ライフサイエンスコーパス: audit

1 on-based database (Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit).

2 urveillance, or quality improvement [QI] and audit).

3 three concepts) were selected for a detailed audit.

4 n procedure (144 997; 20%) identified in the audit.

5 dited and included in the UK National Stroke Audit.

6 e derived from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.

7 , as well as treatment research and clinical audit.

8 ely 3% of the time required by the in-person audit.

9 re included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.

10 dequate in some cases and would merit repeat audit.

11 often evaluated independently using clinical audit.

12 s using the IMS Health National Prescription Audit.

13 equested 28 days after the completion of the audit.

14 invited to participate in this retrospective audit.

15 to an externally validated national outcome audit.

16 015, registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.

17 quality by independent assessors and routine audit.

18 national Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.

19 surveillance, and 4) quality improvement and audit.

20 ated to physiologic needs and organizational audits.

21 lization, and in maintaining long-term QA/QC audits.

22 n their patients' home BP readings and chart audits.

23 nd compared in the year before and after the audits.

24 expensive in-person systematic neighborhood audits.

25 nce date, ascertained through medical record audits.

26 omorbid illnesses was obtained through chart audits.

27 he time and resources required for in-person audits.

28 fold when compared to information from chart audits.

29 sicians who completed the survey matched the audits.

30 (May 2012-December 2013) were prospectively audited.

31 s often were omitted in the referral letters audited.

32 ndardized and surgeons were credentialed and audited.

33 lementation is often unstructured and poorly audited.

34 , or are not available for public review and auditing.

35 the main results accumulated in the 10 years audited [2003-2012 (The 2012 Scottish Confidential Audit

36 Data from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2010-2013) were used.

37 Data from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2011-2012) were used.

38 igned for clinical care, surveillance and QI/audit among 396,241 patients admitted to 12 academic and

39 Data from the "Potential Donor Audit," an audit of all patients younger than 76 years w

40 his review summarizes the methodology of the audit and describes some of the main results accumulated

41 data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' anti

42 let (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI, -0.11 to 1.05), and audit and feedback (SMD = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.10-1.07) had m

43 estigate whether the content and delivery of audit and feedback affects its effectiveness in the cont

44 Audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were

45 The strategies of audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were

46 Interventions using physician audit and feedback are associated with lower odds of ina

47 w strong conclusions on the effectiveness of audit and feedback in dementia care, the large interquar

48 Published studies of audit and feedback in dementia rarely described more tha

49 To investigate whether audit and feedback is effective for improving health pro

50 ported with templated comments and real-time audit and feedback of antimicrobial orders by an antimic

51 authorization of antimicrobials, prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobials, and supplemental s

52 ollowed by 1 year of personalized, quarterly audit and feedback of prescribing for bacterial and vira

53 implemented a pharmacist-driven, prospective audit and feedback strategy for antimicrobial stewardshi

54 Interventions that employed physician audit and feedback were associated with significantly lo

55 n = 7), physician-focused interventions (eg, audit and feedback) (n = 6), school-based programs (n =

56 (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a tex

57 Audit and feedback, also known as clinical audit, is an

58 inders, (2) educational outreach visits, (3) audit and feedback, and (4) provider incentives.

59 vement program including provider education, audit and feedback, and unit-based provider financial in

60 re network, clinician education coupled with audit and feedback, compared with usual practice, improv

61 tion Index were searched combining terms for audit and feedback, health personnel, and dementia.

62 ated large variation in the effectiveness of audit and feedback.

63 onal tools, and clinical pathways as well as audit and feedback.

64 ve for inpatients, often through prescribing audit and feedback.

65 ions, ongoing staff education, and sustained audit and feedback.

66 st explained by the utilization of physician audit and feedback.

67 nt, and 5 included a mechanism for physician audit and feedback.

68 National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme through Healthcare

69 cted within the U.K. Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database.

