戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al recognition memory and auditory function (auditory brainstem response).
2  accompanying hearing loss (estimated by the auditory brainstem response).
3  neuropathy, as measured using Wave I of the auditory brainstem response.
4 w greater between-trial phase-locking in the auditory brainstem response.
5 orresponding decline in the amplitude of the auditory brainstem response.
6 d intact cochlear amplification but impaired auditory brainstem responses.
7 hs of age, after which they display abnormal auditory brainstem responses.
8 al day 7 (P7) to P96 using voltage-clamp and auditory brainstem responses.
9 ional knock-out (cKO) mice exhibit decreased auditory brainstem responses.
10  with reduced acoustic startle and distorted auditory brainstem responses.
11 h DT at P2, had normal hair cells and normal auditory brainstem responses.
12 c emissions and 70-80 dB threshold shifts in auditory brainstem responses.
13 have normal auditory thresholds but abnormal auditory brainstem responses.
14 nd WT mice in spontaneous eyeblink activity, auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes, and tail-f
15 and functional hearing measures, such as the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product
16                      We used measurements of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product
17 the CN participates in the generation of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and receives direct in
18  system function is being measured using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) or distortion product
19 ion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds during and
20      Within 2 weeks of AAV1-VGLUT3 delivery, auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds normalize,
21                                              Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds of Coch(G88
22  the results of our previous study that used auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds to identify
23                                              Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds were compar
24                                              Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, peak laten
25     In the current study, a QTL analysis for auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, which indi
26 chlear responses, both in the neural output [auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave 1] and in outer h
27 sensory hair cells, 5) significantly delayed auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I latencies at lo
28 imals, synaptopathy reduces the amplitude of auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-I.
29             Hearing function was analyzed by auditory brainstem response (ABR) which confirmed that s
30                                          The auditory brainstem response (ABR), a scalp-recorded elec
31 ams by tracking developmental changes in the auditory brainstem response (ABR).
32  either Coch 131-150 or beta-tectorin 71-90, auditory brainstem responses (ABR) showed significant he
33                              The analysis of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) showed that mtl and b
34 w2J/dfw2J homozygotes exhibit no discernible auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to sound pressure lev
35 ng testing as a function of sound frequency (auditory brainstem response -- ABR thresholds, and disto
36 ndent auditory threshold shifts (measured by auditory brainstem response, ABR) of up to 73 dB (16 kHz
37 ng loss and cochlear pathology, we collected auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and determined cochl
38                                              Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and distortion produ
39          To test this hypothesis we obtained auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and micro-CT x-ray s
40 mine this relationship further, we collected auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) from rhesus monkeys
41                                              Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were obtained in ane
42                        In the present study, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded in a f
43 C), which is obtained typically by recording auditory brainstem responses (ABRs)-the BIC reflects the
44 distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).
45  assessed with prepulse inhibition (PPI) and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).
46  emissions) and absent or abnormally delayed auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).
47                       Using a combination of auditory brainstem response analyses (ABR) and electron
48                                              Auditory brainstem response analyses of adult mice show
49                                              Auditory brainstem response analysis revealed that S1P(2
50 ells, in adult mice virtually eliminated the auditory brainstem response and acoustic startle reflex,
51 s seen by morphology and cochlear functions (auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions).
52 ments in hearing and balance, as measured by auditory brainstem response and vestibular testing.
53 d cochlear microphonics, as well as abnormal auditory brainstem responses and cortical auditory-evoke
54 mal cochlear function as indicated by normal auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoa
55                  Remarkably, measurements of auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoa
56 hlear nerve fibers, and using measurement of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions t
57 isplatin-induced ototoxicity, as measured by auditory brainstem responses and scanning electron micro
58 d noise, a normal sense of balance, a normal auditory brainstem response, and normal transduction cur
59  latency and distortion in the wave I of the auditory brainstem responses, and elevated sensitivity t
60 ion in cochlear neural responses, as seen in auditory brainstem responses, and increased the loss of
61 estly increased interpeak intervals in their auditory brainstem responses, and substantially longer l
62  are approximately 10 dB more sensitive than auditory brainstem responses, and they are very sharply
63 tron microscopy, CT scan reconstruction, and auditory brainstem response approach.
64                  These mice did not show any auditory brainstem responses as adults.
65  of both strains were selected with matching auditory brainstem response audiograms and gap detection
66 e resulted in a temporary threshold shift in auditory brainstem responses but a persistent increase i
67 mouse, the ducky mouse (du), showed elevated auditory brainstem response click and frequency-dependen
68     Homozygous mutant mice had no detectable auditory brainstem response, displayed highly disorganiz
69 congenital profound deafness, as assessed by auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacous
70 ng distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem responses, envelope following respons
71 envelope) that should be used when eliciting auditory brainstem responses from mice.
