicrobial timing was explained by the attending physician compared with 4% attributable to ill

67 Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the

68 Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the

69 ry 1, 1996, from an open unit, where private attending physicians contributed and controlled the care

70 In- hospital attending physician coverage attenuated this discrepancy

71 om 12-hr in-hospital pediatric critical care attending physician coverage model in January 2004.

72 in death, and 212 (43.1%) stipulated that an attending physician determine brain death; 150 policies

73 sand five hundred forty-one respondents were attending physicians during their most recent pregnancy

74 Distractions from attending physicians, electronics, nursing, consults, an

75 TPN intakes were prescribed by rotating attending physicians, enabling assessment of protein met

76 med did not correlate with how critical care attending physicians evaluated overall performances of i

77 Critical care attending physician evaluations of residents placed resi

78 nty percent of the variance in critical care attending physician evaluations of the residents during

79 In an experimental setting, attending physicians exposed to videos of good medical t

80 Attending physicians face malpractice exposure not only

81 t (including stent-graft costs and excluding attending physician fees) and mean postoperative length

82 nts, on each medical ICU day, we asked their attending physician, fellow, resident, and primary nurse

83 n-hours), while the new process required two attending physicians for an average of 121 mins (4.03 at

84 The previous process required three attending physicians for an average of 157 mins (7.55 at

85 Once involved, attending physicians frequently modify resident's manage

86 Participants were 41 attending physicians from England and Wales experienced

87 evidence-based literature by the attending, attending physicians giving spontaneous or unplanned pre

88 ied as treatment failure, at which point the attending physician gradually stopped the study drug and

89 s dying in the medical ICU without a private attending physician had statistically shorter hospital a

90 Patients with private attending physicians had significantly greater medical c

91 Sleep loss in attending physicians has an unclear effect on patient ou

92 T included a pediatric ICU-trained fellow or attending physician, ICU nurse, ICU respiratory therapis

93 The primary surgeon was an attending physician in 474 cases and a senior resident p

94 clinical certainty of CHF determined by the attending physician in the emergency department.

95 ttended a 3-hour training session held by an attending physician in the hospital eye clinic and took

96 tical care fellows in 41%, and critical care attending physicians in 13%: first attempt success rate

97 ion reduced the number of rA TTEs ordered by attending physicians in a variety of ambulatory care env

98 on breakdowns between surgical residents and attending physicians in the pre- and postoperative setti

99 nerally held to the same standard of care as attending physicians in their respective specialties.

100 elpful to HIV-positive individuals and their attending physicians in understanding disease progressio

101 Twenty-seven hospital-based attending physicians, including 6 emergency physicians,

102 ity of care as measured by the Continuity of Attending Physician Index increased by 9% with the share

103 ers, when formal criteria were used, and the attending physicians' intuitive clinical impressions in

104 ces are implemented at the discretion of the attending physician, lack the ability to redefine the st

105 o determine whether physical findings by the attending physician led to important changes in clinical

106 Once the costs were identified, attending physician-led teams were designed to reduce co

107 Eight attending physician-led teams were observed for 11 round

108 physicians for an average of 157 mins (7.55 attending physician man-hours), while the new process re

109 physicians for an average of 121 mins (4.03 attending physician man-hours).

110 tisfaction, improved throughput, and reduced attending physician man-hours.

111 Understaffing intensive care units with attending physicians may have a negative impact on teach

112 hr in-hospital pediatric intensive care unit attending physician model.

113 The MCS faculty served as attending physicians more often and were required to pro

114 Chief residents and attending physicians most frequently identified problem

115 rning in academic intensive care units where attending physicians must couple teaching duties with pa

116 in the medical ICU, those without a private attending physician (n = 26) were statistically more lik

117 ining therapies than patients with a private attending physician (n = 87) (80.8% vs. 29.9%; relative

118 surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n =

119 Most were attending physicians (n = 76 [48.1%]).

120 After covariate adjustment, attending physicians' (n = 40) median door-to-antimicrob

121 ions compared with patients having a private attending physician (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence in

122 ing and conducting rounds when serving as an attending physician (odds ratio, 2.48; 95 percent confid

123 of 30-day unplanned revisits for patients of attending physicians on 2-week rotations was 21.2% compa

124 frequently discussed patient management with attending physicians on randomly selected weekends, they

125 A critical care attending physician or fellow and an experienced respira

126 ation training was significantly higher than attending physician performance (internal jugular: media

127 Attending physician performance was compared to resident

128 Attending physicians performed higher on the internal ju

129 , myelosuppression (n=2), seizure (n=2), and attending physician preference (n=1).