70 ith literature estimates; to compare routine audit and research data; and to determine the effect of

71 RESEARCH DESIGN AND The Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) database

72 type 2 diabetes in the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (GO-DARTS) study,

73 nt from patients in the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (GoDARTS) study,

74 pating in the Go-DARTS (Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland) study, which inc

75 The Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Study study holds data for

76 Using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database, we analyzed

77 hage (CRASH-2) trial (derivation) and Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) dataset (validation).

78 ghest discrimination was found in the Trauma Audit and Research Network trauma registry (area under t

79 we know from anecdote, experience and local audit and research that improvements in service design a

80 rive hospital reimbursement and are used for audit and research, and benchmarking and outcomes manage

81 tudinal cohort GoDARTS (Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research, Tayside Scotland), minor allele freq

82 Data from the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit and UK Renal Registry were linked for 1732 adult h

83 nd governance controls which are effectively audited and are viewed as trustworthy by diverse stakeho

84 of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls were audited and linked with emergency medical services and h

85 , a national hand-hygiene campaign, national auditing and inspections of hospital environment cleanli

86 Daily auditing and weekly feedback, and sepsis response team a

87 data from population based stroke registers, audits and published sources.

88 rom 16 separate case series or retrospective audits and seven randomized controlled trials, four of w

89 e, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), and self-reported help-seeking from clinical and

90 sible through household surveys and facility audit, and improvements in vital registration, including

91 y creating country buy-in, reducing costs of audits, and institutionalizing program management.

92 e the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship audit-and-feedback intervention, via a stepped-wedge ran

93 An ICU day 3 audit-and-feedback program can be successfully expanded

94 An effective intensive care unit (ICU) audit-and-feedback program was rolled out to 6 non-ICU s

95 Within each registry, 300 to 625 records are audited annually in 25 randomly identified sites (i.e.,

96 Virtual audits appear to be a viable and much less expensive alt

97 mpare institutional performance via practice audit are needed.

98 Virtual street audits are a novel method for assessing neighborhood cha

99 Nationwide mortality audits are a useful and worthwhile exercise.

100 ribe our experience and responses to such an audit, as well as the to complexities and nuances of pra

101 ation of electronic reports to support order auditing, assessment of blood product utilization and co

102 Case detection was augmented by record audits at major ophthalmic centers.

103 We compared 2 audit-based measures of neighborhood physical disorder i

104 The virtual audit-based physical disorder measure could substitute f

105 r, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit between 2014 and 2015 were included.

106 We collected audited budget statements, annual reports, and project-l

107 Participants who screened positive (AUDIT-C score >/=4) were randomized to undergo screening

108 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in both primary and secondary care to detect al

109 e Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire and alcohol-related diagnoses and

110 se Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire, a validated 3-question alcohol m

111 e Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) screening test were e-mailed to 14,991 students

112 The Australian DonateLife Audit captures information on all deaths which occur in

113 s, using data from a prospective, externally audited, clinical-outcomes registry involving 10,343 pat

114 The data suggest that remote video auditing combined with feedback produced a significant a

115 An Audit Commission survey of ICUs conducted in 1998 gave i

116 teer salaried internists (more trusted, less audited) commissioned to our expandable national health

117 Results of this audit confirm that image-guided and image-assisted biops

118 QI/audit criteria, which emphasized reliability and criteri

119 The authors reviewed screening mammography audit data obtained from 2009 to 2014, during which 108

120 ssion model parameterised with national MRSA audit data to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiv

121 ompliant retrospective review of mammography audit data was performed between May 1, 2008, and Septem

122 Practice audit data were obtained for three breast imaging radiol

123 rder measure constructed from virtual street audit data.

124 Recall rates were calculated from audit data.

125 Central Cardiac Audit Database for all CTO PCI cases carried out in Engl

126 s obtained from the National Central Cardiac Audit Database) and the aggregate research impact factor

127 by retrieving data from a prospective, cross-audited database, and detailed case note review.

