ライフサイエンスコーパス: attentional bias

1 ersus neutral words was used as a measure of attentional bias.

2 correlates of cocStroop- or eStroop-related attentional bias.

3 metabolism of the lateral PPC causes spatial attentional bias.

4 ns underlying a preparatory coding model for attentional bias.

5 Reward learning gives rise to strong attentional biases.

6 f WM and priming states in visual cortex for attentional biasing.

7 isorders typically manifest as problems with attentional biases, aberrant learning, dysfunctional rew

8 ctive stimulation showed greater evidence of attentional bias acquisition in the targeted direction (

9 Importantly, across visual cortex, the attentional biases (activity for attended versus unatten

10 Smokers with the greatest attentional bias also experienced more negative affect d

11 sults were compared between groups to assess attentional bias and cognitive effort to resist salient

12 done by the pursuit system in the absence of attentional bias and that vector averaging is normally u

13 de sensory dysfunctions like hypervigilance, attentional bias, and impaired sensory gating.

14 Influential theories suggest that attentional biases are mediated via preparatory activati

15 Negative attentional biases are thought to increase the risk of r

16 The signals that control this attentional biasing are thought to arise in a frontopari

17 ntrolateral prefrontal cortex activation and attentional bias away from angry faces than healthy adol

18 eral prefrontal areas in the modification of attentional bias by delivering targeted cortical stimula

19 ver, neuroscientific studies have shown that attentional biases can emerge in parallel but in a spati

20 s study has tested whether reducing negative attentional bias causally affects risk factors for depre

21 training to assess the consequent effects on attentional bias change.

22 we demonstrate that exogenous and endogenous attentional biases change linearly as a function of time

23 Such an attentional bias contributes to nonadaptive reward proce

24 tation of individual differences in the drug attentional bias effect associated with cocaine dependen

25 The attentional bias effect for cocaine stimuli and for nega

26 ed the significant correlation of individual attentional bias effect for cocaine stimuli with distrib

27 Variation in the attentional bias effect for cocaine use stimuli among co

28 Greater attentional bias for and greater prefrontal activation b

29 dependencies are associated with significant attentional bias for drug use stimuli that represents a

30 Drug users demonstrated significant attentional bias for drug-related words, which was corre

31 nse time of patients with MDD, indicating an attentional bias for emotional stimuli.

32 Attentional bias for stimulant-related words was measure

33 he neurologic underpinnings of change in the attentional bias for threat have implicated, but not con

34 A pattern of attentional bias for threatening information is thought

35 tive tasks designed to assess visual-spatial attentional biases have shown mixed results.

36 Previous studies raise the hypothesis that attentional bias in the phase of neocortical excitabilit

37 ct may be different from those that generate attentional biases in anxious individuals.

38 ined the effect of monocular eye patching on attentional biases in normal subjects.

39 These findings suggest that attentional biases in PTSD are linked to deficits in ver

40 A newer proposal suggests that attentional bias is not a static phenomenon, but rather

41 A likely source of this attentional bias is the frontal eye field (FEF), an area

42 mulant dependence had significant effects on attentional bias, its brain functional representation, a

43 teral intraparietal area (LIP) encoded these attentional biases, maintaining sustained excitation at

44 reported 'liking', emotional reactivity, and attentional bias measures, both before and after the con

45 ines using both eyes, they demonstrate a far attentional bias, misbisecting lines away from their bod

46 study reports the effects of a computerized attentional bias modification (ABM) procedure on interme

47 l is thought to resolve conflict through the attentional biasing of perceptual processing, emphasizin

48 Nine patients had significant spatial attentional bias on the left side and two patients on th

49 iscovered relationship between dACC GABA and attentional bias provides evidence for a neurochemical t

50 es at the retinal level but potentially from attentional biases, reflected in eye movement patterns.

51 er pathways that are ideally suited to carry attentional biasing signals in visuotopic coordinates fr

52 ' processing: the Concurrent Flanker/Alcohol-Attentional bias task (CFAAT).

53 s are coded asymmetrically, with a rightward attentional bias that reflects spatial attention in visi

54 ta suggest that alcohol at a low dose primes attentional bias to alcohol-associated stimuli, an effec

55 Acute alcohol ingestion increases attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli; however, th

56 modulation by valence and delay suggests an attentional bias to immediate rewards, which may drive s

57 These findings demonstrate an early attentional bias to reward that potentially drives risk

58 Recreational users did not exhibit attentional bias to the cocaine words and did not differ

59 ation when cued to the left, resulting in an attentional bias to the right visual hemifield.

60 e results suggest that acute stress disrupts attentional bias to threat including a reduction in earl

61 Attentional bias to threat is a key endophenotype that c

62 A mediation analysis further suggested that attentional bias to threat mediated the relationship bet

63 y investigated the effect of acute stress on attentional bias to threat using behavioral and ERP meth

64 a, and performance on a dot-probe measure of attentional bias to threat, and clinician interview-base

65 n the amygdala was associated with increased attentional bias to threat, as well as increased severit

66 ine the impact of stress-induced cortisol on attentional bias to threat, participants in the stress g

67 damide levels were associated with decreased attentional bias to threat.

68 Quantifying relationships between attentional biases to drug cues and dACC neurochemistry

69 suggest that the brain uses a linear sum of attentional biases to guide visual selection.

70 sensitized sensory-perceptual processes and attentional biases to potential danger cues in the envir

71 whether bonobos, similar to humans, have an attentional bias toward emotional scenes compared with c

72 A limited attentional bias toward people early in development is l

73 f cholinergic neuromodulation can mediate an attentional bias toward reward-related cues, thereby all

74 oking paradigm revealed that monkeys show an attentional bias toward rising versus falling frequency

75 eatures, whereas the FEF provides a top-down attentional bias toward target features that modulates s

76 eference, positive emotional reactivity, and attentional bias toward the methamphetamine-associated c

77 Behavioral results showed a pattern of attentional bias toward threat in the Control group but

78 dence for source monitoring difficulties and attentional biases toward trauma-relevant information in

79 the dACC would be associated with increased attentional biases towards smoking-related cues.

80 This 'attentional bias' towards drug cues translates into an i

81 in the stress group, suggesting a suppressed attentional bias under stress.

82 rom threat, but PTSD patients showed greater attentional bias variability (ABV), which correlated wit

83 Specifically in subjects with MDD, the attentional bias was completely abolished by anodal tDCS

84 Attentional bias was greater in people with highly compu

85 However, no prior studies have compared attentional bias with cocaine cues between these groups

86 y combining an offline behavioral measure of attentional bias with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.