130 Finally, 78.3% have witnessed attending physicians purposefully disregarding required

131 The median (interquartile range) patient-to-attending physician ratio was 13 (10-16).

132 residents' perception of necessity than from attending physicians' receptiveness or interest in being

133 The attending physician recommended transfer to the intensiv

134 nee evaluations of attending physicians; and attending physician reports of burnout, stress, and work

135 tients were entered into the study after the attending physician requested assistance in tube placeme

136 Nonstudy attending physicians requested GA if pulmonary tuberculo

137 ddition, matching for treatment facility and attending physician revealed similar associations betwee

138 The use of 2-week inpatient attending physician rotations compared with 4-week rotat

139 patients discharged from 2- vs 4-week within-attending-physician rotations.

140 Zealand) supportive therapy according to the attending physician's criteria.

141 -making autonomy needs and the critical care attending physician's desire to provide consistent bedsi

142 tal changed substantially as a result of the attending physician's physical examination.

143 ) on the basis of serial blood tests and the attending physician's report.

144 on educational investment, the critical care attending physician's return on resident investment, and

145 Attending physicians, selected for their teaching prowes

146 we compared Veterans Affairs Medical Centers attending physicians' simulated central venous catheter

147 We aimed to compare attending physicians' simulated central venous catheteri

148 Critical care attending physicians spent a minimum of 12.6 hrs/wk invo

149 Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes

150 eceive usual care (n=102), prescribed by the attending physician; standard low-intensity intervention

151 sion of private health insurance and private attending physician status (r2 = .39, p < .001).

152 fined as attempted CCCs that resulted in the attending physician taking over, radialization of the CC

153 the part of supervising senior residents or attending physicians, the results suggest that concerns

154 Attending physicians thought that protease inhibitors we

155 ars, and for whom we had permission from the attending physician to contact.

156 te of diagnosis; and (3) permission from the attending physician to contact.

157 rs at date of diagnosis, and permission from attending physician to contact.

158 The opportunity cost for using critical care attending physicians to provide 12.6 resident teaching h

159 resident physicians to seek supervision and attending physicians to provide the same.

160 two teams, with each team consisting of two attending physicians, two residents, and three interns.

161 Residents and attending physicians use drugs of abuse for performance

162 When attending physicians visited patients, however, resident

163 owledge test scores higher among fellows and attending physicians vs. residents.

164 f varying the durations of internal medicine attending physician ward rotations.

165 n 10 min additional medication chosen by the attending physician was administered.

166 The primary attending physician was an FP in 1019 cases, an IM in 25

167 of these 18 patients, the opinion of another attending physician was obtained; for 33% (6 of 18), the

168 white patients, regardless of whether their attending physician was white (rate of catheterization,

169 inee workload and increased participation of attending physicians was associated with higher trainee

170 The editorial fellowship for radiology attending physicians was renamed the RSNA William R.

171 Patients without a private attending physician were significantly more likely to un

172 A sample of 29 nurses, residents, and attending physicians were interviewed regarding their at

173 Attending physicians were more likely to score lower in

174 Residents reported that, when contacted, all attending physicians were receptive to communication, wh

175 ulitis, with FPs, IMs, or GIs as the primary attending physician, were included in the study.

176 cy department arrival, or were treated by an attending physician who cared for less than five study p

177 ion, 59.7% of residents work with at least 1 attending physician who intimidates the residents, reduc

178 Of the 341 attending physicians who responded, 144 (42 percent) had

179 Participants were 62 attending physicians who staffed at least 6 weeks of inp

180 t and two interns, plus multiple supervising attending physicians who volunteered to participate.

181 reted independently by two abdominal imaging attending physicians who were blinded to the final resul

182 an alert from a hospital staff member to the attending physician will reduce the rate of symptomatic

183 for stroke risk reduction in AF by supplying attending physicians with reports about patients risk fa

184 aduate year 4 residents worked with multiple attending physicians with varying teaching styles to a s

185 Overall, procedures performed the day after attending physicians worked overnight were not associate

186 Physicians included resident physicians and attending physicians working in the emergency department

187 iversity hospitals, whereas private oncology attending physicians write them in most community hospit