128 Eighty-six percent of the audited deaths occurred in patients requiring an emergen

129 as launched in 6 MOH laboratories, and final audits demonstrated improvements across the 13 quality s

130 Results of comparison of research with audit-derived data were inconclusive.

131 hood stigma hypothesis, this study adopts an audit design in a locally organized, online classified m

132 The baseline audit, done in 259 practices, provided data for 6771 pat

133 In the UK, audit evidence suggests that the quality of these judgem

134 inical performance studies and manufacturing audits, facilitate information sharing through trust and

135 measured reliably and validly using virtual audits, facilitating research on possible associations b

136 peated intervention comprising reminders and audit feedback and targeting of local opinion leaders ca

137 ntion (education, pathways, local champions, audit-feedback).

138 oviding site-specific interventions, monthly audit-feedback, network educational events, internet blo

139 on comprising computerized decision support, audit/feedback tools, and staff training improved (1) gu

140 A post audit for a reactive transport model used to evaluate ac

141 Surgeons were credentialed and video-audited for adherence to technical standards.

142 th progressively shorter telomeres that were audited for mammary tumor formation.

143 ted commentary, I welcome the use of virtual audits for advancing the study of neighborhoods and outl

144 much less expensive alternative to in-person audits for assessing neighborhood conditions.

145 w innovations can advance the use of virtual audits for furthering understanding of neighborhood envi

146 ampaign, researchers completed leak and loss audits for methane emissions at three natural gas compre

147 10) from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group database, which we linked to hospital Scotti

148 ied from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group registry, matched (1:1) with similar hospita

149 The audit has demonstrated changes in clinical practice and

150 Clinical audits have highlighted the many challenges and dilemmas

151 We retrospectively audited hospital occupational exposure events over a 10-

152 This study aims to bridge this gap by auditing hospital claims from the Rajiv Aarogyasri Commu

153 Through the template matching audit, hospitals and stakeholders can better understand

154 resections in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit in 2011 were extended with additional treatment an

155 EUROPAIN (EUROpean Pain Audit In Neonates) was a prospective cohort study of the

156 After a baseline audit in October to December, 2010, primary-care practic

157 Mooney et al. compare in-person and virtual audits in Detroit, Michigan, and demonstrate that virtua

158 IMS Health) or national prescription pricing audit (in the case of England and Canada).

159 eighborhood physical disorder over in-person audits, including substantial reductions in time and res

160 The post audit is based on a paired synoptic approach in which hy

161 ith sufficient sensitivity such that further auditing is not required.

162 Audit and feedback, also known as clinical audit, is an extensively-used intervention to improve ca

163 s, which are less costly than medical record audits, is a reasonable approach for observational compa

164 ion (mean, 6.3 per patient) and 38.9% of all audited laboratory data were inaccurately communicated.

165 served patient presentations including 4,945 audited laboratory results, presenters used a paper prer

166 Time stamps from the medical record and EHR audit log were analyzed to measure the length of time re

167 maternal morbidity have decreased during the audit, major obstetric haemorrhage, the most common caus

168 urrent mandated self-reported compliance and audit measures are poorly correlated with decreased vent

169 ort study using the Pediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database between 2003 and 2010 (

170 ly collected by the Pediatric Intensive Care Audit Network over 8 years (2007-2014).

171 , parents, and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network).

172 We present an audit of 150 patients with difficult to treat nasal poly

173 An audit of a single institution's prospectively maintained

174 Data from the "Potential Donor Audit," an audit of all patients younger than 76 years who died in

175 t was established by comparison to a 6-month audit of clinical C. trachomatis TMA (12,999 specimens)

176 We undertook a 2-center audit of coding accuracy across surgery.

177 An audit of database and software usage patterns could help

178 Documentation and regular audit of donor outcomes is important to help improve the

179 fined clinical samples, and (iii) a 12-month audit of DS2 GM-EIA performance.

180 The surveys included an audit of facility infrastructure and direct observation

181 tone surgery and ERCP, serving as a base for audit of gallstone disease treatment.

182 We, therefore, did an international audit of ICU patients worldwide and assessed variations

183 An audit of intravitreal injections performed by retinal sp

184 ment with data from the National Comparative Audit of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding from 143 hospit

185 preeclampsia was assessed through a blinded audit of medical records.