72       Auditory threshold shifts (measured by auditory brainstem responses), hair cell loss and lipid
73 ials) and auditory nerve/brainstem activity (auditory brainstem responses) have made it possible to d
74         We probed this question by measuring auditory brainstem responses in a cohort of healthy youn
75                                 In contrast, auditory brainstem responses in four of the five subject
76 ubunits may contribute to the development of auditory brainstem responses in the chick.
77                            Here, we recorded auditory brainstem responses in young adult musicians an
78                                              Auditory brainstem responses indicated a mild hearing im
79 ll transduction and decreased suprathreshold auditory brainstem response input/output gain in WT mice
80 nacin treatment of engrafted animals reduced auditory brainstem response interpeak latency, indicativ
81               Wave I of the transient-evoked auditory brainstem response is a noninvasive electrophys
82  distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem response measurements in Col11a2 -/-
83                                              Auditory brainstem response measures of adaptation in ri
84 vidence from human temporal bone studies and auditory brainstem response measures suggests that this
85                   We also observed decreased auditory brainstem response peak 1 amplitude and prolong
86 ces that may be revealed in the waveforms of auditory brainstem response potentials.
87   When tested for endocochlear potential and auditory brainstem response, PVM/M-depleted animals show
88  temporary threshold shift (TTS), evident in auditory brainstem response recordings as sound levels r
89 loss at 3 weeks after infection, measured by auditory brainstem response recordings, correlated to th
90         In typically developing children the auditory brainstem response reflects acoustic difference
91 distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses, respectively.
92                                      In vivo auditory brainstem responses revealed that Gunn rats hav
93               Further, in vivo recordings of auditory brainstem responses revealed that these Kv2.2KO
94 bjects with tinnitus and a normal audiogram, auditory brainstem responses show a significantly reduce
95 less variability when tapping to a beat have auditory brainstem responses that are less variable as w
96 erely hearing-impaired, as shown by elevated auditory brainstem response thresholds and absent endoco
97 osure, nor were click- or noise-burst-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds different from co
98  outer HCs is disrupted in Prox1DTA mice and auditory brainstem response thresholds in adults are 40-
99 ed higher hair cell survival rates and lower auditory brainstem response thresholds in injected ears
100           It is hoped that those who collect auditory brainstem response thresholds in mice will begi
101                                              Auditory brainstem response thresholds in the 8-40 kHz r
102  hearing loss, as measured by an increase in auditory brainstem response thresholds.
103 noise that produced a temporary elevation of auditory brainstem response thresholds.
104 pani, and improvement of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds.
105 ividual differences observed in behavior and auditory brainstem response timing to cochlear synaptopa
106                                              Auditory brainstem response to clicks and tone pips reve
107 develop a mathematical method to measure the auditory brainstem response to running speech, an acoust
108                             By measuring the auditory brainstem response to two musical intervals, th
109  without developmental dyslexia by measuring auditory brainstem responses to a speech syllable presen
110  tones; and (ii) physiological adaptation of auditory brainstem responses to clicks as a function of
111 processing of complex sounds such as speech (auditory brainstem responses to speech and other complex
112 oor readers have significantly more variable auditory brainstem responses to speech than do good read
113 e duration of the wave V-V(n) complex of the auditory brainstem response was studied, as was the effe
114 , as seen in the suprathreshold amplitude of auditory brainstem response Wave 1.
115 nd a reduced activity of the auditory nerve (auditory brainstem response wave I).
116 l brainstem, is potentially more robust than auditory brainstem response Wave I.
117 topathy in humans, namely, modestly abnormal auditory brainstem response Wave I/Wave V ratios in the
118 on were unaffected in these mutant mice, but auditory brainstem response wave-I amplitude was reduced
119 mal data, we demonstrate that the latency of auditory brainstem response wave-V in noise reflects aud
120               Hearing thresholds measured by auditory brainstem response were significantly better fo
121                                 Furthermore, auditory brainstem responses were nearly normal in mice
122                          Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses were recorded from ES-treat
123           Optical stimulation also evoked an auditory brainstem response, which had a simpler wavefor
124 exhibit normal hearing as measured by evoked auditory brainstem responses, which suggests that the ne
125 ermore, 3-week-old double mutant mice lacked auditory brainstem responses, which were present in thei
126 fness characterized by an absent or abnormal auditory brainstem response with preservation of outer h
127 encies and interpeak latencies, evaluated by auditory brainstem response within 48 h after birth, wer

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top