186 Responses to a routine audit of mood obtained from clinical records.

187 We performed a cross-sectional audit of MRI scans of lumbar spine (L-spine) and sacroil

188 erapeutic Index, a nationally representative audit of office-based providers, to quantify patterns of

189 s Kluwer Inc., which maintains an electronic audit of pharmacies nationwide.

190 Audit of process compliance and patient outcomes are imp

191 Since 2003, a continuous audit of severe maternal morbidity in Scotland has been

192 d [2003-2012 (The 2012 Scottish Confidential Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity report is yet to be p

193 formation of the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) and describes its o

194 A nationwide audit of surgical mortality provides an overview of the

195 An audit of the colonoscopy database at The Queen Elizabeth

196 rgan Donation (ACCORD)-Spain consisted of an audit of the donation pathway from patients who died as

197 c review of the literature and international audit of trauma center quality improvement practices.

198 A recent audit of unplanned hospital admissions for neuromuscular

199 t 68 hospitals were listed on the DonateLife Audit of whom 553 (8.1%) were organ donors.

200 , but most endoscopists will require ongoing auditing of performance.

201 e analysis, including parameter adjustments, auditing of results and necessary annotations, should be

202 Audits of indications for cesarean delivery, feedback fo

203 The intervention involved audits of indications for cesarean delivery, provision o

204 total); observations of the context of care; audits of patient hospital records; documentary analysis

205 Repeat audits of the surgical services were then conducted.

206 Advice 3: Expert pathologists should report audits of their diagnosed cases of LGD, such as the freq

207 endoscopic eradication therapy should report audits of their rates of complete eradication of dysplas

208 roit, Michigan, and demonstrate that virtual audits offer key advantages to measuring neighborhood ph

209 ber of donors using data from the DonateLife Audit on the basis of baseline patient characteristics a

210 agent (ASR) screening from 2008 to 2010 were audited on the basis of patient gender, specimen source,

211 uation was performed using real-time bedside audits on morning rounds.

212 Randomisation (1:1) was by use of an audited online system; group allocation was not masked.

213 Analysis of the Potential Donor Audit over the 5-year period 2004 to 2005 to 2008 to 200

214 were submission of outcome data to national audit (P < 0.05), use of safety checklists (P < 0.05), a

215 From this audit, participating UK centers identified infants <30 d

216 used for analyzing the big data on doses for auditing patient safety, scanner utilization, and produc

217 tings), the IMS Health National Prescription Audit (pharmacy sales), and the MarketScan Commercial Cl

218 Criteria for surveillance or QI/audit place greater emphasis on reliability across indiv

219 IBS; and IMS Health's National Prescription Audit Plus (Fairfield, CT) to estimate the number of pre

220 cted estimates using validation studies that audited prescriptions against tuberculosis diagnosis, an

221 Western Australia, which first began the audit process, has shown a 30% reduction in surgical dea

222 ntation phase was initiated directed towards auditing process measures to reduce consumption of antib

223 Adherence with the auditing process was 80%.

224 ty assurance protocols; and 3) a yearly data audit program.

225 btained from the Stroke Improvement National Audit Programme (SINAP) database.

226 using data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme.

227 National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-inco

228 erived from the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (n=51 755).

229 cords from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project and the General Practice Research Database

230 ained from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project between January 1, 2003, and June 30, 2013

231 data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project for patients presenting with NSTE-ACS to E

232 oyal College of Anaesthetists 6(th) National Audit Project.

233 data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project.

234 and surgeons, which maintains an externally-audited prospective clinical registry.

235 llaborative (MBSC) administers an externally audited, prospective clinical registry.

236 The 2010 audits provided evidence that many fields in the NCDR ac

237 addition to these specific results, the post audit provides insight in regard to calibration and sens

238 ogy departments with a department leader for audit registered with the Royal College of Radiologists

239 nts with an approved leader for departmental audit registered with the Royal College of Radiologists

240 Whereas all case series and retrospective audits reported a beneficial effect of thyroid hormone a

241 Recommendations identified in the audit reports direct educational workshops and seminars

242 ion period in September 2011, all 223 (100%) audited reports adhered to the standard report format an

243 In total, the virtual audit required approximately 3% of the time required by

244 died) came from the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme.

245 Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database incl

246 (odds ratio, 1.90), Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Physiology Score (odds ratio, 1.

247 (odds ratio, 1.63), Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Physiology score (odds ratio, 1.

248 rvice Support Costs, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

249 rvice Support Costs, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

250 The initial audit revealed there was greater than 75% compliance in

251 er on secondary outcomes including recovery (AUDIT score < 8 at 3 and 12 months: 27.4% versus 15.1%;

252 llow-up, with the proportion with remission (AUDIT score < 8: 54.3% versus 31.9%; adjusted prevalence

253 Primary outcomes were remission (AUDIT score of <8) and mean daily alcohol consumed in th

254 ted into three experimental conditions using AUDIT score stratified sampling.

255 n Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 12-19 who were aged 18-65 years from ten

256 lly significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F=8.96, p=0.004) but not for gro

257 We audited seizure outcome of 693 adults who had resective

258 identified sites (i.e., 12 to 25 records per audited site).

259 The audit standard for sample adequacy (98%) was narrowly mi

260 Audit standards relating to procedural aspects of biopsy

261 Audit standards were developed for minor pain (<30%), se

262 Audit standards were met for pain, hypotension, hemorrha

263 Using data from an externally audited, statewide clinical registry, we matched 2949 SG

264 Yet a number of recent audits suggest that large numbers of patients are failin

265 ance in physician self-reports and objective audits suggest that pain management optimization studies

266 pecific surgical technical credentialing and auditing, surgeon volume did not predict differences in

267 e use of guidelines; education and training; auditing; surveillance and feedback; multimodal and mult

268 r General has designated ophthalmology as an auditing target, an unusual step to take for an entire s

269 f irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) convened to audit the current state of IBS research.

270 In the 2010 audits, the participant average raw accuracy of data abs

271 Interpreting physicians should audit their reports to ascertain that they include appro

272 cases of eclampsia have decreased during the audit; there were deficiencies in antenatal risk identif

273 This included an initial audit to identify gaps and interviews to assess barriers

274 k prescribing, suggesting a role for routine audits to ensure the validity of publicly reported quali

275 other countries planning to set up their own audits to follow a similar concept.

276 Services (CMS) piloted an infection control audit tool in a sample of ASC inspections to assess faci

277 Surveyors from CMS, trained in use of the audit tool, assessed compliance with specific infection

278 107 adults aged > = 16 years), neighbourhood audit tool, GIS measures and routine data measured neigh

279 However, BICR may be useful as an auditing tool to assess the reliability of marginally po

280 laborative effort at developing standardized audit tools for assessing the quality of antimicrobial p

281 oading and rerunning code and can provide an audit trail for analyses of data that cannot be shared.

282 nce also helps in building activity logs and audit trails.

283 ty analysis of overall survival based on the audited treatment-free interval stratification data gave

284 The UK Liver Transplant Audit (UKLTA) database contains clinical information on

285 biotic therapy through twice-weekly time-out audits using a structured electronic checklist.

286 Then, a 1-day audit was performed at 66 participating adult intensive

287 sed dataset of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit was used selecting 5017 patients with primary rect

288 itation of the case series and retrospective audits was the lack of consideration of uncontrolled var

289 at the time of the pressure ulcer prevalence audit were included.

290 The majority of liver biopsies in this audit were performed by radiologists using image guidanc

291 fection rates, self-reported compliance, and audits were analyzed by Pearson correlation.

292 s proof of assessment for future third-party audits were most useful to them.

293 Quarterly audits were performed to evaluate for adherence to the s

294 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomised to either CAP plus enhanced usual

295 ods as formulary restriction and prospective audit with feedback; however, engagement of prescribers

296 W) hand hygiene with the use of remote video auditing with and without feedback.

297 ivided into baseline (screening only), daily auditing with weekly feedback, and sepsis response team

298 structured improvement strategies, and chart audits with feedback.

299 ured during a 16-week period of remote video auditing without feedback and a 91-week period with feed

300 Thirteen centers were involved and audited yearly.